This is an old revision of this page, as edited by GünniX(talk | contribs) at 09:12, 1 April 2018(v1.43 - WP:WCW project (Template without correct beginning)). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
Revision as of 09:12, 1 April 2018 by GünniX(talk | contribs)(v1.43 - WP:WCW project (Template without correct beginning))
In terms of conciseness and compactness, Classical Chinese rarely uses words composed of two Chinese characters; nearly all words are of one syllable only. This stands directly in contrast with modern Chinese dialects, in which two-syllable words are extremely common. This phenomenon exists, in part, because polysyllabic words evolved in Chinese to disambiguate homophones that result from sound changes. This is similar to such phenomena in English as the pen–pin merger of many dialects in the American south: because the words "pin" and "pen" sound alike in such dialects of English, a certain degree of confusion can occur unless one adds qualifiers like "ink pen" and "stick pin." Similarly, Chinese has acquired many polysyllabic words in order to disambiguate monosyllabic words that sounded different in earlier forms of Chinese but identical in one region or another during later periods. Because Classical Chinese is based on the literary examples of ancient Chinese literature, it has almost none of the two-syllable words present in modern Chinese varieties.
Classical Chinese has more pronouns compared to the modern vernacular. In particular, whereas Mandarin has one general character to refer to the first-person pronoun ("I"/"me"), Literary Chinese has several, many of which are used as part of honorific language (see Chinese honorifics), and several of which have different grammatical uses (first-person collective, first-person possessive, etc.).[citation needed]
In syntax, Classical Chinese is always ready to forego subjects, verbs, objects, etc. when their meaning is understood (pragmatically inferable). Also, words are not restrictively categorized into parts of speech: nouns used as verbs, adjectives used as nouns, and so on. There is no copula in Classical Chinese, "是" (pinyin: shì) is a copula in modern Chinese but in old Chinese it was originally a near demonstrative ("this"); the modern Chinese for "this" is "這" (pinyin: zhè).
Beyond grammar and vocabulary differences, Classical Chinese can be distinguished by literary and cultural differences: an effort to maintain parallelism and rhythm, even in prose works, and extensive use of literary and cultural allusions, thereby also contributing to brevity.
The Muslim Hui people developed Jingtang Jiaoyu for representing Arabic sounds with Chinese characters. Classical Chinese has had influence of Jingtang Jiaoyu.[clarification needed] Rather than using Standard Chinese grammar, they use the grammar of their dialect and Classical Chinese to read the Arabic sounds out loud.[clarification needed] The Classical Chinese word order is often the reverse of Mandarin; for example, Mandarin 饒恕 (pinyin: ráoshù, "forgive") is Classical 恕饒 (pinyin: shùráo).[1]
Many final particles (Chinese: 歇語字; pinyin: xiēyǔzì; Wade–Giles: hsieh1-yü3-tzu4) and[2] interrogative particles are found in Literary Chinese.[3]
1. The word used as a tone for the end of the sentence, which is equivalent to 「啊」、「呢」
生而有疾惡焉,順是,故殘賊生而忠信亡焉。
(Human beings) were born with hatred; (because) people followed (it), cruelty and brutality grew (within them), and faithfulness died out (end of sentence).
2. For the tone of the words express a standstill for the sentence
3. Used as a pronoun, which is equivalent to "he", "them", "it", "here" and "where"
4. Used as pronouns, equivalent to 「豈」 (how/what), 「如何」 (what)
Used as a pronoun. Can be used as a third person pronoun ("him" 「他」, "his" 「他的」, "they" 「他們」, or "their" 「他們的」), objective pronoun ("it" 「它」, "its" 「它的」, "those" 「它們」, the possessive of "those" 「它們的」, or "one of" 「其中」) or demonstrative pronoun ("this" 「這」/「這個」, "these" 「這些」, "that" 「那」/「那個」, "those" 「那些」). Also can be used to distinguish tone, such as words like "approximately" 「大概」, "may" 「也許」, "I think" 「恐怕」, "could" 「還能」, "how" 「怎麼」 or "could it be that" 「難道」. To indicate something in first person, 「己」 is used, for example, 「己身也」.
Used as a preposition for place, reason; expression of action behaviour and the introduction of premises, time, motion, target, location, relationship between people, introduction to the object of comparison or analogy.
Note that for the descriptions provided above, English equivalents are provided in double quotation marks (""), while equivalents in vernacular Chinese are provided in hooked brackets (「」).
^J. J. Brandt (1936). Introduction to literary Chinese (2 ed.). H. Vetch. p. 169. Retrieved 10 February 2012. PART III GRAMMATICAL SECTION THE FINAL PARTICLES (歇語字 hsieh1-yü3-tzu4) The Wenli-style abounds with so called final particles. These particles(the University of Michigan)
^J. J. Brandt (1936). Introduction to literary Chinese (2 ed.). H. Vetch. p. 184. Retrieved 10 February 2012. PART III GRAMMATICAL SECTION THE INTERROGATIVE PARTICLES The Wen-li style particularly abounds with the interrogative particles.(the University of Michigan)
《新高中文言手册》 (1998年 北京华书)
《新华字典》 (第10版)
Further reading
Baller, Frederick William, China Inland Mission (1912). Lessons in elementary Wen-li. China Inland Mission.{{cite book}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
Brandt, J. (1929). Wenli particles. The North China Union Language School.