Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Diplomatic Academy of London: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
or
No edit summary
Line 9: Line 9:
*<small class="delsort-notice">Note: This discussion has been included in the [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting|deletion sorting]] lists for the following topics: [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Organizations|Organizations]], [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Education|Education]], and [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Schools|Schools]]. '''[[User:Wcquidditch|<span style="color:red">WC</span>''<span style="color:#999933">Quidditch</span>'']]''' [[User talk:Wcquidditch|<span style="color:red">☎</span>]] [[Special:Contribs/Wcquidditch|<span style="color:#999933">✎</span>]] 23:06, 30 March 2024 (UTC)</small>
*<small class="delsort-notice">Note: This discussion has been included in the [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting|deletion sorting]] lists for the following topics: [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Organizations|Organizations]], [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Education|Education]], and [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Schools|Schools]]. '''[[User:Wcquidditch|<span style="color:red">WC</span>''<span style="color:#999933">Quidditch</span>'']]''' [[User talk:Wcquidditch|<span style="color:red">☎</span>]] [[Special:Contribs/Wcquidditch|<span style="color:#999933">✎</span>]] 23:06, 30 March 2024 (UTC)</small>
*'''Delete'''. No sources in the article provide SIGCOV. They are primary or press releases with no depth of coverage (Azerbaijan, check if recognized, GCU, opening of new), unreliable forums (houzz, diplomacy.edu), or not even mentioned (US News, Guardian). Nothing better found in my searching. We don't have to dig into the controversy or decide on its legitimacy to determine that it's not notable. —[[User:David Eppstein|David Eppstein]] ([[User talk:David Eppstein|talk]]) 05:36, 31 March 2024 (UTC)
*'''Delete'''. No sources in the article provide SIGCOV. They are primary or press releases with no depth of coverage (Azerbaijan, check if recognized, GCU, opening of new), unreliable forums (houzz, diplomacy.edu), or not even mentioned (US News, Guardian). Nothing better found in my searching. We don't have to dig into the controversy or decide on its legitimacy to determine that it's not notable. —[[User:David Eppstein|David Eppstein]] ([[User talk:David Eppstein|talk]]) 05:36, 31 March 2024 (UTC)
*'''Redirect''': I agree none of the current sources provide RS SIGCOV. I found this article in the Stirling Uni student newspaper [https://brignews.com/2017/12/03/questions-remain-over-stirlings-role-in-diplomatic-academy-run-by-russia-probe-professor/] and this in the BBC [https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-us-canada-43488581]. The first may not be reliable and the latter might not be enough SIGCOV. There is this Guardian article which arguably is RS SIGCOV [https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2017/oct/31/joseph-mifsud-professor-trump-russia-inquiry-kremlin]. In any case all the coverage seems to be in connection with [[Joseph Mifsud]]. The Guardian article also makes clear the LAD no longer exists as does the Brig piece. In that context, it seems most sensible to me to keep it as a redirect to [[Joseph Mifsud]]. Perhaps to a section on the LAD in that article? I'd be happy to create it. [[User:Jtrrs0|Jtrrs0]] ([[User talk:Jtrrs0|talk]]) 15:13, 5 April 2024 (UTC)

Revision as of 15:13, 5 April 2024

Diplomatic Academy of London

Diplomatic Academy of London (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Contested PROD for not being uncontroversial (though not by me). Appears to be original research, possible redirect to Joseph Mifsud? IgelRM (talk) 22:47, 30 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  • Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Academics and educators and United Kingdom. IgelRM (talk) 22:47, 30 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Organizations, Education, and Schools. WCQuidditch 23:06, 30 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete. No sources in the article provide SIGCOV. They are primary or press releases with no depth of coverage (Azerbaijan, check if recognized, GCU, opening of new), unreliable forums (houzz, diplomacy.edu), or not even mentioned (US News, Guardian). Nothing better found in my searching. We don't have to dig into the controversy or decide on its legitimacy to determine that it's not notable. —David Eppstein (talk) 05:36, 31 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Redirect: I agree none of the current sources provide RS SIGCOV. I found this article in the Stirling Uni student newspaper [1] and this in the BBC [2]. The first may not be reliable and the latter might not be enough SIGCOV. There is this Guardian article which arguably is RS SIGCOV [3]. In any case all the coverage seems to be in connection with Joseph Mifsud. The Guardian article also makes clear the LAD no longer exists as does the Brig piece. In that context, it seems most sensible to me to keep it as a redirect to Joseph Mifsud. Perhaps to a section on the LAD in that article? I'd be happy to create it. Jtrrs0 (talk) 15:13, 5 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]