Old English grammar

The grammar of Old English is quite different from that of Modern English, predominantly by being much more inflected. As an old Germanic language, Old English has a morphological system that is similar to that of the hypothetical Proto-Germanic reconstruction, retaining many of the inflections thought to have been common in Proto-Indo-European and also including constructions characteristic of the Germanic daughter languages such as the umlaut.

Among living languages, Old English morphology most closely resembles that of modern Icelandic, which is among the most conservative of the Germanic languages. To a lesser extent, it resembles modern German.

Nouns, pronouns, adjectives and determiners were fully inflected with four grammatical cases (nominative, accusative, genitive, dative), and a vestigial instrumental, two grammatical numbers (singular and plural) and three grammatical genders (masculine, feminine, and neuter). First- and second-person personal pronouns also had dual forms for referring to groups of two people, in addition to the usual singular and plural forms. The instrumental case was somewhat rare and occurred only in the masculine and neuter singular. It was often replaced by the dative. Adjectives, pronouns and (sometimes) participles agreed with their antecedent nouns in case, number and gender. Finite verbs agreed with their subject in person and number.

Nouns came in numerous declensions (with many parallels in Latin, Ancient Greek and Sanskrit). Verbs came in nine main conjugations (seven strong and three weak), all with numerous subtypes, as well as a few additional smaller conjugations and a handful of irregular verbs. The main difference from other ancient Indo-European languages, such as Latin, is that verbs could be conjugated in only two tenses (vs. the six "tenses," really tense/aspect combinations, of Latin), and they have no synthetic passive voice although it still existed in Gothic.

The grammatical gender of a given noun does not necessarily correspond to its natural gender, even for nouns referring to people. For example, sēo sunne (the sun) was feminine, se mōna (the moon) was masculine, and þæt wīf (the woman) was neuter. (Compare modern German die Sonne, der Mond, das Weib.) Pronominal usage usually reflected natural gender rather than grammatical gender when the two conflicted.

Morphology

Verbs

Verbs in Old English are divided into strong and weak verbs. Strong verbs form the past tense by changing a vowel, while weak verbs add an ending.

Strong verbs

Further information: Germanic strong verb

Strong verbs use the Germanic form of conjugation known as ablaut. In this form of conjugation, the stem of the word changes to indicate the tense. Verbs like this persist in modern English; for example sing, sang, sung is a strong verb, as are swim, swam, swum and choose, chose, chosen. The root portion of the word changes rather than its ending. In Old English, there were seven major classes of strong verb; each class has its own pattern of stem changes. Learning these is often a challenge for students of the language, though English speakers may see connections between the old verb classes and their modern forms.

The classes had the following distinguishing features to their infinitive stems:

1. ī + one consonant.
2. ēo or ū + one consonant.
3. Originally e + two consonants. By the time of written Old English, many had changed. If C is used to represent any consonant, verbs in this class usually had short e + lC; short eo + rC; short i + nC/mC; or (g̣ +) short ie + lC.
4. e + one consonant (usually l or r, plus the verb brecan 'to break').
5. e + one consonant (usually a stop or a fricative).
6. a + one consonant.
7. Other than the above. Always a heavy root syllable (either a long vowel or short + two consonants), almost always a non-umlauted vowel – e.g., ō, ā, ēa, a (+ nC), ea (+ lC/rC), occ. ǣ (the latter with past in ē instead of normal ēo). Infinitive is distinguishable from class 1 weak verbs by non-umlauted root vowel; from class 2 weak verbs by lack of suffix -ian. First and second preterite have identical stems, usually in ēo (occ. ē), and the infinitive and the past participle also have the same stem.

Stem changes in strong verbs

Class	Root weight	Infinitive	First preterite	Second preterite	Past participle
I	heavy	ī	ā	i
II		ēo or ū	ēa	u	o
III		see table below
IV	light	e(+r/l)	æ	ǣ	o
V		e(+other)			e
VI		a	ō		a
VII	heavy	ō, ā, ēa, a (+nC), ea (+rC/lC), occ. ǣ	ē or ēo		same as infinitive

The first preterite stem is used in the preterite, for the first- and third-person singular. The second preterite stem is used for second-person singular, and all persons in the plural (as well as the preterite subjunctive). Strong verbs also exhibit i-mutation of the stem in the second- and third-person singular in the present tense.

The third class went through so many sound changes that it was barely recognisable as a single class. The first was a process called 'breaking'. Before ⟨h⟩, and ⟨r⟩ + another consonant, ⟨æ⟩ turned into ⟨ea⟩, and ⟨e⟩ to ⟨eo⟩. Also, before ⟨l⟩ + another consonant, the same happened to ⟨æ⟩, but ⟨e⟩ remained unchanged (except before combination ⟨lh⟩).

The second sound change to affect it was the influence of palatal sounds ⟨g⟩, ⟨c⟩, and ⟨sc⟩. These turned preceding ⟨e⟩ and ⟨æ⟩ to ⟨ie⟩ and ⟨ea⟩, respectively.

The third sound change turned ⟨e⟩ to ⟨i⟩, ⟨æ⟩ to ⟨a⟩, and ⟨o⟩ to ⟨u⟩ before nasals.

Altogether, this split the third class into five sub-classes:

1. e + two consonants (apart from clusters beginning with l).
2. eo + r or h + another consonant.
3. e + l + another consonant.
4. g, c, or sc + ie + two consonants.
5. i + nasal + another consonant.

