Balance of Power (video game)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
Balance of Power
Balance of Power Coverart.png
Cover art
Developer(s) Chris Crawford
Publisher(s) Mindscape
Series Balance of Power
Engine Proprietary
Platform(s) Windows, Apple Macintosh, Amiga, Atari ST, Apple IIGS, MSX, Apple II
Release date(s) September 1985
Genre(s) Government simulation game
Mode(s) Single-player, Hotseat

Balance of Power is a computer strategy game of geopolitics during the Cold War, created by Chris Crawford and published in 1985 on the Apple Macintosh by Mindscape, followed by ports to a variety of platforms over the next two years.

In the game the player takes the role of the President of the United States or General Secretary of the Soviet Union. The goal is to improve the player's country's standing in the world relative to the other superpower. During each yearly turn, random events occur that may have effects on the player's international prestige. The player can chose to respond to these events in various ways, which may prompt a response from the other superpower. This creates brinkmanship situations between the two nations, potentially escalating to a nuclear war, which ends the game.

Crawford was already fairly well known for earlier games, especially Eastern Front (1941). His 1984 announcement that he was moving to the Macintosh platform to work on an entirely new idea in gaming generated considerable interest. It was widely and positively reviewed after its release, including an extremely positive review in The New York Times Magazine. It was widely praised for its inventive nonaction gameplay that was nevertheless exciting and a distinct alternative the the more common arcade games of the era. It has been named as one the most innovative computer games of all time.

Hugely successful on the Mac, the addition of an IBM PC port late in the year made it a best seller. Ultimately selling over a quarter million units although it only ran on relatively new platforms, it represented a not-insignificant fraction of all video game sales through 1985 and 86. It spawned a number of sequels and copycats, but none of these were as successful as the original.

Gameplay[edit]

Screenshot from the Atari ST version

The goal of the game is simple: the player may choose to be either the President of the United States or the General Secretary of the Communist Party of the Soviet Union, and must lead the chosen superpower for eight years, seeking to maximize "prestige" and avoiding a nuclear war. Each turn is one year long; at the beginning of each year, the player is presented with a set of incidents and crises in various countries around the globe, and must choose a response to each one. Responses may range from no action, to diplomatic notes to the other superpower, to military maneuvers. Each response is then met with a counter-response, which may vary from backing down to escalation. The player then gets a chance to initiate actions, and deal with the opponent's responses.

This core mechanic is similar to that of Bruce Ketchledge's 1983 game Geopolitique 1990, published by SSI. One difference from the earlier game is how negotiations are resolved. In both games, backing down in a negotiation results in a loss of prestige, which will reverberate politically. Likewise, in both games brinkmanship may result in a global war. In Geopolitique, such wars were actually fought in-game, after which the game continued. In Balance of Power, such a war ends the game instantly, with the following message: "You have ignited a nuclear war. And no, there is no animated display of a mushroom cloud with parts of bodies flying through the air. We do not reward failure."

Development[edit]

Crawford had made a name for himself during his years at Atari in the late 1970s and early 1980s. His smash hit Eastern Front made him one of the few game authors known by name, and helped ensure later releases were also successful to a degree. By early 1984, Atari was rapidly going bankrupt due to the effects of the North American video game crash of 1983. In March they laid off the majority of their staff, including Crawford. His ample severance was enough to allow him to write a new game as a freelancer. After considering a sequel to Eastern Front or a political game about the Inca empire, he eventually decided to write a cold war "game about peace".[1]

Considering the Atari platform a lost cause, Crawford began looking at the new 16-bit platforms that were just coming to market; he dismissed the IBM PC as too crude, the Amiga as likely to fail for business reasons, and chose the Macintosh as the platform to develop on. At the time this was non-trivial, as there were no development tools for the Mac, and programmers had to buy an Apple Lisa for this.[1]

During an April 1984 interview at the Origins Game Fair, Crawford stated that he was "working on a game for the Macintosh entitled ARMS RACE based on the philosophy that 'H-bombs don't kill people, geopolitics kills people.'"[2] By May the initial concept was fleshed out; the game would take place on top of a world map that could show various details,[3] events would be presented as newspaper stories following an algorithmic concept he developed after considering the headlines in National Enquirer,[4] and these events and their outcomes would be expressed in terms of "prestige points".

