Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Human-oriented sexualism: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
No edit summary
delete
Line 7: Line 7:
COATRACK for [[fictosexuality]], which is already itself a fringe topic with the article existing mainly as a massive advocacy page. In reality any sexuality peference that is directed at non-humans would almost certainly be regarded as a [[paraphilia]] in mainstream psychology, but these articles are built almost 100% without any actual clinical research, just opinion/"analysis" articles from dubious publications which seem intent on hijacking LGBT rethoric. The [[fictosexuality]] article may be fixed eventually with some work to reduce the obvious POV issues but I don't see how this article is anything but an undue weight spin-off. Both this an the main article have been created by the same editor, who very clearly seem to be a single purpose account which does nothing but link to these two articles and insert mentions of the subject in random pages.[[User:StarTrekker|★Trekker]] ([[User talk:StarTrekker|talk]]) 17:51, 25 April 2024 (UTC)
COATRACK for [[fictosexuality]], which is already itself a fringe topic with the article existing mainly as a massive advocacy page. In reality any sexuality peference that is directed at non-humans would almost certainly be regarded as a [[paraphilia]] in mainstream psychology, but these articles are built almost 100% without any actual clinical research, just opinion/"analysis" articles from dubious publications which seem intent on hijacking LGBT rethoric. The [[fictosexuality]] article may be fixed eventually with some work to reduce the obvious POV issues but I don't see how this article is anything but an undue weight spin-off. Both this an the main article have been created by the same editor, who very clearly seem to be a single purpose account which does nothing but link to these two articles and insert mentions of the subject in random pages.[[User:StarTrekker|★Trekker]] ([[User talk:StarTrekker|talk]]) 17:51, 25 April 2024 (UTC)
*<small class="delsort-notice">Note: This discussion has been included in the [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Sexuality and gender|list of Sexuality and gender-related deletion discussions]]. [[User:StarTrekker|★Trekker]] ([[User talk:StarTrekker|talk]]) 17:51, 25 April 2024 (UTC)</small>
*<small class="delsort-notice">Note: This discussion has been included in the [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Sexuality and gender|list of Sexuality and gender-related deletion discussions]]. [[User:StarTrekker|★Trekker]] ([[User talk:StarTrekker|talk]]) 17:51, 25 April 2024 (UTC)</small>
*'''delete'''. this is fringe nonsense. [[user:ltbdl|ltb]][[user:ltbdl/d|<span style="color:orange">d</span>]][[user:ltbdl|l]] ([[user talk:ltbdl|talk]]) 02:56, 26 April 2024 (UTC)

Revision as of 02:56, 26 April 2024

Human-oriented sexualism

Human-oriented sexualism (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

COATRACK for fictosexuality, which is already itself a fringe topic with the article existing mainly as a massive advocacy page. In reality any sexuality peference that is directed at non-humans would almost certainly be regarded as a paraphilia in mainstream psychology, but these articles are built almost 100% without any actual clinical research, just opinion/"analysis" articles from dubious publications which seem intent on hijacking LGBT rethoric. The fictosexuality article may be fixed eventually with some work to reduce the obvious POV issues but I don't see how this article is anything but an undue weight spin-off. Both this an the main article have been created by the same editor, who very clearly seem to be a single purpose account which does nothing but link to these two articles and insert mentions of the subject in random pages.★Trekker (talk) 17:51, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]