Wikipedia talk:Bureaucrats' noticeboard: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
to Angela |
Secretlondon (talk | contribs) :: I just noticed the existance of this page on RfA - it would have been nice to tell your fellow bureaucrats about it.. ~~~~ |
||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
:You will recall that I promised UninvitedCompany that I would change from being so unilateral (the old Uncle Ed ;-) and respect consensus more. [[User:Ed Poor|Uncle Ed]] 17:14, August 29, 2005 (UTC) |
:You will recall that I promised UninvitedCompany that I would change from being so unilateral (the old Uncle Ed ;-) and respect consensus more. [[User:Ed Poor|Uncle Ed]] 17:14, August 29, 2005 (UTC) |
||
:: I just noticed the existance of this page on RfA - it would have been nice to tell your fellow bureaucrats about it.. [[User:Secretlondon|Secret]][[User talk:Secretlondon|london]] 00:37, 31 August 2005 (UTC) |
|||
Revision as of 00:37, 31 August 2005
Is this needed? Renamings should be logged at Wikipedia:Changing username and its archive. There is also an automatic log at Special:Log/renameuser. Close RfA discussions would be better at Wikipedia talk:Requests for adminship where anyone interested can comment rather than only bureaucrats. Angela. 00:19, August 25, 2005 (UTC)
- Maybe not, but since I've been called to account for deciding things on my own which really require consensus, I thought it might be good to create a page which parallels the Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard. Surely not all Bureaucrat actions need go on this project page, but only those which the acting bureaucrat is unsure of doing: either beforehand or afterwards.
- You will recall that I promised UninvitedCompany that I would change from being so unilateral (the old Uncle Ed ;-) and respect consensus more. Uncle Ed 17:14, August 29, 2005 (UTC)