Maxwell coil: Revision history

Filter revisionsshowhide

To date:

Tag filter:

Invert selection

External tools:

For any version listed below, click on its date to view it. For more help, see Help:Page history and Help:Edit summary. (cur) = difference from current version, (prev) = difference from preceding version, m = minor edit, → = section edit, ← = automatic edit summary

curprev 10:2110:21, 20 October 2023‎ Tacocat98 talk contribs‎ 3,570 bytes +61‎ #suggestededit-add 1.0 undo Tags: Mobile edit Mobile app edit Android app edit

curprev 15:5615:56, 24 August 2020‎ 81.157.153.155 talk‎ 3,509 bytes −151‎ Not in reference given but claimed for a different arrangement. undo

curprev 10:4210:42, 15 August 2020‎ RFenergy talk contribs‎ 3,660 bytes −31‎ →‎Description: Better. undo
curprev 10:4110:41, 15 August 2020‎ RFenergy talk contribs‎ 3,691 bytes +208‎ →‎Description: CE for what Maxwell's paper does state. undo
curprev 10:2810:28, 15 August 2020‎ RFenergy talk contribs‎ 3,483 bytes −154‎ →‎Description: The reference does not make this claim for the three coil version but for the four. undo

curprev 13:5813:58, 13 August 2020‎ RFenergy talk contribs‎ 4,282 bytes +37‎ →‎Description: Dubious material apparently not derived from the provided source, and therefore probable original research. See talk page. undo
curprev 13:2813:28, 13 August 2020‎ RFenergy talk contribs‎ m 4,245 bytes −9‎ Undid revision 972627492 by Schvanger (talk) This is an encyclopaedia. It is represented in the design. We don't need any emotive adjectives to make the point. undo Tag: Undo
curprev 02:5102:51, 13 August 2020‎ Schvanger talk contribs‎ 4,254 bytes +9‎ Undid revision 972330691 by 81.157.153.155 (talk) Do you represent most of the population? Fame is relative to something called a Maxwell coil, Mr. Maxwell is famous to this coil. undo Tag: Undo
curprev 02:5002:50, 13 August 2020‎ Schvanger talk contribs‎ 4,245 bytes +652‎ Undid revision 972331458 by 81.157.153.155 (talk) The edit is correct, mathematically. Simple math is not original research. undo Tag: Undo

curprev 13:3413:34, 11 August 2020‎ 81.157.153.155 talk‎ 3,593 bytes −652‎ →‎Description: Unreferenced and original research undo
curprev 13:2913:29, 11 August 2020‎ 81.157.153.155 talk‎ 4,245 bytes −9‎ →‎Description: Not particularly famous if most of the human population has not heard of it. undo
curprev 13:2713:27, 11 August 2020‎ 81.157.153.155 talk‎ 4,254 bytes −9‎ →‎Description: Maxwell coils are not known to suddenly present an electric shock hazard at specific winding ratios. undo
curprev 13:2613:26, 11 August 2020‎ 81.157.153.155 talk‎ 4,263 bytes +10‎ →‎Description: We don't include full size illustrations in article space. The full size image is just a mouse click away. undo

curprev 07:1207:12, 2 December 2019‎ Schvanger talk contribs‎ 4,253 bytes +492‎ Added a more obvious ratio of 3/4, which reveals a baffling error in Maxwell's 1873 proposed design. Maybe it was a typo? undo
curprev 07:1207:12, 2 December 2019‎ Schvanger talk contribs‎ 3,761 bytes −491‎ Undid revision, to repost with my account logged in undo Tag: Undo
curprev 07:0907:09, 2 December 2019‎ 2601:18c:501:3b80:f9dc:4bbb:5d04:37ec talk‎ 4,252 bytes +491‎ Added a more obvious ratio of 3/4, which reveals a baffling error in Maxwell's 1873 proposed design. Maybe it was a typo? undo

curprev 20:3520:35, 30 November 2019‎ Schvanger talk contribs‎ 3,761 bytes +451‎ When building one of these coil setups, I realized that the ratio of 49/64 was only an approximation, based on small integers, for this coil arrangement. I added another suggested ratio of 65/86 that yields a much more uniform field. Another good ratio is 97600604/129113463, but this number of windings is impractical. undo

curprev 02:5302:53, 15 March 2019‎ Citation bot talk contribs‎ m 3,310 bytes +21‎ Alter: isbn. Add: year. | You can use this bot yourself. Report bugs here. | User-activated. undo

curprev 16:3516:35, 7 June 2018‎ Bibcode Bot talk contribs‎ m 3,289 bytes +29‎ Adding 0 arxiv eprint(s), 1 bibcode(s) and 0 doi(s). Did it miss something? Report bugs, errors, and suggestions at User talk:Bibcode Bot undo

