Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Whitehall Township Bureau of Police
Whitehall Township Bureau of Police
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Whitehall Township Bureau of Police (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Police department for a town of 20k people. A cursory Google search doesn't turn up any particularly notable incidents that attracted wider media attention. WP:ORGDEPTH BrigadierG (talk) 22:22, 26 April 2024 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Police and Pennsylvania. Cooper (talk) 22:34, 26 April 2024 (UTC)
- Delete Every town has a police department but they don't usually need standalone articles. Like, do they not all have basically the same rank structure? Reywas92Talk 15:00, 27 April 2024 (UTC)
- Police ranks of the United States. Yevrowl (talk) 15:44, 27 April 2024 (UTC)
- Four external links added, thanks. Yevrowl (talk) 16:36, 27 April 2024 (UTC)
- Every town in the country has routine crime news, these don't actually add anything to the article. There would need to be significant independent coverage about the department itself. But again, small towns generally don't need separate pages for their police departments, fire departments, councils, etc., and these sources don't justify one. Reywas92Talk 20:05, 27 April 2024 (UTC)
- Keep or Merge - There's a whole category of local police departments Category:Municipal police departments of Pennsylvania. Given that it's a police department, there's coverage of the actions of its employees in case law. Alternatively, merge into Whitehall Township, Pennsylvania. GobsPint (talk) 18:02, 28 April 2024 (UTC)
- The existence of other articles isn't a reason to keep an article (WP:WHATABOUTX), only Wikipedia policies and guidance are. If you think there is significant coverage, I would invite you to reference it, rather than simply stating that there WP:MUSTBESOURCES. Note that the burden here is not just reliable sources proving that the subject exists or that it has done something, but significant secondary coverage indicating its notability in particular.BrigadierG (talk) 00:27, 29 April 2024 (UTC)