Stem changes in Class III

Sub-class	Infinitive	First preterite	Second preterite	Past participle
a	e	æ	u	o
b	eo	ea
c	e
d	ie
e	i	a		u

Regular strong verbs were all conjugated roughly the same, with the main differences being in the stem vowel. Thus stelan "to steal" represents the strong verb conjugation paradigm.

Tense/mood	Pronoun	'steal'
Infinitives		stelan
		tō stelanne
Present indicative
	iċ	stele
	þū	stilst
	hē/hit/hēo	stilþ
	Plural	stelaþ
Past indicative	iċ/hē/hit/hēo	stæl
	þū	stǣle
	Plural	stǣlon
Present subjunctive	Singular	stele
	Plural	stelen
Past subjunctive	Singular	stǣle
	Plural	stǣlen
Imperative	Singular	stel
	Plural	stelaþ
Present participle		stelende
Past participle		(ġe)stolen

Weak verbs

Further information: Germanic weak verb

Weak verbs are formed by adding alveolar (t or d) endings to the stem for the past and past-participle tenses. Examples include love, loved and look, looked.

Originally, the weak ending was used to form the preterite of informal, noun-derived verbs such as often emerge in conversation and which have no established system of stem-change. By nature, these verbs were almost always transitive, and even today, most weak verbs are transitive verbs formed in the same way. However, as English came into contact with non-Germanic languages, it invariably borrowed useful verbs which lacked established stem-change patterns. Rather than inventing and standardizing new classes or learning foreign conjugations, English speakers simply applied the weak ending to the foreign bases.

The linguistic trends of borrowing foreign verbs and verbalizing nouns have greatly increased the number of weak verbs over the last 1,200 years. Some verbs that were originally strong (for example help, holp, holpen) have become weak by analogy; most foreign verbs are adopted as weak verbs; and when verbs are made from nouns (for example "to scroll" or "to water") the resulting verb is weak. Additionally, conjugation of weak verbs is easier to teach, since there are fewer classes of variation. In combination, these factors have drastically increased the number of weak verbs, so that in modern English weak verbs are the most numerous and productive form, although occasionally a weak verb may turn into a strong verb through the process of analogy, such as sneak (originally only a noun), where snuck is an analogical formation rather than a survival from Old English.

There are three major classes of weak verbs in Old English. The first class displays i-mutation in the root, and the second class none. There is also a third class explained below.

Class-one verbs with short roots exhibit gemination of the final stem consonant in certain forms. With verbs in ⟨r⟩, this appears as ⟨ri⟩ or ⟨rg⟩, where ⟨i⟩ and ⟨g⟩ are pronounced [j]. Geminated ⟨f⟩ appears as ⟨bb⟩, and that of ⟨g⟩ appears as ⟨cg⟩. Class-one verbs may receive an epenthetic vowel before endings beginning in a consonant.

Where class-one verbs have gemination, class-two verbs have ⟨i⟩ or ⟨ig⟩, which is a separate syllable pronounced [i]. All class-two verbs have an epenthetic vowel, which appears as ⟨a⟩ or ⟨o⟩.

In the following table, three verbs are conjugated. Swebban "to put to sleep" is a class-one verb exhibiting gemination and an epenthetic vowel. Hǣlan "to heal" is a class-one verb exhibiting neither gemination nor an epenthetic vowel. Sīðian "to travel" is a class-two verb.

Tense/mood	Pronoun	'put to sleep'	'heal'	'travel'
Infinitives		swebban	hǣlan	sīðian
		tō swebbanne	tō hǣlanne	tō sīðienne
Present indicative	iċ	swebbe	hǣle	sīðie
	þū	swefest	hǣlst	sīðast
	hē/hit/hēo	swefeþ	hǣlþ	sīðaþ
	Plural	swebbaþ	hǣlaþ	sīðiaþ
Past indicative	iċ/hē/hit/hēo	swefede	hǣlde	sīðode
	þū	swefedest	hǣldest	sīðodest
	Plural	swefedon	hǣldon	sīðodon
Present subjunctive	Singular	swebbe	hǣle	sīðiġe
	Plural	swebben	hǣlen	sīðiġen
Past subjunctive	Singular	swefede	hǣlde	sīðode
	Plural	swefeden	hǣlden	sīðoden
Imperative	Singular	swefe	hǣl	sīða
	Plural	swebbaþ	hǣlaþ	sīðiað
Present participle		swefende	hǣlende	sīðiende
Past participle		(ġe)swefed	(ġe)hǣled	(ġe)sīðod

During the Old English period, the third class was significantly reduced; only four verbs belonged to this group: habban 'have', libban 'live', seċġan 'say', and hyċġan 'think'. Each of these verbs is distinctly irregular, though they share some commonalities.

