Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Helix Fossil (Twitch Plays Pokémon)

Helix Fossil (Twitch Plays Pokémon)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Not suitable for an article on its own, and too specific to be a good redirect Jackmcbarn (talk) 22:46, 21 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. Jinkinson talk to me 23:51, 21 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete or redirect - all the content here is already in Twitch Plays Pokémon (it seems), and there is no point in having a separate article. Chris857 (talk) 01:22, 22 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect — the adherents of the new Twitch Plays Pokemon religions will have to significantly increase their numbers before they meet the general notability guidelines. For such a new topic, Twitch Plays Pokemon is best left centralized on a single page for the time being.AioftheStorm (talk) 02:40, 22 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect - (W/ Helix Fossil) Potentially to something on the Pokémon article or the Pokémon Red and Blue article. This doesn't meet notability as a standalone, but it might be as a section --Super Goku V (talk) 20:21, 22 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The Helix Fossil god actually originates from Twitch Plays Pokémon, so it should go to that article. I suppose I should've specified in my comment where I thought it should be redirected.AioftheStorm (talk) 21:44, 22 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect per above. While the Helix Fossil religion is mentioned in articles, it's done briefly in relation to the game as a whole. ([1], [2]) Most of the articles mention it as an example of the type of chaos and jokes that have come about from the whole experience, so there's really not much to show how it's independently notable of the TpP as a whole. If it does eventually get more coverage and notice, we can always re-create it. Right now it's just too soon. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 05:24, 23 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I was thinking about it and a section on the Helix Fossil and the other fossil would probably be a helpful addition to the TpP entry. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 10:21, 24 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete or redirect clearly not notable on its own. JDDJS (talk) 16:40, 24 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - not appropriate for its own article, and too specific for a redirect in my opinion.--Unionhawk ^Talk ^E-mail 17:08, 24 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]