Samson Option: Revision history

14 April 2024

• curprev 23:0423:04, 14 April 2024‎ Yoshi24517 talk contribs‎ m 21,440 bytes −98‎ Reverted edits by Goyda_warrior (talk) (HG) (3.4.12) undo Tags: Huggle Rollback
• curprev 23:0423:04, 14 April 2024‎ Goyda warrior talk contribs‎ m 21,538 bytes +98‎ No edit summary undo Tag: Reverted

8 April 2024

• curprev 10:2310:23, 8 April 2024‎ Dvaderv2 talk contribs‎ 21,440 bytes +169‎ Removing quotation of Judges 16:30 since the relevance and/or necessity of said quotation is not immediately obvious (if at all); salvaging mwi.westpoint.edu link from revision 1163330093 since it provides some proof of the Biblical allusion being deliberate undo

6 April 2024

• curprev 11:0411:04, 6 April 2024‎ Sean.hoyland talk contribs‎ m 21,271 bytes −54‎ Reverted edits by 24.154.218.188 (talk) to last version by Radio-Somewhere undo Tag: Rollback
• curprev 10:5510:55, 6 April 2024‎ 24.154.218.188 talk‎ 21,325 bytes +49‎ Spelling errors undo Tags: Reverted Visual edit Mobile edit Mobile web edit
• curprev 10:5310:53, 6 April 2024‎ 24.154.218.188 talk‎ 21,276 bytes +5‎ Spelling errors undo Tags: Reverted Visual edit Mobile edit Mobile web edit

29 March 2024

• curprev 17:4217:42, 29 March 2024‎ Radio-Somewhere talk contribs‎ m 21,271 bytes +1‎ →‎Deterrence doctrine undo

10 March 2024

• curprev 21:0221:02, 10 March 2024‎ 181.9.130.187 talk‎ 21,270 bytes −3‎ Undo revision 1212833783 by 80.233.74.237 (talk) undo Tag: Undo

9 March 2024

• curprev 19:5719:57, 9 March 2024‎ 80.233.74.237 talk‎ 21,273 bytes +3‎ No edit summary undo Tags: Reverted Mobile edit Mobile web edit

13 February 2024

• curprev 02:1902:19, 13 February 2024‎ 2607:ea00:107:3c07:e6e6:81f0:b582:a9af talk‎ 21,270 bytes −1‎ →‎Deterrence doctrine undo

28 January 2024

• curprev 04:5304:53, 28 January 2024‎ 2600:1700:e030:8ee0:145a:fcea:865:e49f talk‎ 21,271 bytes −1‎ Changed "Al-Aqsa intifada" to "second intifada" this is a much less charged term undo Tag: Visual edit

14 January 2024

• curprev 13:5313:53, 14 January 2024‎ Issan Sumisu talk contribs‎ 21,272 bytes −63‎ WP:ISATERMFOR undo

31 December 2023

• curprev 18:3318:33, 31 December 2023‎ 181.13.81.248 talk‎ 21,335 bytes −229‎ Undid revision 1192692151 by 89.243.13.94 (talk) vandalism undo Tags: Undo Mobile edit Mobile web edit

30 December 2023

• curprev 20:3820:38, 30 December 2023‎ 89.243.13.94 talk‎ 21,564 bytes +229‎ No edit summary undo Tag: Reverted

15 December 2023

• curprev 20:0520:05, 15 December 2023‎ Ezlev talk contribs‎ 21,335 bytes −43‎ →‎Deterrence doctrine: removed "The greatly outnumbered Jewish state in a surprising turn of events" – just about every word of that is inappropriate editorializing undo Tag: Visual edit

29 November 2023

• curprev 23:4523:45, 29 November 2023‎ Shemostic talk contribs‎ 21,378 bytes −381‎ Dubious, garbage source undo Tags: Manual revert references removed Mobile edit Mobile web edit

28 November 2023

• curprev 23:5423:54, 28 November 2023‎ Rocketboiii talk contribs‎ 21,759 bytes +381‎ Undid revision 1183978712 by 2A0D:6FC0:8DB:4A00:DAD6:4331:D1A6:2C88 (talk) undo Tags: Undo Reverted

7 November 2023

• curprev 16:5416:54, 7 November 2023‎ 2a0d:6fc0:8db:4a00:dad6:4331:d1a6:2c88 talk‎ 21,378 bytes −381‎ Removed unverified claim with no valid reference undo Tags: Reverted references removed Mobile edit Mobile web edit

