Wikipedia talk:Requests for adminship/Liz: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
→‎Worried: OK, will strike this
Line 408: Line 408:
:::::Yeah, I'm impressed too. A good article, sure, but to write it to FA? Wow. I could never do that. <span style="border:1px solid #900;padding:2px;background:#fffff4">[[User:GregJackP|<span style="color:#900;font-size:110%;font-family:Mistral">GregJackP</span>]]&nbsp;[[User talk:GregJackP|<span style="color:#900;font-size:60%">Boomer!</span>]]</span> 03:55, 31 July 2015 (UTC)
:::::Yeah, I'm impressed too. A good article, sure, but to write it to FA? Wow. I could never do that. <span style="border:1px solid #900;padding:2px;background:#fffff4">[[User:GregJackP|<span style="color:#900;font-size:110%;font-family:Mistral">GregJackP</span>]]&nbsp;[[User talk:GregJackP|<span style="color:#900;font-size:60%">Boomer!</span>]]</span> 03:55, 31 July 2015 (UTC)
{{undent}} Aside from agreeing with that whole 8 hours thing, I did look through some of Liz's AN/ANI contributions and did not notice a pattern of making problems worse (or even one off incidents), which is part of why I didn't consider that. If this helps. [[User:Jo-Jo Eumerus|Jo-Jo Eumerus]] ([[User talk:Jo-Jo Eumerus|talk]], [[Special:Contributions/Jo-Jo Eumerus|contributions]]) 07:49, 31 July 2015 (UTC)
{{undent}} Aside from agreeing with that whole 8 hours thing, I did look through some of Liz's AN/ANI contributions and did not notice a pattern of making problems worse (or even one off incidents), which is part of why I didn't consider that. If this helps. [[User:Jo-Jo Eumerus|Jo-Jo Eumerus]] ([[User talk:Jo-Jo Eumerus|talk]], [[Special:Contributions/Jo-Jo Eumerus|contributions]]) 07:49, 31 July 2015 (UTC)

:OK, I've just lost an hour of my life going through Liz's April–June contributions. (Going back further isn't usually worthwhile unless there's a specific concern, as people change; looking at the edits in the month running up to an RFA is also a pointless exercise, as candidates are generally posing for the cameras by then and avoiding anything contentious.) I'm going to strike that oppose, as aside from her baiting of Eric Corbett* I'm not seeing any major recent issues.
::<nowiki>*</nowiki><small>[https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk%3AEric_Corbett&type=revision&diff=669703254&oldid=669695439 The "content creators" diff everyone is raising] can be discounted as a badly misfiring attempt at comedy, but I see no way to interpret her unsolicited comment [[User talk:Eric Corbett/Archives/2015/June#No one deserves to be silenced|here]], which essentially translates as "we are discussing you in a publicly viewable forum but I order you not to read the discussion" as anything other than either intentional baiting to try to provoke a backlash, or spectacular cluelessness.</small>
:For the record, the (relatively minor) issues I ''did'' find are:
:#[https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=All_Natural_Glamour_Solos&diff=prev&oldid=660746938 Removing a film's cover image from the article on the film], explicitly on the [[WP:IDONTLIKEIT]] grounds that [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Liz&diff=prev&oldid=661090277 "I didn't feel like the image enhanced the article"];
:#[https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Nina_Mercedez&diff=prev&oldid=660747404 Making an edit] which negatively impacted a BLP by downplaying the subject's importance (a feature dancer is a famous name, usually from porn or modelling, who makes one-off appearances in strip clubs as a highly-paid headline draw; a stripper is someone gyrates on stage while drunk businessmen stuff banknotes into their garter), with the somewhat odd edit summary of "ME";
:#[https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Josh_Duggar&diff=prev&oldid=665511038 This comment], which I'm sure is in the best of faith but shows a worrying eagerness to reach for the oversight button;
:#[https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Kent_Hovind&diff=prev&oldid=669404467 This rather odd commentary], which I can only translate as "I want someone else to write about this because I can't be bothered to check the sources;
:#[https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:List_of_cosplayers&diff=prev&oldid=669544775 This edit] which can only be described as pot-stirring ("I know nothing about the subject of this article, but I'm sure it's wrong to list this many women"); [https://www.google.com/search?q=famous%20cosplayers&rct=j five seconds background research] would have shown that the notable figures in this field are disproportionately female.
:None of these are any worse than I would expect to find if I went through the contributions of any editor with a fine-tooth comb. I won't be supporting for reasons outlined above—without the content Wikipedia is just Facebook for ugly people, and I don't consider it appropriate for people with no apparent interest in Wikipedia/Wikimedia's mission to be sitting in judgement over the people who actually do the work—but I won't actively oppose.
:(Brief PS; that "eight hours" comment wasn't intended as the "hey, look how fast I am!" which some above seem to have taken it as, but as pointing out that "content writers" aren't some kind of supremely gifted elite. Anyone, working primarily from print sources on a topic with which they're familiar enough to judge reliability and relevance of sourcing, and where the topic is specialised enough that the article won't be a 10,000-word behemoth, can do the same.)&nbsp;–&nbsp;[[User:Iridescent|iridescent]] 10:00, 31 July 2015 (UTC)

