Submission declined on 4 December 2024 by Pythoncoder (talk).
We're sorry, but we cannot accept blank submissions. If in fact you did include text within the article, but it isn't showing, please make sure that any extra text above your entry is removed, as it may be causing it to hide and not be shown to the reviewer.
Comment: The response below is copied from my response to the Layered Universe Model draft, but is equally valid here. I would like to elaborate on this strong response to this article creation attempt. This is clearly referring to one of Maxwell's Four Cosmos Hypotheses, which appears to me as someone with formal education in physics to be a qualitative hand-waving explanation for certain JWST findings which does not have any scientific merit, basis, justification or qualification, and the eponymous Maxwell Starwhisper is clearly a pseudonym attempting to use the name of James Clerk Maxwell to promote their book. I do not want to see this material here. In my opinion, this article is a pseudoscientific neologism that should not be given the credibility of a wikipedia article, and that is why this is a Reject rather than a Decline. Spiralwidget (talk) 02:21, 5 December 2024 (UTC)
Hypothesis linking quantum entanglement to cosmic structures
The WikiProject banner below should be moved to this page's talk page. If this is a demonstration of the template, please set the parameter |category=no to prevent this page being miscategorised.
This page is within the scope of WikiProject Physics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Physics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PhysicsWikipedia:WikiProject PhysicsTemplate:WikiProject Physicsphysics articles
This page does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
The WikiProject banner below should be moved to this page's talk page. If this is a demonstration of the template, please set the parameter |category=no to prevent this page being miscategorised.
This page is within the scope of WikiProject Astronomy, which collaborates on articles related to Astronomy on Wikipedia.AstronomyWikipedia:WikiProject AstronomyTemplate:WikiProject AstronomyAstronomy articles
The Quantum Coupling Hypothesis is a theoretical proposition suggesting that quantum entanglement, a phenomenon traditionally observed at microscopic scales, extends to influence macroscopic cosmic systems. This hypothesis builds on established principles of quantum mechanics and applies them to cosmology, proposing that entangled quantum states might underpin the alignment and behavior of galaxies, galaxy clusters, and other large-scale cosmic structures.[1]
- **Quantum Entanglement Beyond Microscales**: Traditionally confined to the subatomic realm, entanglement is proposed here as a mechanism affecting the organization of vast cosmic entities.
- **Universal Synchronization**: Suggests that quantum coupling could maintain universal balance and influence interactions across large distances.
The hypothesis draws from foundational research on quantum entanglement, notably Einstein, Podolsky, and Rosen's (EPR) 1935 paper that introduced the concept of "spooky action at a distance."[2] Advancements in quantum theory and experimental demonstrations have validated entanglement at microscopic levels, encouraging exploration into its potential macroscopic applications. Frameworks such as the holographic principle in cosmology support the idea of interconnectedness across scales.[3]
1. **Quantum Communication**: Insights from this hypothesis could enhance secure communication technologies, potentially enabling instantaneous data transfer over vast distances.
2. **Cosmology**: The hypothesis provides a novel perspective on the formation and behavior of galaxies, dark matter interactions, and universal dynamics.
Critics of the Quantum Coupling Hypothesis note the significant challenges in empirically testing the effects of entanglement on macroscopic structures. Current observational technologies are limited in their ability to directly detect such phenomena. However, techniques like gravitational lensing and advanced simulations could provide indirect evidence.[4]
Comment: The response below is copied from my response to the Layered Universe Model draft, but is equally valid here. I would like to elaborate on this strong response to this article creation attempt. This is clearly referring to one of Maxwell's Four Cosmos Hypotheses, which appears to me as someone with formal education in physics to be a qualitative hand-waving explanation for certain JWST findings which does not have any scientific merit, basis, justification or qualification, and the eponymous Maxwell Starwhisper is clearly a pseudonym attempting to use the name of James Clerk Maxwell to promote their book. I do not want to see this material here. In my opinion, this article is a pseudoscientific neologism that should not be given the credibility of a wikipedia article, and that is why this is a Reject rather than a Decline. Spiralwidget (talk) 02:21, 5 December 2024 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=small}
.jpg){kind=small}
