Wikipedia:Copyright problems/2018 May 10: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
No edit summary
No edit summary
Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit
Line 8: Line 8:
{{od}} Read [[WP:CIVIL]], [[WP:IDHT]], [[WP:PERSONALATTACK]] and [[WP:BATTLEGROUND]]. Also keep [[WP:AE]] in mind. [[User:JosephusOfJerusalem|JosephusOfJerusalem]] ([[User talk:JosephusOfJerusalem|talk]]) 12:58, 10 May 2018 (UTC)
{{od}} Read [[WP:CIVIL]], [[WP:IDHT]], [[WP:PERSONALATTACK]] and [[WP:BATTLEGROUND]]. Also keep [[WP:AE]] in mind. [[User:JosephusOfJerusalem|JosephusOfJerusalem]] ([[User talk:JosephusOfJerusalem|talk]]) 12:58, 10 May 2018 (UTC)
::Hope you are ready for [[WP:BOOMERANG]]. You can keep the wikilawyering nonsense with yourself because it is not going to turn deliberate copyright violation into non-violation. Next time don't participate in a discussion about evident violation of copyrights by a long term copyright violator. Given your own [[WP:CIR|lack of understanding]] about copyrights,[https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=1947_Poonch_rebellion&diff=prev&oldid=816160162] you should definitely avoid this area. [[User:Capitals00|Capitals00]] ([[User talk:Capitals00|talk]]) 13:05, 10 May 2018 (UTC)
::Hope you are ready for [[WP:BOOMERANG]]. You can keep the wikilawyering nonsense with yourself because it is not going to turn deliberate copyright violation into non-violation. Next time don't participate in a discussion about evident violation of copyrights by a long term copyright violator. Given your own [[WP:CIR|lack of understanding]] about copyrights,[https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=1947_Poonch_rebellion&diff=prev&oldid=816160162] you should definitely avoid this area. [[User:Capitals00|Capitals00]] ([[User talk:Capitals00|talk]]) 13:05, 10 May 2018 (UTC)
*I do not see any copyright violations in the diffs provided. I only see quotes in the citations and those in no way can be qualified as copyvio. According to my understanding, that is an allowed practice and I have seen many editors do the same. I also see User:Capitals00 is making personal attacks on other editors specially on NadirAli and JosephusOfJerusalem and request admins to stop them from doing so, pinging {{ping|Bbb23}}, (not sure if this is your area but see if you can stop them from making personal attacks). I believe [[WP:BOOMERANG]] is in order as well here for Capitals00 if this report is found to be misleading as described by me above. NadirAli have also asked Kautilya3 for evidence of copyvio but they have provided none and I am pretty sure if evidence was provided, NadirAli would have refrained from doing the same. If quotes inside citations are considered copyvios then following edits by Kautilya3 should be considered a copyvio as well, [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1947_Poonch_rebellion#Notes], [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1947_Jammu_massacres#Notes] and [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1947_Mirpur_massacre#Notes]. [[User:SheriffIsInTown|'''<font color="blue">Sh</font><font color="red">eri</font><font color="blue">ff</font>''']] | [[User talk:SheriffIsInTown|'''<font color="black">☎ 911</font>''']] | 14:21, 10 May 2018 (UTC)


* {{pagelinks|Template:User Mason}} Userbox includes school logo. [[User:Hoppyh|Hoppyh]] ([[User talk:Hoppyh|talk]]) 14:14, 10 May 2018 (UTC)
* {{pagelinks|Template:User Mason}} Userbox includes school logo. [[User:Hoppyh|Hoppyh]] ([[User talk:Hoppyh|talk]]) 14:14, 10 May 2018 (UTC)

Revision as of 14:21, 10 May 2018

  • Same copyrights violating editor has now restored the copyright violation and provided a misleading edit summary.[1] Given he has been topic banned from uploading files for his copyright violations[2], I would urge admin to block him for his continued copyright violations. Capitals00 (talk) 06:01, 10 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • This is not the blatant case of copyright violations. Kautilya3 was kind enough to explain the concern in their edit summary. Urging for a straightway block is likely due to bad blood between them.  samee  converse  09:39, 10 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • This is a blatant case of violation of copyrights involving over thousands of words. NadirAli was already warned for his copyright violations, to which he replied and still he restored the copyright violation. Given his history, it should result in another indefinite block, just like it happens with many others. Why NadirAli couldn't defend himself here? Looks like he told you to come here and misrepresent the entire issue for him. Capitals00 (talk) 12:32, 10 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Agree with Samee. Looks like a retaliatory request because of this. I could not find any copyright violations. These are just quotes inside the citations. They are not any more of a copyright violation than this. This is an article related to a content dispute between these users on Talk:Princely state, so the frustration from there is spilling over. JosephusOfJerusalem (talk) 09:57, 10 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Making up nonsense would result in sanctions against you. You know that NadirAli has WP:CIR issues, just like you do, and they will have to be dealt with as appropriate. 1947 Poonch rebellion is not a copyright violation about which you have been told before[3] and your another stale buddy (KA$HMIR) was blocked for making same false claims.[4] It is just interesting to see how two accounts here are engaging in disruption by defending copyright violations from a multiple times indeffed blocked editor. You both have just confirmed it that the issue is serious and a block for copyright violations is warranted. Capitals00 (talk) 12:32, 10 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Read WP:CIVIL, WP:IDHT, WP:PERSONALATTACK and WP:BATTLEGROUND. Also keep WP:AE in mind. JosephusOfJerusalem (talk) 12:58, 10 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hope you are ready for WP:BOOMERANG. You can keep the wikilawyering nonsense with yourself because it is not going to turn deliberate copyright violation into non-violation. Next time don't participate in a discussion about evident violation of copyrights by a long term copyright violator. Given your own lack of understanding about copyrights,[5] you should definitely avoid this area. Capitals00 (talk) 13:05, 10 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • I do not see any copyright violations in the diffs provided. I only see quotes in the citations and those in no way can be qualified as copyvio. According to my understanding, that is an allowed practice and I have seen many editors do the same. I also see User:Capitals00 is making personal attacks on other editors specially on NadirAli and JosephusOfJerusalem and request admins to stop them from doing so, pinging @Bbb23:, (not sure if this is your area but see if you can stop them from making personal attacks). I believe WP:BOOMERANG is in order as well here for Capitals00 if this report is found to be misleading as described by me above. NadirAli have also asked Kautilya3 for evidence of copyvio but they have provided none and I am pretty sure if evidence was provided, NadirAli would have refrained from doing the same. If quotes inside citations are considered copyvios then following edits by Kautilya3 should be considered a copyvio as well, [6], [7] and [8]. Sheriff | ☎ 911 | 14:21, 10 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]