Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Topeka, Kansas
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This is the current revision of this page, as edited by MalnadachBot (talk | contribs) at 05:54, 9 February 2022 (Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12)). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this version.
Revision as of 05:54, 9 February 2022 by MalnadachBot (talk | contribs) (Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12))
(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Closed by nominator. Happy April Fools' Day, everybody! --Dennis The Tiger (Rawr and stuff) 22:38, 1 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Topeka, Kansas[edit]
- Topeka, Kansas (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • AfD statistics)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
As Topeka has renamed themselves to Google, they no longer exist. Therefore, it should be deleted. Dennis The Tiger (Rawr and stuff) 20:06, 1 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- DURR HURR I'M SO FUCKING FUNNY DERP — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jeeeeeeeeeebus (talk • contribs)
- Yes. Yes, you are. --Dennis The Tiger (Rawr and stuff) 20:22, 1 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Topeka is only changing their name for one month. As such, this article should not be deleted. In addition, this subject is already mentioned within the article; for all intents and purposes, this is sufficient to clear up the issue at hand. Speedy Keep 24.181.76.193 (talk) 21:09, 1 April 2010 (UTC)Newguy[reply]
- Yes. Yes, you are. --Dennis The Tiger (Rawr and stuff) 20:22, 1 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep Precedent indicates that anything that is, was, or will be a named city, village, small community, isolated and possibly abandoned locality, or random cabin in the woods gets its own article. So we have to keep this. TheCatalyst31 Reaction•Creation 21:40, 1 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Merge and redirect to Google plans for world domination. Clarityfiend (talk) 21:41, 1 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete – I have a feeling we're not in Kansas anymore, Toto. –MuZemike 21:42, 1 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep. Even if it no longer exists, it should be kept because it contains some good history. NERDYSCIENCEDUDE (✉ message • changes) 21:55, 1 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Kansas is not notable. —Kevin Myers 21:59, 1 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy keep. I don't care if it's April Fools' Day, we do not need this banner on the page. Seriously. CopaceticThought (talk) 22:04, 1 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy keep I second CopaceticThought. mynameinc (t|c) 22:23, 1 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy Keep Can we kill this joke now? Mateinsixtynine (talk) 22:26, 1 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Snowball redirect to Humorless. —Kevin Myers 22:29, 1 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.