Category talk:Redirects with old history

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
WikiProject iconRedirect Category‑class
WikiProject iconThis page is within the scope of WikiProject Redirect, a collaborative effort to improve the standard of redirects and their categorization on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
Note: This banner should be placed on the talk pages of project, template and category pages that exist and operate to maintain redirects.
This banner is not designed to be placed on the talk pages of most redirects and almost never on the talk pages of mainspace redirects. For more information see the template documentation.
CategoryThis category does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.

Suggestion for new category template[edit]

Suggest: {{R to camelcase}}
Checkingfax (talk) 23:45, 19 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, Checkingfax, I noted that Steel1943 opposes this on the index talk page. I have to agree with the rationale that CamelCase is no longer used on Wikipedia, so what is it that you would hope that {{R to camelcase}} would accomplish? Painius  20:42, 20 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Hi, and back to you, Painius, the {{R to camelcase}} template would note that the redirect is to a camelcased article name such as those currently in use for company or product names that are CamelCased. Checkingfax (talk) 21:20, 20 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Can you show some examples of such articles and the redirects that would need to be tagged? Painius  21:30, 20 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

From moves?[edit]

Currently, this is a subcategory of Category:Redirects from moves; however, as far as I remember, there are plenty of historical redirects from merges, too. I suggest tagging that aspect separately and remove the category from this one. 1234qwer1234qwer4 (talk) 22:11, 3 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Good idea! P.I. Ellsworth  ed. put'r there 05:09, 4 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]