Tense/mood	Pronoun	'have'	'live'	'say'	'think'
Infinitives		habban	libban	seċġan	hyċġan
		tō hæbbenne	tō libbenne	tō seċġenne	tō hyċġenne
Present indicative
	iċ	hæbbe	libbe	seċġe	hyċġe
	þū	hæfst	leofast	sæġst	hyġst
	hē/hit/hēo	hæfþ	leofaþ	sæġþ	hyġþ
	Plural	habbaþ	libbaþ	seċġaþ	hyċġaþ
Past indicative	iċ/hē/hit/hēo	hæfde	lifde	sæġde	hogde
	þū	hæfdest	lifdest	sæġdest	hogdest
	Plural	hæfdon	lifdon	sæġdon	hogdon
Present subjunctive	Singular	hæbbe	libbe	seċġe	hyċġe
	Plural	hæbben	libben	seċġen	hyċġen
Past subjunctive	Singular	hæfde	lifde	sæġde	hogde
	Plural	hæfden	lifde	sæġden	hogden
Imperative	Singular	hafa	leofa	sæġe	hyġe
	Plural	habbaþ	libbaþ	seċġaþ	hyċġaþ
Present participle		hæbbende	libbende	seċġende	hyċġende
Past participle		(ġe)hæfd	(ġe)lifd	(ġe)sæġd	(ġe)hogd

Preterite-present verbs

The preterite-present verbs are a class of about a dozen verbs which have a present tense in the form of a strong preterite and a past tense like the past of a weak verb. These verbs derive from the subjunctive or optative use of preterite forms to refer to present or future time. For example, witan, "to know" comes from a verb which originally meant "to have seen" (cf. OE wise "manner, mode, appearance"; Latin videre "to see" from the same root). The present singular is formed from the original singular preterite stem and the present plural from the original plural preterite stem. As a result of this history, the first-person singular and third-person singular are the same in the present.

Few preterite-present verbs appear in the Old English corpus. Not all of the inflections listed below are attested: some have been reconstructed by comparison with cognates in other languages and with similar verbs in Old English.

In spite of heavy irregularities, there are four groups of similarly-conjugated verbs:

1. Āgan, durran, mōtan, and witan
2. Cunnan, ġemunan (outside the past tense), and unnan
3. Dugan, magan, and ġenugan
4. Sċulan and þurfan

The Old English meanings of many of the verbs are significantly different from that of the modern descendants; in fact, the verbs "can, may, must", and to a lesser extent "thurf, durr" appear to have chain shifted in meaning.

Conjugation	Pronoun	'know, know how to'	'be able to, can'	'should, must'	'know'	'own'	'avail'	'dare'	'remember'	'need'	'be allowed to, may'	'grant'	'have use of, enjoy'
Infinitives		cunnan	magan	sċulan	witan	āgan	dugan	durran	ġemunan	þurfan	mōtan	unnan	ġenugan
		tō cunnenne	tō magenne	tō sculenne	tō witenne	tō āgenne	tō dugenne	tō durrenne	tō ġemunenne	tō þurfenne	tō mōtenne	tō unnenne	tō ġenugenne
Present indicative	iċ/hē/hit/hēo	cann	mæġ	sċeal	wāt	āh	deah	dearr	ġeman	þearf	mōt	ann	ġeneah
	þū	canst	meaht	sċealt	wāst	āhst	deaht	dearst	ġemanst	þearft	mōst	anst	ġeneaht
	Plural	cunnon	magon	sċulon	witon	āgon	dugon	durron	ġemunon	þurfon	mōton	unnon	ġenugan
Past indicative	iċ/hē/hit/hēo	cūðe	meahte	sċolde	wiste	āhte	dohte	dorste	ġemunde	þorfte	mōste	ūðe	ġenohte
	þū	cūðest	meahtest	sċoldest	wistest	āhtest	dohtest	dorstest	ġemundest	þorftest	mōstest	ūðest	ġenohtest
	Plural	cūðon	meahton	sċoldon	wiston	āhton	dohton	dorston	ġemundon	þorfton	mōston	ūðon	ġenohton
Present subjunctive	Singular	cunne	mæġe	sċyle	wite	āge	duge	dyrre	ġemune	þyrfe	mōte	unne	ġenuge
	Plural	cunnen	mæġen	sċylen	witen	āgen	dugen	dyrren	ġemunen	þyrfen	mōten	unnen	ġenugen
Past subjunctive	Singular	cūðe	mihte	sċolde	wiste	āhte	dohte	dyrste	ġemunde	þyrfte	mōste	ūðe	ġenohte
	Plural	cūðen	mihten	sċolden	wisten	āhten	dohten	dyrsten	ġemunden	þyrften	mōsten	ūðen	ġenohten
Imperative	Singular	cunne	mæġe	sċyle	wite	āge	duge	dyrre	ġemune	þyrfe	mōte	unne	ġenuge
	Plural	cunnaþ	magaþ	sċulaþ	witaþ	āgaþ	dugaþ	durraþ	ġemunaþ	þurfaþ	mōtaþ	unnaþ	ġenugaþ
Present participle		cunnende	mæġende	sċulende	witende	āgende	dugende	durrende	ġemunende	þurfende	mōtende	unnende	ġenugende
Past participle		(ġe)cunnen/(ġe)cūþ	(ġe)mægen	(ġe)sċulen	(ġe)witen	(ġe)āgen	(ġe)dugen	(ġe)dorren	ġemunen	(ġe)þurfen	(ġe)mōten	(ġe)unnen	ġenugen

Anomalous verbs

Additionally, there is a further group of four verbs which are anomalous: "want", "do", "go" and "be". These four have their own conjugation schemes which differ significantly from all the other classes of verb. This is not especially unusual: "want", "do", "go", and "be" are the most commonly used verbs in the language, and are very important to the meaning of the sentences in which they are used. Idiosyncratic patterns of inflection are much more common with important items of vocabulary than with rarely used ones.

Dōn 'to do' and gān 'to go' are conjugated alike; willan 'to want' is similar outside of the present tense.

