Jump to content

Talk:Clark House (New Zealand)

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
(Redirected from Draft talk:Clark House)

Did you know nomination

[edit]
The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by AirshipJungleman29 talk 19:27, 18 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Clark House from behind
Clark House from behind
  • ... that Clark House (pictured) was used to host Cold War meetings?
  • ALT1: ... that Clark House (pictured) was constructed with hollow ceramic blocks? Source: https://clough.co.nz/monographs/clough_monograph3.pdf
  • Reviewed:
  • Comment: First time at DYK, I think the Cold War hook is more interesting to a general reader, although someone into architecture would be more interested about the hollow ceramic blocks (but most of that information is out of scope for the article).
Created by Abydocomist (talk). Number of QPQs required: 0. Nominator has less than 5 past nominations.

Abydocomist (talk) 17:56, 23 May 2024 (UTC).[reply]

General: Article is new enough and long enough
Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems
Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation
Image: Image is freely licensed, used in the article, and clear at 100px.
QPQ: None required.

Overall: Really nice inaugural article from new user Abydocomist about a historic house in West Auckland, New Zealand (hopefully many more to come!) Since I am taking the Clough & Associates reference on good faith (I had problems accessing it on my browser) I would rather stick with ALT0. I also removed a possibly promotional sentence which used an unreliable source. Havradim leaf a message 08:00, 24 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Date discrepancy?

[edit]

Hi there. I just noticed the lede says both "early 20th century" and "constructed in the late 1890s". Would it be an idea to re-word one of these so they aren't contradictory? - e.g. instead of "early 20th century" have "turn of the 20th century"? Daveosaurus (talk) 04:11, 25 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Construction started in the late 1890s and finished in the 20th century. There is certainly a better way to word this. Abydocomist (talk) 06:39, 30 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]