In the sport of cricket, ball tampering is an action in which a fielder illegally alters the condition of the ball. The primary motivation of ball tampering is to interfere with the aerodynamics of the ball to aid swing bowling.
- 1 Definition
- 2 Purpose
- 3 Altering a ball legally
- 4 Sanction
- 5 Examples and allegations
- 5.1 Chris Pringle, 1990
- 5.2 Michael Atherton, 1994
- 5.3 Waqar Younis, 2000
- 5.4 Sachin Tendulkar, 2001
- 5.5 Rahul Dravid, 2004
- 5.6 England cricket team, 2005
- 5.7 Pakistan cricket team, 2006
- 5.8 James Anderson and Stuart Broad, 2010
- 5.9 Shahid Afridi, 2010
- 5.10 Australia vs Sri Lanka, 2012
- 5.11 Faf du Plessis, 2013
- 5.12 South Africa vs Sri Lanka, 2014
- 5.13 South Africa vs Australia, 2016
- 5.14 Australia vs South Africa, 2018
- 5.15 Sri Lanka vs West Indies 2018
- 6 References
Under Law 41, subsection 3 of the Laws of Cricket, the ball may be polished without the use of an artificial substance, may be dried with a towel if it is wet, and have mud removed from it under supervision; all other actions which alter the condition of the ball are illegal. These are usually taken to include rubbing the ball on the ground, scuffing with a fingernail or other sharp object, or tampering with the seam of the ball.
Generally, the purpose of altering the state of the ball is to achieve more favourable bowling conditions. Examples of ball tampering would include a fielder applying a substance, such as lip balm or sweetened saliva, to shine one side of the ball or pick the seam of the ball to encourage more swing. Conversely, roughening one side of the ball by use of an abrasive or cutting surface (such as boot spikes or bottle caps or sandpaper) is also ball tampering.
Altering a ball legally
Using spit and/or sweat is common and, for practitioners of swing bowling, integral. The moisture gained from spit or sweat when combined with polishing, smooths out one half of the ball which in turn allows air to pass over one side of the ball more quickly than over the other. When bowled correctly, a bowler can get the ball to move from one side to the other through the air. Also, it is common for fielders to rub the ball against their clothing to dry or polish it, as seen in most cricket matches.
The umpires are responsible for monitoring the condition of the ball, and must inspect it regularly. Where an umpire has deemed a player to be guilty of ball tampering (the Laws refer to unfairly changing the condition of the ball), five penalty runs are awarded to the other side, and, if desired by the opposing captain, the ball is immediately replaced. The replacement ball is chosen by the umpires, and should match the condition of the previous ball (before tampering) as closely as possible. Depending on additional agreements laid out before the beginning of a series of matches, the team may instead be permitted to choose the ball from a selection of balls in various stages of use.
If a bowler is found to be guilty of repeated ball tampering he can be prohibited from continuing to bowl in that innings. Following the conclusion of play, additional sanctions are usually brought against a ball tamperer, as it is considered a serious offence. The captain may also be penalised, if he is also responsible for the conduct of his players on the field.
Examples and allegations
The use of foreign substances to polish the ball, while illegal, is in some corners considered to be relatively common, and passes without incident or sanction. Substances which have been used for this purpose include hair gel, sugar and lip balm.
In addition, picking at the threads of the main seam or 'lifting' the quarter seam to aid conventional and reverse swing respectively are considered illegal. Modifying the quarter seam can be particularly difficult to detect or prove.
Chris Pringle, 1990
During a tour of Pakistan, New Zealand bowler Chris Pringle used a bottle cap to rough up one side of a ball. The New Zealand team had suspected that the Pakistan team had done this in the series, but there is no evidence beyond their claimed observations during the matches. 
Michael Atherton, 1994
In the "dirt in pocket" affair, then England captain Michael Atherton was accused of ball tampering during a Test match with South Africa at Lord's in 1994, after television cameras caught Atherton reaching into his pocket and then rubbing a substance on the ball. Atherton denied ball tampering, claiming that he had dirt in his pocket which he used to dry his hands. He was also accused of lying to the match referee. Atherton was summoned to the match referee and was fined £2,000 (£3,900 today) for failing to disclose the dirt to the match referee.
