Bagaceratops: Revision history

22 August 2024

• curprev 22:1622:16, 22 August 2024 Citation bot talk contribs 33,480 bytes +256 Add: isbn, bibcode. | Use this bot. Report bugs. | Suggested by Abductive | Category:Ornithischian genera | #UCB_Category 328/448 undo

20 July 2024

• curprev 12:2312:23, 20 July 2024 Sittaco talk contribs 33,224 bytes +29 →Additional specimens undo
• curprev 12:2012:20, 20 July 2024 Sittaco talk contribs 33,195 bytes +67 →Additional specimens: clarification undo

2 March 2024

• curprev 20:4720:47, 2 March 2024 Arjayay talk contribs m 33,128 bytes −1 Sp undo

18 August 2023

• curprev 22:5222:52, 18 August 2023 OAbot talk contribs m 33,129 bytes −8 Open access bot: doi updated in citation with #oabot. undo

27 July 2023

• curprev 17:1217:12, 27 July 2023 Trilletrollet talk contribs 33,137 bytes +1 removed Category:Coronosaurs; added Category:Ceratopsians using HotCat undo

11 February 2023

• curprev 00:0200:02, 11 February 2023 Citation bot talk contribs 33,136 bytes −27 Alter: pages, issue. Add: s2cid. Removed proxy/dead URL that duplicated identifier. Formatted dashes. | Use this bot. Report bugs. | Suggested by Corvus florensis | #UCB_webform 1454/3499 undo

31 January 2023

• curprev 07:3807:38, 31 January 2023 Perfect4th talk contribs m 33,163 bytes 0 fixing typos undo

26 August 2022

• curprev 16:2116:21, 26 August 2022 GünniX talk contribs m 33,163 bytes −9 template closed undo Tag: AWB

25 August 2022

• curprev 01:4201:42, 25 August 2022 2001:4453:5f7:6400:dc7e:c9f0:ea1e:892 talk 33,172 bytes +62 To clarify why it has a large, Protoceratops-like skull instead of the more familiar rounded one. undo

22 August 2022

• curprev 02:0602:06, 22 August 2022 PaleoNeolitic talk contribs 33,110 bytes +4,793 More to come, eventually undo

20 August 2022

• curprev 19:0019:00, 20 August 2022 HeyElliott talk contribs 28,317 bytes +104 Added links, unit conversions. Fixed grammer, typos. undo Tag: Visual edit

19 August 2022

• curprev 04:1404:14, 19 August 2022 Junsik1223 talk contribs 28,213 bytes −314 →Description undo
• curprev 04:0804:08, 19 August 2022 Junsik1223 talk contribs 28,527 bytes +25 →Description undo
• curprev 04:0704:07, 19 August 2022 Junsik1223 talk contribs 28,502 bytes −22 →Description undo
• curprev 04:0604:06, 19 August 2022 Junsik1223 talk contribs 28,524 bytes −1,493 →Description undo

