Amount of substance
In chemistry, the amount of substance in a given sample of matter is defined as the number of discrete atomic-scale particles in it divided by the Avogadro constant NA. In a truly atomistic view, the amount of substance is simply the number of particles that constitute the substance.[1][2][3] The particles or entities may be molecules, atoms, ions, electrons, or other, depending on the context. The value of the Avogadro constant NA has been defined as 6.02214076×1023 mol−1. In the truly atomistic view, 1 mol = 6.02214076×1023 particles (the Avogadro number) [4] and therefore the conversion constant is simply NA = 1.[3] The amount of substance is sometimes referred to as the chemical amount.
The mole (symbol: mol) is a unit of amount of substance in the International System of Units, defined (since 2019) by fixing the Avogadro constant at the given value. Historically, the mole was defined as the amount of substance in 12 grams of the carbon-12 isotope. As a consequence, the mass of one mole of a chemical compound, in grams, is numerically equal (for all practical purposes) to the mass of one molecule of the compound, in daltons, and the molar mass of an isotope in grams per mole is equal to the mass number. For example, a molecule of water has a mass of about 18.015 daltons on average, whereas a mole of water (which contains 6.02214076×1023 water molecules) has a total mass of about 18.015 grams.
In chemistry, because of the law of multiple proportions, it is often much more convenient to work with amounts of substances (that is, number of moles or of molecules) than with masses (grams) or volumes (liters). For example, the chemical fact "1 molecule of oxygen (O
2) will react with 2 molecules of hydrogen (H
2) to make 2 molecules of water (H2O)" can also be stated as "1 mole of O2 will react with 2 moles of H2 to form 2 moles of water". The same chemical fact, expressed in terms of masses, would be "32 g of oxygen will react with approximately 2.0156 g of hydrogen to make approximately 18.0152 g of water" (and the numbers would depend on the isotopic composition of the reagents). In terms of volume, the numbers would depend on the pressure and temperature of the reagents and products. For the same reasons, the concentrations of reagents and products in solution are often specified in moles per liter, rather than grams per liter.
The amount of substance is also a convenient concept in thermodynamics. For example, the pressure of a certain quantity of a noble gas in a recipient of a given volume, at a given temperature, is directly related to the number of molecules in the gas (through the ideal gas law), not to its mass.
This technical sense of the term "amount of substance" should not be confused with the general sense of "amount" in the English language. The latter may refer to other measurements such as mass or volume,[5] rather than the number of particles. There are proposals to replace "amount of substance" with more easily-distinguishable terms, such as enplethy[6] and stoichiometric amount.[5]
The IUPAC recommends that "amount of substance" should be used instead of "number of moles", just as the quantity mass should not be called "number of kilograms".[7]
Nature of the particles
To avoid ambiguity, the nature of the particles should be specified in any measurement of the amount of substance: thus, 1 mol of molecules of oxygen (O
2) is about 32 grams, whereas 1 mol of atoms of oxygen (O) is about 16 grams.[8][9]
When not specified, the amount of a substance with discrete covalently bonded molecules of definite size, like water or ethylene (C
2H
4), usually means the number of such molecules. For metallic elements, and some non-metallic elements like carbon and silicon which have molecules of indefinite size, it usually refers to atoms instead. For element allotropes with discrete molecules – like iodine, I
2, chlorine, Cl
2, white phosphorus P
4, and octasulfur S
8 – the term is ambiguous, and should be clarified.
For salts (ionic solids) and for polymers of indeterminate molecular size, the term usually refers to the number of instances of the conventional chemical formula of the substance. Thus, for example, 1 mol of calcium chloride (CaCl
2) is understood to contain one mole of calcium cations Ca2+
and two moles of chloride anions Cl−
, even though the ions are not bound into separate three-atom molecules. Likewise, 1 mol of solid silicon dioxide (SiO
2)n, which has a three-dimensional covalent lattice structure, is understood to contain one mole of silicon atoms and two moles of oxygen atoms.
For substances that normally exist in partially dissociated or polymerized form, the amount of substance usually refers to its nominal formula, without taking those changes into account. For example, "a solution of 1 mol of formaldehyde (CH
2O) in water" is generally understood to contain one mole of carbon atoms, even though some of the formaldehyde may be in the form of methanediol CH
4O
2 or oligomers like paraformaldehyde H(CH
2O)
nOH and metaformaldehyde C
3H
6O
3. Note that, because of the latter, the number of carbon-containing molecules in the solution may be substantially less than one mole.