Revision as of 10:00, 31 July 2015

Edit stats

Edit stats from here:

Liz •  en.wikipedia.org

 Block log · Global user contributions · Global Account Manager · SUL Info · Pageviews in userspace ·
General statistics [hide]    

User ID:	19404073
User groups:	autoreviewer, massmessage-sender, reviewer, rollbacker, user, autoconfirmed
First edit:	Jul 25, 2013, 5:02 PM
Latest edit:	Jul 28, 2015, 1:14 PM
Live edits:	44,229
Deleted edits:	1,580
Total edits:  	45,809
Edits in the past 24 hours:	37
Edits in the past 7 days:	499
Edits in the past 30 days:	8,489
Edits in the past 365 days:	19,467
Ø number of edits per day:	62.6

Live edits:
Unique pages edited:	24,161
Pages created:	1,846
Pages moved:	229
Ø edits per page:	1.8
Ø change per page (bytes):	extended
Files uploaded:	0
Files uploaded (Commons):	0
(Semi-)automated edits:	1,529
Reverted edits:	237
Edits with summary:	43,834
Number of minor edits (tagged):	1,380
Number of edits (<20 bytes):	extended
Number of edits (>1000 bytes):	extended
Actions:
Thank:	124 x
Approve:	60 x
Patrol:	815 x
Admin actions
Block:	0 x
Protect:	0 x
Delete:	0 x
Import:	0 x
过错:
(Re)blocked:	0 x
Longest block: –
Current block: –
SUL editcounter
(approximate):	latest
► enwiki 	45,390 	+2 hours
metawiki 	71 	+4 days
commonswiki 	42 	+23 days
wikidatawiki 	40 	> 30 days
mediawikiwiki 	24 	> 30 days
enwikinews 	6 	> 30 days
enwikisource 	4 	> 30 days
enwikibooks 	3 	> 30 days
wikimania2015wiki 	2 	> 30 days
wikimania2014wiki 	2 	> 30 days
svwiki 	1 	> 30 days
43 others	7	> 30 days
Total edits	45,592

bla bla
Namespace Totals [hide]
	일반 문서 	12,364 	28%
	Talk 	1,245 	2.8%
	User 	809 	1.8%
	User talk 	4,841 	10.9%
	Wikipedia 	16,112 	36.4%
	Wikipedia talk 	1,366 	3.1%
	File 	35 	0.1%
	File talk 	2 	0%
	MediaWiki talk 	9 	0%
	Template 	176 	0.4%
	Template talk 	107 	0.2%
	Help 	7 	0%
	Help talk 	7 	0%
	Category 	7,054 	15.9%
	Category talk 	41 	0.1%
	Portal 	16 	0%
	Portal talk 	15 	0%
	Book 	1 	0%
	Draft 	16 	0%
	Draft talk 	4 	0%
	Education Program talk 	2 	0%
	
