Armor piercing shells
Röchling shells were bunker-busting artillery shells, developed by the German engineer August Cönders, based on the theory of increasing sectional density to improve penetration. They were tested in 1942 and 1943 against the Belgian Fort d'Aubin-Neufchâteau.
Aircraft delivered bombs
World War II
In World War II, the British designer Barnes Wallis, already famous for inventing the bouncing bomb, designed two bombs that would become the conceptual predecessors of modern bunker busters: the five tonne Tallboy and the ten tonne Grand Slam. These were "Earthquake" bombs—a concept he had first proposed in 1939. The designs were very aerodynamic, allowing them to exceed the speed of sound as they fell from 22,000 ft (6,700 m). The tails were designed with offset fins causing the bombs to spin as they fell. Using the same principle as a spinning top, this enabled them to resist being deflected, thereby improving accuracy. They had casings of high grade steel, much stronger than the typical World War II bomb so that they would survive hitting a hardened surface, or penetrate deep into the ground.
Though these bombs might be thought of as 'bunker busters' today, in fact the original 'earthquake' theory was more complex and subtle than simply penetrating a hardened surface. The Earthquake bombs were designed not to strike a target directly, but to impact beside it, penetrate under it, and create a 'camouflet' or large buried cavern at the same time as delivering a shock wave through the target's foundations. The target then collapses into the hole, no matter how hardened it may be. The bombs had strong casings because they needed to travel through rock rather than reinforced concrete, though they could perform equally well against hardened surfaces. In an attack on the Valentin U-Boat pens at Farge, two Grand Slams went through the 15 ft (4.5 m) reinforced concrete hardening—equalling or exceeding the best current penetration specifications.
The British Disney bomb (officially "4500 lb Concrete Piercing/Rocket Assisted bomb") was a World War II device designed to be used against U-boat pens and other super-hardened targets. Devised by Captain Edward Terrell RNVR of the Admiralty's Directorate of Miscellaneous Weapons Development, it had a streamlined hardened case and weighed some 4,500 lb (2,000 kg) including the rocket assembly. The actual explosive content was about 500 lb (230 kg).
For accuracy, the bombs had to be dropped precisely from a pre-determined height (usually 20,000 ft (6,100 m)). They would free-fall for around 30 seconds until, at 5,000 ft (1,500 m), the rockets were ignited, causing the tail section to be expelled. The rocket burn lasted for three seconds and added 300 ft/s (91 m/s) to the bomb's speed, giving a final impact speed of 1,450 ft/s (440 m/s; 990 mph), approximately Mach 1.29.[a] Post-war tests demonstrated that the bombs were able to penetrate a 14-foot-8-inch (4.47 m) thick concrete roof, with the predicted (but untested) ability to penetrate 16 feet 8 inches (5.08 m) of concrete.
During Operation Desert Storm (1991), there was a need for a deep penetration bomb similar to the British weapons of World War II, but none of the NATO air forces had such a weapon. As a stop-gap, some were developed over a period of 28 days, using old 8 inch (203 mm) artillery barrels as casings. These bombs weighed over two tons but carried only 647 lb (293 kg) of high explosive. They were laser-guided and were designated "Guided Bomb Unit-28 (GBU-28)". It was proven effective for the intended role.
An example of a Russian bunker buster is the KAB-1500L-Pr. It is delivered with the Su-24M and the Su-27IB aircraft. It is stated to be able to penetrate 10–20 m of earth or 2 m of reinforced concrete. The bomb weighs 1,500 kg (3,300 lb), with 1,100 kg (2,400 lb) being the high explosive penetrating warhead. It is laser guided and has a reported strike accuracy of 7 m (23 ft) CEP.