Crawford had difficulty in finding a publisher for Balance of Power, due in no small part to the lingering effects of the 1983 crash. Random House eventually agreed to publish it, but there was considerable ill will between Crawford and the editor assigned to him, who had no prior experience with video games. Random House ultimately cancelled the contract and demanded that Crawford return its $10,000 advance payment, almost causing him to lose his home.[5] His wife demanded he get a "real job".[6]

The work was saved by a friend at InfoWorld, who heard of his troubles and published a two-part column on the game. The article was seen by a producer at the newly formed Mindscape, who agreed to publish it. Betas were ready in February 1985, and were polished through the spring and summer. The game was released in September, and was an immediate sensation given that the world was then at the height of the Cold War. The fame was in no small part helped by a review in The New York Times Magazine written by David L. Aaron, Jimmy Carter's Deputy Assistant to the President for National Security Affairs, who called it "about as close as one might get to the cut-and-thrust of international politics without going though confirmation by the Senate."[7]

The game was an immediate hit on the initial Macintosh and Apple II platforms. A release for Microsoft Windows 1.0 in 1986 made it a multiplatform best seller. These were followed by versions on the Atari ST (1987) and Amiga, among others. In total, the game sold over $10 million during its heyday, during a time when total sales for all gaming hardware and software combined was about $500 million.[7]

In 1986, Crawford published a book also called Balance of Power, which goes into great depth on the game, including the background of the politics, the formulas used to calculate prestige and related parameters, and an account of its (lengthy) gestation.

Sequel[edit]

After Balance, Crawford began work on an entirely new game, Trust & Betrayal: The Legacy of Siboot, released in 1987 and selling only a few thousand copies. Mindscape was disappointed, and pressured Crawford to do a follow-up to Balance. This was released in 1989 as Balance of Power: The 1990 Edition (sometimes referred to as Balance of Power II) on the Apple IIGS, Windows, Macintosh, Amiga and Atari ST.

The video game industry considers it a sequel, but Crawford considers it not so much a sequel as a cleaned up version of the original.[8] It adds more countries, advisors to help the player, a new "multi-polar" level that allows countries to generate events of their own (such as declaring war on other countries), and a few miscellaneous features including a 2 player Hotseat mode. However, with the ending of the Cold War, interest declined.

In 1992 Crawford gave the "Dragon Speech" where he explained that he was going to leave the game industry to make something more interactive and artistic. After many false starts, this emerged initially as The Erasmatron, and later re-released under the name Storytron. Both systems were used to make highly complex interactive storylines, and as a demo, Crawford used Storytron to build a new game, Balance of Power: 21st Century. This version begins on 12 September 2001 and mostly involves the US's interactions with Asia and other emerging powers. It was not a success; Crawford himself describes it as "crap".[9]

The game has also been use as the basis for a number of play by mail versions, manually run and based on moves posted in internet forum systems. One long running example is hosted on eRegime.[10]

Reception[edit]

Computer Gaming World stated that Balance of Power "stands in a prestigious circle: that of the most innovative computer games of all time. If there were Academy Awards for computer games, BOP would get my votes for Best Picture and Best Director of 1985".[11] A 1992 survey in the magazine of wargames with modern settings gave the game four stars out of five.[12] Dragon recommended the game and called it a "superb game of global strategy that goes beyond other games, wherein thoughtful, calculated geopolitics could prevent a worldwide nuclear war!"[13] as well as "a truly entertaining and thought-provoking simulation of world geopolitics which involves the player in a quest to prevent a worldwide nuclear holocaust, while promoting either the U.S.A. or Russia to world prominence. This is a marvelous program that everyone should experience at least once."[14] BYTE praised the game in 1986, describing the Mac version as "the best game I had ever seen on any computer ... by all means, get the program".[15]

Compute! presented opposing views of the game in May 1988. The magazine included Balance of Power in its list of "Our Favorite Games", calling it "an impressive recreation of the world's geopolitical landscape ... call one too many bluffs and you'll see the chilling message You have ignited a nuclear war".[16] Orson Scott Card, however, wrote in his review of the game that Crawford—"the best designer of simulation games I've seen"—was "leaning over your shoulder and bullying you into playing the game his way. He has a sweet delusion that as long as the United States is very nice and doesn't do anything to offend them, the Russians will go home. And if you don't play that way, why, he'll stop the game with a nasty remark about how the world was just destroyed by nuclear war". He added that since no nuclear war had been fought Crawford could not know what would cause one, and "there are a lot of experts who claim that the Soviets seem to behave a lot nicer when we stand up to them than when we disarm", but that "[Crawford] is so sure he's right that Balance of Power isn't a game, it's propaganda".[17]

