Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mission of the International Organisation for Migration, London: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
 
Line 7: Line 7:
No secondary sources. Sole source is government list. Article on an individual office of the IOM which simply states it exists and its location. Fails [[WP:ORGCRIT]] and [[WP:GNG]]. Nothing to merge and an implausible search term. [[User:AusLondonder|AusLondonder]] ([[User talk:AusLondonder|talk]]) 00:06, 26 April 2024 (UTC)
No secondary sources. Sole source is government list. Article on an individual office of the IOM which simply states it exists and its location. Fails [[WP:ORGCRIT]] and [[WP:GNG]]. Nothing to merge and an implausible search term. [[User:AusLondonder|AusLondonder]] ([[User talk:AusLondonder|talk]]) 00:06, 26 April 2024 (UTC)
*<small class="delsort-notice">Note: This discussion has been included in the [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting|deletion sorting]] lists for the following topics: [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Bilateral relations|Bilateral relations]], [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Organizations|Organizations]], and [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/United Kingdom|United Kingdom]]. [[User:AusLondonder|AusLondonder]] ([[User talk:AusLondonder|talk]]) 00:06, 26 April 2024 (UTC)</small>
*<small class="delsort-notice">Note: This discussion has been included in the [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting|deletion sorting]] lists for the following topics: [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Bilateral relations|Bilateral relations]], [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Organizations|Organizations]], and [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/United Kingdom|United Kingdom]]. [[User:AusLondonder|AusLondonder]] ([[User talk:AusLondonder|talk]]) 00:06, 26 April 2024 (UTC)</small>

:'''Delete''' I don't think this is a good merge candidate because there's not even enough information to work out if any of the content is even still true. It does seem to still exist from a Google search, but it's certainly not notable outside of its parent article. Redirect not especially good idea other as is not a likely redirect <span style="color:#ef5224">[[User:BrigadierG|BrigadierG]]</span> ([[User talk:BrigadierG|talk]]) 01:37, 26 April 2024 (UTC)

Revision as of 01:37, 26 April 2024

Mission of the International Organisation for Migration, London

Mission of the International Organisation for Migration, London (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No secondary sources. Sole source is government list. Article on an individual office of the IOM which simply states it exists and its location. Fails WP:ORGCRIT and WP:GNG. Nothing to merge and an implausible search term. AusLondonder (talk) 00:06, 26 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete I don't think this is a good merge candidate because there's not even enough information to work out if any of the content is even still true. It does seem to still exist from a Google search, but it's certainly not notable outside of its parent article. Redirect not especially good idea other as is not a likely redirect BrigadierG (talk) 01:37, 26 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]