Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/1956 Crane Corporation Lockheed PV-1 crash: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
RGFI (talk | contribs)
RGFI (talk | contribs)
Line 16: Line 16:
*'''Delete''' per above and per [[WP:AIRCRASH]], which suggests that crashes of this type might be included in lists within articles on the (civil) aircraft or the airline. We don't have an article on the airline, and the aircraft is a converted military plane so there's no list there either. [[User:Ivanvector|Ivanvector]] (<sup>[[User talk:Ivanvector|Talk]]</sup>/<sub>[[Special:Contributions/Ivanvector|Edits]]</sub>) 20:36, 18 February 2020 (UTC)
*'''Delete''' per above and per [[WP:AIRCRASH]], which suggests that crashes of this type might be included in lists within articles on the (civil) aircraft or the airline. We don't have an article on the airline, and the aircraft is a converted military plane so there's no list there either. [[User:Ivanvector|Ivanvector]] (<sup>[[User talk:Ivanvector|Talk]]</sup>/<sub>[[Special:Contributions/Ivanvector|Edits]]</sub>) 20:36, 18 February 2020 (UTC)
*'''Delete''' per nominator.[[User:WilliamJE|...William]], is the complaint department really on [[User talk:WilliamJE|the roof?]] 20:46, 18 February 2020 (UTC)
*'''Delete''' per nominator.[[User:WilliamJE|...William]], is the complaint department really on [[User talk:WilliamJE|the roof?]] 20:46, 18 February 2020 (UTC)
'''Delete''' Don't know how often the creator of an article actually agrees with a potential deletion to the point they vote in favor of it, it's certainly my first time, but I'm struggling to find anything I can use to try to beef up noteworthiness. I didn't even know about it until I stumbled upon the final report while looking for an update on a more recent aircraft crash in the area. Chalk this one up to the good idea fairy giving me bad advice. [[User:RGFI|RGFI]] ([[User talk:RGFI|talk]]) 04:49, 23 February 2020 (UTC)
*'''Delete''' Don't know how often the creator of an article actually agrees with a potential deletion to the point they vote in favor of it, it's certainly my first time, but I'm struggling to find anything I can use to try to beef up noteworthiness. I didn't even know about it until I stumbled upon the final report while looking for an update on a more recent aircraft crash in the area. Chalk this one up to the good idea fairy giving me bad advice. [[User:RGFI|RGFI]] ([[User talk:RGFI|talk]]) 04:49, 23 February 2020 (UTC)

Revision as of 04:49, 23 February 2020

1956 Crane Corporation Lockheed PV-1 crash

1956 Crane Corporation Lockheed PV-1 crash (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Doesnt appear to be particularly noteworthy, a crash of non-commercial aircraft are rarely notable and not that uncommon. It really needs to kill somebody with a wikipedia article or hit something of note or cause a significant change in rules. Prod removed with a claim that the article is referenced, being referenced doesnt make it notable. MilborneOne (talk) 16:06, 18 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Aviation-related deletion discussions. MilborneOne (talk) 16:10, 18 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Events-related deletion discussions. ...William, is the complaint department really on the roof? 16:15, 18 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Transportation-related deletion discussions. ...William, is the complaint department really on the roof? 16:15, 18 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Indiana-related deletion discussions. ...William, is the complaint department really on the roof? 16:15, 18 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • leaning delete Searching for this is a real pain but there's no evidence that this was more than, well, akin to a fatal traffic accident. Mangoe (talk) 16:55, 18 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per WP:GNG and WP:INDEPTH --BonkHindrance (talk) 18:31, 18 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per above and per WP:AIRCRASH, which suggests that crashes of this type might be included in lists within articles on the (civil) aircraft or the airline. We don't have an article on the airline, and the aircraft is a converted military plane so there's no list there either. Ivanvector (Talk/Edits) 20:36, 18 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per nominator....William, is the complaint department really on the roof? 20:46, 18 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete Don't know how often the creator of an article actually agrees with a potential deletion to the point they vote in favor of it, it's certainly my first time, but I'm struggling to find anything I can use to try to beef up noteworthiness. I didn't even know about it until I stumbled upon the final report while looking for an update on a more recent aircraft crash in the area. Chalk this one up to the good idea fairy giving me bad advice. RGFI (talk) 04:49, 23 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]