Cis (mathematics): historial de revisions

Filtra les revisionsAmpliaTanca

A la data:

Inverteix la selecció

Selecció de diferències: Marqueu els botons corresponents de les revisions per comparar i premeu Intro o el botó inferior. Llegenda: (act) = diferències amb la revisió actual, (prev) = diferències amb revisió anterior, m = edició menor.

actprev 22:3122:31, 13 feb 2024‎ Quondum discussió contribucions‎ 30.772 octets −23‎ rm undue emphasis on name and origin desfés

actprev 12:1012:10, 27 des 2023‎ Matthiaspaul discussió contribucions‎ 30.795 octets 0‎ →‎References: But we can set an expired URL to "dead2, so that access to the archived PDF becomes easier. desfés
actprev 12:0612:06, 27 des 2023‎ Matthiaspaul discussió contribucions‎ 30.795 octets +551‎ Undid revision 1192061102 by Citation bot (talk) No, we don't remove URLs just because a DOI exists, in particular not when the URL comes with an archived link. DOIs are not garanteed to exist forever (there are lots of broken DOIs already) and they don't have archives. desfés Etiqueta: Desfés
actprev 11:2911:29, 27 des 2023‎ Citation bot discussió contribucions‎ 30.244 octets −551‎ Removed proxy/dead URL that duplicated identifier. Removed access-date with no URL. Removed parameters. | Use this bot. Report bugs. | #UCB_CommandLine desfés Etiqueta: Revertida
actprev 10:3310:33, 27 des 2023‎ Matthiaspaul discussió contribucions‎ 30.795 octets −1‎ →‎References: CE desfés

actprev 22:3622:36, 24 oct 2023‎ Citation bot discussió contribucions‎ 30.796 octets +18‎ Add: doi-access. | Use this bot. Report bugs. | #UCB_CommandLine desfés

actprev 15:4615:46, 18 set 2023‎ Matthiaspaul discussió contribucions‎ 30.778 octets +47‎ →‎References: improved ref desfés

actprev 22:0022:00, 16 set 2023‎ Matthiaspaul discussió contribucions‎ 30.731 octets +2.450‎ Readded source which was identified as a "predatory" source by Headbomb. I won't comment on the academic quality of the source/publisher, since we don't use it for anything but the plain definition of these hyp-functions which is simple math. It's not worse than any self-published source, which we would include here without objections to support a basic statement as this one. Since we're not here to WP:RIGHTGREATWRONGS let's take the pragmatic path and keep it until a better source is found. desfés Etiqueta: use of predatory open access journal
actprev 21:4221:42, 16 set 2023‎ Matthiaspaul discussió contribucions‎ 28.281 octets +2‎ →‎References: improved ref desfés

actprev 22:4222:42, 10 set 2023‎ SentientObject discussió contribucions‎ m 28.279 octets +141‎ Added link to argument of Complex Number desfés

actprev 21:1021:10, 14 ago 2023‎ Matthiaspaul discussió contribucions‎ 28.138 octets +31‎ →‎History: Either we keep the source (which was removed for being from a questionable journal, the reason why I did not add a link to the journal/publisher and provided a local quotation) but is still perfectly valid to proof the simple fact that he defined these two functions, or we don't ask for other citations. A source from a questionable journal is not worse than any private or institutional web site which we would easily accept to proof a simple and undisputable fact such as this one. desfés

actprev 18:2018:20, 12 ago 2023‎ AnomieBOT discussió contribucions‎ m 28.107 octets +17‎ Dating maintenance tags: {{Cn}} desfés
actprev 17:5917:59, 12 ago 2023‎ Headbomb discussió contribucions‎ 28.090 octets −1.649‎ -predatory source desfés

actprev 09:3409:34, 3 ago 2023‎ Citation bot discussió contribucions‎ 29.739 octets +16‎ Add: s2cid. | Use this bot. Report bugs. | Suggested by Headbomb | Linked from Wikipedia:WikiProject_Academic_Journals/Journals_cited_by_Wikipedia/Sandbox2 | #UCB_webform_linked 284/2044 desfés