Jump to content

Hannibal Directive

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Omnipaedista (talk | contribs) at 12:04, 12 November 2023 (per MOS:BOLDSYN). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

IDF Chief of Staff Benny Gantz (right) in a training exercise where the forces practiced a soldier abduction scenario. Addressing the IDF's operations forum, Gantz stated that IDF protocols do not allow for a soldier to be killed in order to prevent his abduction.[1]

The Hannibal Directive (Hebrew: נוהל חניבעל; also Hannibal Procedure or Hannibal Protocol) is a controversial procedure used by Israeli Defense Forces (IDF) to prevent the capture of Israeli soldiers by enemy forces. The directive was revoked in 2016, to be replaced by a new directive of unknown content.[2][3] It was introduced in 1986, after a number of abductions of IDF soldiers in Lebanon and subsequent controversial prisoner exchanges. The full text of the directive was not published, and until 2003, Israeli military censorship forbade any discussion of the subject in the press. The directive has been changed several times. At one time, the formulation was that "the kidnapping must be stopped by all means, even at the price of striking and harming our own forces."[4]

Two versions of the Hannibal Directive may have existed simultaneously at times: a written version, accessible only to the upper echelon of the IDF, and an "oral law" version for division commanders and lower levels. In the latter version, "by all means" was often interpreted literally, as in "an IDF soldier was 'better dead than abducted'". In 2011, IDF Chief of Staff Benny Gantz stated the directive does not permit killing IDF soldiers to prevent abduction.[5]

Among the 11 Israelis involved in the seven reported Hannibal incidents, only one soldier (Gilad Shalit) survived. In his case, invocation of the Hannibal Directive occurred too late to have any influence on the course of events. There is only one case for which Israeli forces have been officially confirmed to be directly responsible for an Israeli death.

Background

Israel has, with several notable exceptions, adhered to the principle of not negotiating with those it considers terrorists, especially in hostage situations. This policy led to some notable successes, such as Operation Entebbe, but also to loss of human life, e.g. the Maalot Massacre. In cases where Israeli soldiers were captured and no military solution was found, Israel was forced to negotiate with the captors for an exchange of prisoners. Large parts of the Israeli public would not accept abandoning captured soldiers to their fate.

In 1970, a member of the Palestinian National Liberation Movement (now Fatah) illegally entered Israel from Lebanon and abducted a security guard in the northernmost Israeli town of Metula. He did this in order to secure a swap of the guard for a senior member of Fatah, jailed in Israel. In 1979, Israel agreed to exchange an Israeli POW held by Palestinians for 76 convicted Palestinian militants in Israeli jails.

After the 1982 Lebanon War, Palestinian forces imprisoned nine IDF soldiers as POWs. Six were held by Fatah (the main faction of the PLO) and three by the pro-Syrian PFLP-GC. In 1983, Israel agreed to free 4,700 Palestinian and Lebanese prisoners, including several high ranking PLO officers, for the six IDF soldiers held captive by Fatah. The following year Israel agreed to free another 1,150 Palestinian prisoners from Israeli jails. Many were allowed to remain in Israeli controlled territory.

The Hannibal Directive

According to Haaretz reporter Leibovich-Dar, the motivation for the directive was the capture of two Israeli soldiers during a Hezbollah ambush in South Lebanon in June 1986. Both soldiers presumably died during the attack, and their bodies were returned to Israel in an exchange with Hezbollah in 1996. The directive developers were three top officers of the IDF Northern Command: Major General Yossi Peled, the command's operations officer; Colonel Gabi Ashkenazi; and the intelligence officer, Colonel Yaakov Amidror. The order was secret, and its existence was denied by Israeli military authorities.

On August 1, 2014, the New York Times reported that Hamas had captured an IDF officer and that the IDF responded with an assault that killed around 140 Palestinian civilians. The "Hannibal Directive" was not mentioned in the article. The paper had not been subjected to this level of scrutiny for more than six years.[6] But the New York Times was contacted by the Israeli military censor and informed that any material related to the missing officer had to be submitted for prior review before publication.[7]

The exact wording of the directive was not known, though Leibovich-Dar claimed that it had been updated several times over the years.[8][9] The Jerusalem Post journalist Anshel Pfeffer described the order in 2006 as the "rumored" standard procedure in the eventuality of a kidnap attempt: "soldiers are told, though never officially" the content of this order.[10]

Maariv quoted a version of the directive apparently applicable in 2014:

"A. During a kidnapping, the main task becomes to rescue our soldiers from the abductors, even at the cost of harming or injuring our soldiers.

