Physics envy

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search

The term physics envy is a phrase used to criticize modern writing and research of academics working in areas such as "softer sciences", liberal arts, business studies and humanities.[1][2][3] The term argues that writing and working practices in these disciplines have overused confusing jargon and complicated mathematics, in order to seem more 'rigorous' and like mathematics-based subjects like physics.[4][5]

Background[edit]

The success of physics in "mathematicizing" itself, particularly since Isaac Newton's Principia Mathematica, is generally considered remarkable and often disproportionate compared to other areas of inquiry.[6] "Physics envy" refers to the envy (perceived or real) of scholars in other disciplines for the mathematical precision of fundamental concepts obtained by physicists. It is an accusation raised against disciplines (typically against soft sciences and liberal arts such as literature, philosophy, psychology, social sciences) when these academic areas try to express their fundamental concepts in terms of mathematics, which is seen as an unwarranted push for reductionism.

Evolutionary biologist Ernst Mayr discusses the issue of the inability to reduce biology to its mathematical basis in his book What Makes Biology Unique?.[7] Noam Chomsky discusses the ability and desirability of reduction to its mathematical basis in his article "Mysteries of Nature: How Deeply Hidden."[8]

See also[edit]

Notes[edit]

  1. ^ Clarke, Kevin; Primo, David. "Overcoming 'Physics Envy'". New York Times. Retrieved 10 August 2016. 
  2. ^ Sokal, Alan. "Physics envy in psychology: A cautionary tale" (PDF). New York University. Retrieved 10 August 2016. 
  3. ^ Bennis, Warren; O'Toole, James. "How Business Schools Lost Their Way". Harvard Business Review. Retrieved 10 August 2016. 
  4. ^ Robin Dunbar (7 April 2011). The Trouble with Science. Faber & Faber. pp. 214–231. ISBN 978-0-571-26519-0. 
  5. ^ Smith, Noah. "Academic B.S. as artificial barriers to entry". Economics, neologisms, and distraction. Retrieved 10 August 2016. 
  6. ^ For example, Eugene Wigner remarked "The miracle of the appropriateness of the language of mathematics for the formulation of the laws of physics is a wonderful gift which we neither understand nor deserve.", while Richard Feynman said "To those who do not know mathematics it is difficult to get across a real feeling as to the beauty, the deepest beauty, of nature ... If you want to learn about nature, to appreciate nature, it is necessary to understand the language that she speaks in."
  7. ^ Mayr (2004)
  8. ^ Chomsky (2009)

References[edit]

External links[edit]