Tense/mood	Pronoun	'do'	'go'	'want'
Infinitives		dōn	gān	willan
		tō dōnne	tō gānne	tō willenne
Present indicative	iċ	dō	gā	wille
	þū	dēst	gǣst	wilt
	hē/hit/hēo	dēþ	gǣþ	wile
	Plural	dōþ	gāþ	willaþ
Past indicative	iċ/hē/hit/hēo	dyde	ēode	wolde
	þū	dydest	ēodest	woldest
	Plural	dydon	ēodon	woldon
Present subjunctive	Singular	dō	gā	wille
	Plural	dōn	gān	willen
Past subjunctive	Singular	dyde	ēode	wolde
	Plural	dyde	ēode	wolde
Imperative	Singular	dō	gā	wille
	Plural	dōþ	gāþ	willaþ
Present participle		dōnde	gangende	willende
Past participle		(ġe)dōn	(ġe)gān	*(ġe)willen

The verb 'to be' is actually composed of three different stems: one beginning with w-, one beginning with b-, and one beginning with s-. These are traditionally thought of as forming two separate words: wesan, comprising the forms beginning with w- and s-, and bēon, comprising the forms beginning with b-.

Tense/mood	Pronoun	'be'
Infinitives		wesan, bēon
		tō bēonne
Present indicative	iċ	eom, bēo
	þū	eart, bist
	hē/hit/hēo	is, biþ
	Plural	sind, bēoþ
Past indicative	iċ/hē/hit/hēo	wæs
	þū	wǣre
	Plural	wǣron
Present subjunctive	Singular	sīe, bēo
	Plural	sīen, bēon
Past subjunctive	Singular	wǣre
	Plural	wǣren
Imperative	Singular	wes, bēo
	Plural	wesaþ, bēoþ
Present participle		wesende, bēonde
Past participle		(ġe)bēon

In the present tense, wesan and bēon carried a difference in meaning. Wesan was used in most circumstances, whereas bēon was used for the future and for certain kinds of general statements.

Nouns

Old English is an inflected language, and as such its nouns, pronouns, adjectives and determiners must be declined in order to serve a grammatical function. A set of declined forms of the same word pattern is called a declension. As in several other ancient Germanic languages, there are five major cases: nominative, accusative, dative, genitive and instrumental.

• The nominative case indicated the subject of the sentence. For example: se cyning means 'the king'. It was also used for direct address. Adjectives in the predicate (qualifying a noun on the other side of 'to be') were also in the nominative.
• The accusative case indicated the direct object of the sentence, for example: Æðelbald lufode þone cyning means "Æðelbald loved the king", where Æðelbald is the subject and the king is the object. Already the accusative had begun to merge with the nominative; it was never distinguished in the plural, or in a neuter noun.
• The genitive case indicated possession, for example: the þæs cyninges sċip is "the king's ship". It also indicated partitive nouns.
• The dative case indicated the indirect object. For example: hringas þǣm cyninge means "rings for the king" or "rings to the king". Here, the word cyning is in its dative form: cyninge. There were also several verbs that took direct objects in the dative.
• The instrumental case indicated an instrument used to achieve something, for example: lifde sweorde, "he lived by the sword", where sweorde is the instrumental form of sweord. During the Old English period, the instrumental was falling out of use, having largely merged with the dative. Only pronouns and strong adjectives retained separate forms for the instrumental.

The small body of evidence available for Runic texts suggests that there may also have been a separate locative case in early or Northumbrian forms of the language (e.g., ᚩᚾ ᚱᚩᛞᛁ on rodi "on the Cross").

In addition to inflection for case, nouns take different endings depending on whether the noun was in the singular (for example, hring "one ring"') or plural (for example, hringas "many rings"). Also, some nouns pluralize by way of Umlaut, and some undergo no pluralizing change in certain cases.

Nouns are also categorized by grammatical gender – masculine, feminine, or neuter. In general, masculine and neuter words share most of their endings, while feminine words have their own subset of endings.

Furthermore, Old English nouns are divided as either strong or weak. Weak nouns have their own endings. In general, weak nouns are less complex than strong nouns, since they had begun to lose their system of declension. However, the various noun classes are not totally distinct from one another, and there is a great deal of overlap between them.

Descriptions of Old English language grammars often follow the NOM-ACC-GEN-DAT-INST case order.

Strong nouns

Here are the strong declensional endings and examples for each gender:

Case	Masculine		Neuter		Feminine
	Singular	Plural	Singular	Plural	Singular	Plural
Nominative	–	-as	–	-u/–	-u/–	-a
Accusative					-e	-a/-e
Genitive	-es	-a	-es	-a		-a
Dative	-e	-um	-e	-um		-um

For the '-u/–' forms above, the '-u' is used with a root consisting of a single short syllable or ending in a long syllable followed by a short syllable, while roots ending in a long syllable or two short syllables are not inflected. (A long syllable contains a long vowel or is followed by two consonants. There are some exceptions; for example, feminine nouns ending in -þu such as strengþu 'strength'.)

Example of the strong noun declension for each gender

Case	Masculine engel 'angel'		Neuter scip 'ship'		Feminine sorg 'sorrow'
	Singular	Plural	Singular	Plural	Singular	Plural
Nominative	enġel	englas	sċip	sċipu	sorg	sorga
Accusative					sorge	sorga/sorge
Genitive	engles	engla	sċipes	sċipa		sorga
Dative	engle	englum	sċipe	sċipum		sorgum

There is a syncope of the second e in enġel when an ending follows. This syncope of the vowel in the second syllable occurs with two-syllable strong nouns, which have a long vowel in the first syllable and a second syllable consisting of a short vowel and single consonant (for example, enġel, wuldor 'glory', and hēafod 'head'). However, this syncope is not always present, so forms such as engelas may be seen.

