Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2002–03 Yeovil Town F.C. season: Difference between revisions

Browse history interactively

← Previous edit Next edit →

Content deleted Content added

VisualWikitext

Inline

Revision as of 09:37, 6 October 2020

2002–03 Yeovil Town F.C. season

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

A decent article, but it fails WP:NSEASONS. REDMAN 2019 (talk) 10:42, 4 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. REDMAN 2019 (talk) 10:42, 4 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sports-related deletion discussions. _wjemather^{please leave a message...} 11:39, 4 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Spiderone 13:46, 4 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. Spiderone 13:46, 4 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Events-related deletion discussions. Spiderone 13:46, 4 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Keep WP:NSEASONS states that "Articles can be created on individual seasons of teams in top professional leagues, as these articles almost always meet the notability requirements" (my emphasis). It doesn't state that a season outside of a top professional league MUST NOT be created. This article is well written with plenty of prose, and would surely meet WP:GNG, and could possibly be a GA contender. Lugnuts ^{Fire Walk with Me} 14:31, 4 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Also, in comparsion, I looked at some of the other 2002/03 articles linked from the footer, and pages such as 2002–03 Sheffield Wednesday F.C. season and 2002–03 West Ham United F.C. season are pretty terrible, with them mainly being a stats-dump. But because they are Div1/Div2 teams, they get to be kept. Lugnuts ^{Fire Walk with Me} 14:33, 4 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Weak keep - meets the NSEASONS criteria in the sense that it satisfies "Team season articles should consist mainly of well-sourced prose", however, a lot of the sourcing is just routine match reports and/or primary sources Spiderone 15:57, 4 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - what is significant here, where is the coverage? Yes the prose is well-written, but it's 90% match reports. Giant Snowman 16:50, 4 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Championship winning season and extremely well source! I would say GNG is met. @GiantSnowman: Do you not think that winning the league and being promoted back to the Football League not significant?? Govvy (talk) 17:16, 4 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

So you're saying every non-league team gets a season article when they win a title? Giant Snowman 18:35, 4 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - surely passes GNG as a notable season that was not only the club's promotion winning season to the Football League after 108 years as a non-league club but also broke a number of records winning the league by a then record points margin and unbeaten home season. Ytfc23 (talk) 17:58, 4 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per WP:NSEASONS failure. Number 5 7 09:37, 6 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@@ Line 18: / Line 18: @@
 ::So you're saying every non-league team gets a season article when they win a title? [[User:GiantSnowman|Giant]][[User talk:GiantSnowman|Snowman]] 18:35, 4 October 2020 (UTC)
 *'''Keep''' - surely passes GNG as a notable season that was not only the club's promotion winning season to the Football League after 108 years as a non-league club but also broke a number of records winning the league by a then record points margin and unbeaten home season. [[User:Ytfc23|Ytfc23]] ([[User talk:Ytfc23|talk]]) 17:58, 4 October 2020 (UTC)
+*'''Delete''' per [[WP:NSEASONS]] failure. [[User:Number 57|<span style="color: orange;">Number</span>]] [[User talk:Number 57|<span style="color: green;">5</span>]][[Special:Contributions/Number 57|<span style="color: blue;">7</span>]] 09:37, 6 October 2020 (UTC)