B. If the abductors and the kidnapped are identified and the calls are not heeded, a firearm must be fired in order to bring the kidnappers to the ground, or arrest them.

D.(sic) If the vehicle or the hijackers do not stop, they should be fired at individually, intentionally, in order to hit the hijackers, even if it means harming our soldiers. (This section was accompanied by an asterisk comment emphasizing: "In any case, everything should be done to stop the vehicle and not allow it to escape").[11]

Apparently, the Hannibal Directive existed in several versions at that time. It had been amended by the IDF General Staff in October 2013, but neither the corresponding orders at the IDF Southern Command, nor the one at the Gaza Division had been similarly updated by July 2014. The three different, simultaneously current, versions of the directive could therefore be interpreted in different ways, especially on the sensitive question of the value of a soldier's life.[12]

Israeli officials insisted that the directive's name was a random computer-generated designation, however, Hannibal, the Carthaginian general, is said to have preferred suicide by poison rather than being taken prisoner by his Roman enemies.[8][13][14]

According to statements by several Israeli officials, the aim of the directive is to prevent the capture of an IDF soldier by enemy forces, even by risking the soldier's life or the lives of scores of non-Israeli civilians. Israeli spokespersons claim that IDF forces are forbidden to attempt to kill a captured soldier, rather than having him captured. Many testimonies from IDF soldiers and other sources contradict this claim and suggest that the IDF in practice adheres to the principle that a dead soldier is better than a captive soldier.[8][15]

According to the directive, once it had been declared by a field officer, Israeli forces were to open fire on enemy forces carrying away an IDF prisoner. Vehicles suspected of removing such a prisoner from the battlefield could thus be attacked, even at the risk of harming, or even killing, the abductee himself. According to some interpretations, this includes even firing missiles from attack helicopters or firing tank shells at suspected escaping vehicles.[8]

Amos Harel of Haaretz wrote in November 2011 that the Hannibal Directive was suspended for a time "due to opposition from the public and reservist soldiers" but was revised and reinstated by IDF Chief-of-Staff Benny Gantz after the abduction of Gilad Shalit in June 2006. The revised order stated that IDF commanders may take whatever action is necessary, even at the risk of endangering the life of an abducted soldier, to foil an abduction, but it does not allow them to kill an abducted Israeli soldier.[1] The post-2006 version gave local field commanders the right to invoke Hannibal and take action, without waiting for superior officers' confirmation.[13]

Former head of Israeli military intelligence (1974–1978) Shlomo Gazit criticised the fact that a low level officer ("a corporal") could invoke the Hannibal Directive, with such potentially far reaching consequences. The invocation of the Hannibal Directive in the 2006 Hezbollah cross-border raid had far-reaching consequences. An IDF tank sent in pursuit of the abductors attacked, killing its crew. Attempts to rescue the bodies of the tank crew led to further IDF losses. By the time the Israeli government convened to decide how to respond to the attack, Israel - according to Gazit - "was already at war".[16]

The Hannibal Directive was officially revoked by the military in 2016.[3][17][18]

Controversy within the army

Dr. Avner Shiftan, an army physician with the rank of major, came across the Hannibal directive while on reserve duty in South Lebanon in 1999. In army briefings he "became aware of a procedure ordering soldiers to kill any IDF soldier if he should be taken captive by Hezbollah. This procedure struck me as being illegal and not consistent with the moral code of the IDF. I understood that it was not a local procedure but originated in the General Staff, and had the feeling that a direct approach to the army authorities would be of no avail, but would end in a cover-up."[19]

He contacted Asa Kasher, the Israeli philosopher noted for his authorship of Israel Defense Forces' Code of Conduct, who "found it difficult to believe that such an order exists" since this "is wrong ethically, legally and morally". He doubted that "there is anyone in the army" believing that 'better a dead soldier than an abducted soldier'. Haaretz article about Dr. Shiftan's experience was the first to be published in an Israeli newspaper.[19]