Year counts [hide]
2013 	14,477	
2014 	10,297	
2015 	19,455	

Time card [hide]
Timecard
Latest edit (global) - Edits in the past 30 days, max. 10 / Wiki [hide]
Date  ↓ 	Wiki  ↓ 	Links  ↓ 	Page title  ↓ 	Comment  ↓
2015-07-28, 13:14 	enwiki 	( diff · log · top ) 	:Articles for deletion/2015 Cirrus SR-20 Crash 	Amending comment
2015-07-28, 13:12 	enwiki 	( diff · log · top ) 	:Articles for deletion/2015 Cirrus SR-20 Crash 	/* 2015 Cirrus SR-20 Crash */ Delete
2015-07-28, 12:45 	enwiki 	( diff · log · top ) 	:Meetup/NYC 	/* Possible attendees */ Adding my name to the list
2015-07-28, 12:15 	enwiki 	( diff · log · top ) 	:Thegleaminureyes 	/* Welcome to Wikipedia: check out the Teahouse! */ new s...
2015-07-28, 12:15 	enwiki 	( diff · log · top ) 	:Thegleaminureyes 	Welcome to Wikipedia! ([[WP:TW|TW]])
2015-07-28, 12:12 	enwiki 	( diff · log · top ) 	:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Kww and The Rambling Man/Proposed decision 	Enforcing section warning
2015-07-28, 10:41 	enwiki 	( diff · log · top ) 	:Liz 	Posting RfA notice
2015-07-28, 10:30 	enwiki 	( diff · log · top ) 	:Requests for adminship/Liz 	RfA/Liz goes live
2015-07-28, 10:20 	enwiki 	( diff · log · top ) 	:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Kww and The Rambling Man/Proposed decision 	/* General comments */ Removing TRM header for pre-PD tim...
2015-07-28, 00:35 	enwiki 	( diff · log · top ) 	:Articles for deletion/PartStore.com 	Delete
2015-07-24, 14:25 	metawiki 	( diff · log · top ) 	Association of Categorist Wikipedians/Members 	
2015-07-04, 17:23 	commonswiki 	( diff · log · top ) 	:Wikimedia organizational and user rights hierarchy.svg 	Comment

Month counts [hide]
2013-07 	300	
2013-08 	1,363	
2013-09 	3,869	
2013-10 	4,281	
2013-11 	3,041	
2013-12 	1,623	
2014-01 	2,252	
2014-02 	2,034	
2014-03 	3,858	
2014-04 	678	
2014-05 	1,412	
2014-06 	51	
2014-11 	9	
2014-12 	3	
2015-01 	59	
2015-02 	1,662	
2015-03 	672	
2015-04 	3,213	
2015-05 	2,794	
2015-06 	2,935	
2015-07 	8,120	

