George Montague Harper
|Sir George Harper|
Lt-Gen Sir George Harper
|Born||11 January 1865
Batheaston, Somerset, England
|Died||15 December 1922 (aged 57)
Sherborne, Dorset, England
|Buried at||London Road Cemetery, Salisbury, Wiltshire|
|Years of service||1884 - 1922|
|Commands held||17th Brigade
51st (Highland) Division
|Awards||Knight Commander of the Order of the Bath
Distinguished Service Order
As a protégé of General Henry Wilson, he held important staff positions at the War Office before the war and at British Expeditionary Force (BEF) GHQ in 1914. He later commanded the 51st (Highland) Division at the Battles of the Ancre, Arras, Third Ypres and Cambrai. It was widely claimed by tank officers that his adoption of idiosyncratic tactics at Cambrai caused his division's failure to reach its objectives, although this view has now been called into question. He commanded IV Corps in 1918.
Early military career
George Harper was educated at Bath College and at the Military Academy at Woolwich.
Harper was commissioned into the Royal Engineers in 1884. In 1899 he was deployed to South Africa where he joined 37th Field Company RE and saw action at Spion Kop, Val Kranz, Tugela Heights and Pieter's Hill. He was awarded the Distinguished Service Order (DSO) in November 1900 for his service in South Africa.
Harper accompanied Henry Wilson, then Commandant at Staff College, on his reconnaissance of the likely future theatre of war. In August 1908, along with Edward Percival (“Perks”), they explored south of Namur by train and bicycle. In August 1909 Harper and Wilson travelled from Mons then down the French frontier almost as far as Switzerland. In Spring 1910, this time by motor car, they travelled from Rotterdam into Germany, then explored the German side of the frontier, noting the new railway lines and “many sidings” which had been built near St Vith and Bitburg (to allow concentration of German troops near the Ardennes).
He became Deputy Director of Military Operations (DDMO) at the War Office in 1911 (serving under Wilson, DMO). From June 1911 Harper headed M.O.1 section. After the Agadir Crisis Gen Sir Percy Radcliffe wrote that M.O.1, formerly “academic and sterile”, “became the mainspring of all our preparations for war”.
Because of the need for secrecy, Harper’s MO1 was tiny – ten officers, three of them seconded from the Quartermaster-General’s Department. Secret documents (e.g. railway timetables) were typed up by officers rather than (enlisted) clerks and printed on a secret printing press. By 14 November 1912, after two years of work, the railway timetables were ready for the assembly of the BEF, prior to sea transport to France.
When Deputy Director of Military Operations, Colonel Harper minuted (1 October 1913) that in the event of war corps should simply be “post boxes” to relay the decisions of GHQ to divisions – this view would gradually be revised in the course of the war, and by the latter part of World War One experienced corps commanders were taking on more and more autonomy over operations.
First World War
On the outbreak of war Colonel Harper was placed in charge of the Oa (planning operations and written orders) section at BEF GHQ. The I (intelligence) and Ob (written records) sections were subordinate to Oa, making Oa in practice something of a bottleneck. He had a poor relationship with the BEF Chief of Staff Murray, as he was used to working with Murray’s deputy and rival Wilson. On 24 August (the day after the Battle of Mons) Harper refused to do anything for Murray, so that Lord Loch had to write messages even though it was not his job. Wilson had to intercede to prevent French from sacking Harper (Wilson diary 7 Sep) but a week later recorded (Wilson diary 14 Sep), that Murray and Harper argued constantly.
Robertson (QuarterMaster-General of the BEF) was known to remark - by one account to some visiting politicians at Abbeville in 1914 who saw the letters written on a door - that "Oa" stood for “Old ‘Arper”.
Robertson, now BEF Chief of Staff, removed Harper – who had been promoted temporary Brigadier-General in November - “in a very untactful way” (Rawlinson diary 29 Jan & 8 Feb 1915) whilst Wilson was away touring the French front. Robertson separated Staff Duties and Intelligence out from Operations into separate sections, each headed by a Brigadier-General. Although Harper’s removal was part of a restructuring at GHQ, his successor Whigham was more focussed and approachable than Harper.
In February 1915 he was given command of 17th Infantry Brigade. Harper briefly succeeded to Wilson's old job as Director of Military Operations. In September 1915 he took command of the 51st (Highland) Division which saw action during the Battle of the Somme.