Weak nouns

Here are the weak declensional endings and examples for each gender:

Case	Singular			Plural
	Masculine	Feminine	Neuter
Nominative	-a	-e		-an
Accusative	-an		-e
Genitive	-an			-ena
Dative	-an			-um

Example of the weak noun declension for each gender

Case	Masculine nama 'name'		Neuter ēage 'eye'		Feminine tunge 'tongue'
	Singular	Plural	Singular	Plural	Singular	Plural
Nominative	nama	naman	ēage	ēagan	tunge	tungan
Accusative	naman				tungan
Genitive	naman	namena	ēagan	ēagena	tungan	tungena
Dative		namum		ēagum		tungum

Irregular strong nouns

In addition, masculine and neuter nouns whose main vowel is short æ and end with a single consonant change the vowel to a in the plural (a result of the phonological phenomenon known as Anglo-Frisian brightening):

Example: dæg 'day' (masculine)

Case	Singular	Plural
Nominative	dæg	dagas
Accusative
Genitive	dæges	daga
Dative	dæge	dagum

Some masculine and neuter nouns end in -e in their base form. These drop the -e and add normal endings. Neuter nouns in -e always have -u in the plural, even with a long vowel:

Example of the strong noun declensions ending in -e

Case	Masculine ende 'end'		Neuter stīele 'steel'
	Singular	Plural	Singular	Plural
Nominative	ende	endas	stīele	stīelu
Accusative
Genitive	endes	enda	stīeles	stīela
Dative	ende	endum	stīele	stīelum

Nouns ending in -h lose this when an ending is added, and lengthen the vowel in compensation (this can result in compression of the ending as well):

Example of the strong noun declensions ending in -h

Case	Masculine mearh 'horse'		Neuter feorh 'life'		Masculine sċōh 'shoe'
	Singular	Plural	Singular	Plural	Singular	Plural
Nominative	mearh	mēaras	feorh		sċōh	sċōs
Accusative
Genitive	mēares	mēara	fēores	fēora	sċōs	sċōna
Dative	mēare	mēarum	fēore	fēorum	sċō	sċōm

Nouns whose stem ends in -w change this to -u or drop it in the nominative singular. (This '-u/–' distinction depends on syllable weight, as for strong nouns, above.)

Example of the strong noun declensions ending in -w

Case	Neuter smeoru 'grease'		Feminine sinu 'sinew'		Feminine lǣs 'pasture'
	Singular	Plural	Singular	Plural	Singular	Plural
Nominative	smeoru		sinu	sinwa	lǣs	lǣswa
Accusative			sinwe	sinwa, -e	lǣswe	lǣswa, -e
Genitive	smeorwes	smeorwa		sinwa		lǣswa
Dative	smeorwe	smeorwum		sinwum		lǣswum

A few nouns follow the -u declension, with an entirely different set of endings. The following examples are both masculine, although feminines also exist, with the same endings (for example duru 'door' and hand 'hand'). The '-u/–' distinction in the singular depends on syllable weight, as for strong nouns, above.

Example of the -u declension

Case	Masculine sunu 'son'		Masculine feld 'field'
	Singular	Plural	Singular	Plural
Nominative	sunu	suna	feld	felda
Accusative
Genitive	suna		felda
Dative	suna	sunum	felda	feldum

Mutating strong nouns

There are also some nouns of the consonant declension, which show i-umlaut in some forms.

Example of the strong noun declensions with i-shift

Case	Masculine fōt 'foot'		Feminine hnutu 'nut'		Feminine bōc 'book'
	Singular	Plural	Singular	Plural	Singular	Plural
Nominative	fōt	fēt	hnutu	hnyte	bōc	bēċ
Accusative
Genitive	fōtes	fōta	hnyte, hnute	hnuta	bēċ, bōce	bōca
Dative	fēt, fōte	fōtum		hnutum	bēċ, bōc	bōcum

Other such nouns include (with singular and plural nominative forms given):

Masculine: tōþ, tēþ 'tooth'; mann, menn 'person'; frēond, frīend 'friend'; fēond, fīend 'enemy' (cf. 'fiend')

Feminine: studu, styde 'post' (cf. 'stud'); hnitu, hnite 'nit'; āc, ǣċ 'oak'; gāt, gǣt 'goat'; brōc, brēċ 'leg covering' (cf. 'breeches'); gōs, gēs 'goose'; burg, byrġ 'city'; dung, dynġ 'prison'; turf, tyrf 'turf'; grūt, grȳt 'meal' (cf. 'grout'); lūs, lȳs 'louse'; mūs, mȳs 'mouse' Feminine with loss of -h in some forms: furh, fyrh 'furrow' or 'fir'; sulh, sylh 'plough'; þrūh, þrȳh 'trough'; wlōh, wlēh 'fringe'. Feminine with compression of endings: cū, cȳ 'cow' (cf. dialectal plural 'kine')

Neuter: In addition, sċrūd 'clothing, garment' has the umlauted dative-singular form sċrȳd.

