Jump to content

Payday loans in the United States: Difference between revisions

Add links
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Browse history interactively
← Previous editNext edit →
Content deleted Content added
VisualWikitext
m Reverting possible vandalism by Ultrasurf2 to version by Kumioko. False positive? Report it. Thanks, ClueBot NG. (441903) (Bot)
Line 6: Line 6:
==US loan process==
==US loan process==
If the account is short on funds to cover the check, the borrower may face a bounced check fee from their [[bank]] in addition to the costs of the loan, and the loan may incur additional fees and/or an increased interest rate as a result of the failure to pay. For customers who cannot pay back the loan when due, members of the national trade association are required to offer an extended payment plan at no additional cost. In [[Washington (U.S. state)|Washington]] and some other states, extended payment plans are required by state law.
If the account is short on funds to cover the check, the borrower may face a bounced check fee from their [[bank]] in addition to the costs of the loan, and the loan may incur additional fees and/or an increased interest rate as a result of the failure to pay. For customers who cannot pay back the loan when due, members of the national trade association are required to offer an extended payment plan at no additional cost. In [[Washington (U.S. state)|Washington]] and some other states, extended payment plans are required by state law.

Get $1500 Cash Advances in 1 Hour
No Hassle.No Faxing.No Credit Check
[http://www.resourcecash1hour.com www.resourcecash1hour.com]


==Regulation==
==Regulation==

Revision as of 06:16, 30 May 2011

A shop window in Falls Church, Virginia advertises payday loans.

Payday loans in the United States are a growing industry. Regulation of lending institutions is handled primarily by individual states, and the industry exists atop an active and shifting legal landscape. Lenders lobby to enable payday lending practices, while opponents of the industry lobby to prohibit the high cost loans in the name of consumer protection.[1] In the United States, finance charges on payday loans are typically in the range of 15 to 30 percent of the amount for the two-week period, which translates to annual percentage rates (APRs) from 390 to 780.[2]

Payday lending is legal and regulated in 37 states. In 13 states it is either illegal or not feasible, given state law.[3] When not explicitly banned, laws that prohibit payday lending are usually in the form of usury limits: hard interest rate caps calculated strictly by annual percentage rate (APR). Since Oct. 1, 2007 a federal law has capped lending to military personnel at a maximum of 36% APR as defined by the Secretary of Defense.[4]

US loan process

If the account is short on funds to cover the check, the borrower may face a bounced check fee from their bank in addition to the costs of the loan, and the loan may incur additional fees and/or an increased interest rate as a result of the failure to pay. For customers who cannot pay back the loan when due, members of the national trade association are required to offer an extended payment plan at no additional cost. In Washington and some other states, extended payment plans are required by state law.

Get $1500 Cash Advances in 1 Hour No Hassle.No Faxing.No Credit Check www.resourcecash1hour.com

Regulation

The current list of states that have made payday loans illegal is:

  • Arizona
  • Arkansas
  • Colorado
  • Connecticut
  • Georgia
  • Maine
  • Maryland
  • Massachusetts (not strictly illegal but highly regulated[5])
  • New Hampshire
  • New Jersey
  • New York[6]
  • North Carolina
  • Pennsylvania
  • Vermont
  • West Virginia [1]

In the United States, many states[7] have usury laws which forbid interest rates in excess of a certain APR. Some payday lenders have succeeded in getting around usury laws in some states by forming relationships with nationally-chartered banks based in a different state with no usury ceiling (such as South Dakota or Delaware). This practice has been referred to as "rate exportation", the "lender/servicer" model, or the "rent-a-bank" model. Under the legal doctrine of interest-rate exportation, established by Marquette Nat. Bank of Minneapolis v. First of Omaha Service Corp. 439 U.S. 299 (1978), the loan is governed by the laws of the state where the bank is chartered, regardless of the borrower's state of residence. This is the same doctrine that allows credit card issuers based in South Dakota and Delaware — states that abolished their usury laws — to offer credit cards nationwide.[8] As federal banking regulators became aware of this practice, they began prohibiting these partnerships between commercial banks and payday lenders. The FDIC still allows its member banks to participate in payday lending, but it did issue guidelines in March 2005 that are meant to discourage long term debt cycles by transitioning to a longer term loan after six payday loan renewals.[9] As a result, no federally insured banks engage in the business of payday lending as of 2007 using an agency model.

