Jump to content

Proto-Romance language

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Nicodene (talk | contribs) at 19:03, 12 August 2020 (→Present indicative). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Proto-Romance is the comparatively reconstructed ancestor of all Romance languages. It reflects a late variety of Latin, one of the Italic languages in the broader Indo-European family.

Exceptionally in comparative linguistics, specialists in Proto-Romance can refer to an abundant corpus of texts written in a rough equivalent of their proto-language, namely Latin. This has however had the drawback of leading many to rely excessively on the written record in lieu of reconstructing Proto-Romance proper.[1]

Proto-Romance is an abstraction and should not be taken as equivalent to Latin as it was actually spoken in any particular time or place.[2] The version reconstructed in the Dictionnaire Étymologique Roman appears to most closely reflect the spoken Latin of the sixth century AD.[3]

Phonology

Monophthongs

Front Central Back
Close i u
Near-close ɪ ʊ
Close-mid e o
Open-mid ɛ ɔ
Open a
  • The open-mid vowels /ɛ, ɔ/ merge with /e, o/ in all unstressed contexts.[4][5]
  • A further reduction is observed in intertonic syllables where /i, u/ merge with /ɪ, ʊ/.[6]
  • Vowels are lengthened allophonically in stressed open syllables,[7] although perhaps not /ɪ/ or /ʊ/.[8]
  • /i, u/ become [j, w] between a consonant and following vowel. [j] then triggers palatalization, e.g. /basiáre/ [basʲáːɾe].[9]

Diphthong

Only one diphthong can be reconstructed for Proto-Romance, namely /au̯/. It can be found in both stressed and unstressed positions.[10] Its phonemic status is however debatable, as it could also be simply regarded as a sequence of /a/ and /u/.[11]

Consonants

Labial Coronal Velar Palatal
Nasal m n
Occlusive p b t d k g j
Fricative f β s
Labialized kʷ
Vibrant r
Lateral l
  • When palatalized /t, k, n, l/ become [tsʲ, c, ɲ, ʎ].[12][13]
  • Intervocalic [c, ɲ, ʎ] regularly geminate.[12] [tsʲ] does so only sporadically.[14]
  • Words beginning with /sC/ undergo prosthesis, e.g. /stáre/ [ɪstáːɾe], unless preceded by a vowel.[15][16]
  • It is debated whether /kʷ/ is its own phoneme or merely an allophone of /ku/ before vowels.[17]
  • There is some evidence that /f/ could have been bilabial, but a labiodental is more likely.[18]
  • /b, d, g/ represent the fricatives [β, ð, ɣ] between vowels or in contact with /r/ and /l/.[19]
  • Intervocalic /di, gi/ do not occur, these having previously reduced to /j/.[20][21]
  • /j/ represents [ɟ] in word-initial position, [ɟɟ~ʝ] intervocalically.[22][23]
  • The rhotic may have been [ɾ~r], as in Spanish or Catalan.[24]
  • /ll/ had a retroflex realization: [ɭɭ].[25][26]
  • /gn/ fricativizes to [ɣn].[27][28]

Morphology

Nouns

Proto-Romance nouns had three cases: nominative, accusative, and a combined genitive-dative which was only used in reference to humans.[29]

Class I II III m. III f.
Number singular plural singular plural singular plural singular plural
Nominative fémɪna fémɪne[α] fíʎʎʊs fíʎʎi pátrɪs~pátre pátri mátre mátres
Accusative fémɪnas fíʎʎu fíʎʎos pátre pátres
Gen-Dat. fémɪne femɪnóru fíʎʎo fiʎʎóru pátri patróru mátri matróru
Translation woman son father mother

Several Class III nouns had inflections that differed by syllable count or stress position.[31]

Nominative ɔ́mo pástor sɔ́ror
Accusative ɔ́mɪne pastóre soróre
Translation man pastor sister

A few Class II nouns were pluralized with -a or -ora, these originally having been neuter in Classical Latin. Though their singular was masculine, the plural was treated as feminine.[32]

