Wronger than wrong: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
Shermer didn't "coin" it, Asimov did. |
||
| Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
According to [[John Holmes Jenkins|John Jenkins]],<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.asimovreviews.net/Books/Book378.html|title=Welcome to Jenkins' Spoiler-Laden Guide to Isaac Asimov's The Relativity of Wrong|date=26 February 2006}}</ref> who reviewed ''The Relativity of Wrong'', the title essay of Asimov's book is the one "which I think is important both for understanding Asimov's thinking about science and for arming oneself against the inevitable anti-science attack that one often hears – [that] theories are always preliminary and science really doesn't 'know' anything." |
According to [[John Holmes Jenkins|John Jenkins]],<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.asimovreviews.net/Books/Book378.html|title=Welcome to Jenkins' Spoiler-Laden Guide to Isaac Asimov's The Relativity of Wrong|date=26 February 2006}}</ref> who reviewed ''The Relativity of Wrong'', the title essay of Asimov's book is the one "which I think is important both for understanding Asimov's thinking about science and for arming oneself against the inevitable anti-science attack that one often hears – [that] theories are always preliminary and science really doesn't 'know' anything." |
||
Along these lines, [[Michael Shermer]] even coined |
Along these lines, [[Michael Shermer]] even coined the name '''Asimov's axiom''' for it.<ref name="Shermer">{{cite journal |author=Shermer M |date=November 2006 |title=Wronger Than Wrong |url=http://www.sciam.com/article.cfm?id=wronger-than-wrong |journal=Scientific American |volume=295 |issue=5 |pages=40 |bibcode=2006SciAm.295e..40S |doi=10.1038/scientificamerican1106-40}}</ref> |
||
==See also== |
==See also== |
||
Latest revision as of 12:19, 16 April 2024
Wronger than wrong (also Pauli's proverb)[1] is a statement that equates two errors when one of the errors is clearly more grave than the other. The mistake was discussed in Isaac Asimov's book of essays The Relativity of Wrong[2] as well as in a 1989 article[3] of the same name in the Fall 1989 issue of the Skeptical Inquirer:
When people thought the Earth was flat, they were wrong. When people thought the Earth was spherical, they were wrong. But if you think that thinking the Earth is spherical is just as wrong as thinking the Earth is flat, then your view is wronger than both of them put together.
According to John Jenkins,[4] who reviewed The Relativity of Wrong, the title essay of Asimov's book is the one "which I think is important both for understanding Asimov's thinking about science and for arming oneself against the inevitable anti-science attack that one often hears – [that] theories are always preliminary and science really doesn't 'know' anything."
Along these lines, Michael Shermer even coined the name Asimov's axiom for it.[1]
See also[edit]
References[edit]
- ^ a b Shermer M (November 2006). "Wronger Than Wrong". Scientific American. 295 (5): 40. Bibcode:2006SciAm.295e..40S. doi:10.1038/scientificamerican1106-40.
- ^ Asimov, Isaac. The Relativity of Wrong. ISBN 1-55817-169-X (paperback, 1989); ISBN 1-57566-008-3 (paperback reissue, 1996).
- ^ Asimov Isaac (Fall 1989). "Wronger Than Wrong". The Skeptical Inquirer. 14 (1).
- ^ "Welcome to Jenkins' Spoiler-Laden Guide to Isaac Asimov's The Relativity of Wrong". 26 February 2006.
 | This philosophy of science-related article is a stub. You can help Wikipedia by expanding it. |