Derived quantities
Molar quantities (per mole)
The quotient of some extensive physical quantity of a homogeneous sample by its amount of substance is an intensive property of the substance, usually named by the prefix molar.[10]
For example, the ratio of the mass of a sample by its amount of substance is the molar mass, whose SI unit is kilograms (or, more usually, grams) per mole; which is about 18.015 g/mol for water, and 55.845 g/mol for iron. From the volume, one gets the molar volume, which is about 17.962 milliliter/mol for liquid water and 7.092 mL/mol for iron at room temperature. From the heat capacity, one gets the molar heat capacity, which is about 75.385 J/K/mol for water and about 25.10 J/K/mol for iron.
Amount concentration (moles per liter)
Another important derived quantity is the amount of substance concentration[11] (also called amount concentration, or substance concentration in clinical chemistry;[12] which is defined as the amount of a specific substance in a sample of a solution (or some other mixture), divided by the volume of the sample.
The SI unit of this quantity is the mole (of the substance) per liter (of the solution). Thus, for example, the amount concentration of sodium chloride in ocean water is typically about 0.599 mol/L.
The denominator is the volume of the solution, not of the solvent. Thus, for example, one liter of standard vodka contains about 0.40 L of ethanol (315 g, 6.85 mol) and 0.60 L of water. The amount concentration of ethanol is therefore (6.85 mol of ethanol)/(1 L of vodka) = 6.85 mol/L, not (6.85 mol of ethanol)/(0.60 L of water), which would be 11.4 mol/L.
In chemistry, it is customary to read the unit "mol/L" as molar, and denote it by the symbol "M" (both following the numeric value). Thus, for example, each liter of a "0.5 molar" or "0.5 M" solution of urea (CH
4N
2O) in water contains 0.5 moles of that molecule. By extension, the amount concentration is also commonly called the molarity of the substance of interest in the solution. However, as of May 2007, these terms and symbols are not condoned by IUPAC.[13]
This quantity should not be confused with the mass concentration, which is the mass of the substance of interest divided by the volume of the solution (about 35 g/L for sodium chloride in ocean water).
Amount fraction (moles per mole)
Confusingly, the amount concentration, or "molarity", should also be distinguished from "molar concentration", which should be the number of moles (molecules) of the substance of interest divided by the total number of moles (molecules) in the solution sample. This quantity is more properly called the amount fraction.
History
The alchemists, and especially the early metallurgists, probably had some notion of amount of substance, but there are no surviving records of any generalization of the idea beyond a set of recipes. In 1758, Mikhail Lomonosov questioned the idea that mass was the only measure of the quantity of matter,[14] but he did so only in relation to his theories on gravitation. The development of the concept of amount of substance was coincidental with, and vital to, the birth of modern chemistry.
- 1777: Wenzel publishes Lessons on Affinity, in which he demonstrates that the proportions of the "base component" and the "acid component" (cation and anion in modern terminology) remain the same during reactions between two neutral salts.[15]
- 1789: Lavoisier publishes Treatise of Elementary Chemistry, introducing the concept of a chemical element and clarifying the Law of conservation of mass for chemical reactions.[16]
- 1792: Richter publishes the first volume of Stoichiometry or the Art of Measuring the Chemical Elements (publication of subsequent volumes continues until 1802). The term "stoichiometry" is used for the first time. The first tables of equivalent weights are published for acid–base reactions. Richter also notes that, for a given acid, the equivalent mass of the acid is proportional to the mass of oxygen in the base.[15]
- 1794: Proust's Law of definite proportions generalizes the concept of equivalent weights to all types of chemical reaction, not simply acid–base reactions.[15]
- 1805: Dalton publishes his first paper on modern atomic theory, including a "Table of the relative weights of the ultimate particles of gaseous and other bodies".[17]
- The concept of atoms raised the question of their weight. While many were skeptical about the reality of atoms, chemists quickly found atomic weights to be an invaluable tool in expressing stoichiometric relationships.