The US has a series of custom made bombs to penetrate hardened or deeply buried structures:
|Depth of Penetration||Weapon Systems|
|Penetration of reinforced concrete: 1.8 m (6 ft)||BLU-109 Penetrator||GBU-10, GBU-15, GBU-24, GBU-27, AGM-130|
|Penetration of reinforced concrete: 3.4 m (11 ft)||BLU-116 Advanced Unitary Penetrator (AUP)||GBU-15, GBU-24, GBU-27, AGM-130|
|BLU-118/B Thermobaric Warhead||GBU-15, GBU-24, AGM-130|
|Penetration of reinforced concrete: more than 6 m (20 ft)||BLU-113 Super Penetrator||GBU-28, GBU-37|
More recently, the US has developed the 30,000-pound GBU-57.
The traditional fuze is the same as a classic armor-piercing bomb: a combination of timer and a sturdy dynamic propeller on the rear of the bomb. The fuze is armed when the bomb is released, and detonates when the propeller stops turning and the timer has expired.
Modern bunker busters may use the traditional fuze, but some also include a microphone and microcontroller. The microphone listens, and the micro controller counts floors until the bomb breaks through the desired numbers of floors.
The extra speed provided by a rocket motor enables greater penetration of a missile-mounted bunker buster warhead. To reach maximum penetration (impact depth), the warhead may consist of a high-density projectile only. Such a warhead carries more energy than a warhead with chemical explosives (kinetic energy of a projectile at hypervelocity).
The nuclear bunker buster is the nuclear weapon version of the bunker buster. The non-nuclear component of the weapon is designed to greatly enhance the penetration into soil, rock, or concrete to deliver a nuclear warhead to a target. These weapons would be used to destroy hardened, underground military bunkers deeply buried. In theory, the amount of radioactive nuclear fallout would be reduced from that of a standard, air-burst nuclear detonation because they would have relatively low explosive yield. However, because such weapons necessarily come into contact with large amounts of earth-based debris, they may, under certain circumstances, still generate significant fallout. Warhead yield and weapon design have changed periodically throughout the history of the design of such weapons. An underground explosion releases a larger fraction of its energy into the ground, compared to an explosion at or above the surface which releases most of its energy into the atmosphere.
Russian spy interest
In 2010, it was revealed that members of the Illegals Program, a group of Russian sleeper agents in the US were gathering online information about bunker busters and made contacts with a former intelligence official and with a scientist involved in developing the weapons.
This article includes a list of references, but its sources remain unclear because it has insufficient inline citations. (August 2013) (Learn how and when to remove this template message)
- "Les étranges obus du fort de Neufchâteau (suite)". derelicta.pagesperso-orange.fr (in French). Retrieved 11 June 2016.
- Project Ruby 1946, p. 214
- RAF staff 2005, Grand Slams.
- Terrell 1958, pp. 197–212.
- Burakowski & Sala 1960, p. 556
- Project Ruby 1946, p. 18
- Project Ruby 1946, p. 23
- "ATK Awarded Contract for Hard Target Void Sensing Fuze (HTVSF) Engineering & Manufacturing Development (EMD) Phase." ATK, 5 April 2011.
- Savage, Charles. "U.S. Charges 11 With Acting as Agents for Russia", The New York Times, June 28, 2010. Retrieved June 28, 2010.
- Staff. "Ten arrested in US on charges of spying for Russia", BBC News, June 29, 2010. Retrieved June 28, 2010.
- Air Proving Ground Command Eglin Field (31 October 1946). Comparative Test of the Effectiveness of Large Bombs against Reinforced Concrete Structures (Anglo-American Bomb Tests – Project Ruby) (PDF). Orlando, Florida: US Air Force. Retrieved 9 June 2011. "Running parallel with the development of large bombs was a project for obtaining high striking velocities by means of a rocket assisted 4,500-lb British bomb called the Disney. (...) As early as June 1945, the concrete V-weapon structure at Watten was used as a target".