5 November 2023

• curprev 01:1101:11, 5 November 2023‎ Kawnhr talk contribs‎ 21,759 bytes −27‎ →‎top: WP:EASTEREGG. replaced with a more natural target, since the linked article is prominently included in the next section of the article undo

4 November 2023

• curprev 05:3505:35, 4 November 2023‎ AnomieBOT talk contribs‎ m 21,786 bytes +19‎ Dating maintenance tags: {{Failed verification}} undo
• curprev 03:3503:35, 4 November 2023‎ 82.12.148.203 talk‎ 21,767 bytes +23‎ How about a compromise position, where we acknowledge it's nonsense but leave it in anyway? Do say something if you revert, any discussion at all would be nice. undo

3 November 2023

• curprev 22:1522:15, 3 November 2023‎ John Yunshire talk contribs‎ m 21,744 bytes +339‎ Reverted 1 edit by 82.12.148.203 (talk) to last revision by John Yunshire undo Tags: Twinkle Undo
• curprev 04:4004:40, 3 November 2023‎ 82.12.148.203 talk‎ 21,405 bytes −339‎ Undid revision 1183197508 by John Yunshire (talk) I've read all of both the sources; neither of them supports the statement. Here's an archive link to the second one if the paywall is an issue: archive.ph/rlWEU Please indicate where the support for this statement is in either of them. undo Tags: Undo Reverted references removed

2 November 2023

• curprev 19:5419:54, 2 November 2023‎ John Yunshire talk contribs‎ 21,744 bytes +339‎ Restored revision 1183095317 by TadejM (talk): LTA undo Tags: Twinkle Undo Reverted
• curprev 08:5008:50, 2 November 2023‎ 82.12.148.203 talk‎ 21,405 bytes −545‎ Oops, I meant to revert to the deleted-entirely version. undo Tags: Manual revert Reverted references removed
• curprev 08:4808:48, 2 November 2023‎ 82.12.148.203 talk‎ 21,950 bytes +206‎ Undid revision 1183095317 by TadejM (talk) The statement itself is not supported by its alleged sources. undo Tags: Undo Reverted
• curprev 03:5203:52, 2 November 2023‎ TadejM talk contribs‎ 21,744 bytes −206‎ undid; though that may be true, it is original research unless a source is provided undo Tags: Undo Reverted
• curprev 01:4701:47, 2 November 2023‎ 97.113.199.251 talk‎ 21,950 bytes +206‎ Removed possible vandalism that has no reasonable source of proof to validate. It's not possible for the local powers of the Middle East to cause "global scale" damage outside of the region with the current nuclear stockpile level Israel is estimated to possess. As of today only a war between Russia and the United States would cause such global destruction undo Tags: Reverted Mobile edit Mobile web edit

1 November 2023

• curprev 21:0021:00, 1 November 2023‎ John Yunshire talk contribs‎ 21,744 bytes +339‎ Undid revision 1181998960 by 82.12.148.203 (talk) undo Tags: Undo Reverted

31 October 2023

• curprev 19:2319:23, 31 October 2023‎ Kawnhr talk contribs‎ 21,405 bytes −17‎ →‎Nuclear ambiguity: WP:EASTEREGG. neither of these links point where they might be expected to, so rewording undo

26 October 2023

• curprev 14:2814:28, 26 October 2023‎ 82.12.148.203 talk‎ 21,422 bytes −339‎ No, a mideast nuclear exchange would not destroy the world undo Tags: Manual revert Reverted references removed

24 October 2023

• curprev 02:0902:09, 24 October 2023‎ Rocketboiii talk contribs‎ 21,761 bytes +338‎ Undid revision 1181472646 by 186.111.141.106 (talk) It is irrelevant if something is technically possible or not. or are you deleting harry potter for magic? what matters is what this is about and that the sources check out. this is a fictional scenario after all. undo Tags: Undo Reverted

23 October 2023

• curprev 07:1907:19, 23 October 2023‎ 186.111.141.106 talk‎ 21,423 bytes −338‎ Ridiculous assessment not supported by source. You can't destroy the entire world with 400 nukes or whatever Israel has. Maybe Russia and the US can. undo Tags: Reverted references removed