In contrast to the view of Kasher, the IDF Chief of Staff Shaul Mofaz said in an interview with Israeli daily Yedioth Ahronoth in 1999: "In certain senses, with all the pain that saying this entails, an abducted soldier, in contrast to a soldier who has been killed, is a national problem." Asked whether he was referring to cases like Ron Arad (an Air Force navigator captured in 1986) and Nachshon Wachsman (an abducted soldier killed in 1994 in a failed rescue attempt), he replied "definitely, and not only".[19]

According to Prof. Emanuel Gross, from the Faculty of Law at the University of Haifa, "Orders like that have to go through the filter of the Military Advocate General's Office, and if they were not involved that is very grave", he said. "The reason is that an order that knowingly permits the death of soldiers to be brought about, even if the intentions were different, carries a black flag and is a flagrantly illegal order that undermines the most central values of our social norms".[8]

Harel writes that a kind of "Oral Law" has developed inside IDF, which is supported by many commanders, even at brigade and division level. It goes further than the official order, including the use of tank shells or air strikes. "A dangerous, unofficial interpretation of the protocol has been created," a senior officer told Haaretz. "Intentionally targeting a vehicle in order to kill the abductee is a completely illegal command. The army's senior command must make this clear to officers."[1]

In anticipation of the Gaza War in 2009, Lt. Col. Shuki Ribak, the commander of the Golani Brigade's 51st battalion instructed his soldiers to avoid kidnapping at any cost and even made clear that he expected his soldiers to commit suicide rather than being abducted:

[N]o soldier in Battalion 51 will be kidnapped at any price. At any price. Under any condition. Even if it means that he blows himself with his own grenade together with those trying to capture him. Also even if it means that now his unit has to fire a barrage at the car that they are trying to take him away in.[20][21]

After a recording of Ribak's instructions was distributed by an anonymous source, the IDF reiterated its denial of having a policy of intentionally killing captured soldiers.[20]

Incidents where the directive was invoked

Shebaa farms (2000)

The Hannibal Directive was invoked in October 2000 after the Hezbollah capture of three Israeli soldiers in the Israeli-occupied Shebaa Farms area. An Israeli border patrol was attacked by a Hezbollah squad with rockets and automatic fire. St.-Sgt. Adi Avitan, St.-Sgt. Benyamin Avraham and St.-Sgt. Omar Sawaid were captured and brought over the ceasefire line into Lebanon by their captors. When the abduction was discovered, the Northern Command ordered a "Hannibal situation". Israeli attack helicopters fired at 26 moving vehicles in the area since they assumed that the abducted soldiers were transported in one of them.[8]

Kerem Shalom crossing (2006)

Tank gunner Cpl. Gilad Shalit was captured by Hamas in a cross-border raid from Gaza 25 June 2006. Two IDF soldiers were killed in the attack and another two were wounded. Shalit was held for five years, before being exchanged for 1,027 Palestinian prisoners held in Israeli jails, which was the highest number released for a single Israeli prisoner. According to the Israeli commission of inquiry, headed by Giora Eiland, the Hannibal directive was declared more than an hour after the capture. By that time, Shalit and his captors were already well inside the Gaza strip.[22] The declaration of Hannibal therefore had few practical consequences.

Ayta ash-Shaab (2006)

On 12 July 2006, two Israeli soldiers, Ehud Goldwasser and Eldad Regev, were captured by Hezbollah in an ambush, in which three other soldiers were killed. The Hannibal directive was invoked and a force consisting of tanks and Armored Personnel Carriers was sent across the border to capture a Hezbollah post and block the exit routes out of the town of Ayta ash-Sha’b. A Merkava II main battle tank however ran over a powerful explosive charge and was totally destroyed and its four crewmen killed. The rescue mission was therefore aborted. An eighth IDF soldier was killed trying to retrieve the bodies of the tank crew.[23][24][25] The Hannibal directive triggered instant aerial surveillance and airstrikes inside Lebanon to limit Hezbollah's ability to move the soldiers it had seized. "If we had found them, we would have hit them, even if it meant killing the soldiers," a senior Israeli official said.[26] The bodies of the two soldiers were returned in an exchange with Hezbollah in July 2008.