- 1808: Publication of Dalton's A New System of Chemical Philosophy, containing the first table of atomic weights (based on H = 1).[18]
- 1809: Gay-Lussac's Law of combining volumes, stating an integer relationship between the volumes of reactants and products in the chemical reactions of gases.[19]
- 1811: Avogadro hypothesizes that equal volumes of different gases (at same temperature and pressure) contain equal numbers of particles, now known as Avogadro's law.[20]
- 1813/1814: Berzelius publishes the first of several tables of atomic weights based on the scale of O = 100.[15][21][22]
- 1815: Prout publishes his hypothesis that all atomic weights are integer multiple of the atomic weight of hydrogen.[23] The hypothesis is later abandoned given the observed atomic weight of chlorine (approx. 35.5 relative to hydrogen).
- 1819: Dulong–Petit law relating the atomic weight of a solid element to its specific heat capacity.[24]
- 1819: Mitscherlich's work on crystal isomorphism allows many chemical formulae to be clarified, resolving several ambiguities in the calculation of atomic weights.[15]
- 1834: Clapeyron states the ideal gas law.[25]
- The ideal gas law was the first to be discovered of many relationships between the number of atoms or molecules in a system and other physical properties of the system, apart from its mass. However, this was not sufficient to convince all scientists of the existence of atoms and molecules, many considered it simply being a useful tool for calculation.
- 1834: Faraday states his Laws of electrolysis, in particular that "the chemical decomposing action of a current is constant for a constant quantity of electricity".[26]
- 1856: Krönig derives the ideal gas law from kinetic theory.[27] Clausius publishes an independent derivation the following year.[28]
- 1860: The Karlsruhe Congress debates the relation between "physical molecules", "chemical molecules" and atoms, without reaching consensus.[29]
- 1865: Loschmidt makes the first estimate of the size of gas molecules and hence of number of molecules in a given volume of gas, now known as the Loschmidt constant.[30]
- 1886: van't Hoff demonstrates the similarities in behaviour between dilute solutions and ideal gases.
- 1886: Eugen Goldstein observes discrete particle rays in gas discharges, laying the foundation of mass spectrometry, a tool subsequently used to establish the masses of atoms and molecules.
- 1887: Arrhenius describes the dissociation of electrolyte in solution, resolving one of the problems in the study of colligative properties.[31]
- 1893: First recorded use of the term mole to describe a unit of amount of substance by Ostwald in a university textbook.[32]
- 1897: First recorded use of the term mole in English.[33]
- By the turn of the twentieth century, the concept of atomic and molecular entities was generally accepted, but many questions remained, not least the size of atoms and their number in a given sample. The concurrent development of mass spectrometry, starting in 1886, supported the concept of atomic and molecular mass and provided a tool of direct relative measurement.
- 1905: Einstein's paper on Brownian motion dispels any last doubts on the physical reality of atoms, and opens the way for an accurate determination of their mass.[34]
- 1909: Perrin coins the name Avogadro constant and estimates its value.[35]
- 1913: Discovery of isotopes of non-radioactive elements by Soddy[36] and Thomson.[37]
- 1914: Richards receives the Nobel Prize in Chemistry for "his determinations of the atomic weight of a large number of elements".[38]
- 1920: Aston proposes the whole number rule, an updated version of Prout's hypothesis.[39]
- 1921: Soddy receives the Nobel Prize in Chemistry "for his work on the chemistry of radioactive substances and investigations into isotopes".[40]
- 1922: Aston receives the Nobel Prize in Chemistry "for his discovery of isotopes in a large number of non-radioactive elements, and for his whole-number rule".[41]
- 1926: Perrin receives the Nobel Prize in Physics, in part for his work in measuring the Avogadro constant.[42]
- 1959/1960: Unified atomic mass unit scale based on 12C = 12 adopted by IUPAP and IUPAC.[43]
- 1968: The mole is recommended for inclusion in the International System of Units (SI) by the International Committee for Weights and Measures (CIPM).[44]
- 1972: The mole is approved as the SI base unit of amount of substance.[44]
- 2019: The mole is redefined in the SI as "the amount of substance of a system that contains 6.02214076×1023 specified elementary entities".[45]
See also
Notes
References
- ^ Baranski, A. (2012) "The Atomic Mass Unit, the Avogadro Constant, and the Mole: A way to Understanding" J. Chem. Educ. 89: 97–102. doi:10.1021/ed2001957
- ^ Giunta, C. J. (2015) "The Mole and Amount of Substance in Chemistry and Education: Beyond Official Definitions" J. Chem. Educ. 92: 1593–97. doi:10.1021/ed2001957
- ^ a b Schmidt-Rohr, K. (2020). "Analysis of Two Definitions of the Mole That Are in Simultaneous Use, and Their Surprising Consequences” J. Chem. Educ. 97: 597–602. doi:10.1021/acs.jchemed.9b00467
- ^ Brown, L.; Holme, T. (2011) Chemistry for Engineering Students, Brooks/Cole.