Top edited pages [hide]
일반 문서
29 	List of redheads 	log · page history · topedits
15 	Usher (singer) 	log · page history · topedits
15 	Darius McCrary 	log · page history · topedits
14 	Laurence Fishburne 	log · page history · topedits
13 	Gary Coleman 	log · page history · topedits
12 	Keith David 	log · page history · topedits
12 	List of fictional supercouples 	log · page history · topedits
12 	Judith Sargent Murray 	log · page history · topedits
12 	Wayne Brady 	log · page history · topedits
12 	Ranjana Khanna 	log · page history · topedits
11 	Tahj Mowry 	log · page history · topedits
11 	Gamergate controversy 	log · page history · topedits
11 	Alfonso Ribeiro 	log · page history · topedits
10 	Carlon Jeffery 	log · page history · topedits
10 	Deaths in 2013 	log · page history · topedits
-More-
Talk
91 	Talk:Gamergate controversy 	log · page history · topedits
37 	Talk:Hapa/Archive 1 	log · page history · topedits
37 	Talk:Hapa 	log · page history · topedits
18 	Talk:Ashkenazi Jews 	log · page history · topedits
15 	Talk:Brianna Wu 	log · page history · topedits
13 	Talk:Galicia (Eastern Europe) 	log · page history · topedits
12 	Talk:Leo Frank 	log · page history · topedits
12 	Talk:Leo Frank/Archive 5 	log · page history · topedits
10 	Talk:Raul Julia-Levy 	log · page history · topedits
9 	Talk:Irom Chanu Sharmila 	log · page history · topedits
9 	Talk:Ave Maria University/Archive 1 	log · page history · topedits
9 	Talk:David Ray Griffin 	log · page history · topedits
9 	Talk:Proposals for a Palestinian state/Archive 1 	log · page history · topedits
9 	Talk:Ave Maria University 	log · page history · topedits
9 	Talk:Proposals for a Palestinian state 	log · page history · topedits
-More-
User
269 	User:Liz/CSD log 	log · page history · topedits
136 	User:Liz 	log · page history · topedits
23 	User:Liz/PROD log 	log · page history · topedits
17 	User:Liz/Whiteboard3 	log · page history · topedits
15 	User:Liz/common.js 	log · page history · topedits
14 	User:Liz/Whiteboard 	log · page history · topedits
7 	User:Liz/Whiteboard2 	log · page history · topedits
7 	User:Liz/Whiteboard4 	log · page history · topedits
6 	User:Liz/Pej Vahdat 	log · page history · topedits
6 	User:Liz/Whiteboard5 	log · page history · topedits
5 	User:Liz/monobook.js 	log · page history · topedits
5 	User:Wik 	log · page history · topedits
5 	User:Liz/Wikicountitis 	log · page history · topedits
5 	User:Ruud Koot/Feed 	log · page history · topedits
5 	User:Liz/Whiteboard8 	log · page history · topedits
-More-
User talk
813 	User talk:Liz 	log · page history · topedits
153 	User talk:Jimbo Wales 	log · page history · topedits
60 	User talk:Drmies 	log · page history · topedits
38 	User talk:Callanecc 	log · page history · topedits
35 	User talk:Gamaliel 	log · page history · topedits
34 	User talk:BrownHairedGirl 	log · page history · topedits
34 	User talk:Bishonen 	log · page history · topedits
32 	User talk:Flyer22 	log · page history · topedits
31 	User talk:Ignocrates 	log · page history · topedits
28 	User talk:Zad68 	log · page history · topedits
25 	User talk:Good Olfactory 	log · page history · topedits
24 	User talk:Kim Dent-Brown 	log · page history · topedits
24 	User talk:Obiwankenobi 	log · page history · topedits
23 	User talk:Bbb23 	log · page history · topedits
23 	User talk:HJ Mitchell 	log · page history · topedits
-More-
Wikipedia
1107 	Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents 	log · page history · topedits
245 	Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard 	log · page history · topedits
133 	Wikipedia:Teahouse/Questions 	log · page history · topedits
72 	Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons/Noticeboard 	log · page history · topedits
70 	Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Enforcement 	log · page history · topedits
46 	Wikipedia:Requests for undeletion 	log · page history · topedits
36 	Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case 	log · page history · topedits
33 	Wikipedia:Missing Wikipedians 	log · page history · topedits
30 	Wikipedia:Requests for page protection 	log · page history · topedits
29 	Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard 	log · page history · topedits
28 	Wikipedia:Usernames for administrator attention 	log · page history · topedits
28 	Wikipedia:Wikipedia Signpost/Newsroom/Suggestions 	log · page history · topedits
28 	Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Ebionites 3/Workshop 	log · page history · topedits
24 	Wikipedia:Requests for undeletion/Archive 193 	log · page history · topedits
23 	Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Lightbreather/Evidence 	log · page history · topedits
-More-
Wikipedia talk
61 	Wikipedia talk:Requests for adminship 	log · page history · topedits
58 	Wikipedia talk:Arbitration/Requests 	log · page history · topedits
