Gender neutrality in English: Revision history

Filter revisionsshowhide

To date:

Tag filter:

Invert selection

External tools:

For any version listed below, click on its date to view it. For more help, see Help:Page history and Help:Edit summary. (cur) = difference from current version, (prev) = difference from preceding version, m = minor edit, → = section edit, ← = automatic edit summary

curprev 06:1306:13, 6 May 2015 BG19bot talk contribs m 35,774 bytes −1 →Honorifics: WP:CHECKWIKI error fix for #61. Punctuation goes before References. Do general fixes if a problem exists. - using AWB (10901) undo

curprev 23:0423:04, 8 February 2015 BattyBot talk contribs m 34,166 bytes +4 Fixed author and/or language parameters in citation templates, General fixes using AWB (10810) undo

curprev 23:4523:45, 22 December 2014 188.79.40.214 talk 34,222 bytes +6 All honorifics are invented. It is a meaningless qualifier to refer to language constructs. undo

curprev 01:2501:25, 14 December 2014 50.174.192.155 talk 34,216 bytes 0 →Pronouns: Changed grammar prescription to grammar proscription, since while they are setting down a rule, it's a rule against the use undo

curprev 18:5818:58, 29 August 2014 95.16.114.201 talk 34,216 bytes −21 Another "who?" is deleted because it is answered at the end of the sentence undo
curprev 18:5618:56, 29 August 2014 95.16.114.201 talk 34,237 bytes −21 Deleted a "Who?" because it is answered in the links at the end of the sentence undo

curprev 19:1119:11, 14 July 2014 Rachel148 talk contribs 33,795 bytes +16 →References: replaced non-existing link Louis Markos by an existing one (http://www.one-eternal-day.com/2009/08/world-safe-from-male-pronouns.html) undo
curprev 18:5218:52, 14 July 2014 Rachel148 talk contribs m 33,779 bytes −187 →External links: I took away the dead link * New Feminist. "Against 'Against the Theory of Sexist Language.'" http://newfeminist.wordpress.com/2008/10/02/against-against-the-theory-of-sexist-language/{{dead link|date=April 2014}} undo

curprev 19:4519:45, 18 May 2014 Fuebar talk contribs 33,962 bytes −100 →Rationale: -- added clarification templates and removed unsourced and NPOV statements at end of section undo
curprev 19:2819:28, 18 May 2014 Fuebar talk contribs 34,062 bytes −96 →top: -- removed second sentence as it introduces the article as if it's a textbook article and probably encourages that context, WP:NOTTEXT. undo

curprev 15:5415:54, 21 February 2014 158.65.242.28 talk 34,645 bytes +9 "all honorifics are invented" no...not as such. no more than any other word is at least. where this was specifically created far far more recently as a gender neutral alternative. its like esperanto vs spanish. one is invented the other not so much undo

curprev 22:2122:21, 7 February 2014 158.65.236.110 talk 34,636 bytes −342 first: the article is clearly written with a strong bias, but far far more importantly the removed example made zero sense. is mary supposed to be a gender nonspecific name? but even more importantly the example used is actually for the opposite argume undo

curprev 01:5401:54, 2 February 2014 Thnidu talk contribs 34,978 bytes +43 No edit summary undo Tag: Mobile edit

curprev 21:0621:06, 7 December 2013 Rosefox talk contribs 34,935 bytes −9 →Honorifics: Removed "invented" from "The invented honorific 'Mx'" as all honorifics are invented. undo

curprev 03:2303:23, 19 October 2013 Cmantito talk contribs m 34,944 bytes −33 →Honorifics: "Mx" *is* the full form, and Mixter has never been an "official" pronunciation within the larger community. undo