Waqar Younis, 2000
Sachin Tendulkar, 2001
In the second Test match of India's 2001 tour of South Africa, at St George's Park, Port Elizabeth, match referee Mike Denness suspended Sachin Tendulkar for one game in light of alleged ball tampering. Television cameras picked up images that suggested Tendulkar was scuffing the seam of the cricket ball, though Tendulkar claimed he was actually just removing a piece of grass stuck in the seam of the ball. The incident escalated to include allegations of racism, and led to Denness being barred from entering the venue of the third Test match. Subsequently, the International Cricket Council revoked the status of the match as a Test, as the teams rejected the appointed referee.
The ICC later cleared Tendulkar of ball tampering charges, though said he had cleaned the ball without the umpire's permission.
Rahul Dravid, 2004
Rahul Dravid of India rubbed a cough lozenge on the shiny side of the ball at The Gabba during an Australian Tri-Series match against Zimbabwe. India won the match, but footage emerged of Dravid tampering with the ball, and he was fined 50% of his match fee.
England cricket team, 2005
Marcus Trescothick admitted in his autobiography, Coming Back to Me, that he used mints to shine the ball to produce more swing: "It was my job to keep the shine on the new ball for as long as possible with a bit of spit and a lot of polish. And through trial and error I finally settled on the type of spit for the task at hand. It had been common knowledge in county cricket for some time that certain sweets produced saliva which, when applied to the ball for cleaning purposes, enabled it to keep its shine for longer and therefore its swing." He found Murray Mints worked the best.
Pakistan cricket team, 2006
In 2006, an alleged ball-tampering issue overshadowed a Test match between Pakistan and England, whereby Pakistan refused to take to the field for the evening session after being penalised for ball tampering in the afternoon. Television cameras caught the umpires discussing the condition of the quarter seam. Pakistan are believed to have intended a protest against the decision by delaying their return after tea; however, while they were refusing to play, the umpires awarded the game to England in accordance with the Laws of Cricket.
The controversy arose when the umpires, Darrell Hair and Billy Doctrove, ruled that the Pakistani team had been involved in ball tampering. They awarded five penalty runs to England and a replacement ball was selected by England batsman Paul Collingwood. Play continued until the tea break, without any Pakistani protest. After the tea break, the Pakistani team, after having agreed amongst themselves that no ball tampering had taken place and given consideration to the severity of the implication, refused to take the field. The umpires then left the field, gave a warning to the Pakistani players, and returned once more 15 minutes later. After waiting two more minutes the umpires removed the bails and declared England winners by forfeiture. A deal was brokered between the English and Pakistani cricket boards to allow the match to continue, and the Pakistani team did take to the field 55 minutes after the umpires first took to the field for the resumption of play. Hair and Doctrove, however, declined to continue the game maintaining their decision that Pakistan had forfeited the match by refusing to play.
The impasse continued late into the evening. Pakistan captain Inzamam ul-Haq claimed that Darrell Hair did not inform him or the rest of his side of the reasons why the ball was replaced, and that Hair had implied that Pakistan were cheating. At 19:50 UTC it was finally announced at a press conference that the Test was over. The ECB's statement said that England were awarded the match by the umpires as Pakistan refused to take the field after being warned that under law 21.3, failure to do so would result in them forfeiting the game. This is the first time a Test match has been decided this way.
The England and Wales Cricket Board refunded fourth-day spectators 40% of their ticket price (after deduction of an administration fee), and gave an automatic 100% refund to those with tickets for the fifth day. It later asked the Pakistan Cricket Board to pick up the £800,000 (£1.14 million today) costs of doing this, which the PCB refused to do. In March 2007, the PCB and ECB reached a settlement where Pakistan would play a Twenty20 International in England and waive their fees.
