Self-healing materials are artificial or synthetically-created substances that have the built-in ability to automatically repair damage to themselves without any external diagnosis of the problem or human intervention. Generally, materials will degrade over time due to fatigue, environmental conditions, or damage incurred during operation. Cracks and other types of damage on a microscopic level have been shown to change thermal, electrical, and acoustical properties of materials, and the propagation of cracks can lead to eventual failure of the material. In general, cracks are hard to detect at an early stage, and manual intervention is required for periodic inspections and repairs. In contrast, self-healing materials counter degradation through the initiation of a repair mechanism that responds to the micro-damage.:1–2 Some self-healing materials are classed as smart structures, and can adapt to various environmental conditions according to their sensing and actuation properties.:145
The Ancient Egyptians were the first to use lime mortars. About 6,000 years ago, they used lime to plaster the pyramids at Giza. In addition, the Egyptians also incorporated various limes into their religious temples as well as their homes. Indian traditional structures built with lime mortar, which are more than 4,000 years old like Mohanjo-Daro is still a heritage monument of Indian civilization. Understanding the materials science involved, and intentionally designing such materials, however, has taken place mostly since the end of the 1990s. The inspiration for the development of self-healing materials comes from biological systems, which have the ability to heal after being wounded. Such approaches are sometimes referred to as biomimetic.
Although the most common types of self-healing materials are polymers or elastomers, self-healing covers all classes of materials, including metals, ceramics, and cementitious materials. Healing mechanisms vary from an instrinsic repair of the material to the addition of a repair agent contained in a microscopic vessel. For a material to be strictly defined as autonomously self-healing, it is necessary that the healing process occurs without human intervention. Self-healing polymers may, however, activate in response to an external stimulus (light, temperature change, ...) to initiate the healing process. Animations show the surface topography healing from a scratch made by a metallic tool.
A material that can intrinsically correct damage caused by normal usage could prevent costs incurred by material failure and lower costs of a number of different industrial processes through longer part lifetime, and reduction of inefficiency caused by degradation over time.
- 1 History
- 2 Biomimetics
- 3 Self-healing polymers & elastomers
- 3.1 Polymer breakdown
- 3.2 Intrinsic polymer-based systems
- 3.3 Extrinsic polymer-based systems
- 4 Self-healing fibre-reinforced polymer composites
- 5 Self-healing coatings
- 6 Self-healing cementitious materials
- 7 Self-healing ceramics
- 8 Further applications
- 9 Assessment of self-healing efficacy
- 10 Commercialization
- 11 References
The ancient Romans used a form of lime mortar that has been found to have self-healing properties. Geologist Marie Jackson and her colleagues have recreated the type of mortar used in Trajan's Market and other Roman structures such as the Pantheon and the Colosseum and studied its response to cracking. The Romans mixed a particular type of volcanic ash called Pozzolane Rosse, from the Alban Hills volcano, with quicklime and water. They used it to bind together decimenter-sized chunks of tuff, a aggregate of volcanic rock. As a result of Pozzolanic activity as the material cured, the lime interacted with other chemicals in the mix and was replaced by crystals of a calcium aluminosilicate mineral called Strätlingite. Crystals of platey strätlingite grow in the cementitious matrix of the material including the interfacial zones where cracks would tend to develop. This ongoing crystal formation holds together the mortar and the coarse aggregate, countering crack formation and resulting in a material that has lasted for 1,900 years.
Related processes in concrete have been studied microscopically since the 19th century.
Self healing materials only emerged as a widely recognized field of study in the 21st century. The first international conference on self-healing materials was held in 2007. The field of self-healing materials is related to biomimetic materials (materials inspired by living nature) as well as to other novel materials and surfaces with the embedded capacity for self-organization, such as the self-lubricating and self-cleaning materials.
In the course of 3.8 billion years plants and animals have evolved the amazing capacity to seal and heal wounds. In all plants and animals examined, firstly a self-sealing phase and secondly a self-healing phase can be identified. In plants, the rapid self-sealing prevents the plants from desiccation and from infection by pathogenic germs. This gives time for the subsequent self-healing of the injury which in addition to wound closure also results in the (partly) restoration of mechanical properties of the plant organ. Based on a variety of self-sealing and self-healing processes in plants different functional principles were successfully transferred into bio-inspired self-repairing materials. The connecting link between the biological model and the technical application is an abstraction describing the underlying functional principle of the biological model which can be for example an analytical model or a numerical model. In cases where mainly physical-chemical processes are involved a transfer is especially promising. There is evidence in the academic literature of these biomimetic design approaches being used in the development of self-healing systems for polymer composites. In biology, for the minimum power to pump fluid through vessels Murray's law applies. Deviation from Murray’s law is small however, increasing the diameter 10% only leads to an additional power requirement of 3%–5%. Murray’s law is followed in some mechanical vessels, and using Murray’s law can reduce the hydraulic resistance throughout the vessels. The DIW structure from above can be used to essentially mimic the structure of skin. Toohey et al. did this with an epoxy substrate containing a grid of microchannels containing dicyclopentadiene (DCPD), and incorporated Grubbs' catalyst to the surface. This showed partial recovery of toughness after fracture, and could be repeated several times because of the ability to replenish the channels after use. The process is not repeatable forever, because the polymer in the crack plane from previous healings would build up over time. Inspired by rapid self-sealing processes in the twining liana Aristolochia macrophylla and related species (pipevines) a biomimetic PU-foam coating for pneumatic structures was developed. With respect to low coating weight and thickness of the foam layer maximum repair efficiencies of 99.9% and more have been obtained. Other role models are latex bearing plants as the weeping fig (Ficus benjamina), the rubber tree (Hevea brasiliensis) and spurges (Euphorbia spp.), in which the coagulation of latex is involved in the sealing of lesions. Different self-sealing strategies for elastomeric materials were developed showing significant mechanical restoration after a macroscopic lesion.