For usury laws to be effective, they need to include all loan fees as part of the interest. Otherwise, lenders can charge any amount they want as fees and still claim a low interest rate. State laws in the United States generally preclude charging of fees other than those expressly permitted by law[citation needed], and the federal Truth In Lending Act requires disclosure of all fees.

Some states have laws limiting the number of loans a borrower can take at a single time[citation needed]. This is currently being accomplished by single, statewide realtime databases. These systems are required in Florida, Michigan, Illinois, Indiana, North Dakota, New Mexico, Oklahoma, South Carolina, and Virginia[citation needed]. These systems require all licensed lenders to conduct a real time verification of the customer's eligibility to receive a loan before conducting a loan. Reports published by state regulators in these states indicate that this system enforces all of the provisions of the state's statutes. Some states also cap the number of loans per borrower per year (Virginia), or require that after a fixed number of loan renewals, the lender must offer a lower interest loan with a longer term, so that the borrower can eventually get out of the debt cycle[citation needed]. Borrowers can circumvent these laws by taking loans from more than one lender if there is not an enforcement mechanism in place by the state. Some states allow that a consumer can have more than one loan outstanding (Oklahoma).

Federal regulation

In the US, although payday lending is primarily regulated at the state level, the United States Congress passed a law in October 2006 becoming effective on Oct. 1, 2007 that caps lending to military personnel at a maximum of 36% APR as defined by the Secretary of Defense.[10] The Defense Department called payday lending practices "predatory", and military officers cited concerns that payday lending ruined low-paid enlisted men and women's finances, jeopardized their security clearances, and even interfered with deployment schedules to Iraq.[11]

Some federal banking regulators and legislators seek to restrict or prohibit the loans not just for military personnel, but for all borrowers,[12] because the high costs are viewed as a financial drain on the working and lower-middle class populations who are the primary borrowers.

Illinois Representative Luis Gutiérrez introduced the "Payday Loan Reform Act of 2009"[13] to the 111th Congress. Although Gutierrez introduced a bill in 2007 which was supported by consumer activism nonprofits,[14] the 2009 bill was heavily criticized by these groups, who nevertheless noted that the stricter state regulation would not be preempted.[15] The bill would allow for rates of 780 percent APR.[16] Gutierrez defended the bill by pointing out that as of 2009, in 23 states borrowers have no protection from payday lenders, and argued that only the proposed bill could pass.[17] The payday loan company QC Holdings[18] was Luis Gutiérrez's largest 2007-2008 election contributor with a contribution of about $10,000.[16][19] The "C.L.E.A.R. Act"[20] submitted by California's Joe Baca April 1, 2009 is almost identical.[20]

Regulation in the District of Columbia

Effective January 9, 2008, the maximum interest rate that payday lenders may charge in the District of Columbia is 24 percent,[21] which is the same maximum interest rate for banks and credit unions.[22][23] Payday lenders also must have a license from the District government in order to operate.[22] As a result of the interest-rate cap enacted by D.C., all licensed payday lenders have withdrawn from the market, and no lawful payday loans are presently available in D.C.

Banning in Georgia

Georgia law prohibited payday lending for more than 100 years, but the state was not successful in shutting the industry down until the 2004 legislation made payday lending a felony, allowed for racketeering charges and permitted potentially costly class-action lawsuits.[3]

Regulation in New Mexico

New Mexico caps fees, restricts total loans by a consumer and prohibits immediate loan rollovers, in which a consumer takes out a new loan to pay off a previous loan, under a law that took effect November 1, 2007. A borrower who is unable to repay a loan is automatically offered a 130-day payment plan, with no fees or interest. Once a loan is repaid, under the new law, the borrower must wait 10 days before obtaining another payday loan. The law allows the term of a loan to run from 14 to 35 days, with the fees capped at $15.50 for each $100 borrowed[citation needed]58-15-33 NMSA 1978. There is also a 50-cent administrative fee to cover costs of lenders verifying whether a borrower qualifies for the loan, such as determining whether the consumer is still paying off a previous loan. This is accomplished by verifying in real time against the approved lender compliance database administered by the New Mexico regulator. The statewide database does not allow a loan to be issued to a consumer by a licensed payday lender if the loan would result in a violation of state statute. A borrower's cumulative payday loans cannot exceed 25 percent of the individual's gross monthly income.[24]