As a result of Pakistan's forfeiting of the game, Inzamam was charged and found guilty of "bringing the game into disrepute", though he was cleared of the charges relating to "changing the condition of the ball". In January 2008, Pakistan's cricket board asked the International Cricket Council to change the official result to "match abandoned" or "match drawn" on the basis of having been subsequently cleared of ball tampering by an ICC tribunal. In July 2008, the International Cricket Council (ICC) changed the result of the match to a draw, though in October 2008 the Marylebone Cricket Club (MCC) released the statement "The ICC has no power under the laws of cricket to decide that results should be altered, whether it feels it's ‘inappropriate’ or otherwise,"  The decision also angered former players including Michael Holding, who at the time was a member of the ICC cricket committee. Holding felt that Pakistan's refusal to play should not go unpunished even though they were not guilty of ball tampering,
"I have just written my letter of resignation to the ICC cricket committee because I cannot agree with what they've done," Holding said while commentating for Sky Sports during a domestic match in England. "That game should never, ever be a draw. When you take certain actions, you must be quite happy to suffer the consequences."
On 1 February 2009, the ICC reversed their earlier decision, and changed the match result back to a win for England.
James Anderson and Stuart Broad, 2010
In January 2010, England bowlers Stuart Broad and James Anderson were accused of ball tampering by stopping the ball with the spikes of their boots in the third Test Match against South Africa. Broad maintained that he was just being lazy, because it was 40 degrees Celsius in Cape Town that day. Andy Flower said in his defence that "the scoreline suggested that there was obviously no ball tampering." Nasser Hussain, who had captained Anderson, said: "Stuart Broad and James Anderson were wrong to behave in the manner they did and I've no doubt that if a player from another country did the same we'd have said they were cheating." No charges were formally requested by South Africa even though they made the accusations at a press conference.
Shahid Afridi, 2010
Shahid Afridi, standing in as the Pakistani captain, received a two T20 international match ban for ball tampering in a match against Australia in January 2010. He was caught on camera biting the cricket ball in a bizarre attempt to re-adjust the seam of the ball. The ball was eventually replaced. He told the Hindustan Times that he was trying to smell the ball, but he pleaded guilty to ball tampering. Afridi had previously been banned for tampering with the pitch in a game against England in 2005.
Australia vs Sri Lanka, 2012
In the first Test, Sri Lanka notified match referee Chris Broad that Australian bowler Peter Siddle may have been raising the seam of the ball during Sri Lanka's first innings. Peter Siddle collected 5/54. He was later cleared by the ICC.
Faf du Plessis, 2013
While fielding during the third day of the second Test in Dubai, cameras captured footage of South Africa fielder Faf du Plessis scuffing the ball against the zip of his trousers. The on-field umpires penalised South Africa by adding 5 runs to Pakistan's total and changing the ball. The match referee imposed a 50% match fee fine on du Plessis after the fielder pleaded guilty, although the team manager Mohammed Moosajee maintained that penalty was "harsh", and the team decided not to challenge the finding as it may have led to heavier sanctions. Despite the "guilty" plea, team vice-captain AB de Villiers maintained that "we are not cheats" and team captain Graeme Smith denied that their participation in ball tampering tainted the series-levelling win, as South Africa went on to record an innings victory during the Test.
During the same match, footage of South African medium-pace bowler Vernon Philander apparently scratching the ball with his forefinger was also brought under scrutiny, but ultimately was not considered to have constituted illegal ball tampering by the match referee.
South Africa vs Sri Lanka, 2014
For the second time in nine months, the South African Test side found itself in a ball-tampering scandal, this time with medium-pace bowler Vernon Philander found guilty of tampering with the ball during the third day of the Galle Test against Sri Lanka in 2014. Philander was found to have breached clause 42.1 of the Laws, "scratching the ball with his fingers and thumb", and was fined 75% of his match fee. South Africa went on to win the Test by 153 runs.
This incident followed speculation by Australian Test batsman David Warner in February 2014 over the South African team's practices in altering the state of the ball during Australia's tour to South Africa. Speaking to Sky Sports Radio, Warner commented on the South African fielders' more "obvious" use of throwing the ball into the ground on return throws after fielding, and South African wicket-keeper AB de Villiers' habit of getting "the ball in his hand and with his glove wipe the rough side every ball." Warner was later fined 15% of his match fee for the comments he made, under an ICC Code of Conduct breach.