Erez Crossing (2009)

In 2009, Israeli civilian Yakir Ben-Melech was shot dead by Israeli security guards while trying to enter the Gaza Strip from Israel, by jumping the fence at the Erez crossing. In the Israeli press the man was described as a mentally disturbed Israeli citizen, who wanted to contact Hamas, so as to secure the release of Israeli captive Gilad Shalit. Officially, Ben-Melech was mistakenly identified as a potential terrorist.[27]

According to a report by Israeli radio the Hannibal procedure was declared and Ben-Melech was shot to death when he refused to stop. Chief of Staff of the Southern Command, Brig.-Gen. Zvika Fogel commented: "We can't afford now any soul mate of Gilad Shalit" Apparently, Ben-Melech was killed, not by IDF soldiers, but by members of a private security firm, responsible for security at the Erez gate.[28][29]

Gaza (2008–09)

During the 2008–2009 Gaza war, an unidentified Israeli soldier was shot and injured by a Hamas fighter during a search of a house in one of the neighbourhoods of Gaza. The Hannibal directive was declared. The wounded soldiers' comrades evacuated the house due to fears that it was booby-trapped. According to testimony by soldiers who took part in the incident the house was then shelled to prevent the wounded soldier from being captured alive by Hamas. According to the IDF spokesman, however, the soldier was already dead, killed by terrorist gun fire.[30]

Rafah (2014)

During the 2014 Gaza War, the third major offensive launched by Israel in Gaza since 2008, IDF Givati Brigade Lieutenant Hadar Goldin was captured by Hamas soldiers after a brief skirmish on August 1, despite the announcement of a 72-hour ceasefire agreement earlier that day. Israel then reportedly initiated the Hannibal Directive, ultimately resulting in carnage dubbed "Black Friday."[31][32][33]The IDF carried out air and ground attacks on residential areas of Rafah during the Hannibal Directive attempt to prevent capture of Lt. Goldin.[34] A 2015 joint report by Amnesty International and Forensic Architecture found that Israel's indiscriminate violence against all human life amounted to war crimes.[34] That report, along with the United Nations' investigation, the United Nations' Gaza Inquiry investigation alleged that war crimes were committed by both Israel and armed Palestinian groups, presumably Hamas.[35][36] The massive Israeli bombardment killed between 135 and 200 Palestinian civilians, including 75 children, in the three hours following the suspected capture of the one Israeli soldier.[37][38] Haaretz reported this to be the "most devastating" use of the Hannibal Directive to date.[39]

In December 2014, audio recordings from the IDF's communication system were obtained by Ynet.[40] This evidence, in addition to the July 2015 release of full transcripts from the IDF's communication system, reveal the initiation of the Hannibal Directive.[41][42] However, an IDF investigation denied that the "Hannibal Procedure" was implemented, despite admitting to using the phrase on IDF field radios. The IDF investigation concluded that 41 people were killed, 12 of them Hamas combatants.[43] Asa Kasher, a winner of the Israel Prize and the author of the IDF's ethical code, disagreed with the IDF's report while speaking at a conference of the Tzohar Zionist rabbinical organization. Kasher stated that a soldier had been killed during the summer of 2014 by his comrades due to a mistaken understanding of the directive; Kasher intimated that the soldier was Lt. Goldin.[44]

Testimonies from IDF soldiers involved in the attack provided further evidence contrary to the official IDF story.[45] An Israeli army infantry officer described the events of August 1 to Israeli NGO Breaking the Silence as follows:

"The minute 'Hannibal Directive' is declared on the radio, there are consequences. There's a fire procedure called the 'Hannibal fire procedure' – you fire at every suspicious place that merges with a central route. You don't spare any means."[46]

He reported that the initial burst of fire lasted three hours.[46] An artillery soldier said his battery was "firing at a maximum fire rate" into inhabited areas.[37][47] According to the Givati Brigade inquiry, more than 2,000 bombs, missiles and shells were fired in Rafah on 1 August 2014, including 1,000 in the three hours following the capture.[48][49]

Shuja'iyya (2014)

During the Battle of Shuja'iyya, on July 20, 2014, Hamas fired an anti-tank missile at an IDF armored personnel carrier carrying 7 soldiers, including St.-Sgt. Oron Shaul.[50]

Hamas claimed to have captured an IDF soldier named Aron Shaul, corroborating its claim with the soldier's "photo ID and credentials".[51][52] The IDF later stated that the body of Oron Shaul had not been identified among the dead found inside the vehicle.[53][54] It is unclear if Shaul was captured alive or dead or whether the Hannibal Directive was invoked or not.[55]

The second case possibly occurred five days later. St.-Sgt. Guy Levy was killed on July 25, 2014. According to the IDF, Levy and 27 IDF soldiers were killed by another Hamas anti-tank missile fired from the yard of a United Nations school.[56]

Reactions

No mother would want her son to be killed rather than be taken prisoner…You prefer to wait until he returns, even if it goes on for very many years.