Type I II
Number singular plural singular plural singular plural singular plural
Noun[β] ɔ́βu ɔ́βa braccu bracca tɛ́mpʊs tɛ́mpora pɛ́ktʊs pɛ́ktora
Translation egg arm time chest

The plural was often reanalyzed as a feminine singular, resulting in gender shifts.[33]

Number singular plural singular plural
Original noun fɔ́ʎʎu fɔ́ʎʎa lɪ́ɣnu lɪ́ɣna
Fem. variant fɔ́ʎʎa fɔ́ʎʎas lɪ́ɣna lɪ́ɣnas
Translation leaf firewood

Such a trend had already begun in Classical Latin; for example the feminine noun opera was formed from the plural of neuter opus.

Adjectives

Absolute

These inflect the same way as nouns.[34]

Comparative

While the original Latin ending -(i)or still existed, it was only used in a limited number of adjectives.[35][36]

Adjective mɛ́ʎʎor pɛ́jor májor mɪ́nor
Translation better worse larger smaller

Otherwise, the typical way to form a comparative was to add either plús or máis (meaning 'more') to an absolute adjective. This had been done in Classical Latin as well, albeit sporadically.[37]

Superlative

No dedicated ending existed to express the superlative. A variety of alternatives were used instead, such as an intensifying adverb (mʊ́ltu, bɛ́ne, etc.) or a simple comparative.[38]

Possessive

Shown here in the feminine singular.[39]

First person Second person Third person
singular mɛ́a tʊ́a sʊ́a
plural nɔ́stra βɔ́stra -

Pronouns

Personal

These are the equivalents of "you, me" etc.[40][41]

Person I II III f. III m.
Number singular plural singular plural singular plural singular plural
Nominative ɛ́ɣo nós tú βós ɪ́ɭɭa ɪ́ɭɭe[γ] ɪ́lle~ɪ́ɭɭi
Accusative mé, méne té, téne ɪ́ɭɭas ɪ́ɭɭu ɪ́ɭɭos
Gen-Dat. mí, mɪ́βɪ nóβɪs tí, tɪ́βɪ βóβɪs ɪɭɭɛ́i~ɪɭɭi* ɪɭɭóru~ɪɭɭis* ɪɭɭúi~ɪɭɭi* ɪɭɭóru~ɪɭɭis*

Asterisks indicate unstressed variants.

Interrogative

These are the equivalents of 'who' and 'what'.[43]

Animacy Animate Inanimate
Number singular plural singular plural
Nominative kuí kuɪ́d kuɛ́
Accusative kuɛ́ne kuɛ́
Gen-Dat. kúi kúi

Verbs

Proto Romance verbs belong to three main classes, each of which is characterized by a different thematic vowel. Their conjugations are built on three stems and involve various combinations of mood, aspect, and tense.[44] For the sake of brevity, only one chart will be shown below.

Present indicative

On occasion this could also refer to the future.[45]

First person Second person Third person Translation
Number singular plural singular plural singular plural
Class I kánto kantámʊs kántas kantátɪs kántat kántant sing
Class II dɔ́rmo dormímʊs dɔ́rmɪs dɔrmítɪs dɔ́rmɪt dɔ́rment
~dɔ́rmʊnt 		sleep
Class III bátto battémʊs báttes battétɪs báttet báttent beat
Irregular sʊ́n sʊ́mʊs~sémʊs ɛ́s ɛ́stɪs~sɛ́tɪs~sʊ́tɪs ɛ́st sʊ́nt am/are/is
ájo aβémʊs ás aβétɪs át ánt~áunt have/has

Participles

Of these there were only two: a present active and a preterite passive. They declined like adjectives.[46]

Present Active Translation Preterite Passive Translation
Class I amánte (is) adoring amáta (was) adored
Class II finɛ́nte (is) finishing finíta (was) finished
Class III aβɛ́nte (is) possessing aβúta (was) possessed

