Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Genome-wide complex trait analysis

Genome-wide complex trait analysis

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This is page is an astounding work of original research and synthesis, assembling a bunch of primary sources and unsourced content into a review article. To make this a Wikipedia article it would have be completely done over. It reflects a ton of work and kudos for that, but it doesn't belong here per WP:OR and WP:NOT. Maybe Wikiversity.

-- Jytdog (talk) 10:23, 2 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Medicine-related deletion discussions. Jytdog (talk) 10:25, 2 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. I am the primary author of these two articles. Jytdog is engaged in a hostile nomination due to my comments on his other genetics AfD, Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Designer baby (2nd nomination). (We have never interacted before that I can recall, but he has a history of this sort of thing.) His comments here are no more correct than his claims on that AfD; if you look at the 2 articles, you will see scores of citations of reviews, systematic reviews, textbooks, and meta-analyses and that they are scrupulously cited, to a fault. --Gwern (contribs) 21:12 2 December 2018 (GMT)
- I am sorry you feel that it is hostile. These two pages are what they are; they don't belong in WP. You should publish them somewhere else as your own review of the field. We will see what others say. Jytdog (talk) 21:46, 2 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]