— Pnina Feldman, mother of Zvi Feldman, missing since the battle of Sultan Yakub in Lebanon, in June 1982[9]

The nightmare we went through for 10 years is indescribable, but despite that, I would not agree to have the buddies of an abducted soldier try to save him even at the price of killing him. As long as there is life there is hope. I am also positive that the soldiers would refuse to obey the order and would not kill an Israeli soldier. What about the effect of the order on the soldiers' morale? A soldier who is taken prisoner has to know that everything will be done to rescue him without killing him.

— Mordechai Fink, father of Yossi Fink, whose abduction in 1986 brought about the formulation of the Hannibal Directive.[9]

See also

References

  1. ^ a b c Harel, Amos. After Shalit, some IDF officers see a dead soldier as better than abducted, Haaretz. 2011
  2. ^ Harel, Amos. "Israel's Military Chief Orders to Revoke Controversial 'Hannibal' Directive". Haaretz. Retrieved 3 November 2023.
  3. ^ a b Kershner, Isabel (28 June 2016). "Israeli Military Revokes Use of Maximum Force to Foil Captures". The New York Times.
  4. ^ Weizman, Eyal (2017). Forensic Architecture, VIOLENCE AT THE THRESHOLD OF DETECTABILITY. New York: Zone Books. ISBN 9781935408864., page 176.
  5. ^ Amos Harel (2011). "Haaretz, Chief of Staff to Military Commanders: Hannibal Directive Does Not Permit Killing of Soldiers to Prevent Abduction".
  6. ^ Jodi Rudoren and Isabel Kershner (1 August 2014). "Gaza Fighting Intensifies as Cease-Fire Falls Apart". New York Times. Retrieved 16 January 2022.
  7. ^ Margaret Sullivan (1 August 2014). "Times Foreign Editor Responds on Israeli Censorship". New York Times. Retrieved 16 January 2022.
  8. ^ a b c d e f Sara Leibovich-Dar (2003-05-21). "The Hannibal Procedure". Haaretz. Retrieved 2011-10-20.
  9. ^ a b c Sara Leibovich-Dar (2003-05-21). "Continuation of The Hannibal Procedure". Haaretz. Retrieved 2011-10-20.
  10. ^ Anshel Pfeffer (2006-06-25). "Comment: The Entebbe Syndrome". Jerusalem Post. Retrieved 2011-10-20.
  11. ^ Noam Amir (28 June 2016). "הרמטכ"ל איזנקוט: נוהל חניבעל שמופעל לאחר אירוע חטיפה ייכתב מחדש (Chief of Staff Eizenkot: The Hannibal procedure used after a kidnapping incident will be rewritten)". Maariv. Retrieved 26 January 2022. Hebrew text: "א. בזמן מחטף הופכת המשימה העיקרית חילוץ חיילינו מידי החוטפים גם במחיר של פגיעה או פציעת חיילינו. ב. במידה ויזוהו החוטפים והחטופים ולא נענו לקריאות לעצור, יש לבצע ירי נק"ל (נשק קל), על מנת להוריד את החוטפים לקרקע, או לעצור אותם.ד. אם לא עצר הרכב או החוטפים, יש לירות לעברם ירי נשק קל בבודדת, במכוון, על מנת לפגוע בחוטפים גם אם המשמעות פגיעה בחיילינו (סעיף זה לווה בהערת כוכבית שהדגישה: "בכל מקרה ייעשה הכל על מנת לעצור הרכב ולא לאפשר בריחתו").
  12. ^ State Comptroller and Ombudsman, Justice (Ret.) Joseph Chaim Shapira (March 14, 2018), Operation "Protective Edge" - IDF Activity from the Perspective of International Law, Particularly with Regard to Mechanisms of Examination and Oversight of Civilian and Military Echelons, p.9
  13. ^ a b Ruth Margalit (August 6, 2014). "Hadar Goldin and the Hannibal Directive". The New Yorker. Retrieved August 9, 2014.
  14. ^ Titus Livius (Livy) (1936). The History of Rome, Book XXIX, Chapter 51. Harvard University Press.
