Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Freedom and Justice Party (Bolivia): Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
On the subject and the sources
Line 8: Line 8:
*<small class="delsort-notice">Note: This discussion has been included in the [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting|deletion sorting]] lists for the following topics: [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Organizations|Organizations]], [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Politics|Politics]], and [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Bolivia|Bolivia]]. [[User:AusLondonder|AusLondonder]] ([[User talk:AusLondonder|talk]]) 17:35, 3 March 2024 (UTC)</small>
*<small class="delsort-notice">Note: This discussion has been included in the [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting|deletion sorting]] lists for the following topics: [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Organizations|Organizations]], [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Politics|Politics]], and [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Bolivia|Bolivia]]. [[User:AusLondonder|AusLondonder]] ([[User talk:AusLondonder|talk]]) 17:35, 3 March 2024 (UTC)</small>


:'''Support''' and we shouldn't stop here. There are several articles about political parties that should be deleted for the same reason. [[User:Charles Essie|Charles Essie]] ([[User talk:Charles Essie|talk]]) 20:34, 4 March 2024 (UTC)
*'''Support''' and we shouldn't stop here. There are several articles about political parties that should be deleted for the same reason. [[User:Charles Essie|Charles Essie]] ([[User talk:Charles Essie|talk]]) 20:34, 4 March 2024 (UTC)
**We really have no need of more research-free nominations and deletion rationales. Instead, we need people to do the research ''before'' coming to AFD. That's what the unsourced article drive ''is about'': looking for sources. You show no evidence of looking for sources in this rationale. That hasn't helped the encyclopaedia one iota. [[User:Uncle G|Uncle G]] ([[User talk:Uncle G|talk]]) 09:13, 5 March 2024 (UTC)
*I looked in the same handbook where I found {{On AFD|Social Liberal and Democratic Party}} documented in depth. It doesn't have this party, by either English or Spanish names. Looking for anything else, after eliminating the Egyptian party of the same name (in Spanish as well), turns up pretty much nothing. {{ISBN|9781107145948}} gives this a total of ''two words'': "unsuccessful (flop)". [[User:Uncle G|Uncle G]] ([[User talk:Uncle G|talk]]) 09:13, 5 March 2024 (UTC)

Revision as of 09:14, 5 March 2024

Freedom and Justice Party (Bolivia)

Freedom and Justice Party (Bolivia) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Has been unsourced for nearly two decades. No evidence of notability per WP:NORG. AusLondonder (talk) 17:35, 3 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  • Support and we shouldn't stop here. There are several articles about political parties that should be deleted for the same reason. Charles Essie (talk) 20:34, 4 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    • We really have no need of more research-free nominations and deletion rationales. Instead, we need people to do the research before coming to AFD. That's what the unsourced article drive is about: looking for sources. You show no evidence of looking for sources in this rationale. That hasn't helped the encyclopaedia one iota. Uncle G (talk) 09:13, 5 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • I looked in the same handbook where I found Social Liberal and Democratic Party (AfD discussion) documented in depth. It doesn't have this party, by either English or Spanish names. Looking for anything else, after eliminating the Egyptian party of the same name (in Spanish as well), turns up pretty much nothing. ISBN 9781107145948 gives this a total of two words: "unsuccessful (flop)". Uncle G (talk) 09:13, 5 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]