- Burakowski, Tadeusz; Sala, Aleksander (1960). Rakiety i Pociski Kierowane [Rockets and guided missiles] (in Polish). Część 1 – Zastosowania (Volume 1 – applications). Warsaw: Wydawnictwo Ministerstwa Obrony Narodowej (Ministry Of National Defense Publishing House). pp. 556–557.CS1 maint: ref=harv (link) Figure 280, p. 558, provides a detailed diagram of the Disney bomb (with its internals).
- Johnsen, Frederick A. (2003). Weapons of the Eighth Air Force. St. Paul, MN: MBI Publishing. p. 45. ISBN 0-7603-1340-7.CS1 maint: ref=harv (link)
- RAF staff (6 April 2005). "RAF: Bomber Command: Grand Slams". Archived from the original on 6 July 2007.CS1 maint: ref=harv (link)
- Terrell, Edward (1958). Admiralty Brief: the story of inventions that contributed to victory in the Battle of the Atlantic. Harrap.CS1 maint: ref=harv (link)
- Alekseevskii, V. P. (1966). "Penetration of a rod into a target at high velocity". Combustion, Explosion, and Shock Waves (Fizika Goreniya i Vzryva). 2 (2): 99–106. doi:10.1007/BF00749237. ISSN 0010-5082.
- Bernard, Robert S. (1978). Depth and Motion Prediction for Earth Penetrators (PDF) (Report). ADA056701. Army Engineer Waterways Experiment Station Vicksburg.CS1 maint: ref=harv (link)
- Parsch, Andreas (2006). "Textron (Avco) BLU-106/B BKEP (Boosted Kinetic Energy Penetrator)". Directory of U.S. Military Rockets and Missiles fitted with bunker busting bombs to extend distances and to have horizontal as well as vertical movement and control. (Appendix 4). Retrieved 27 June 2011. US rocket-boosted submunition against runways and hardened aircraft shelters.
- Segletes, Steven B.; Walters, William P. (2003). "Extensions to the exact solution of the long-rod penetration/erosion equations" (PDF). International Journal of Impact Engineering. 28 (4): 363–376. doi:10.1016/S0734-743X(02)00071-4. Retrieved 23 June 2011.
- Tate, A. (1 November 1967). "A theory for the deceleration of long rods after impact" (PDF). Journal of the Mechanics and Physics of Solids. 15 (6): 387–399. Bibcode:1967JMPSo..15..387T. doi:10.1016/0022-5096(67)90010-5. Archived from the original (PDF) on March 26, 2012. Retrieved 23 June 2011.
- Segletes, Steven B.; Walters, William P. (2002). Efficient Solution of the Long-Rod Penetration Equations of Alekseevskii-Tate (PDF) (Report). ARL-TR-2855. Army Research Lab Aberdeen Proving Ground MD.CS1 maint: ref=harv (link)
- Walters, William P.; Segletes, Steven B. (1991). "An exact solution of the long rod penetration equations". International Journal of Impact Engineering. 11 (2): 225–231. doi:10.1016/0734-743X(91)90008-4.
- Young, C.W. (1997). Penetration equations (PDF) (Report). SAND94-2726. Albuquerque NM: Sandia National Laboratories.
This is a standalone report documenting the latest version of the Young/Sandia penetration equations and related analytical techniques to predict penetration into natural earth materials and concrete.CS1 maint: ref=harv (link)
- Young, C.W. (1967). The Development Of Empirical Equations For Predicting Depth Of An Earth Penetrating Projectile (Report). SC-DR-67-60. Albuquerque NM: Sandia National Laboratories.CS1 maint: ref=harv (link)
- Guided Bomb Unit-28 (GBU-28) BLU-113 Penetrator
- BBC: 'Bunker buster' missiles aim at Moon
- Annotated bibliography for nuclear bunker buster bombs from the Alsos Digital Library for Nuclear Issues
- Read Congressional Research Service (CRS) Reports regarding Bunker Busters
- Video against usage (produced by Union of Concerned Scientists)
- (Project spider; Massive natural passive defense against air raid by anna farahmand)
- Video of bunker buster bomb in action
- Tunnel buster bomb
- Bunker buster