Nouns of relationship

Nouns of relationship

Case	Masculine fæder 'father'		Masculine brōðor 'brother'		Feminine mōdor 'mother'		Feminine sweostor 'sister'		Feminine dohtor 'daughter'
	Singular	Plural	Singular	Plural	Singular	Plural	Singular	Plural	Singular	Plural
Nominative-Accusative	fæder	fæderas	brōðor	(ġe)brōðor, -ra, -ru	mōdor	mōdra, -ru	sweostor	(ġe)sweostor, -tra, -tru	dohtor	dohtor, -ra, -ru
Genitive		fædera		(ġe)brōðra		mōdra		(ġe)sweostra	dohtor	dohtra
Dative		fæderum	brēðer	(ġe)brōðrum	mēder	mōdrum		(ġe)sweostrum	dehter	dohtrum

Neuter nouns with -r- in the plural

Example: lamb 'lamb' (neuter)

Case	Singular	Plural
Nominative-Accusative	lamb	lambru
Genitive	lambes	lambra
Dative	lambe	lambrum

The other nouns of this type are ǣġ, ǣġru 'egg'; ċealf, ċealfru 'calf'; and ċild 'child', which has either the a-stem plural ċild or the inherited plural ċildru (cf. 'children', with -en from the weak nouns).

Adjectives

Adjectives in Old English are declined using the same categories as nouns: five cases (nominative, accusative, genitive, dative, and instrumental), three genders (masculine, feminine, neuter), and two numbers (singular, plural). In addition, they can be declined either strong or weak. The weak forms are used in the presence of a definite or possessive determiner, while the strong ones are used in other situations. The weak forms are identical to those for nouns, while the strong forms use a combination of noun and pronoun endings:

The strong adjective declension

Case	Singular			Plural
	Feminine	Masculine	Neuter		Feminine	Masculine
Nominative	-u/–	–	–	-u/–	-e, -a	-e
Accusative	-e	-ne
Genitive	-re	-es		-ra
Dative		-um
Instrumental		-e		-um

For the '-u/–' forms above, the distinction is the same as for strong nouns.

Example of the strong adjective declension: gōd 'good'

Case	Singular			Plural
	Feminine	Masculine	Neuter		Feminine	Masculine
Nominative	gōd				gōde, -a	gōde
Accusative	gōde	gōdne	gōd
Genitive	gōdre	gōdes		gōdra
Dative		gōdum
Instrumental		gōde		gōdum

Example of the weak adjective declension: gōd 'good'

Case	Singular			Plural
	Masculine	Feminine	Neuter
Nominative	gōda	gōde		gōdan
Accusative	gōdan		gōde
Genitive	gōdan			gōdena
Dative				gōdum
Instrumental

The same variants described above for nouns also exist for adjectives. The following example shows both the æ/a variation and the -u forms in the feminine singular and neuter plural:

Example of the strong adjective declension: glæd 'glad'

Case	Singular			Plural
	Feminine	Neuter	Masculine	Feminine	Neuter	Masculine
Nominative	gladu	glæd	glæd	glade, -a	gladu	glade
Accusative	glade		glædne
Genitive	glædre	glades		glædra
Dative		gladum
Instrumental		glade		gladum

The following shows an example of an adjective ending with -h:

Example of the strong adjective declension: hēah 'high'

Case	Singular			Plural
	Masculine	Neuter	Feminine
Nominative	hēah		hēa
Accusative	hēane	hēah
Genitive	hēas		hēare	hēara
Dative	hēam			hēam
Instrumental	hēa

The following shows an example of an adjective ending with -w:

Example of the strong adjective declension: ġearu 'ready'

Case	Singular			Plural
	Feminine	Masculine	Neuter		Masculine-Feminine
Nominative	ġearu				ġearwe
Accusative	ġearwe	ġearone	ġearu
Genitive	ġearore	ġearwes		ġearora
Dative		ġearwum
Instrumental		ġearwe		ġearwum

Definite articles and demonstratives

Old English had two main determiners: se, which could function as both 'the' or 'that', and þes for 'this'.

the/that/those

Case	Masculine	Neuter	Feminine	Plural
Nominative	se	þæt	sēo	þā
Accusative	þone		þā
Genitive	þæs		þǣre	þāra
Dative	þǣm			þǣm
Instrumental	þȳ, þon		þǣre	þǣm

Modern English 'that' descends from the neuter nominative/accusative form, and 'the' from the masculine nominative form, with 's' replaced analogously by the 'th' of the other forms. The feminine nominative form was possibly the source of Modern English 'she'.

this/these

Case	Masculine	Neuter	Feminine	Plural
Nominative	þes	þis	þēos	þās
Accusative	þisne		þās
Genitive	þisses		þisse	þissa
Dative	þissum			þissum
Instrumental	þȳs		þisse	þissum

Pronouns

Most pronouns are declined by number, case and gender; in the plural form most pronouns have only one form for all genders. Additionally, Old English pronouns preserve the dual form, which was specifically used for groups of two things, as in "we both" and "you two"). These were common, but could optionally be substituted with the ordinary plural forms.