- ^ a b Giunta, Carmen J. (2016). "What's in a Name? Amount of Substance, Chemical Amount, and Stoichiometric Amount". Journal of Chemical Education. 93 (4): 583–86. Bibcode:2016JChEd..93..583G. doi:10.1021/acs.jchemed.5b00690.
- ^ "E.R. Cohen, T. Cvitas, J.G. Frey, B. Holmström, K. Kuchitsu, R. Marquardt, I. Mills, F. Pavese, M. Quack, J. Stohner, H.L. Strauss, M. Takami, and A.J. Thor, "Quantities, Units and Symbols in Physical Chemistry", IUPAC Green Book, 3rd Edition, 2nd Printing, IUPAC & RSC Publishing, Cambridge (2008)" (PDF). p. 4. Archived from the original (PDF) on 2016-12-20. Retrieved 2019-05-24.
- ^ International Union of Pure and Applied Chemistry (1993). Quantities, Units and Symbols in Physical Chemistry, 2nd edition, Oxford: Blackwell Science. ISBN 0-632-03583-8. p. 4. Electronic version.
- ^ IUPAC, Compendium of Chemical Terminology, 2nd ed. (the "Gold Book") (1997). Online corrected version: (2006–) "amount of substance, n". doi:10.1351/goldbook.A00297
- ^ International Union of Pure and Applied Chemistry (1993). Quantities, Units and Symbols in Physical Chemistry, 2nd edition, Oxford: Blackwell Science. ISBN 0-632-03583-8. p. 46. Electronic version.
- ^ International Union of Pure and Applied Chemistry (1993). Quantities, Units and Symbols in Physical Chemistry, 2nd edition, Oxford: Blackwell Science. ISBN 0-632-03583-8. p. 7. Electronic version.
- ^ IUPAC, Compendium of Chemical Terminology, 2nd ed. (the "Gold Book") (1997). Online corrected version: (2006–) "amount-of-substance concentration". doi:10.1351/goldbook.A00298
- ^ International Union of Pure and Applied Chemistry (1996). "Glossary of Terms in Quantities and Units in Clinical Chemistry" (PDF). Pure Appl. Chem. 68: 957–1000. doi:10.1351/pac199668040957.
- ^ International Union of Pure and Applied Chemistry (1993). Quantities, Units and Symbols in Physical Chemistry, 2nd edition, Oxford: Blackwell Science. ISBN 0-632-03583-8. p. 42 (n. 15). Electronic version.
- ^ Lomonosov, Mikhail (1970). "On the Relation of the Amount of Material and Weight". In Leicester, Henry M. (ed.). Mikhail Vasil'evich Lomonosov on the Corpuscular Theory. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. pp. 224–33 – via Internet Archive.
- ^ a b c d e "Atome". Grand dictionnaire universel du XIXe siècle. 1. Paris: Pierre Larousse: 868–73. 1866.. (in French)
- ^ Lavoisier, Antoine (1789). Traité élémentaire de chimie, présenté dans un ordre nouveau et d'après les découvertes modernes. Paris: Chez Cuchet.. (in French)
- ^ Dalton, John (1805). "On the Absorption of Gases by Water and Other Liquids". Memoirs of the Literary and Philosophical Society of Manchester, 2nd Series. 1: 271–87.
- ^ Dalton, John (1808). A New System of Chemical Philosophy. Manchester: London.
- ^ Gay-Lussac, Joseph Louis (1809). "Memoire sur la combinaison des substances gazeuses, les unes avec les autres". Mémoires de la Société d'Arcueil. 2: 207. English translation.
- ^ Avogadro, Amedeo (1811). "Essai d'une maniere de determiner les masses relatives des molecules elementaires des corps, et les proportions selon lesquelles elles entrent dans ces combinaisons". Journal de Physique. 73: 58–76. English translation.
- ^ Excerpts from Berzelius' essay: Part II; Part III.
- ^ Berzelius' first atomic weight measurements were published in Swedish in 1810: Hisinger, W.; Berzelius, J.J. (1810). "Forsok rorande de bestamda proportioner, havari den oorganiska naturens bestandsdelar finnas forenada". Afh. Fys., Kemi Mineral. 3: 162.
