Draft:Meta-religion
![]() | Review waiting, please be patient.
This may take 3 months or more, since drafts are reviewed in no specific order. There are 2,604 pending submissions waiting for review.
Where to get help
How to improve a draft
You can also browse Wikipedia:Featured articles and Wikipedia:Good articles to find examples of Wikipedia's best writing on topics similar to your proposed article. Improving your odds of a speedy review To improve your odds of a faster review, tag your draft with relevant WikiProject tags using the button below. This will let reviewers know a new draft has been submitted in their area of interest. For instance, if you wrote about a female astronomer, you would want to add the Biography, Astronomy, and Women scientists tags. Editor resources
Reviewer tools
|
![]() | This article has multiple issues. Please help improve it or discuss these issues on the talk page. (Learn how and when to remove these template messages)
|
Meta-religion is a theoretical framework aimed at understanding and comparing various world religions by identifying common principles and values that transcend individual traditions. This concept seeks to foster a critical and rational examination of religious beliefs and practices, promoting a unified perspective that integrates diverse religious experiences.[1] The idea of meta-religion is particularly significant within Islamic thought, where it is seen as a way to harmonize the various religious experiences of humanity under a single, comprehensive framework.[2][3][4]
Key characteristics
[edit]Meta-religion is defined by several key characteristics. It is rational and critical, evaluating each religion based on historical and rational analysis rather than condemning any religion a priori.[2] It considers the possibility that various religions may have a common divine origin, expressed through different historical and cultural contexts. This perspective allows for the recognition of shared ethical principles and values, fostering a dialogue that transcends individual traditions.[2] According to al-Faruqi, meta-religion involves a belief in God or Ultimate Reality as the "totally other" and is not about testing the validity of religions through external or functional tests, but rather about understanding the condition of homo religiosus.[5]
Historical development
[edit]The concept of meta-religion has evolved through the efforts of scholars aiming to reconcile the diverse religious experiences of humanity. Isma'il Raji al-Faruqi's work in the late 20th century significantly shaped the understanding of meta-religion within Islamic thought.[1][4] He advocated for a rational approach to studying religions, proposing a meta-religion that acknowledges the potential divine origin of religious experiences while critically examining their historical manifestations.[3][4] Al-Faruqi also suggested that meta-religion could serve as a basis for meaningful interfaith dialogue, where shared values and ethical principles are emphasized to foster mutual understanding.[6][4]
Applications
[edit]Meta-religion can be applied in various fields, including interfaith dialogue, religious studies, and cultural analysis. In interfaith dialogue, it promotes mutual understanding and respect among different religious traditions by highlighting shared values and ethical principles.[2][4] In religious studies, meta-religion provides a framework for the interdisciplinary study of religion, encouraging exploration of the broader context of religious phenomena.[2][3][4] In cultural analysis, it examines the impact of religion on culture and society, analyzing how religious ideas shape art, literature, politics, and social norms.[4]
Criticisms
[edit]Meta-religion has faced criticism. Some argue that it can oversimplify the complexities of individual religious traditions by focusing on commonalities. Others suggest it may inadvertently privilege certain philosophical or cultural perspectives over others, potentially leading to biased interpretations of religion. Critics like Abdulkader Tayob argue that al-Faruqi's approach manipulates philosophical frameworks like those of Kant to fit Islamic theological commitments, potentially limiting the space for contemplation or alternative religious expressions, such as Sufism or other forms of mysticism.[4][7] This critique highlights that while al-Faruqi's approach sought to integrate religious values into socio-political contexts, it may have inadvertently sidelined diverse religious experiences and interpretations.[4] Al-Faruqi himself acknowledged these challenges but maintained that a meta-religious approach could provide a valuable framework for understanding and engaging with diverse religious traditions.[6][4]
References
[edit]- ^ a b Ibrahim, Haslina (March 2008). "Al-Faruqi and His Principles of Meta-Religion: The Islamisation of Comparative Religion". Kulliyah Research Bulletin. 3 (1). IIUM: 1–6.
- ^ a b c d e al-Faruqi, Ismail Raji (1986). "Meta-Religion: Towards A Critical World Theology". American Journal of Islamic Social Sciences. 3 (1): 13–21. doi:10.35632/ajis.v3i1.2902.
- ^ a b c Osman, Ahmad Sabri; Sharif, Mohd Farid Mohd; Zakaria, Raihaniah (2012). "Konsep Meta-Religion Menurut Isma'il Raji Al-Faruqi". Voice of Academia. 7 (1). Universiti Teknologi MARA (Perlis): 72–87.
- ^ a b c d e f g h i j Yusuf, Imtiyaz (Spring–Summer 2014). "Ismail al-Faruqi's Contribution to the Academic Study of Religion". Islamic Studies. 53 (1/2). Islamic Research Institute, International Islamic University, Islamabad: 99–115. JSTOR 44627369.
- ^ Yusuf, Imtiyaz (Spring–Summer 2014). "Ismail al-Faruqi's Contribution to the Academic Study of Religion". Islamic Studies. 53 (1/2): 105–106.
- ^ a b al-Faruqi, Isma'il Raji (1967). Christian Ethics: A Historical and Systematic Analysis of its Dominant Ideas. Montreal: McGill University Press. pp. 21–24.
- ^ Tayob, Abdulkader (2013). "Religion in Modern Islamic Discourse". Numen. 60 (2–3): 232–247.