First person

Case	Singular	Plural	Dual
Nominative	iċ	wē	wit
Accusative	mē	ūs	unc
Genitive	mīn	ūre	uncer
Dative	mē	ūs	unc

Second person

Case	Singular	Plural	Dual
Nominative	þū	ġē	ġit
Accusative	þē	ēow	inc
Genitive	þīn	ēower	incer
Dative	þē	ēow	inc

Third person

Case	Singular			Plural
	Masculine	Neuter	Feminine	Masculine	Feminine
Nominative	hē	hit	hēo	hīe
Accusative	hine		hīe
Genitive	his		hiere	hiera	heora
Dative	him			him

Many of the forms above bear strong resemblances to their contemporary English language equivalents: for instance in the genitive case ēower became "your", ūre became "our", mīn became "mine". However, the h- in plural forms such as hīe was eventually replaced with þ- under Norse influence, yielding "they," "them," and "their."

Prepositions

Prepositions (like Modern English words by, for, and with) sometimes follow the word which they govern (especially pronouns), in which case they are called postpositions.

The following is a list of prepositions in the Old English language. Prepositions may govern the accusative, genitive, dative or instrumental cases.

Prepositions

Old English	Definition	Notes
æfter	after	Related to Frisian efter, Dutch achter ("behind"), Icelandic eftir. Ancestor of modern after.
ǣr	before	Related to German eher and Icelandic áður. Ancestor of modern ere.
æt	at	Related to Icelandic að ("to, towards"). Ancestor of modern at.
andlang	along	Related to German entlang. Ancestor of modern along. Governs the genitive.
bæftan	behind	Ancestor of modern (nautical) abaft.
be, bī	by, about	Related to West Frisian by, Low German bi, Dutch bij, German bei. Ancestor of modern by.
beforan	before	Related to German bevor. Ancestor of modern before.
beġeondan	beyond	Ancestor of modern beyond
behindan	behind	Ancestor of modern behind. Related to German hinter.
binnan	in, within	Related to German and Dutch binnen
benēoðan	beneath	Ancestor of modern beneath.
betwēonum	between	Ancestor of modern between
bufan	above	Ancestor of modern above through compound form onbufan
būtan	without, except	Related to Dutch buiten. Ancestor of modern but.
ēac	also	Related to Frisian ek, Low German ook, Dutch ook, and German auch. Ancestor of modern (archaic) eke
for	for, because of, instead of	Ancestor of modern for, related to modern German für
fram	from, by	Ancestor of modern from
ġeond	through	Ancestor of modern yonder through comparative form ġeondra. Related to Dutch ginds and (archaic) ginder
in	in	Ancestor of modern in, related to German and Latin in
innan	within	Related to modern German innen
intō	into	Ancestor of modern into
mid	with	Related to modern German mit
nēah	near	Ancestor of modern nigh. German nah
of	from, out of	Ancestor of modern of and off
ofer	over	Ancestor of modern over
on	on, in	Ancestor of modern on
onbūtan	around	Ancestor of modern about
onġēan	opposite, against; towards; in reply to	Ancestor of modern again. Related to German entgegen
oþ	until
samod	together	Related to German samt
tō	to	Ancestor of modern to, related to German zu
tōeācan	in addition to, besides
tōforan	before	Related to Dutch tevoren, German zuvor
tōgeagnes	towards, against	Related to Dutch tegen
tōweard	toward	Ancestor of modern toward
þurh	through	Ancestor of modern through. Related to German durch.
under	under	Ancestor of modern under, related to German unter
undernēoðan	underneath	Ancestor of modern underneath
uppon	upon, on	Not the ancestor of modern upon, which came from "up on".
ūtan	without, outside of	Related to modern Swedish utan, German außen. The adverbial form ūt is the ancestor of modern out.
wiþ	against	Ancestor of modern with
wiþinnan	within	Ancestor of modern within
wiþūtan	outside of	Ancestor of modern without
ymb	around	Related to modern German um and Latin ambi

Syntax

Old English syntax was similar in many ways to that of Modern English. However, there were some important differences. Some were simply consequences of the greater level of nominal and verbal inflection, and word order was generally freer. There are also differences in the default word order and in the construction of negation, questions, relative clauses and subordinate clauses.

• The default word order was verb-second and more like German than Modern English.
• There was no do-support in questions and negatives.
• Multiple negatives could stack up in a sentence and intensified each other (negative concord).
• Sentences with subordinate clauses of the type "When X, Y" did not use a wh-type word for the conjunction but used a th-type correlative conjunction (e.g., þā X, þā Y instead of "When X, Y").

Word order

There was some flexibility in word order of Old English since the heavily inflected nature of nouns, adjectives, and verbs often indicated the relationships between clause arguments. Scrambling of constituents was common. Even sometimes scrambling within a constituent occurred, as in Beowulf line 708 wrāþum on andan:

wrāþum	on	andan
hostile (Dative Singular)	on/with	malice (Dative Singular)
"with hostile malice"

Something similar occurs in line 713 in sele þām hēan "in the high hall" (lit. "in hall the high").

Extraposition of constituents out of larger constituents is common even in prose, as in the well-known tale of Cynewulf and Cyneheard, which begins

Hēr Cynewulf benam Sigebryht his rīces ond westseaxna wiotan for unryhtum dǣdum, būton Hamtūnscīre; ...