- ^ Prout, William (1815). "On the relation between the specific gravities of bodies in their gaseous state and the weights of their atoms". Annals of Philosophy. 6: 321–30.
- ^ Petit, Alexis Thérèse; Dulong, Pierre-Louis (1819). "Recherches sur quelques points importants de la Théorie de la Chaleur". Annales de Chimie et de Physique. 10: 395–413. English translation
- ^ Clapeyron, Émile (1834). "Puissance motrice de la chaleur". Journal de l'École Royale Polytechnique. 14 (23): 153–90.
- ^ Faraday, Michael (1834). "On Electrical Decomposition". Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society. 124: 77–122. doi:10.1098/rstl.1834.0008.
- ^ Krönig, August (1856). "Grundzüge einer Theorie der Gase". Annalen der Physik. 99 (10): 315–22. Bibcode:1856AnP...175..315K. doi:10.1002/andp.18561751008.
- ^ Clausius, Rudolf (1857). "Ueber die Art der Bewegung, welche wir Wärme nennen". Annalen der Physik. 176 (3): 353–79. Bibcode:1857AnP...176..353C. doi:10.1002/andp.18571760302.
- ^ Wurtz's Account of the Sessions of the International Congress of Chemists in Karlsruhe, on 3, 4, and 5 September 1860.
- ^ Loschmidt, J. (1865). "Zur Grösse der Luftmoleküle". Sitzungsberichte der Kaiserlichen Akademie der Wissenschaften Wien. 52 (2): 395–413. English translation Archived February 7, 2006, at the Wayback Machine.
- ^ Arrhenius, Svante (1887). Zeitschrift für Physikalische Chemie. 1: 631.
{{cite journal}}
: CS1 maint: untitled periodical (link) English translation Archived 2009-02-18 at the Wayback Machine. - ^ Ostwald, Wilhelm (1893). Hand- und Hilfsbuch zur ausführung physiko-chemischer Messungen. Leipzig: W. Engelmann.
- ^ Helm, Georg (1897). The Principles of Mathematical Chemistry: The Energetics of Chemical Phenomena. (Transl. Livingston, J.; Morgan, R.). New York: Wiley. pp. 6.
- ^ Einstein, Albert (1905). "Über die von der molekularkinetischen Theorie der Wärme geforderte Bewegung von in ruhenden Flüssigkeiten suspendierten Teilchen". Annalen der Physik. 17 (8): 549–60. Bibcode:1905AnP...322..549E. doi:10.1002/andp.19053220806.
- ^ Perrin, Jean (1909). "Mouvement brownien et réalité moléculaire". Annales de Chimie et de Physique. 8e Série. 18: 1–114. Extract in English, translation by Frederick Soddy.
- ^ Soddy, Frederick (1913). "The Radio-elements and the Periodic Law". Chemical News. 107: 97–99.
- ^ Thomson, J.J. (1913). "Rays of positive electricity". Proceedings of the Royal Society A. 89 (607): 1–20. Bibcode:1913RSPSA..89....1T. doi:10.1098/rspa.1913.0057.
- ^ Söderbaum, H.G. (November 11, 1915). Statement regarding the 1914 Nobel Prize in Chemistry.
- ^ Aston, Francis W. (1920). "The constitution of atmospheric neon". Philosophical Magazine. 39 (6): 449–55. doi:10.1080/14786440408636058.
- ^ Söderbaum, H.G. (December 10, 1921). Presentation Speech for the 1921 Nobel Prize in Chemistry.
- ^ Söderbaum, H.G. (December 10, 1922). Presentation Speech for the 1922 Nobel Prize in Chemistry.
- ^ Oseen, C.W. (December 10, 1926). Presentation Speech for the 1926 Nobel Prize in Physics.
- ^ Holden, Norman E. (2004). "Atomic Weights and the International Committee – A Historical Review". Chemistry International. 26 (1): 4–7.
- ^ a b International Bureau of Weights and Measures (2006), The International System of Units (SI) (PDF) (8th ed.), pp. 114–15, ISBN 92-822-2213-6, archived (PDF) from the original on 2021-06-04, retrieved 2021-12-16
- ^ Bureau International des Poids et Mesures (2019): The International System of Units (SI), 9th edition, English version, p. 134. Available at the BIPM website.