Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Lisa Simpson/archive1

The following is an archived discussion of a featured article nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured article candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.

The article was not promoted by SandyGeorgia 03:39, 14 November 2009 [1].

Lisa Simpson[edit]

Nominator(s): Pedro J. ^{the rookie} 20:32, 12 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I am nominating this for featured article because... I think it meets FA criteria, after a PR i think it is ready Pedro J. ^{the rookie} 20:32, 12 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Comments: Excellent articles, sources are all reliable and the prose is clear. Minor issues:

Wikilink to "animated television series"

Done--Pedro J. ^{the rookie} 01:26, 13 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Ref 12 does not need to link to IMDb

Done--Pedro J. ^{the rookie} 01:26, 13 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

De-capitalize ref 74

Done--Pedro J. ^{the rookie} 01:26, 13 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The Flash ^{talk} 00:56, 13 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Support: Issues taken care of. The Flash ^{talk} 01:34, 13 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Comment: State what country this TV program comes from, and link it, in the first paragraph, preferably first sentence. If you say it is an "American" program, link to United States. Amandajm (talk) 10:30, 13 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

done--Pedro J. ^{the rookie} 10:33, 13 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose (suggest withdrawal): Has the primary contributor of this article User:Scorpion0422 been informed of this FAC nomination? This article uses primary sources (ie the episodes themselves) as a reference some fifteen times (refs #41-#55). In my book, watching an episode, determining character traits (or whatever) based on that viewing, and then adding that interpretation here constitutes original research. Only include information sourced to independent reliable sources, or at least, direct comments from the creators themselves. —indopug (talk) 12:26, 13 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

He is informed--Pedro J. ^{the rookie} 18:32, 13 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I think most of the statements sourced to episodes are neutral (though I could be wrong), but I could try and source some of the statements to books. Is there anything in particular that strikes you as being very ORish? -- Scorpion ⁰⁴²² 18:56, 13 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I want to give Pedro thy master a lot of credit for cleaning the page up. It's better than it was a month ago. However, I think it's not quite in FA territory yet. What is there very good, but I think it could still be expanded, with more influence and reception and possibly some more real-world info added. -- Scorpion ⁰⁴²² 18:56, 13 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Do you sugest i close it and wait some more?--Pedro J. ^{the rookie} 18:58, 13 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

And thanks:)--Pedro J. ^{the rookie} 18:58, 13 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Well, since it's open, we might as well see what kind of feedback we get before closing it. Perhaps others think the current amount of content is perfect. -- Scorpion ⁰⁴²² 19:03, 13 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah look at flash's comments.--Pedro J. ^{the rookie} 22:59, 13 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.