Harper remained a favourite of Wilson, and throughout 1916, whilst Wilson commanded IV Corps, they would – as Andy Simpson puts it – regularly “meet, eat and criticise others”. He told Wilson (24 September 1916) that GHQ was out of touch with the troops and had no knowledge and no imagination.
Harper's Division also saw action in the Battle of Arras in spring 1917. Spears commented on Harper’s interest in training prior to the Battle of Arras, and remarked on the steep improvement in many divisions in this regard since the Somme. The 51st Division, known initially as "Harper's Duds", was later described as "one of the two or three best divisions in France" under Harper's leadership.
Spears described him as “fine-looking, with an aquiline nose and snow-white hair, although his moustache was black”. He was known as “Uncle” or, occasionally, “Daddy”. Lieutenant-Colonel Walter Nicholson commented that his experience of working with Territorials made him the right man to encourage the individualism of Highlanders, and that he had “the makings of a great general”. Cyril Falls commented that “He had a touch of showmanship which troops like when it is combined with efficiency”.
Ivor Maxse (GOC XVIII Corps) wrote a glowing report of Harper’s performance between 31 July and 22 September 1917 (he was highly critical of H.D.Fanshawe of 58th Division and Cuthbert, 39th Division). Maxse’s report stressed Harper's skill both at training and command, and mentioned the improvement in 51st Division, which had previously been “ill-organised and unsoldier-like”, and recommended him for promotion to corps command.
51st Division took part in Gough’s attacks to assist Plumer’s offensive at Menin Road (September 1917). In an attempt to economise on soldiers’ lives, he attacked with only one brigade, reinforced to six battalions, unlike most divisions which attacked with two brigades (“two up”) and one in reserve. However, his division was driven back by German counterattacks.
Harper’s tactical plan for Cambrai was for his infantry to follow the tanks in line. He was entitled to draw up his own plan under “Field Service Regulations”, and Braithwaite of 62nd Division had also adopted his own tactics. These tactics were based on previous experience of infantry-tank cooperation, and concern that infantry in column might suffer excess casualties before being able to return fire. Christopher Baker-Carr later claimed in his memoirs (From Chauffeur to Brigadier – 1930) that the attack on Flesquieres failed as a result of Harper using his own idiosyncratic tactical drill. Although widely repeated, this claim is dismissed by Bryn Hammond as “plainly rot” – Baker-Carr made no such complaint at the time (he in fact praised the arrangements), it is not corroborated in other contemporary accounts, and it was Baker-Carr’s own brigade which failed.
To retake Fontaine on 23 November, Harper concurred with the brigade commander Henry Pelham Burn's suggestion to attack with only two of his seven battalions in a misguided attempt to conserve lives.
Bryn Hammond attributes Harper’s failure to take Flesquieres to a strong German defence, to the holding back of his reserve brigade, and partly to the overextended command and control structure (Harper had sited his HQ too far back, 8,000 yards (over 4.5 miles) behind the original British front line, and 7 miles from Flesquieres).
Brigadier-General Hardress-Lloyd (GOC 3 Tank Brigade) thought Harper “an old ass” and claimed (according to the May 1918 journals of J.F.C. Fuller) that he had expressed scepticism about the new tactics of infantry advancing in single file (“worms”) and had remarked that they should advance in line as if “you were walking arm-in-arm with a girl”. Hardress-Lloyd claimed to have retorted “if the late Oscar Wilde were walking with you, where do you think he would go?” and that Harper almost had to be “carried from the room in an ambulance”.
Harper was promoted to GOC IV Corps on 11 March 1918, as part of a reshuffle in which a number of older corps commanders were retired from front-line command. He held this command, part of British Third Army, until the end of the war.
Harper and his colleague Aylmer Haldane (VI Corps) are described by Travers as “seasoned and reliable commanders”. Nonetheless they suffered command problems in the early stages of the March retreat, particularly on 26 March when the Germans were rumoured to be breaking through at Hebuterne.
In September 1918, during the period after the Battle of Albert whilst Third Army was advancing towards the Hindenburg Line, Haldane regularly vented in his diary about Harper’s supposed shortcomings. At one point Haldane lobbyied Byng (GOC Third Army) to urge Harper to make quicker progress, and when Byng pointed out that IV Corps were making progress recorded “I should “progress” by sending Harper to the rear”. Haldane was concerned that Third Army orders gave Harper (on Haldane’s right, i.e. southern flank) “an excuse for not coming forward at the same time as my Corps” (22 September). Haldane appealed to Byng, who refused to overrule Harper. Haldane attributed this to their lack of experience of the NorthWest Frontier. Byng’s decision was wrong and Haldane’s advance was hampered by Harper’s failure to seize the high ground.