18 August 2022

• curprev 23:5223:52, 18 August 2022 Junsik1223 talk contribs 30,017 bytes +10 →Description undo
• curprev 22:5422:54, 18 August 2022 Junsik1223 talk contribs 30,007 bytes +437 No edit summary undo Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit
• curprev 22:5222:52, 18 August 2022 Junsik1223 talk contribs 29,570 bytes +401 No edit summary undo Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit
• curprev 22:1022:10, 18 August 2022 Junsik1223 talk contribs 29,169 bytes +6 →Description undo
• curprev 22:1022:10, 18 August 2022 Junsik1223 talk contribs 29,163 bytes +237 →Description undo
• curprev 22:0822:08, 18 August 2022 Junsik1223 talk contribs 28,926 bytes +117 →Description: Also some of the referred cf specimen is considered to be an actual indeterminate specimen without a cf sign. And if Tereschenko's assignment is faulty, doesn't that render your 2008 source unreliable? undo
• curprev 21:5421:54, 18 August 2022 Junsik1223 talk contribs 28,809 bytes +481 Undid revision 1105164397 by PaleoNeolitic (talk) Then explain this in the text, don't just erase it. This is what other users (i.e. Lythronaxargestes & FunkMonk) say so. undo Tag: Undo
• curprev 21:4221:42, 18 August 2022 PaleoNeolitic talk contribs 28,328 bytes −481 cf. taxa are hardly reliable and doubtfully useful in this matter. Tereshchenko assignment of specimens is questionable, even by other authors. undo Tags: Manual revert Reverted
• curprev 21:0321:03, 18 August 2022 Junsik1223 talk contribs 28,809 bytes +15 →Description undo Tag: Reverted
• curprev 21:0121:01, 18 August 2022 Junsik1223 talk contribs 28,794 bytes +466 →Description: I found where the 2.5 m estimate by Tereshchenko came from. This is indeed based on speicmens. undo Tag: Reverted
• curprev 20:2920:29, 18 August 2022 Junsik1223 talk contribs 28,328 bytes +1 →Description: This still should be written in 1.37~1.87 m range (because we can’t exclude the mature individual which has this length). undo Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit
• curprev 17:3017:30, 18 August 2022 Bruce1ee talk contribs m 28,327 bytes −1 fixed lint errors – file options undo
• curprev 17:2317:23, 18 August 2022 PaleoNeolitic talk contribs 28,328 bytes +64 Again, it is misleading to include that estimate. If there are more accurate estimates it can be ignored. undo
• curprev 05:0805:08, 18 August 2022 Junsik1223 talk contribs 28,264 bytes −10 →Description undo
• curprev 05:0705:07, 18 August 2022 Junsik1223 talk contribs 28,274 bytes +279 We at least need to mention it, since both sources specifically say 2.5 m. Also, while you specifically refer to the table of the 2008 study (which I presume to be Table 1), the mature adult lengths range from 1.37 to 1.87 m approximately. undo
• curprev 04:4004:40, 18 August 2022 PaleoNeolitic talk contribs 27,995 bytes −4 Undid revision 1105025270 by Junsik1223 (talk) This is starting to get disruptively repetitive. While both Paul and Tereschhenko converge in the largest estimates, we have other estimates on the table. Since there aren't specimens reaching such sizes, lower published estimates should be used. Why continue to use a maximum estimate when there are better approaches? undo Tag: Undo
• curprev 03:5403:54, 18 August 2022 Junsik1223 talk contribs 27,999 bytes +4 →Description: While I do understand your point (since I had a similar issue with Giganotosaurus weight), this size range is from the 2008 source you brought up which concurs with Paul’s estimate. Unless you have a specific scholarly source which claims that this estimate is exaggerated or overestimated, this should be remained. undo Tags: Manual revert Reverted Mobile edit Mobile web edit
• curprev 03:0203:02, 18 August 2022 PaleoNeolitic talk contribs 27,995 bytes −4 To use such exaggerated estimate, you at least need a specimen around that size. undo Tag: Reverted

17 August 2022

• curprev 08:5008:50, 17 August 2022 Junsik1223 talk contribs 27,999 bytes +2 →Description: citing correction undo
• curprev 08:3008:30, 17 August 2022 Junsik1223 talk contribs 27,997 bytes −2 →Description: Ok it actually says 1-2.5 m in page 281 of the 2008 source you’ve cited (the point still stands though) undo Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit
• curprev 07:4707:47, 17 August 2022 Junsik1223 talk contribs 27,999 bytes +6 →Description: The 2008 study does show the length range between 1.2 and 2.5 m though undo Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit

13 August 2022

• curprev 05:2105:21, 13 August 2022 PaleoNeolitic talk contribs 27,993 bytes +16,093 No edit summary undo

12 August 2022

• curprev 16:3816:38, 12 August 2022 PaleoNeolitic talk contribs 11,900 bytes +97 This is also not true. undo
• curprev 16:2516:25, 12 August 2022 PaleoNeolitic talk contribs 11,803 bytes +426 Second, it is a fact that Bagaceratops was smaller than Protoceratops. Using Magnirostris as a model results in a ~1.7 m body length (see skeletal). undo
• curprev 15:3715:37, 12 August 2022 PaleoNeolitic talk contribs 11,377 bytes −25 First of all, this is not true. undo

11 August 2022

• curprev 06:2106:21, 11 August 2022 Junsik1223 talk contribs 11,402 bytes +6 →Description undo

10 August 2022

• curprev 16:4216:42, 10 August 2022 Junsik1223 talk contribs 11,396 bytes +238 No edit summary undo
• curprev 14:3214:32, 10 August 2022 Junsik1223 talk contribs 11,158 bytes +204 →Description undo

5 April 2022

• curprev 14:3214:32, 5 April 2022 Meekororum talk contribs 10,954 bytes −50 dml is down undo Tag: Visual edit

2 March 2022

• curprev 08:1408:14, 2 March 2022 ZI Jony talk contribs m 11,004 bytes −4 v2.04b - Fix errors for CW project (Title linked in text) undo Tag: WPCleaner

1 March 2022

• curprev 16:2716:27, 1 March 2022 PaleoNeolitic talk contribs 11,008 bytes +3,348 Some re-wording and additional information is due undo

10 January 2022

• curprev 21:5221:52, 10 January 2022 Citation bot talk contribs 7,660 bytes +56 Alter: pages. Add: s2cid, issue, volume. Formatted dashes. | Use this bot. Report bugs. | Suggested by Abductive | Category:Ornithischian genera | #UCB_Category 214/425 undo
• curprev 01:2401:24, 10 January 2022 GoingBatty talk contribs m 7,604 bytes −9 →History of discovery: clean up undo Tag: AWB

9 January 2022

• curprev 10:3010:30, 9 January 2022 589q talk contribs 7,613 bytes +9 issue of the reference undo