Withdrawal from North Carolina

In 2006, the North Carolina Department of Justice announced the state had negotiated agreements with all the payday lenders operating in the state. The state contended that the practice of funding payday loans through banks chartered in other states illegally circumvents North Carolina law.[25] Under the terms of the agreement, the last three lenders will stop making new loans, will collect only principal on existing loans and will pay $700,000 to non-profit organizations for relief.[26]

Operation Sunset in Arizona

Arizona usury law prohibits lending institutions to charge greater than 36% annual interest on a loan. On July 1, 2010, a law exempting payday loan companies from the 36% cap expired.[27] State Attorney General Terry Goddard initiated Operation Sunset, which aggressively pursues lenders who violate the lending cap. The expiration of the law caused many payday loan companies to shut down their Arizona operations, notably Advance America.[28]

See also

References

  1. ^ Driehaus, Bob (April 15, 2009). "Lenders thwart Ohio law intended to limit high interest on payday loans". New York Times. Retrieved 2009-08-13.
  2. ^ CNN Money. 13 December 2007, A low, low interest rate of 396 percent
  3. ^ a b "Payday lenders hope to return in Georgia, 3/18/07". Retrieved 2010-10-03.
  4. ^ The John Warner National Defense Authorization Act - Talent Amendment
  5. ^ Division of Banks. "Payday Loans". The Official Website of the Office of Consumer Affairs & Business Regulation (OCABR). Mass.gov. Retrieved 22 November 2010.
  6. ^ Bachelor, Lisa (2008-05-29). "You can settle the loan on payday - but the APR could be more than 2,000 per cent". The Guardian. London.
  7. ^ WA.gov
  8. ^ Text of Marquette Nat. Bank v. First of Omaha Corp. decision from Findlaw
  9. ^ FDIC's Revised Examination Guidance on Payday Lending
  10. ^ The John Warner National Defense Authorization Act - Talent Amendment
  11. ^ USA Today: Law caps interest on 'payday advances' to service members
  12. ^ Duprey, Rich. "Legislative Foes Shackle Payday Loans". Motley Fool. Retrieved 2007-10-14. The payday loan industry remains under assault at both the federal and state level.
  13. ^ 11th - H.R. 1214
  14. ^ U.S. PIRG. Consumer Groups Applaud Legislation to Halt Check Kiting for Loans.
  15. ^ U.S. PIRG. Letter to Gutierrez in regard to Payday Loan Reform Act.
  16. ^ a b Colbert Report - Tuesday April 14, 2009, The Word. (~6:30-9:30). Cite error: The named reference "colbert" was defined multiple times with different content (see the help page).
  17. ^ Delaney A. (2009). Consumer Advocates Decry Consumer Protection Bill. Huffington Post.
  18. ^ Google Finance NASDAQ:QCCO - Summary
  19. ^ Opensecrets.org
  20. ^ a b Govtrack.us
  21. ^ "Special Feature: Payday Lenders to Comply With New Law: An Effective Consumer Protection Measure". District of Columbia Department of Insurance, Securities and Banking. December 18, 2007.
  22. ^ a b Jarrett, Jillian S. (2007-12-13). "Payday Lending Rules Tightened". The Washington Post. Retrieved 2008-01-20.
  23. ^ Stewart, Nikita (2007-09-19). "Bill to Cap Payday Loan Interest Rates Passes". The Washington Post. Retrieved 2008-01-20.
  24. ^ Forbes.com: NM Governor Signs Payday Lenders Bill
  25. ^ North Carolina Department of Justice (2006). "Payday lending on the way out in NC" (PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on 21 March 2009. Retrieved 2006-03-22.
  26. ^ North Carolina Declares Victory In War On Payday Lending
  27. ^ "Letter to lender from the Office of the Attorney General of the State of Arizona" (PDF). Retrieved 2010-10-03.
  28. ^ "Goddard: Payday Lender's Departure Shows Repeal is Working". Retrieved 2010-10-03.
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Payday_loans_in_the_United_States&oldid=431606695"