After the War, in 1919, Harper became General Officer Commanding-in-Chief of Southern Command. On 15 December 1922 Harper was driving from Sherborne to Bradford Abbas when his car skidded and overturned, he died of a fractured skull and his wife was injured.
Honours and awards
- 27 September 1901 - Captain (now Major) George Montague Harper is appointed a Companion of the Distinguished Service Order in recognition for services during operations in South Africa.
- 18 February 1915 - Colonel (Temporary Brigadier-General) George Montague Harper DSO is appointed a Companion of the Order of the Bath in recognition of the meritorious service during the war.
- 1 January 1918 - Major-General George Montague Harper CB DSO is promoted to Knight Commander of the Order of the Bath for valuable services rendered in connection with military operations in the field.
He married Ella Constance Jackson in 1893.
- "General Sir G. M. Harper." Times [London, England] 16 Dec. 1922: 14. The Times Digital Archive. Web. 7 Nov. 2013.
- 1891 Census of Bath - Batheaston Manor, High Street, Batheaston, Piece:1940 Folio:48 Page:23
- Travers 1987, p287
- Biography of General Sir George Harper
- "No. 27359". The London Gazette. 27 September 1901. p. 6309.
- Jeffery 2006, p101
- Jeffery 2006, p74-5
- Jeffery 2006, p102
- Sheffield & Todman 2004, p98
- Sheffield & Todman 2004, p45
- Robbins 2005, p116
- Hammond 2008, p60-2
- Robbins 2005, p117-8
- Sheffield & Todman 2004, p46 Sheffield & Todman argue that this had the unintended consequence of allowing John Charteris to build up his own untrammelled "empire" when head of Intelligence during the middle part of the war. Intelligence was once again made to "report to" Operations when BEF GHQ was again restructured early in 1918.
- Sheffield & Todman 2004, p48
- Simpson 2006, p205
- Travers 1987, p108
- Simpson 2006, p48-9
- British generalship on the Western Front 1914-18: defeat into victory By Simon Robbins, Page 63 Taylor & Francis, 2006, ISBN 978-0-415-40778-6
- Jeffery 2006, p194
- Simpson 2006, p103
- Sheffield & Todman 2004, p138
- the official recommendation for columns of men to follow the tanks mirrored the new tactics - “worms” of moppers-up following “waves” of skirmishers - pioneered by Fifth Army at Third Ypres over the summer
- Hammond 2008, p83-6, 431
- Hammond 2008, p252
- Hammond 2008, p179, 435
- Travers 1992, p6
- Simpson 2006, p230
- Travers 1987, p238
- Simpson 2006, p200
- Boff 2012 pp201-2
- "Sir G. M. Harper Killed." Times [London, England] 16 Dec. 1922: 12. The Times Digital Archive. Web. 7 Nov. 2013.
- "No. 27359". The London Gazette. 27 September 1901. p. 6309.
- "No. 29086". The London Gazette. 2 March 1915. p. 2091.
- "No. 30450". The London Gazette (Supplement). 1 January 1918. p. 1.
|Wikimedia Commons has media related to George Montague Harper.|
Books used for citations
- Boff, Jonathan (2012). Winning and Losing on the Western Front. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. ISBN 978-1-1074-4902-2.
- Hammond, Bryn (2008). Cambrai, The Myth of the First Great Tank Battle. Weidenfeld & Nicholson, London. ISBN 978-0-7538-2605-8.
- Jeffery, Keith (2006). Field Marshal Sir Henry Wilson: A Political Soldier. Oxford University Press. ISBN 978-0-19-820358-2.Harper
- Robbins, Simon (2005). British Generalship on the Western Front. Abingdon: Routledge. ISBN 0-415-40778-8.
- Sheffield, Gary; Todman, Dan (2004). Command and Control on the Western Front. Stroud: Spellmount. ISBN 978-1-86227-420-4.
- Simpson, Andy (2006). Directing Operations: British Corps Command on the Western Front 1914-18. Stroud: Spellmount. ISBN 1-86227-292-1.
- Travers, Tim (1987). The Killing Ground. Allen & Unwin. ISBN 0-85052-964-6.
- Travers, Tim (1992). How the War Was Won. Routledge. ISBN 978-1-84415-207-0.
|GOC IV Corps
March 1918–November 1918
Sir Henry Sclater
|GOC-in-C Southern Command
Sir Walter Congreve