Relation to written Latin

At first there was no distinction between Latin and Romance, the former being the archaic written form of the latter. For instance in early medieval Spain the word [sjeglo] 'century' was routinely spelled ⟨saeculum⟩. The writer would not actually read it aloud as /sɛkulum/ any more than an English speaker today would pronounce ⟨knight⟩ as */knɪxt/.[47]

The spoken version of Ecclesiastical Latin was created later during the Carolingian Renaissance by the British scholar Alcuin, who ordered the French clergy to read aloud Latin precisely as it was spelled. This represented a radical break from the traditional system; for instance the word ⟨viridiarium⟩, which had until then been pronounced */verdʒjær/ ('orchard' in Old French), now had to be read aloud as /viridiarium/.[48] Officials soon found it necessary to instruct priests to read Latin sermons in the old way so that they might be understood by the general public.[49]

Since this left French without a dedicated orthography, various attempts were soon made to devise one, as can be seen in the Oaths of Strasbourg and Sequence of Saint Eulalia. As the Carolingian reforms brought Church Latin to other lands where Romance was spoken, local scholars devised spelling systems for their own dialects as well.[50]

Notes

  1. ^ This ending was steadily being replaced in Proto-Romance by -as.[30]
  2. ^ Forms given in the accusative.
  3. ^ This ending was steadily being replaced in Proto-Romance by -as.[42]

References

  1. ^ Dworkin (2016), p. 2
  2. ^ Hall (1976), pp. 10-11
  3. ^ Kramer (2014), p. 295
  4. ^ Gouvert (2014), pp. 73–6
  5. ^ Ferguson (1976), p. 78
  6. ^ Gouvert (2014), pp. 78–81
  7. ^ Loporcaro (2015), pp. 25–30
  8. ^ Gouvert (2014), p. 69
  9. ^ Gouvert (2014), p. 83
  10. ^ Ferguson (1976), p. 84
  11. ^ Gouvert, p. 81
  12. ^ a b Gouvert (2014), pp. 92–115
  13. ^ Zampaulo (2019), pp. 50, 78, 94
  14. ^ Wilkin (1926), pp. 11–14
  15. ^ Gouvert (2014), pp. 125–6
  16. ^ Hall (1976), p. 128
  17. ^ Gouvert (2014), p. 100
  18. ^ Gouvert (2016), p. 38
  19. ^ Gouvert (2016), p. 48
  20. ^ Zampaulo (2019), p. 87
  21. ^ Gouvert (2016), p. 43
  22. ^ Gouvert (2014), p. 83, 91
  23. ^ Penny (2002), p. 62, 64
  24. ^ Gouvert (2014), p. 113
  25. ^ Gouvert (2014), p. 115
  26. ^ Zampaulo (2019), pp. 71-77
  27. ^ Gouvert (2014), p. 95
  28. ^ Zampaulo (2019), p. 80
  29. ^ De Dardel & Gaenge (1992), p. 104
  30. ^ De Dardel & Wüest (1993), p. 57
  31. ^ Hall (1983), p. 28
  32. ^ Hall (1983), pp. 23–4, 29–30.
  33. ^ Akire & Rosen (2010), pp. 193–4
  34. ^ Hall (1983), pp. 31-33
  35. ^ Hall (1983), pp. 32, 119-20
  36. ^ Maltby (2016), p. 340
  37. ^ Maltby (2016), pp. 340–5.
  38. ^ Bauer (2016), pp. 340, 359
  39. ^ Hall (1983), p. 122
  40. ^ De Dardel & Wüest (1993), pp. 39-43
  41. ^ Hall (1983), p. 39
  42. ^ De Dardel & Wüest (1993), p. 57
  43. ^ Hall (1983), pp. 42–43
  44. ^ Hall (1983), pp. 47–50
  45. ^ Hall (1983), pp. 52–7
  46. ^ Hall (1983), pp. 122–3
  47. ^ Wright (1982), pp. 44–50
  48. ^ Wright (1982), pp. 104–7
  49. ^ Wright (1982), pp. 118-20
  50. ^ Wright (1982), pp. 122–32, 143–4

Bibliography

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Proto-Romance_language&oldid=972565905"