Jump to content

Book Rights Registry

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by InternetArchiveBot (talk | contribs) at 22:53, 5 November 2016 (Rescuing 2 sources and tagging 0 as dead. #IABot (v1.2.6)). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

The Book Rights Registry is an entity to be founded as part of a settlement of the lawsuit between the Authors Guild and Google over the Google Books scanning project. The Registry will be initially funded by $34.5 million from Google but it will be an independent, not-for-profit organization that collects and disburses revenue from third party users of content (e.g. Google Book Search) to authors, publishers and other rightsholders. According to the Settlement Agreement, the Registry will own and maintain a rights information database for all books (and parts of books) covered by the Agreement and their authors and publishers. It will also resolve disputes between rightsholders.

Michael Healy, the current head (as of September 2009) of the Book Industry Study Group, is slated to become the new head of the Registry.[1]

Authors Guild president Roy Blount, Jr. described it as "the writers' equivalent of ASCAP."[2][3][4]

Criticism

The Open Book Alliance – whose members include American Society of Journalists and Authors, Internet Archive, Amazon, Yahoo, National Writers Union and New York Library Association[5] among others – maintain the deal would create a de facto exclusive license for Google because the deal grants no rights to the BRR to license books to competitors – copyright owners will have to license Google’s competitors voluntarily, while Google gets an involuntary, virtual compulsory license through class action process. As a result, only Google receives a license to “orphan books”, whose owners won’t show up to license competitors and which comprise an estimated 70% of books. In short, the settlement all but guarantees that Google would have permanent competitive advantages around comprehensiveness and cost. This is one reason why the Department of Justice is investigating the proposed deal and numerous non-profit organizations, academics and other stakeholders have condemned it.[6]

Pam Samuelson, UC Berkeley Professor of Law says "Libraries everywhere are terrified that Google will engage in price-gouging when setting prices for institutional subscriptions to "the works"[7]

References

  1. ^ [1] What to Expect From the Book Rights Registry: A Q&A With the New Executive Director, Michael Healy, Book Business
  2. ^ Google strikes book search deal - 28 October 2008 - Technology - BBC NEWS
  3. ^ "Archived copy" (PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on 31 October 2008. Retrieved 2008-10-28. {{cite web}}: Unknown parameter |deadurl= ignored (|url-status= suggested) (help)CS1 maint: archived copy as title (link)
  4. ^ New chapter for Google Book Search 28 October 2008 07:14:00 AM - Official Google Blog
  5. ^ [2] Open Book Alliance Members
  6. ^ [3] Open Book Alliance: The Proposed Google Book Search Settlement: Fact vs. Fiction
  7. ^ [4] Google Books Is Not a Library