42 	Wikipedia talk:Arbitration Committee/Noticeboard 	log · page history · topedits
31 	Wikipedia talk:Arbitration Committee 	log · page history · topedits
31 	Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Judaism 	log · page history · topedits
21 	Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Editor Retention 	log · page history · topedits
21 	Wikipedia talk:Wikipedia Signpost 	log · page history · topedits
19 	Wikipedia talk:Top 25 Report 	log · page history · topedits
18 	Wikipedia talk:Missing Wikipedians 	log · page history · topedits
17 	Wikipedia talk:Categorization of people 	log · page history · topedits
16 	Wikipedia talk:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Ebionites 3/Workshop 	log · page history · topedits
16 	Wikipedia talk:Categories for discussion 	log · page history · topedits
15 	Wikipedia talk:Arbitration Committee Elections December 2013 	log · page history · topedits
14 	Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Council 	log · page history · topedits
14 	Wikipedia talk:Arbitration Committee/Clerks 	log · page history · topedits
-More-
File
2 	File:Tom Selleck - publicity - 1980-1.jpg 	log · page history · topedits
2 	File:Irolas.jpg 	log · page history · topedits
2 	File:Graph of active admins, edits, and ratio of active admins to edits for each September, 2002-2013.png 	log · page history · topedits
2 	File:Graph of active admins and edit for each September, 2002-2013.png 	log · page history · topedits
1 	File:Saint Maron.JPG 	log · page history · topedits
1 	File:LudlowPostVandal1.jpg 	log · page history · topedits
1 	File:American Dream (film).jpg 	log · page history · topedits
1 	File:World-Fit-logo-childhood obesity programs - kids fitness programs - school fitness programs.png 	log · page history · topedits
1 	File:LudlowPostVandal3.jpg 	log · page history · topedits
1 	File:Admin-monthly.png 	log · page history · topedits
1 	File:Justin Bieber Signature.svg 	log · page history · topedits
1 	File:LudlowPostVandal4.jpg 	log · page history · topedits
1 	File:Ludlow-miliitia.jpg 	log · page history · topedits
1 	File:LudlowPostVandal5.jpg 	log · page history · topedits
1 	File:Molly coffinnotice.gif 	log · page history · topedits
-More-
File talk
1 	File talk:Edvard Munch, Loving Woman (Madonna), 1895–1902, lithograph. Munch Museum, Oslo.gif 	log · page history · topedits
1 	File talk:Self Portrait with Skeleton Arm.jpg 	log · page history · topedits
MediaWiki talk
4 	MediaWiki talk:Spam-whitelist 	log · page history · topedits
4 	MediaWiki talk:Bad image list 	log · page history · topedits
1 	MediaWiki talk:Spam-blacklist 	log · page history · topedits
Template
17 	Template:ArbComOpenTasks/CaseRequests 	log · page history · topedits
15 	Template:Casenav/data 	log · page history · topedits
10 	Template:Gestures 	log · page history · topedits
10 	Template:ArbComOpenTasks/ClarificationAmendment 	log · page history · topedits
6 	Template:Jews by country 	log · page history · topedits
4 	Template:User Canon Law 	log · page history · topedits
3 	Template:Ds/topics 	log · page history · topedits
3 	Template:ArbComOpenTasks/Cases 	log · page history · topedits
3 	Template:Retired Australian cyclones 	log · page history · topedits
2 	Template:Religious Colleges and Schools in New Jersey 	log · page history · topedits
2 	Template:Arbitration talk archive navbox 	log · page history · topedits
2 	Template:Qual é o Seu Talento? 	log · page history · topedits
2 	Template:Uw-cfd4 	log · page history · topedits
2 	Template:Demi Lovato 	log · page history · topedits
2 	Template:User WikiProject Glee 	log · page history · topedits
-More-
Template talk
22 	Template talk:ArbComOpenTasks 	log · page history · topedits
21 	Template talk:ArbComOpenTasks/Archive 1 	log · page history · topedits
19 	Template talk:Religion topics 	log · page history · topedits
19 	Template talk:Religion topics/Archive 1 	log · page history · topedits
5 	Template talk:Infobox royalty 	log · page history · topedits
3 	Template talk:WikiProject status 	log · page history · topedits
3 	Template talk:Infobox person 	log · page history · topedits
2 	Template talk:Copyviocore 	log · page history · topedits
2 	Template talk:Stock characters 	log · page history · topedits
2 	Template talk:Modernism 	log · page history · topedits
2 	Template talk:Infobox comedian 	log · page history · topedits
1 	Template talk:Torchwood Task Force userbox 	log · page history · topedits
1 	Template talk:Shades of color 	log · page history · topedits
1 	Template talk:Torchwood fan userbox 	log · page history · topedits
1 	Template talk:User torchwood fan 	log · page history · topedits
-More-
Help
2 	Help:User style 	log · page history · topedits
2 	Help:Userspace draft 	log · page history · topedits
2 	Help:Userspace draft/sandbox 	log · page history · topedits