South Africa vs Australia, 2016
Another South African was charged with ball tampering on 18 November 2016 after their victory in the second Test against Australia in Hobart. Proteas skipper Faf du Plessis was alleged to have tampered with the condition of the ball after TV footage appeared to show him applying saliva onto the ball from a mint or a lolly. The charge was made by the ICC, although Cricket Australia did not file a complaint. Du Plessis was found guilty of ball tampering on 22 November and fined his match fee from the second Test.
Australia vs South Africa, 2018
Australian player Cameron Bancroft was charged with ball tampering on 24 March 2018, when videos emerged that showed him rubbing the ball with, and later concealing, a yellow object during day three of the Third Test against South Africa at Newlands Stadium. Bancroft later claimed the object was a short length of yellow adhesive tape to which dirt and grit had adhered, forming an abrasive surface – though four days later, Cricket Australia confirmed that this was actually sandpaper. Captain Steve Smith and Bancroft attended a press conference at the end of that day's play. Bancroft admitted ball tampering to Andy Pycroft, the match referee, and the press. Smith then said that the tampering was planned by an unnamed "leadership group" during the lunch break. Smith and vice-captain David Warner stood down from the team leadership the morning after the incident, but still played on, with wicket-keeper Tim Paine taking over as captain for the rest of the Test match.
The ICC banned Smith for one Test match and he was fined 100% of his match fee, while Bancroft was fined 75% of his match fee.
As well as a public outcry, especially in Australia, the Australian Sports Commission, the Prime Minister of Australia Malcolm Turnbull, many famous international cricketers and commercial partners of both the Test side and Cricket Australia universally condemned the team for its actions.
Steve Smith, David Warner and Bancroft were charged with bringing the game into disrepute, suspended, and sent home. Smith and Warner were then banned from all international cricket and domestic cricket in Australia for twelve months while Bancroft received a nine-month ban. Australia's coach Darren Lehmann, though not directly involved, announced he would step down from his role following the scandal.
Sri Lanka vs West Indies 2018
On the third morning of the second Test between West Indies and Sri Lanka in June 2018, the umpires replaced the match ball and awarded the West Indies five penalty runs when they deemed the Sri Lankan team to have been guilty of ball tampering on the previous day. The Sri Lankan team initially refused to take the field in protest, though they completed the match. Their captain, Dinesh Chandimal, was charged with altering the condition of the ball by the match referee. Chandimal appealed the charge, but he was given a one-match ban by the ICC.
- Law 42 (fair and unfair play) Archived 5 January 2013 at the Wayback Machine lords.org, 22 August 2006
- "BALL TAMPERERS CAUGHT OUT - Sporting Life - Cricket News - Live ball-by-ball scorecards, Pakistan v England". 4 February 2012. Archived from the original on 4 February 2012. Retrieved 26 March 2018.
- "Simon Hughes' Swing Guide" The Daily Telegraph 21 August 2006
- "As old as the hills". ESPNCricinfo. 16 September 2006. Retrieved 26 May 2019.
- "Atherton's Darkest Day" bbc.co.uk, 28 August 2000.
- "Waqar suspended for ball-tampering". BBC. 1 July 2007. Retrieved 22 April 2012.
- "Tendulkar handed suspended ban". Cricinfo. Retrieved 1 June 2008.
- "Tendulkar appears before match referee". Cricinfo. Retrieved 1 June 2008.
- "Tendulkar not guilty of ball-tampering, say ICC". the Guardian. 29 November 2001. Retrieved 26 March 2018.
- "India won because Rahul Dravid tempered the ball". Times of India. 25 March 2018. Retrieved 26 March 2018.
- "Mints made England '05 Ashes swing kings: Trescothick". The Age. The Age.
- "Ball tampering row mars Oval Test" Cricinfo, 20 August 2006.
- "Lengthy talks fail to save Test". 20 August 2006. Retrieved 26 March 2018 – via news.bbc.co.uk.
- England v Pakistan 4th Test, from BBC, retrieved 20 August 2006
- "Sky Sports – Cricket – Internationals – Pakistan". Sky Sports.[permanent dead link]
- Inzamam cleared of ball tampering, from Cricinfo, retrieved 28 September 2006
- "Pakistan seek Oval result change". BBC News. 11 January 2008. Retrieved 26 April 2010.
