Jump to content

Cebupithecia

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by MichaelMaggs (talk | contribs) at 14:48, 26 January 2021 (Changing short desc from "Genus of monkeys" to "Single-species extinct genus of monkeys"). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Cebupithecia
Temporal range: Middle Miocene (Laventan)
~13.8–11.8 Ma
Reconstructed skull
Scientific classification Edit this classification
Domain: Eukaryota
Kingdom: Animalia
Phylum: Chordata
Class: Mammalia
Order: Primates
Suborder: Haplorhini
Infraorder: Simiiformes
Family: Pitheciidae
Subfamily: Pitheciinae
Genus: Cebupithecia
Stirton & Savage 1950
Species

Cebupithecia is an extinct genus of New World monkeys from the Middle Miocene (Laventan in the South American land mammal ages; 13.8 to 11.8 Ma). Its remains have been found at the Konzentrat-Lagerstätte of La Venta in the Honda Group of Colombia. The type species is C. sarmientoi.[1][2]

Description

Fossils of Cebupithecia were discovered in the "Monkey Beds" of the Honda Group, that has been dated to the Laventan, about 13.5 Ma. Cebupithecia had a dental formula of 2:1:3:3 on the lower jaw. The incisors of this species were procumbant, suggesting a close relation to Pithecia.[3] and the canines had a stout appearance. The molars were flat with cusps having little contours.[2] Cebupithecia had an estimated average body mass of around 1,602 grams (3.532 lb).[4] Cebupithecia had a relatively longer talar neck and a higher, more squared-shaped talar body. In these features, Cebupithecia is more like cebines or aotins than pitheciines, but its overall pattern is unlike any living platyrrhine group or any of the known fossils.[5]

Movement

Cebupithecia also exhibits a relatively large medial protuberance which is smoothed, another resemblance to aotins. The significance of these characters is difficult to interpret. Cebupithecia may be the most primitive known pitheciine, retaining shared primitive resemblances with aotins and cebines. Alternatively, its unusual morphology could reflect a unique, derived (for pitheciines) locomotor pattern. The talar features which distinguish Cebupithecia from other pitheciines indicate that leaping was relatively more frequent, as is also indicated by other postcranial features. The locomotor behavior of Cebupithecia has been reconstructed as frequent quadrupedalism and leaping,[5] or more relying on vertical clinging and leaping rather than quadrupedal locomotion, much like members of the extant genus Pithecia, to which the genus is related.[2][6]

Later research suggests that Cebupithecia may have employed its tail differently than most nonprehensile-tailed platyrrhines living today, behaviors that possibly involved tail-bracing or twisting during hindlimb (pedal grasping) suspensory behaviors. Such behaviors may serve as a preadaptive model for the full-fledged evolution of below-branch tail suspension and prehensility seen in other New World primates.[7]

Evolution

The evolutionary split between Pitheciidae, of which Cebupithecia, and Callicebus, including Miocallicebus, also found in the Honda Group, has been placed at 15.2 million years ago.[8]

Habitat

The Honda Group, and more precisely the "Monkey Beds", are the richest site for fossil primates in South America.[9] It has been argued that the monkeys of the Honda Group were living in habitat that was in contact with the Amazon and Orinoco Basins, and that La Venta itself was probably seasonally dry forest.[10] From the same level as where Cebupithecia has been found, also fossils of Aotus dindensis, Micodon, Mohanamico, Saimiri annectens, Saimiri fieldsi and Stirtonia tatacoensis have been uncovered.[11][12][13]

See also

References

  1. ^ Cebupithecia sarmientoi at Fossilworks.org
  2. ^ a b c Cebupithecia sarmientoi
  3. ^ Defler, 2004, p.32
  4. ^ Silvestro et al., 2017, p.14
  5. ^ a b Gebo et al., 1990, p.744
  6. ^ Tejedor, 2013, p.28
  7. ^ Organ & Lemelin, 2011, p.2013
  8. ^ Takai et al., 2001, p.304
  9. ^ Rosenberger & Hartwig, 2001, p.3
  10. ^ Lynch Alfaro et al., 2015, p.520
  11. ^ Luchterhand et al., 1986, p.1753
  12. ^ Wheeler, 2010, p.133
  13. ^ Setoguchi et al., 1986, p.762

Bibliography

Further reading