22 October 2023

• curprev 18:3318:33, 22 October 2023‎ Vanished User 345678909876 talk contribs‎ 21,761 bytes +339‎ Undid revision 1181382344 by Virief (talk) undo Tags: Undo Reverted
• curprev 18:3318:33, 22 October 2023‎ Virief talk contribs‎ 21,422 bytes −339‎ No edit summary undo Tags: Undo Reverted references removed Mobile edit Mobile web edit
• curprev 17:0717:07, 22 October 2023‎ 118.106.227.40 talk‎ 21,761 bytes +339‎ Rv AndresHerutJaim ‎/ Yaniv Horon sock undo Tags: Manual revert Reverted Non-autoconfirmed user rapidly reverting edits

21 October 2023

• curprev 16:1016:10, 21 October 2023‎ 77.103.3.53 talk‎ 21,422 bytes −339‎ Undid revision 1181211676 by Taking Out The Trash (talk) yes, but that's nuclear war between USSR/russia and the US involving tens of thousands of nukes. not israel striking 1 or 2 invading countries with a handful undo Tags: Undo Reverted references removed
• curprev 16:0616:06, 21 October 2023‎ Taking Out The Trash talk contribs‎ m 21,761 bytes +339‎ Reverted 1 edit by 77.103.3.53 (talk): Says who? Most people would agree that nuclear war = the apocalypse undo Tags: Twinkle Undo Reverted
• curprev 16:0516:05, 21 October 2023‎ 77.103.3.53 talk‎ 21,422 bytes −339‎ a few dozen nuclear weapons won't destroy the planet undo Tags: Manual revert Reverted references removed

20 October 2023

• curprev 14:2214:22, 20 October 2023‎ John Yunshire talk contribs‎ 21,761 bytes +339‎ Undid revision 1163480596 by Garyweaton (talk) undo Tags: Undo Reverted

9 October 2023

• curprev 04:1004:10, 9 October 2023‎ Jweiss11 talk contribs‎ m 21,422 bytes −17‎ →‎References: cleanup undo

10 July 2023

• curprev 07:4707:47, 10 July 2023‎ Sergiö3LR talk contribs‎ 21,439 bytes −3‎ →‎Deterrence doctrine undo Tag: Visual edit

5 July 2023

• curprev 04:0804:08, 5 July 2023‎ Garyweaton talk contribs‎ 21,442 bytes −339‎ Rv meaningless tasteless commentary, specially for lead, all nuclear weapons might cause havoc in the planet if detonated. Unrelated to topic. undo Tags: Undo Reverted Non-autoconfirmed user rapidly reverting edits references removed

4 July 2023

• curprev 07:4207:42, 4 July 2023‎ 2601:3c5:8200:97e0:1d1f:ca05:b748:478e talk‎ 21,781 bytes +247‎ Sources of the protocol undo Tag: Reverted
• curprev 07:2607:26, 4 July 2023‎ ButterCashier talk contribs‎ 21,534 bytes +1‎ citation needed? undo Tag: Reverted
• curprev 07:2607:26, 4 July 2023‎ 2601:3c5:8200:97e0:1d1f:ca05:b748:478e talk‎ 21,533 bytes +91‎ The end result of the Ultimate achievement of samson option according to Israel undo Tag: Reverted

13 June 2023

• curprev 17:0017:00, 13 June 2023‎ Oneiros talk contribs‎ m 21,442 bytes −2‎ →‎Authors' opinions: hyphens undo

16 March 2023

• curprev 05:3005:30, 16 March 2023‎ Citation bot talk contribs‎ 21,444 bytes −108‎ Misc citation tidying. | Use this bot. Report bugs. | Suggested by AManWithNoPlan | #UCB_CommandLine undo

9 March 2023

• curprev 17:5517:55, 9 March 2023‎ 2a02:14f:177:cb5:7951:3f5c:885:9af2 talk‎ 21,552 bytes +14‎ The original language unintentionally gives the indication that Israel was threatening the use of nuclear weapons against the United States, as opposed to indicating the might be used against the enemy states in the 1973 war and this article has been repeatedly cited incorrect towards that end. I improved the implication by changing a few words, but someone else may be able to express it better undo Tags: Visual edit Mobile edit Mobile web edit

29 December 2022

• curprev 16:4716:47, 29 December 2022‎ 212.112.126.42 talk‎ 21,538 bytes −2‎ corrected "the" to "a', there was no antecedent to support the use of the word "the" instead of "a" undo