  15. ^ Yossi Yehoshua (14 January 2015). "Hannibal Directive: Soldiers were following clear orders". ynetnews. Retrieved 20 September 2021.
  16. ^ Benny Brunner (7 October 2016). "The Hannibal Directive". Al Jazeera English. Retrieved 25 May 2021.
  17. ^ Spitka, Timea (12 April 2023). "Israeli National Protection Strategies and Realities". National and International Civilian Protection Strategies in the Israeli-Palestinian Conflict (First ed.). Springer International Publishing. p. 35. ISBN 978-3-031-20389-3. Retrieved 28 October 2023. The directive was officially cancelled by the military in 2016 following heavy criticism.
  18. ^ Johnson, D.E.; Cohen, R.S. (2017). "4". Lessons from Israel's Wars in Gaza. Santa Monica, CA: Rand Corp. p. 120. ISBN 978-0-8330-9787-3. In June 2016, the IDF announced it was revoking the controversial Hannibal directive.
  19. ^ a b c Aviv Lavie (8 May 2003). "Better dead than abducted". Haaretz. Archived from the original on 9 August 2014.
  20. ^ a b Anshel Pfeffer (2011-10-18). "IDF warns soldiers of kidnappings ahead of Gilad Shalit's release". Haaretz. Retrieved 2011-10-20.
  21. ^ "The IDF Hannibal Protocol - IDF Commander Briefing Troops". Israel Television Channel 2 News. 16 October 2011. Retrieved Aug 25, 2012.
  22. ^ Hanan Greenberg (2006-07-10). "דו"ח איילנד: זמן רב חלף עד להכרזה על חטיפה". Yedioth Aharonoth. Retrieved 2011-10-30.
  23. ^ Eitan Baron (25 July 2006). "Angels of death knocking at my door". Haaretz. Retrieved 2011-10-20.
  24. ^ Harel, Amos and Avi Issacharoff, 34 Days: Israel, Hezbollah, and the War in Lebanon, Palgrave Macmillan, New York, 2008, p.12
  25. ^ Amos Harel (2006-07-13). "Hezbollah kills 8 soldiers, kidnaps two in offensive on northern border". Haaretz. Retrieved 2011-11-10.
  26. ^ Scott Wilson (21 October 2006). "Israeli War Plan Had No Exit Strategy". Washington Post. Retrieved 10 November 2020.
  27. ^ "Man shot on Gaza border was mental patient". Yediot Achronot. 12 July 2009. Retrieved 2011-11-20.
  28. ^ Meron Rapoport and Kobi Peterzil (8 December 2009). "ידיד נפש, אב הרחמן: כך הרגו את יקיר בן מלך". Haoketz.org. Retrieved 2011-10-30.
  29. ^ Blumenthal, Max, THE 51 DAY WAR, Ruin and Resistance in Gaza, p.97.
  30. ^ Amir Bohbot (2009-01-26). "בית בעזה ובו גופת חייל הופגז - למנוע חטיפתה". Maariv (NRG). Retrieved 2011-10-30.
  31. ^ Jack Moore, Hadar Goldin and 'Hannibal Directive': Israel's Nightmare Dilemma to Stop Soldier Becoming Hamas Pawn, International Business Times, August 1, 2014; Quote: Following the capture of Israel Defense Forces (IDF) soldier Hadar Goldin, reports are circulating that the Israeli military may invoke the covert 'Hannibal Directive' to prevent the Second Lieutenant being used as critical leverage in the ongoing Gaza conflict.
  32. ^ "Israel 'committed war crimes' in Gaza, Amnesty says". The Independent. 2015-07-29. Archived from the original on 2022-05-09. Retrieved 2022-01-16.
  33. ^ "Gaza 'Black Friday': Cutting edge investigation points to Israeli war crimes in Rafah". Amnesty International. 2015-07-29. Retrieved 2022-01-16.
  34. ^ a b "Gaza: 'Israeli war crimes' followed soldier's capture – Amnesty". BBC News. 2015-07-29. Retrieved 2022-01-16.
  35. ^ "OHCHR | CoIGazaConflict Report of the Independent Commission of Inquiry on the 2014 Gaza Conflict". www.ohchr.org. Retrieved 2022-01-16.
