Draft:Farjand Ali
| Submission declined on 4 November 2023 by Theroadislong (talk). This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
Where to get help
How to improve a draft
You can also browse Wikipedia:Featured articles and Wikipedia:Good articles to find examples of Wikipedia's best writing on topics similar to your proposed article. Improving your odds of a speedy review To improve your odds of a faster review, tag your draft with relevant WikiProject tags using the button below. This will let reviewers know a new draft has been submitted in their area of interest. For instance, if you wrote about a female astronomer, you would want to add the Biography, Astronomy, and Women scientists tags. Editor resources
|  |
| Submission declined on 30 August 2023 by ARandomName123 (talk). This submission does not appear to be written in the formal tone expected of an encyclopedia article. Entries should be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources. Please rewrite your submission in a more encyclopedic format. Please make sure to avoid peacock terms that promote the subject. | |
Comment: At first glance I thought this draft was worth accepting, but two sentences strike me as odd:*He has been well known for his record of hearing 529 cases in a day. → This is definitely impossible. If we make the assumption that a human can work 16 hours a day, then this results in about 1.8 minutes per case, which doesn't work in a real court.*He persuades his BA LLB from neemuch. → What does that mean?Best, --Johannes (Talk) (Contribs) (Articles) 08:03, 3 September 2023 (UTC)
First incidence is real it can be framed as 529 cases taken up and decided , in a single day including four extra hours of official timing. second line was about his law degree. but i deleted the two lines as of now. kindly approve.
Farjand Ali.[1][2][3] (born 15 December 1968) is an Indian jurist, who is the current judge of Rajasthan high court. He was appointed a judge of the Rajasthan High court in October 2021[4]. He has also previously served as the Govt. Advocate-cum-Additional Advocate General at Principal Bench, Rajasthan High Court Jodhpur from 2019 to 2021. He was also been standing council of central government and panel advocate of NHAI, Wakf board and other corporate bodies.[1] He is often known for extra hour sitting in court room.[5][6]
Early life and education[edit]
Farjand Ali was born on 15 December 1968. His father Daulat Ali, is also an Advocate.[1]
References[edit]
- ^ a b c "CDJ Law Journal". www.cdjlawjournal.com. Retrieved 2023-08-31.
- ^ "List of High Court Judges | Department of Justice | India". Retrieved 2023-08-31.
- ^ "Press Communique". pib.gov.in. Retrieved 2023-09-05.
- ^ "जज नियुक्त किए गए फरजंद अली ने कहा इंसाफ़ ही अंतिम लक्ष्य | Judge-appointed Farzand Ali said justice is the ultimate goal". Patrika News (in Hindi). 2021-10-12. Retrieved 2023-08-31.
- ^ livelaw. "Read all Latest Updates on and about Justice Farjand Ali". www.livelaw.in. Retrieved 2023-09-03.
- ^ "Raj HC Judge Ali hears record 500 cases in a day". First India. 3 September 2022.