1 	Help:Using colours 	log · page history · topedits
Help talk
4 	Help talk:Wiki markup 	log · page history · topedits
1 	Help talk:Preferences 	log · page history · topedits
1 	Help talk:Special page 	log · page history · topedits
1 	Help talk:Cheatsheet 	log · page history · topedits
Category
11 	Category:Wikipedia Signpost Interview archives 	log · page history · topedits
11 	Category:American people of Jewish descent 	log · page history · topedits
11 	Category:Ashkenazi Jews 	log · page history · topedits
10 	Category:Wikipedia Signpost Digital media archives 	log · page history · topedits
10 	Category:Wikipedia Signpost coverage of women 	log · page history · topedits
9 	Category:Wikipedia Signpost April Fools Day 	log · page history · topedits
8 	Category:South American people of Jewish descent 	log · page history · topedits
8 	Category:Wikipedia Signpost Education archives 	log · page history · topedits
8 	Category:Actors by ethnic or national descent 	log · page history · topedits
8 	Category:Wikipedia Signpost Library and Museum archives 	log · page history · topedits
8 	Category:Wikipedia Signpost China archives 	log · page history · topedits
8 	Category:Wikipedia Signpost Paid editing archives 	log · page history · topedits
7 	Category:Argentine people of Oceanian descent 	log · page history · topedits
7 	Category:People of Arab descent 	log · page history · topedits
7 	Category:American people of Middle Eastern descent 	log · page history · topedits
-More-
Category talk
6 	Category talk:People of Jewish descent 	log · page history · topedits
3 	Category talk:Candidates for speedy deletion 	log · page history · topedits
3 	Category talk:Wikipedians 	log · page history · topedits
3 	Category talk:Advocates of pseudoscience/Move discussion notes 	log · page history · topedits
2 	Category talk:Philosophers 	log · page history · topedits
2 	Category talk:Wikipedia adminship 	log · page history · topedits
2 	Category talk:People of Arab descent 	log · page history · topedits
2 	Category talk:Wikipedia archives 	log · page history · topedits
1 	Category talk:African-American players of American football 	log · page history · topedits
1 	Category talk:Tibetan philosophy 	log · page history · topedits
1 	Category talk:Wikipedia template categories 	log · page history · topedits
1 	Category talk:Roman Catholic clergy in Argentina 	log · page history · topedits
1 	Category talk:Defunct buildings and structures in Manhattan 	log · page history · topedits
1 	Category talk:Jinn in popular culture 	log · page history · topedits
1 	Category talk:Pivot original programming 	log · page history · topedits
-More-
Portal
4 	Portal:Syriac Christianity 	log · page history · topedits
2 	Portal:Narnia 	log · page history · topedits
2 	Portal:Christmas/Calendar 	log · page history · topedits
1 	Portal:Television 	log · page history · topedits
1 	Portal:Music/Featured articles/Suggest 	log · page history · topedits
1 	Portal:Ohio 	log · page history · topedits
1 	Portal:Baptist 	log · page history · topedits
1 	Portal:Anabaptism 	log · page history · topedits
1 	Portal:South Sudan 	log · page history · topedits
1 	Portal:Religion 	log · page history · topedits
1 	Portal:Christianity/Related portals 	log · page history · topedits
Portal talk
5 	Portal talk:Current events 	log · page history · topedits
3 	Portal talk:Dogs 	log · page history · topedits
2 	Portal talk:Judaism 	log · page history · topedits
1 	Portal talk:LGBT 	log · page history · topedits
1 	Portal talk:Transgender 	log · page history · topedits
1 	Portal talk:Asian Americans 	log · page history · topedits
1 	Portal talk:Mathematics 	log · page history · topedits
1 	Portal talk:Ireland 	log · page history · topedits
Book
1 	Book:Wikipedia Manual of Style 	log · page history · topedits
Draft
3 	Draft:Location map Houston Downtown 	log · page history · topedits
3 	Draft:Chairman (President) of the People's Republic of Bulgaria 	log · page history · topedits
2 	Draft:Valerie Sutton 	log · page history · topedits
2 	Draft:Sandbox 	log · page history · topedits
1 	Draft:Paola Bacchetta 	log · page history · topedits
1 	Draft:Jane Peterson 	log · page history · topedits
1 	Draft:Keystone Symposia 	log · page history · topedits
1 	Draft:Jem Jem Italia 	log · page history · topedits
1 	Draft:Roopesh Kumar 	log · page history · topedits
1 	Draft:Uttarakhand Judicial and legal Academy (UJALA) 	log · page history · topedits
Draft talk
2 	Draft talk:List of churches in New York City 	log · page history · topedits
1 	Draft talk:Cultural Marxism 	log · page history · topedits
1 	Draft talk:STOP Bang Questionnaire 	log · page history · topedits
Education Program talk
2 	Education Program talk:University of Cincinnati/Philosophy and Women (Summer 2013)/Timeline 	log · page history · topedits


