Talk:Nandamuri Balakrishna

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

Biography Unassessed

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.

India: Cinema Stub‑class

	India portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.IndiaWikipedia:WikiProject IndiaTemplate:WikiProject IndiaIndia articles
Stub	This article has been rated as Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Indian cinema workgroup.
	This article has been automatically rated by a bot or other tool as Stub-class because it uses a stub template. Please ensure the assessment is correct before removing the `\|auto=` parameter.

Taking the article under my wing

Cleaned up some more Hate Edits and added a brief Biography.--Milki 17:00, 17 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

If you have something to say, say it in a productive manner or if you need help post it on my talk page. Also please use proper layouts.--Milki 19:41, 18 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Please lock this

This article has again been vandalised. Please post matters in a reasonable format. We don't want your opinions here.--Milki 02:49, 13 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Doesn't even care anymore. Please lock this. I can't keep reverting it every time it gets vandalised--Milki 20:07, 13 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

NPOV

Fancruft needs to be cleaned up --Vyzasatya 06:46, 27 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Yes ... This Article needs to be checked thoroughly ... Its all rubbish...I dont know, why do people make fun of a great actor in telugu film industry. Wikipedia folks ,this article is embarassing.Guys who wrote this article please behave as a literate.

I dont know who has written this article one can not write as his wish scolding a hero and his admirers

The article is swinging to extremes with both fancruft on one extreme and vandalism on the other extreme --Vyzasatya 15:52, 4 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

_______________________________

Dear Vyzasatya,

(No offence)

You seem to be displaying "en-3" on your user page that says, "This user is able to contribute with an advanced level of English". I wonder whether you are for real, and whether the same is self-proclaimed. The post above exhibits your ignorance of the basics of English punctuation. Please find your mistakes below. You also seem to be a member of the "Cleanup Task Force", "Counter-Vandalism Unit", etc.. I suggest you learn some punctuation.

> Wikipedia folks ,this article is embarassing.Guys

1. Always put a space after a comma and *none* before it. Same applies to a period.

> Its all rubbish

2. It should be "It's" and not "Its". See its.

3. dont -> don't

4. I'm omitting other nitpicks here. Of course, your sentences are ungrammatical.

The above sentences you attribute to me are not mine (please see page history and figure it out) --Vyzasatya 10:35, 21 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

__________________________________

Hello Vyzasatya,

I donot find any scolding or vandalism. This article is totally a neutral point of view and unbiased. It places the actual facts about the actor. One cannot deny it.

Hello Vyzasatya, I think that was an interesting article,comin out with the real facts...such articles should be encouraged.....

Naveen Lanke

This article is biased! It should also tell more beyond sarcastic comments. Chiranjeevi's page was written a lot of different than this. By the bye, chiranjeevi is also one of the mass appealing actors in tollywood if you don't know. His mass films has many derogatory dialogues on ladies. Those facts were never presented in Chiru's page!

This article serously needs some cleanup. Some of things may be facts but the sarcasm should be removed. 203.200.33.2 12:22, 26 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

i believe the WP policy doesn't allow images with logos across it. This is article should have been invariably made some of his fanatic fans.

Remove Commercial Links

I believe it is WP policy to remove links to fansites and blogs? Can anybody explain if this article is an exception to it ?if so why? Anon..alleged vandal of Diamirza article.

Cleanup required

Well.. i do agree that his recent movies have been totally rubbish and illogical. But your/my POV has no place in a wikipedia article. The saracasm definitely needs to be removed. As such most of the telugu films are illogical. It is only that we don't see them that way (POV). Sumanthk 12:29, 26 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Why was my article " balakrishna shooting controversy" deleted ?

The article has been deleted because of the false information presented. The information is presented in a way which is defametory. Balakrishna has been cleared Not guilty is the above shooting case you cited in the court of law. If you believe, your information is valid please post it in your personal blogs. Information which is presented in a way which defies truth cannot be permitted here.

Please stop rude criticism

I request all Telugu people who ever is doing rude (very bad) criticism about Bala Krishna, Please stop. I receive many emails that makes fun of him (very badly). I am fan of MegaStar Chiranjeevi still I do not like this sort of rude criticism. When these emails are reaching other region people (Particulary Tamilians) how they badly speak about Telugu people.

I feel that by criticising Bala Krishna, writing in Internet and spreading the emails We (Telugu People) are putting ourselves in bad position before other state people.

I request every Telugu person to kindly think and act.

--192.193.221.202 04:39, 31 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Very Well Said.--Milki 16:16, 31 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]