Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Will Vladimir Stoyanov: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
→Will Vladimir Stoyanov: addendum |
|||
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
:({{findsources|Will Vladimir Stoyanov}}) |
:({{findsources|Will Vladimir Stoyanov}}) |
||
Non-notable inventor. It's difficult to figure out exactly what's going on in this article, but there appears to be no viable claim to notability with references from reliable sources. Author saw fit to include references written by the subject's adviser--that's not how Wikipedia works. [http://82.29.113.227/file/Edu/RefProfLeitch.doc The reference], by the way, is an interesting read--I would have removed it from my portfolio. [[User:Drmies|Drmies]] ([[User talk:Drmies|talk]]) 03:22, 9 September 2009 (UTC) |
Non-notable inventor. It's difficult to figure out exactly what's going on in this article, but there appears to be no viable claim to notability with references from reliable sources. Author saw fit to include references written by the subject's adviser--that's not how Wikipedia works. [http://82.29.113.227/file/Edu/RefProfLeitch.doc The reference], by the way, is an interesting read--I would have removed it from my portfolio. [[User:Drmies|Drmies]] ([[User talk:Drmies|talk]]) 03:22, 9 September 2009 (UTC) |
||
*'''Delete''' Did anyone else notice that the MS-word personal references and the "Journal of Anti-Aging" link are hosted at the same IP? Someone editing under that IP also came to [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/T-loop deletion factor|another AfD]] and admitted to being Stoyanov (as well as pulling deletion tags from this article and the one in the other AfD). This is vanity, and MS-Word documents hosted on the subject's website are certainly not reliable. [[User:JeremyMcCracken|JeremyMcCracken]] ([[user talk:JeremyMcCracken|talk]]) ([[Special:Contributions/JeremyMcCracken|contribs]]) 03:39, 9 September 2009 (UTC) |
|||
Revision as of 03:39, 9 September 2009
Will Vladimir Stoyanov
- Will Vladimir Stoyanov (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Non-notable inventor. It's difficult to figure out exactly what's going on in this article, but there appears to be no viable claim to notability with references from reliable sources. Author saw fit to include references written by the subject's adviser--that's not how Wikipedia works. The reference, by the way, is an interesting read--I would have removed it from my portfolio. Drmies (talk) 03:22, 9 September 2009 (UTC)
- Delete Did anyone else notice that the MS-word personal references and the "Journal of Anti-Aging" link are hosted at the same IP? Someone editing under that IP also came to another AfD and admitted to being Stoyanov (as well as pulling deletion tags from this article and the one in the other AfD). This is vanity, and MS-Word documents hosted on the subject's website are certainly not reliable. JeremyMcCracken (talk) (contribs) 03:39, 9 September 2009 (UTC)