Wikipedia:Notability (people): Revision history

8 May 2012

• curprev 01:5201:52, 8 May 2012‎ Elockid talk contribs‎ m 25,501 bytes 0‎ Changed protection level of Wikipedia:Notability (people): Intended protection duration over (‎[edit=autoconfirmed] (indefinite) ‎[move=autoconfirmed] (indefinite))

2 May 2012

• curprev 20:3320:33, 2 May 2012‎ Elockid talk contribs‎ m 25,501 bytes 0‎ Changed protection level of Wikipedia:Notability (people): Edit warring. Full protecting for 5 days. (‎[edit=sysop] (indefinite) ‎[move=sysop] (indefinite))
• curprev 20:0520:05, 2 May 2012‎ Morbidthoughts talk contribs‎ 25,501 bytes −20‎ Undid revision 490350879 by Hipocrite Right above the section "Arbitrary break: discussing Morbidthought's draft" is the proposal that was discussed and agreed to. No multiple years is consistent with ANYBIO.
• curprev 20:0120:01, 2 May 2012‎ Hipocrite talk contribs‎ 25,521 bytes +20‎ Undid revision 490350051 by Morbidthoughts (talk) - I don't see that agreement on the talk page.
• curprev 19:5719:57, 2 May 2012‎ Morbidthoughts talk contribs‎ 25,501 bytes −20‎ →‎Pornographic actors and models: multiple years requirement was agreed to be excised
• curprev 19:0619:06, 2 May 2012‎ Hullaballoo Wolfowitz talk contribs‎ 25,521 bytes −34‎ →‎Pornographic actors and models: attempt to revise to reflect what's been agreed on while leaving other issues open
• curprev 18:5218:52, 2 May 2012‎ Hullaballoo Wolfowitz talk contribs‎ 25,555 bytes −54‎ no consensus for this, and the implicit assertion that any notable award is sufficient to establish notability is contrary to consensus in AFD/DRV discussions

1 May 2012

• curprev 21:0421:04, 1 May 2012‎ Morbidthoughts talk contribs‎ m 25,609 bytes −1‎ →‎Pornographic actors and models: fixing wikilink
• curprev 21:0321:03, 1 May 2012‎ Morbidthoughts talk contribs‎ 25,610 bytes +55‎ →‎Pornographic actors and models: I prefer more time to hammer out details but this is what was agreed to in the talk page.
• curprev 20:0320:03, 1 May 2012‎ Hipocrite talk contribs‎ 25,555 bytes +31‎ RV - please review your most recent revert, I believe it was in error.
• curprev 20:0220:02, 1 May 2012‎ Morbidthoughts talk contribs‎ 25,524 bytes −31‎ Reverted 2 edits by Hipocrite (talk): There's been no discussion on order! (TW)
• curprev 20:0020:00, 1 May 2012‎ Hipocrite talk contribs‎ 25,555 bytes 0‎ →‎Pornographic actors and models: though perhaps not for the reordering
• curprev 19:5719:57, 1 May 2012‎ Hipocrite talk contribs‎ 25,555 bytes +31‎ Undid revision 490178223 by Morbidthoughts (talk) - this "rv no consensus" stuff is old. There is consensus for this on the talk page.
• curprev 19:4719:47, 1 May 2012‎ Morbidthoughts talk contribs‎ 25,524 bytes −31‎ Reverted good faith edits by SmokeyJoe (talk): I don't think order indicates importance but let's not mess with this until we finally revamp things. (TW)
• curprev 07:2107:21, 1 May 2012‎ SmokeyJoe talk contribs‎ 25,555 bytes +31‎ →‎Pornographic actors and models: raise bar slighty on awards and nominations. Reorder from strongest to weakest indicators

25 April 2012

• curprev 17:1617:16, 25 April 2012‎ Erpert talk contribs‎ 25,524 bytes −52‎ I'm not sure there IS a consensus for this; see talk page
• curprev 15:1315:13, 25 April 2012‎ Dream Focus talk contribs‎ 25,576 bytes −17‎ Undid revision 489154055 by Hipocrite (talk) no way to determine which are minor and which are not. List specific awards, don't be vague and cause nonstop arguing in the future
• curprev 13:4013:40, 25 April 2012‎ Hipocrite talk contribs‎ 25,593 bytes +17‎ →‎Pornographic actors and models: excludes minor awards also.
• curprev 13:3813:38, 25 April 2012‎ Epbr123 talk contribs‎ 25,576 bytes +52‎ amended PORNBIO per consensus

21 April 2012

• curprev 17:2417:24, 21 April 2012‎ Erpert talk contribs‎ 25,524 bytes −68‎ See talk page
• curprev 12:3812:38, 21 April 2012‎ SmokeyJoe talk contribs‎ 25,592 bytes +68‎ Revert Erpert's revert of HW's excellent improvement, which was & is consistent with talk page discussion. No valid reason was given for the revert; he should read WP:DRNC

20 April 2012

• curprev 07:3307:33, 20 April 2012‎ Erpert talk contribs‎ 25,524 bytes −68‎ You should change the wording AFTER a consensus is met

19 April 2012

• curprev 17:4617:46, 19 April 2012‎ Hullaballoo Wolfowitz talk contribs‎ 25,592 bytes +68‎ →‎Pornographic actors and models: let's see if this comes closer to matching the patter of AFD and DRV outcomes and the talk page discussions
• curprev 17:1517:15, 19 April 2012‎ Cavarrone talk contribs‎ 25,524 bytes +424‎ Undid revision 488197149 by Hipocrite (talk)I don't see a consensus for that
• curprev 17:0317:03, 19 April 2012‎ Hipocrite talk contribs‎ 25,100 bytes −424‎ →‎Pornographic actors and models: Boldly removing what lacks consensus and has been demonstrated at AFD to be not enough.

12 April 2012

• curprev 11:1311:13, 12 April 2012‎ Spartaz talk contribs‎ 25,524 bytes +3‎ →‎Pornographic actors and models: correct tag
• curprev 11:0511:05, 12 April 2012‎ Spartaz talk contribs‎ 25,521 bytes +12‎ →‎Pornographic actors and models: +disputed

10 April 2012

• curprev 01:5401:54, 10 April 2012‎ Singhalawap talk contribs‎ 25,509 bytes +124‎ No edit summary