(Semi-)automated edits (approximate) [hide]
1,228 	Twinkle
273 	STiki
28 	Huggle
0 	NPWatcher
0 	HotCat
0 	FurMe
0 	Igloo
0 	AutoWikiBrowser
0 	Popups
0 	Articles For Creation tool
0 	WPCleaner

Worried

I gave glowing support. Now, after reading User:Iridescent's oppose, I am worried. I respect Iridescent enourmously. Before supporting, I spot-checked many of Liz's talk posts and found good manners. Maybe I was unlucky. Sometimes, it is necessary to read big discussions very thoroughly to know if someone is helping to diffuse and resolve rather than stir the pot and pick fights. I do not want to support an admin who has even a smidgen of those last characteristics. If anyone can provide diffs that conclusively show those, I will move to oppose at once. Anna Frodesiak (talk) 23:33, 30 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not sure Iridescent's oppose can be taken that way, Anna. If you're working in contentious areas, it's pretty easy for those on the opposing side to pick diffs and say, "See! They were stirring the pot here!" or "Everything would have been okay if they just gave up and stopped arguing". I think you need to judge what they were fighting for. --NeilN talk to me 23:58, 30 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]
(edit conflict)Anna Frodesiak, I posted that oppose as a token gesture when this looked certain to finish well above 90%, and will freely admit to not doing a full contribution history check. In light of your comments, and the fact that this could theoretically end up in the discretionary zone, I'm going to go more thoroughly through her contributions and see if I've just happened to only encounter her on bad days. (It won't be until tomorrow, though, it's 1:30 am here.) I can't imagine I'll be moving to support—I'm not one of those who expects admins to have written FAs or GAs but I do expect to see some interest in what Wikipedia is actually about, and 7% mainspace edits, almost all minor, makes Newyorkbrad look like Diderot—but I'll be more than willing to strike the oppose if I feel I've been unfair. (When an RFA candidate can't give a single example in their "best work" section, it isn't a good sign; writing adequate-quality articles really isn't difficult for anyone who understands the basics of essay-writing, sourcing and wiki markup. To put that in perspective, tomorrow's TFA took about eight hours start-to-finish to write from a redlink.)
It is possible that because of the somewhat unusual combination of pages on my watchlist, which by definition includes a disproportionate number of high-drama pages, I'm only seeing her in environments where people are unusually combative. (I don't automatically assume a tendency to get into fights is an automatic fail—I was one of the co-noms on Malleus's RFA—but it needs to be outweighed by positives elsewhere, and my impression of this candidate has been of someone whose history consists solely of a mix of unnecessary stirring of other peoples' disputes, and hyper-minor edits.) What I will say, just doing a quick skim of recent article talk edits (generally the best way to get a feel for an editor's interests), is that her edit count in that particular namespace is massively inflated through the pointless but edit-count-inflating job of manually archiving threads one-by-one which were about to be archived by the bot anyway.
I'll update here tomorrow with either a retraction or an affirmation. – iridescent 00:25, 31 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Well, I'm impressed. There is no way I could write a Featured article in just eight hours. Hawkeye7 (talk) 02:38, 31 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Let's see: 20+ sources were carefully researched, winnowed out, found, read, and synthesized; 7 images were researched, found, uploaded (some of them), and captioned; and 23,000 bytes of deathless prose, with 44 footnotes, were written, formatted, edited, and refined, all within eight hours? That is impressive. Softlavender (talk) 02:56, 31 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Yeah, I'm impressed too. A good article, sure, but to write it to FA? Wow. I could never do that. GregJackP Boomer! 03:55, 31 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