  36. ^ "OHCHR | UN Gaza Inquiry finds credible allegations of war crimes committed in 2014 by both Israel and Palestinian armed groups". www.ohchr.org. Retrieved 2022-01-16.
  37. ^ a b "'Black Friday' Summary: Carnage in Rafah during 2014 Israel/Gaza conflict". blackfriday.amnesty.org. Retrieved 2022-01-16.
  38. ^ Zitun, Yoav (2015-01-08). "Defense Minister Ya'alon objects to probe into 'Black Friday'". Ynetnews. Retrieved 2022-01-16.
  39. ^ "The Hannibal Directive: Why Israel Risks the Life of the Soldier Being Rescued". Haaretz. Archived from the original on 16 January 2022. Retrieved 2022-01-16. On Friday morning... the Hannibal Directive was activated to its most devastating extent yet – including massive artillery bombardments and air strikes on possible escape routes.
  40. ^ Zitun, Yoav (2014-12-31). "Hannibal Directive: Exclusive tapes reveal details of IDF's Black Friday". Ynetnews. Retrieved 2022-01-16.
  41. ^ "Recordings from 'Black Friday' in Rafah". Haaretz. July 7, 2015. Archived from the original on 16 January 2022.
  42. ^ "'You're Shooting Like Retards': Rafah recordings reveal IDF's Hannibal directive in action". Mondoweiss. 2015-01-08. Retrieved 2022-01-16.
  43. ^ "Apparently the 'Hannibal Procedure' was not activated, and no one will be tried". www.makorrishon.co.il. Archived from the original on 16 January 2022. Retrieved 2022-01-16.
  44. ^ "IDF Ethics Code Author: Hannibal Protocol Misused Last Summer". Arutz Sheva. 2015-07-08. Retrieved 2015-07-08.
  45. ^ "This is How We Fought in Gaza: Soldiers׳ testimonies and photographs from Operation Protective Edge" (PDF). Archived (PDF) from the original on 16 January 2022.
  46. ^ a b "Breaking the Silence › Testimony › "You don't spare any means"". Breaking the Silence. Retrieved 2022-01-16.
  47. ^ "Breaking the Silence › Testimony › The battery fired 900 shells that night". Breaking the Silence. Retrieved 2022-01-16.
  48. ^ "'Black Friday' Report: Carnage in Rafah during 2014 Israel/Gaza conflict". blackfriday.amnesty.org. Retrieved 2022-01-16.
  49. ^ "תחקיר גבעתי על הקרב ברפיח: הפעלת האש היתה מידתית, אך החיילים פעלו בגזרה שלא אובטחה כראוי". הארץ (in Hebrew). Archived from the original on 16 January 2022. Retrieved 2022-01-16.
  50. ^ Harel, Amos (20 July 2014). "Soldiers killed in Gaza were deployed in 50-year-old APC". Haaretz. Retrieved 15 October 2014.
  51. ^ Plesser, Ben (22 July 2014). "Israel Hunts Remains of Missing Soldier Sgt. Oron Shaul". NBC. Retrieved 15 October 2014.
  52. ^ Lynfield, Ben (22 July 2014). "Israel-Gaza conflict: Israeli military names soldier Oron Shaul confirmed as 'missing' after Hamas celebrates alleged kidnap". The Independent. Archived from the original on 2022-05-09. Retrieved 15 October 2014.
  53. ^ "Israel says soldier missing, presumed dead; Kerry presses for truce". Reuters.
  54. ^ Ginsberg, Mitch (22 July 2014). "Golani soldier Oron Shaul caught in Gaza ambush is MIA". Times of Israel. Retrieved 15 October 2014.
  55. ^ § 57, Report of the independent commission of inquiry established pursuant to Human Rights Council resolution S-21/1, 24 June 2015
  56. ^ "Soldier killed by anti-tank missile fired from near UN school, raising IDF toll to 35". Times of Israel. July 25, 2014. Retrieved August 3, 2014.
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Hannibal_Directive&oldid=1184754926"