- "FOX SPORTS - Live Sports Scores - NRL, AFL, Cricket Scores". FOX SPORTS. Retrieved 26 March 2018.
- "2006 Oval Test still a forfeit for MCC". Cricinfo. 26 October 2008. Retrieved 26 March 2018.
- ICC does U-turn on 2006 Oval Test result: Cricinfo, 1 February 2009
- Cricinfo staff (9 January 2010). "Stuart Broad 'astonished' by tampering charges". Cricinfo. Archived from the original on 4 February 2010. Retrieved 1 February 2010.
- Paul Weaver (5 January 2010). "South Africa raise ball tampering concerns about England". London: guardian.co.uk. Archived from the original on 8 January 2010. Retrieved 1 February 2010.
- Nasser Hussain (8 January 2010). "Character reference". Sky Sports. Archived from the original on 14 January 2010. Retrieved 1 February 2010.
- McGlashan, Andrew (6 January 2010). "No official complaint over Broad footwork". Cricinfo. Archived from the original on 13 February 2010. Retrieved 1 February 2010.
- "Australia complete one-day series sweep over Pakistan". bbc.co.uk. 31 January 2010. Archived from the original on 3 February 2010. Retrieved 31 January 2010.
- "Controversy mars Australia win". metro.co.uk. Retrieved 31 January 2010.
- "Shahid Afridi in ball-tampering scandal during wild night at the WACA". theaustralian.com.au. Retrieved 31 January 2010.
- "Afridi banned for two T20s for ball-tampering". Cricinfo. 31 January 2010. Archived from the original on 3 February 2010. Retrieved 31 January 2010.
- "I tried to smell the ball: Afridi". Hindustan Times. Retrieved 24 September 2010.
- "Australia v Sri Lanka, 1st Test, Hobart, 5th day : No evidence of tampering by Australia, says ICC match referee | Cricket News | Australia v Sri Lanka". ESPN Cricinfo. Retrieved 18 December 2012.
- "South Africa penalised for ball-tampering". ESPNcricinfo. ESPN. Retrieved 22 February 2016.
- "Du Plessis pleads guilty, fined for ball-tampering". ESPNcricinfo. ESPN. Retrieved 22 February 2016.
- "Philander fined for ball-tampering". ESPNcricinfo. ESPN. Retrieved 22 February 2016.
- "Warner queries South Africa swing tactics". ESPNcricinfo. ESPN. Retrieved 22 February 2016.
- "Warner fined for sharp-practice comments". ESPNcricinfo. ESPN. Retrieved 22 February 2016.
- "ICC charges du Plessis over alleged ball tampering". ESPNcricinfo. ESPN. Retrieved 18 November 2016.
- "Du Plessis found guilty, but free to play in Adelaide". ESPN Cricinfo. Retrieved 22 November 2016.
- "Sticky truth about sandpaper revelation". cricket.com.au. Retrieved 28 March 2018.
- "Cameron Bancroft: Australia player admits to ball-tampering, Steve Smith knew in advance". BBC Sport. 24 March 2018. Retrieved 27 March 2018.
- "Readers verdict: Public call for Australian cricket captain Steve Smith and leadership group to go over South Africa ball tampering". The Daily Telegraph, 25 March 2018
- "O'Halloran, Kate. An unashamed disgrace: ball tampering cheats Australian cricket fans". The Guardian, 25 March 2018
- "Australian cricket sponsors demand action after ball-tampering crisis with QANTAS latest to speak out. Nine's Wide World of Sports, 27 March 2018
- Ferris, Sam. "Tampering trio learn their fate". cricket.com.au. Retrieved 28 March 2018.
- "Australian ball-tampering: Darren Lehmann to quit as Australia coach". BBC Sport. 29 March 2018. Retrieved 29 March 2018.
- "How the ball-tampering episode unfolded in St Lucia". ESPNcricinfo. Retrieved 19 June 2018.
- "Dinesh Chandimal out of third Test after dismissal of appeal against ball-tampering sanctions". ESPN Cricinfo. Retrieved 22 June 2018.