curprev 18:4018:40, 17 March 2018‎ Geek3 talk contribs‎ 3,260 bytes +367‎ references fixed undo

curprev 23:2123:21, 19 February 2018‎ Geek3 talk contribs‎ 2,893 bytes +112‎ new image: 3D surface plot of the modulus of the field undo

curprev 14:5914:59, 20 November 2017‎ 134.169.112.52 talk‎ 2,781 bytes +10‎ Added volumne to reference, since the reference is found in the second volume. undo

curprev 14:0514:05, 31 December 2016‎ Jayaar72 talk contribs‎ 2,771 bytes +534‎ In many fields, "Maxwell coil" refers to the two-coil setup. However, the small paragraph on the 2-coil setup can be easily missed. I therefore gave it a heading and some additional information. undo Tag: Visual edit: Switched

curprev 22:3522:35, 24 January 2016‎ Glrx talk contribs‎ 2,237 bytes 0‎ Undid revision 700974514 by 182.66.18.114 (talk) previous was better undo

curprev 19:0819:08, 21 January 2016‎ 182.66.18.114 talk‎ 2,237 bytes 0‎ →‎See also: correcting search phrase undo Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit

curprev 04:3304:33, 19 February 2015‎ Glrx talk contribs‎ 2,237 bytes −20‎ →‎See also: Helmholtz mentioned in text undo
curprev 04:3304:33, 19 February 2015‎ Glrx talk contribs‎ m 2,257 bytes 0‎ →‎See also: sort undo
curprev 04:3204:32, 19 February 2015‎ Glrx talk contribs‎ m 2,257 bytes +3‎ WP:ORDER undo

curprev 22:0322:03, 6 March 2014‎ Wtshymanski talk contribs‎ 2,254 bytes −8‎ unlink undo

curprev 00:0700:07, 5 December 2013‎ Yobot talk contribs‎ m 2,262 bytes −8‎ →‎Description: WP:CHECKWIKI error fixes using AWB (9773) undo

curprev 22:2022:20, 30 November 2013‎ Jim Swenson talk contribs‎ m 2,270 bytes +5‎ →‎Description undo
curprev 22:1122:11, 30 November 2013‎ Jim Swenson talk contribs‎ m 2,265 bytes +30‎ →‎Description: formatting for comprehensibiilty undo

curprev 19:4719:47, 22 October 2012‎ Feyrauth talk contribs‎ 2,235 bytes +73‎ Added reference to inventor; consistent with helmholtz coils. undo

curprev 12:1712:17, 12 October 2012‎ Yobot talk contribs‎ m 2,162 bytes −14‎ WP:CHECKWIKI error 61 fix, References after punctuation per WP:REFPUNC and WP:PAIC using AWB (8459) undo

curprev 22:5522:55, 20 July 2012‎ Rgdboer talk contribs‎ m 2,176 bytes +97‎ →‎Description: article title undo

curprev 01:3901:39, 23 June 2012‎ Embrittled talk contribs‎ 2,079 bytes +19‎ →‎See also: halbach array undo

curprev 21:2421:24, 19 December 2011‎ 149.43.60.188 talk‎ 2,060 bytes +196‎ reference back to helmholtz coils undo

curprev 12:1312:13, 16 December 2010‎ 194.29.146.146 talk‎ 1,864 bytes −12‎ →‎Description: Year for reference undo

curprev 14:1514:15, 24 July 2010‎ Geek1337~enwiki talk contribs‎ m 1,876 bytes +22‎ No edit summary undo
curprev 14:1414:14, 24 July 2010‎ Geek1337~enwiki talk contribs‎ 1,854 bytes +65‎ new title image undo

curprev 03:1803:18, 14 December 2008‎ Citation bot talk contribs‎ m 1,789 bytes −3‎ Updating page numbers after recent improvement to Template:Cite book. Removed redundant parameters. undo

curprev 20:1920:19, 5 November 2008‎ 128.159.133.66 talk‎ 1,792 bytes +1‎ →‎Description undo

curprev 20:3520:35, 27 May 2008‎ 132.163.11.68 talk‎ 1,791 bytes −4‎ Deleted improper use of "ths" undo

curprev 04:1504:15, 20 February 2008‎ DanielSlaughter talk contribs‎ 1,795 bytes +1,057‎ No edit summary undo

20 October 2023

24 August 2020

15 August 2020

14 August 2020

13 August 2020

11 August 2020

2 December 2019

30 November 2019

15 March 2019

7 June 2018

17 March 2018

19 February 2018

20 November 2017

31 December 2016

24 January 2016

21 January 2016

19 February 2015

6 March 2014

5 December 2013

30 November 2013

22 October 2012

12 October 2012

20 July 2012

23 June 2012

19 December 2011

16 December 2010

24 July 2010

14 December 2008

5 November 2008

27 May 2008

20 February 2008