In 1989 Compute! stated that the 1990 edition's multipolar features were welcome additions to the game.[18] That year Card stated that the magazine's 1988 list caused him to reevaluate the game when playing the 1990 edition, stating that it had "the most detailed, carefully extrapolated future world I've worked with". While still criticizing geopolitical "absurdities" such as forcing the United States to passively accept Soviet troops in Syria (contrary to what happened during the Yom Kippur War) and advisors in Mexico or start nuclear war, Card now concluded that such outcomes probably reflected computer limitations rather than Crawford's political views. He advised players to pretend that Balance of Power was set on an alien planet "astonishingly similar" to Earth, and to play solely based on the game's assumptions about the world.[19] Chuck Moss disagreed with Card's revised view, describing Balance of Power in Computer Gaming World in 1992 as "reflect[ing] extreme bias on the part of [its] designers". He called it a "pacific treatise ... nuclear war erupted if the U.S. so much as sent five million dollars to Panama".[20] In 2014 historian Jimmy Maher wrote of the game's "We do not reward failure" nuclear-war ending, "speaking here as someone who is quite sympathetic to Crawford’s agenda[, it's] kind of disingenuous and unfair and, well, just kind of cheap", noting that the game requires brinkmanship to win but "Nuclear war, when it comes, can seem almost random, arising from a seemingly innocuous exchange after half a dozen computerized Cuban Missile Crises have passed harmlessly".[21]

Crawford stated in 1987 that he was most proud of his work on the game: "I feel [it] has made the world a better place ... I think it has made a small number of people much more realistic in their appraisal of world affairs".[5] In 1996 Computer Gaming World ranked it as the 78th best game of all time, calling it "a wonderful game of political intrigue that felt just like the Cold War and didn't require the detail of Shadow President or CyberJudas."[22] That same year, it was ranked as the 75th top game of all time by Next Generation.[23] In 2006, The Guardian listed it first on its list of "The 10 political games everyone should play".[24]

See also[edit]

References[edit]

Citations[edit]

  1. ^ a b Crawford 2003, p. 282.
  2. ^ Crawford 2003, p. 285.
  3. ^ Crawford 2003, p. 286.
  4. ^ Crawford 2003, p. 287.
  5. ^ a b "Designer Profile: Chris Crawford (Part 2)". Computer Gaming World. Jan–Feb 1987. pp. 56–59. Retrieved 1 November 2013. 
  6. ^ Crawford 2003, p. 296.
  7. ^ a b Crawford 2003, p. 297.
  8. ^ Rouse III, Richard. Game Design: Theory and Practice, Second Edition. p. 269. 
  9. ^ Crawford, Chris. "Storytron: What Went Wrong". Storytron. 
  10. ^ "Rules & Actions". eRegime. 
  11. ^ Boosman, Frank C. (May 1986). "Macintosh Window". Computer Gaming World. pp. 18, 45. Retrieved November 1, 2013. 
  12. ^ Brooks, M. Evan (June 1992). "The Modern Games: 1950 - 2000". Computer Gaming World. p. 120. Retrieved November 24, 2013. 
  13. ^ Lesser, Hartley and Pattie (June 1986). "The Role of Computers". The Dragon (110): 38–43. 
  14. ^ Lesser, Hartley and Pattie (December 1986). "The Role of Computers". Dragon (116): 69–76. 
  15. ^ Shapiro, Ezra (December 1986). "Stocking Stuffers". BYTE. p. 321. Retrieved 9 May 2015. 
  16. ^ "Our Favorite Games". Compute!. May 1988. p. 12. Retrieved November 10, 2013. 
  17. ^ Card, Orson Scott (May 1988). "Do You Want to Change the World? Two Games Let You Try". Compute!. p. 9. Retrieved November 10, 2013. 
  18. ^ Keizer, Gregg (January 1989). "Balance of Power: The 1990 Edition". Compute!. p. 80. Retrieved November 10, 2013. 
  19. ^ Card, Orson Scott (June 1989). "Light-years and Lasers / Science Fiction Inside Your Computer". Compute!. p. 29. Retrieved November 11, 2013. 
  20. ^ Moss, Chuck (November 1992). "Spectrum Holobyte's Crisis in the Kremlin". Computer Gaming World. p. 34. Retrieved 4 July 2014. 
  21. ^ Maher, Jimmy (2014-02-28). "Macware". The Digital Antiquarian. Retrieved 11 July 2014. 
  22. ^ CGW 148: 150 Best Games of All Time
  23. ^ Next Generation 21 (September 1996), p.48.
  24. ^ Stuart, Keith (26 October 2006). "The 10 political games everyone should play". The Guardian. 

Biblography[edit]

External links[edit]