Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Whitehall Township Bureau of Police

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by BrigadierG (talk | contribs) at 00:28, 29 April 2024 (→‎Whitehall Township Bureau of Police). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Whitehall Township Bureau of Police

Whitehall Township Bureau of Police (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Police department for a town of 20k people. A cursory Google search doesn't turn up any particularly notable incidents that attracted wider media attention. WP:ORGDEPTH BrigadierG (talk) 22:22, 26 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Four external links added, thanks. Yevrowl (talk) 16:36, 27 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Every town in the country has routine crime news, these don't actually add anything to the article. There would need to be significant independent coverage about the department itself. But again, small towns generally don't need separate pages for their police departments, fire departments, councils, etc., and these sources don't justify one. Reywas92Talk 20:05, 27 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep or Merge - There's a whole category of local police departments Category:Municipal police departments of Pennsylvania. Given that it's a police department, there's coverage of the actions of its employees in case law. Alternatively, merge into Whitehall Township, Pennsylvania. GobsPint (talk) 18:02, 28 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    The existence of other articles isn't a reason to keep an article (WP:WHATABOUTX), only Wikipedia policies and guidance are. If you think there is significant coverage, I would invite you to reference it, rather than simply stating that there WP:MUSTBESOURCES. Note that the burden here is not just reliable sources proving that the subject exists or that it has done something, but significant secondary coverage indicating its notability in particular.BrigadierG (talk) 00:27, 29 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]