() Aside from agreeing with that whole 8 hours thing, I did look through some of Liz's AN/ANI contributions and did not notice a pattern of making problems worse (or even one off incidents), which is part of why I didn't consider that. If this helps. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 07:49, 31 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

OK, I've just lost an hour of my life going through Liz's April–June contributions. (Going back further isn't usually worthwhile unless there's a specific concern, as people change; looking at the edits in the month running up to an RFA is also a pointless exercise, as candidates are generally posing for the cameras by then and avoiding anything contentious.) I'm going to strike that oppose, as aside from her baiting of Eric Corbett* I'm not seeing any major recent issues.
*The "content creators" diff everyone is raising can be discounted as a badly misfiring attempt at comedy, but I see no way to interpret her unsolicited comment here, which essentially translates as "we are discussing you in a publicly viewable forum but I order you not to read the discussion" as anything other than either intentional baiting to try to provoke a backlash, or spectacular cluelessness.
For the record, the (relatively minor) issues I did find are:
  1. Removing a film's cover image from the article on the film, explicitly on the WP:IDONTLIKEIT grounds that "I didn't feel like the image enhanced the article";
  2. Making an edit which negatively impacted a BLP by downplaying the subject's importance (a feature dancer is a famous name, usually from porn or modelling, who makes one-off appearances in strip clubs as a highly-paid headline draw; a stripper is someone gyrates on stage while drunk businessmen stuff banknotes into their garter), with the somewhat odd edit summary of "ME";
  3. This comment, which I'm sure is in the best of faith but shows a worrying eagerness to reach for the oversight button;
  4. This rather odd commentary, which I can only translate as "I want someone else to write about this because I can't be bothered to check the sources;
  5. This edit which can only be described as pot-stirring ("I know nothing about the subject of this article, but I'm sure it's wrong to list this many women"); five seconds background research would have shown that the notable figures in this field are disproportionately female.
None of these are any worse than I would expect to find if I went through the contributions of any editor with a fine-tooth comb. I won't be supporting for reasons outlined above—without the content Wikipedia is just Facebook for ugly people, and I don't consider it appropriate for people with no apparent interest in Wikipedia/Wikimedia's mission to be sitting in judgement over the people who actually do the work—but I won't actively oppose.
(Brief PS; that "eight hours" comment wasn't intended as the "hey, look how fast I am!" which some above seem to have taken it as, but as pointing out that "content writers" aren't some kind of supremely gifted elite. Anyone, working primarily from print sources on a topic with which they're familiar enough to judge reliability and relevance of sourcing, and where the topic is specialised enough that the article won't be a 10,000-word behemoth, can do the same.) – iridescent 10:00, 31 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]