(Literally) "Here Cynewulf deprived Sigebryht of his kingdom and West Saxons' counselors for unright deeds, except Hampshire"

(translated) "Here Cynewulf and the West Saxon counselors deprived Sigebryht of his kingdom, other than Hampshire, for unjust actions"

The words ond westseaxna wiotan "and the West Saxon counselors" (lit. "and (the) counselors of (the) West Saxons") have been extraposed from (moved out of) the compound subject they belong in, in a way that would be impossible in modern English. In Old English, case inflection preserves the meaning: the verb beniman "to deprive" (appearing in this sentence in the form benam, "[he] deprived") needs a word in the genitive case to show what someone or something is deprived of, which in this sentence is rīces "of kingdom" (nominative rīce, "kingdom"), whereas wiotan "counselors" is in the nominative case and therefore serves a different role entirely (the genitive of it would be wiotana, "of counselors"); for this reason the interpretation that Cynewulf deprived Sigebryht of the West Saxon counselors was not possible for speakers of Old English. The Old English sentence still isn't in theory perfectly unambiguous, as it contains one more word in the genitive: westseaxna ("of West Saxons", nominative westseaxan "West Saxons"), and the form wiotan "counselors" may also represent the accusative case in addition to the nominative, thus for example creating the grammatical possibility of the interpretation that Cynewulf also took the West Saxons away from the counselors, but this would have been difficult to conceive.

Main clauses in Old English tend to have a verb-second (V2) order, where the finite verb is the second constituent in a sentence, regardless of what comes first. There are echoes of this in modern English: "Hardly did he arrive when ...", "Never can it be said that ...", "Over went the boat", "Ever onward marched the weary soldiers ...", "Then came a loud sound from the sky above". In Old English, however, it was much more extensive, like the word order in modern Germanic languages other than modern English. If the subject appears first, there is an SVO order, but it can also yield orders such as OVS and others. In questions VSO was common, see below.

In subordinate clauses, however, the word order is markedly different, with verb-final constructions the norm, again as in Dutch and German. Furthermore, in poetry, all the rules were frequently broken. In Beowulf, for example, main clauses frequently have verb-initial or verb-final order, and subordinate clauses often have verb-second order. (However, in clauses introduced by þā, which can mean either "when" or "then", and where word order is crucial for telling the difference, the normal word order is nearly always followed.)

Those linguists who work within the Chomskyan transformational grammar paradigm often believe that it is more accurate to describe Old English (and other Germanic languages with the same word-order patterns like modern German) as having underlying subject-object-verb (SOV) ordering. According to this theory, all sentences are initially generated using this order, but in main clauses, the verb is moved back to the V2 position (technically, the verb undergoes V-to-T raising). That is said to explain the fact that Old English allows inversion of subject and verb as a general strategy for forming questions, while modern English uses this strategy almost only with auxiliary verbs and the main verb "to be", requiring do-support in other cases.

Questions

Most of the time the word order of Old English changed when asking a question, from SVO to VSO. While many purport that Old English had free word order, this is not quite true, as there were conventions for the positioning of subject, object and verb in clause.

"I am..." becomes "Am I..."

"Ic eom..." becomes "Eom ic..."

Relative and subordinate clauses

Old English did not use forms equivalent to "who, when, where" in relative clauses (as in "The man whom I saw") or subordinate clauses ("When I got home, I went to sleep").

Instead, relative clauses used one of the following:

1. An invariable complementizer þe
2. The demonstrative pronoun se, sēo, þæt
3. The combination of the two, as in se þe

Subordinate clauses tended to use correlative conjunctions, e.g.

Þā ic hām ēode, þā slēp ic.

(word-for-word) "Then I home went, then slept I."

(translated) "When I went home, I slept."

The word order usually distinguished the subordinate clause (with verb-final order) from the main clause (with verb-second word order).

The equivalents of "who, when, where" were used only as interrogative pronouns and indefinite pronouns, as in Ancient Greek and Sanskrit.

Besides þā ... þā ..., other correlative conjunctions occurred, often in pairs of identical words, e.g.:

• þǣr X, þǣr Y: "Where X, Y"
• þanon X, þanon Y: "Whence (from where/wherefrom) X, Y"
• þider X, þider Y: "Whither (to where/whereto) X, Y"
• þēah (þe) X, þēah Y: "Although X, Y"
• þenden X, þenden Y: "While X, Y"
• þonne X, þonne Y: "Whenever X, Y"
• þæs X, þæs Y: "As/after/since X, Y"
• þȳ X, þȳ Y: "The more X, the more Y"

Phonology

Main article: Old English phonology

The phonology of Old English is necessarily somewhat speculative, since it is preserved purely as a written language. Nevertheless, there is a very large corpus of Old English, and the written language apparently indicates phonological alternations quite faithfully, so it is not difficult to draw certain conclusions about the nature of Old English phonology.

See also

• Middle English
• Old English phonology

Sources

• Moore, Samuel, and Thomas A. Knott. The Elements of Old English. 1919. Ed. James R. Hulbert. 10th ed. Ann Arbor, Michigan: George Wahr Publishing Co., 1958.
• The Magic Sheet, one page color PDF summarizing Old English declension, from Peter S. Baker, inspired by Moore and Marckwardt's 1951 Historical Outlines of English Sounds and Inflections
• J. Bosworth & T.N. Toller, An Anglo-Saxon dictionary: Germanic Lexicon Project

Further reading

• Brunner, Karl (1965). Altenglische Grammatik (nach der angelsächsischen Grammatik von Eduard Sievers neubearbeitet) (3rd ed.). Tübingen: Max Niemeyer.
• Campbell, A. (1959). Old English Grammar. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
• Mitchell, Bruce & Robinson, Fred (2001) A Guide to Old English; 6th ed. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing ISBN 0-631-22636-2
• Quirk, Randolph; & Wrenn, C. L. (1957). An Old English Grammar (2nd ed.) London: Methuen.