Talk:Infinite Conflict

	This article was reviewed by member(s) of WikiProject Articles for creation. The project works to allow users to contribute quality articles and media files to the encyclopedia and track their progress as they are developed. To participate, please visit the project page for more information.Articles for creationWikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creationTemplate:WikiProject Articles for creationAfC articles
	This article was accepted from this draft on 10 March 2023 by reviewer Galobtter (talk · contribs).

Board and table games Low‑importance

	Games portal This article is part of WikiProject Board and table games, an attempt to better organize information in articles related to board games and tabletop games. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.Board and table gamesWikipedia:WikiProject Board and table gamesTemplate:WikiProject Board and table gamesboard and table game articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Role-playing games Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Role-playing games, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of role-playing games on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Role-playing gamesWikipedia:WikiProject Role-playing gamesTemplate:WikiProject Role-playing gamesrole-playing game articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Move to mainspace

@BOZ, I think this one could reasonably be moved to mainspace. I defer to you. Airborne84 (talk) 00:33, 4 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

We've got to overcome a potential challenge based on the result at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Infinite Conflict. If you come across a third review or good-sized reliable source, I think we'd have it. BOZ (talk) 01:06, 4 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

So yeah, I did say the previous AFD could be a challenge, but I have gotten rebuilt articles through AFC before, it's just a matter of making sure you've got enough good sources. I think we can try again with another good independent source or two either in the reception section or something in-depth going into its history and/or gameplay. BOZ (talk) 17:53, 8 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@BOZ since no answer to my request for comment by Blaze Wolf, perhaps we should seek another opinion? Airborne84 (talk) 23:05, 10 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, I say resubmit and hopefully someone else will pay better attention to the current state of the article rather than judging it by its past. BOZ (talk) 00:00, 11 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Done Airborne84 (talk) 00:20, 11 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]