Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dreams of India (3rd nomination): Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
→Dreams of India: Reply |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
*<small class="delsort-notice">Note: This discussion has been included in the [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting|deletion sorting]] lists for the following topics: [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Arts|Arts]], [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Radio|Radio]], [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Popular culture|Popular culture]], and [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Hinduism|Hinduism]]. '''[[User:Andrevan|Andre]]'''<span style="border:2px solid #073642;background:rgb(255,156,0);background:linear-gradient(90deg, rgba(255,156,0,1) 0%, rgba(147,0,255,1) 45%, rgba(4,123,134,1) 87%);">[[User_talk:Andrevan|🚐]]</span> 08:55, 14 January 2024 (UTC)</small> |
*<small class="delsort-notice">Note: This discussion has been included in the [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting|deletion sorting]] lists for the following topics: [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Arts|Arts]], [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Radio|Radio]], [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Popular culture|Popular culture]], and [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Hinduism|Hinduism]]. '''[[User:Andrevan|Andre]]'''<span style="border:2px solid #073642;background:rgb(255,156,0);background:linear-gradient(90deg, rgba(255,156,0,1) 0%, rgba(147,0,255,1) 45%, rgba(4,123,134,1) 87%);">[[User_talk:Andrevan|🚐]]</span> 08:55, 14 January 2024 (UTC)</small> |
||
*:This article is about the second of four radio plays in the ''Travels With Jack'' series. Why is only the second play in the series being repeatedly deleted as not notable? It seems peculiar to do this while leaving the first, third, and fourth plays in the series in place. If ''Dreams of India'' is not notable, shouldn't the articles for the other three plays also be deleted? Won't that be strange to have only the links for the second play in the series be dead? Won't the article just end up getting repeatedly recreated each time someone notices the missing link? Should there perhaps instead be an article for the series that replaces the articles for the individual plays? [[User:Bryan H Bell|Bryan H Bell]] ([[User talk:Bryan H Bell|talk]]) 07:28, 15 January 2024 (UTC) |
*:This article is about the second of four radio plays in the ''Travels With Jack'' series. Why is only the second play in the series being repeatedly deleted as not notable? It seems peculiar to do this while leaving the first, third, and fourth plays in the series in place. If ''Dreams of India'' is not notable, shouldn't the articles for the other three plays also be deleted? Won't that be strange to have only the links for the second play in the series be dead? Won't the article just end up getting repeatedly recreated each time someone notices the missing link? Should there perhaps instead be an article for the series that replaces the articles for the individual plays? [[User:Bryan H Bell|Bryan H Bell]] ([[User talk:Bryan H Bell|talk]]) 07:28, 15 January 2024 (UTC) |
||
*::Sure, maybe we should just merge them into one article about the series. Is the series itself notable though? '''[[User:Andrevan|Andre]]'''<span style="border:2px solid #073642;background:rgb(255,156,0);background:linear-gradient(90deg, rgba(255,156,0,1) 0%, rgba(147,0,255,1) 45%, rgba(4,123,134,1) 87%);">[[User_talk:Andrevan|🚐]]</span> 07:38, 15 January 2024 (UTC) |
*::Sure, maybe we should just merge them into one article about the series. Is the series itself notable though? [[Dreams of the Amazon]], [[Dreams of Bali]] and [[Dreams of Sumatra]] all seem pretty skimpy on source coverage? '''[[User:Andrevan|Andre]]'''<span style="border:2px solid #073642;background:rgb(255,156,0);background:linear-gradient(90deg, rgba(255,156,0,1) 0%, rgba(147,0,255,1) 45%, rgba(4,123,134,1) 87%);">[[User_talk:Andrevan|🚐]]</span> 07:38, 15 January 2024 (UTC) |
||
Revision as of 07:55, 15 January 2024
Dreams of India
AfDs for this article:
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Dreams of India (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
This page has been soft-deleted and refunded twice, but it still doesn't appear to have sufficient WP:SIGCOV. The journal article is a passing mention. The other sources do not appear independent. Andre🚐 08:55, 14 January 2024 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Arts, Radio, Popular culture, and Hinduism. Andre🚐 08:55, 14 January 2024 (UTC)
- This article is about the second of four radio plays in the Travels With Jack series. Why is only the second play in the series being repeatedly deleted as not notable? It seems peculiar to do this while leaving the first, third, and fourth plays in the series in place. If Dreams of India is not notable, shouldn't the articles for the other three plays also be deleted? Won't that be strange to have only the links for the second play in the series be dead? Won't the article just end up getting repeatedly recreated each time someone notices the missing link? Should there perhaps instead be an article for the series that replaces the articles for the individual plays? Bryan H Bell (talk) 07:28, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
- Sure, maybe we should just merge them into one article about the series. Is the series itself notable though? Dreams of the Amazon, Dreams of Bali and Dreams of Sumatra all seem pretty skimpy on source coverage? Andre🚐 07:38, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
- This article is about the second of four radio plays in the Travels With Jack series. Why is only the second play in the series being repeatedly deleted as not notable? It seems peculiar to do this while leaving the first, third, and fourth plays in the series in place. If Dreams of India is not notable, shouldn't the articles for the other three plays also be deleted? Won't that be strange to have only the links for the second play in the series be dead? Won't the article just end up getting repeatedly recreated each time someone notices the missing link? Should there perhaps instead be an article for the series that replaces the articles for the individual plays? Bryan H Bell (talk) 07:28, 15 January 2024 (UTC)