Self-healing polymers & elastomers
In the last century, polymers became a base material in everyday life for products like plastics, rubbers, films, fibres or paints. This huge demand has forced to extend their reliability and maximum lifetime, and a new design class of polymeric materials that are able to restore their functionality after damage or fatigue was envisaged. These polymer materials can be divided into two different groups based on the approach to the self-healing mechanism: intrinsic or extrinsic. Autonomous self-healing polymers follow a three-step process very similar to that of a biological response. In the event of damage, the first response is triggering or actuation, which happens almost immediately after damage is sustained. The second response is transport of materials to the effected area, which also happens very quickly. The third response is the chemical repair process. This process differs depending on the type of healing mechanism that is in place (e.g., polymerization, entanglement, reversible cross-linking). These self-healing materials can be classified in three different ways: capsule based, vascular, and intrinsic. While similar in some ways, these three ways differ in the ways that response is hidden or prevented until actual damage is sustained.
From a molecular perspective, traditional polymers yield to mechanical stress through cleavage of sigma bonds. While newer polymers can yield in other ways, traditional polymers typically yield through homolytic or heterolytic bond cleavage. The factors that determine how a polymer will yield include: type of stress, chemical properties inherent to the polymer, level and type of solvation, and temperature. From a macromolecular perspective, stress induced damage at the molecular level leads to larger scale damage called microcracks. A microcrack is formed where neighboring polymer chains have been damaged in close proximity, ultimately leading to the weakening of the fiber as a whole.
Homolytic bond cleavage
Polymers have been observed to undergo homolytic bond cleavage through the use of radical reporters such as DPPH (2,2-diphenyl-1-picrylhydrazyl) and PMNB (pentamethylnitrosobenzene.) When a bond is cleaved homolytically, two radical species are formed which can recombine to repair damage or can initiate other homolytic cleavages which can in turn lead to more damage.
Heterolytic bond cleavage
Polymers have also been observed to undergo heterolytic bond cleavage through isotope labeling experiments. When a bond is cleaved heterolytically, cationic and anionic species are formed which can in turn recombine to repair damage, can be quenched by solvent, or can react destructively with nearby polymers.
Reversible bond cleavage
Certain polymers yield to mechanical stress in an atypical, reversible manner. Diels-Alder-based polymers undergo a reversible cycloaddition, where mechanical stress cleaves two sigma bonds in a retro Diels-Alder reaction. This stress results in additional pi-bonded electrons as opposed to radical or charged moieties.
Supramolecular polymers are composed of monomers that interact non-covalently. Common interactions include hydrogen bonds, metal coordination, and van der Waals forces. Mechanical stress in supramolecular polymers causes the disruption of these specific non-covalent interactions, leading to monomer separation and polymer breakdown.
Intrinsic polymer-based systems
In intrinsic systems, the material is inherently able to restore its integrity. While extrinsic approaches are generally autonomous, intrinsic systems often require an external trigger for the healing to take place (such as thermo-mechanical, electrical, photo-stimuli, etc.). It is possible to distinguish among 5 main intrinsic self-healing strategies. The first one is based on reversible reactions, and the most widely used reaction scheme is based on Diels-Alder (DA) and retro-Diels-Alder (rDA) reactions. Another strategy achieves the self-healing in thermoset matrices by incorporating meltable thermoplastic additives. A temperature trigger allows the redispertion of thermoplastic additives into cracks, giving rise to mechanical interlocking. Polymer interlockings based on dynamic supramolecular bonds or ionomers represent a third and fourth scheme. The involved supramolecular interactions and ionomeric clusters are generally reversible and act as reversible cross-links, thus can equip polymers with self-healing ability. Finally, an alternative method for achieving intrinsic self-healing is based on molecular diffusion.
Reversible bond-based polymers
Reversible systems are polymeric systems that can revert to the initial state whether it is monomeric, oligomeric, or non-cross-linked. Since the polymer is stable under normal condition, the reversible process usually requires an external stimulus for it to occur. For a reversible healing polymer, if the material is damaged by means such as heating and reverted to its constituents, it can be repaired or "healed" to its polymer form by applying the original condition used to polymerize it.
Polymer systems based on covalent bond formation and breakage
Diels-Alder and retro-Diels-Alder
Among the examples of reversible healing polymers, the Diels-Alder (DA) reaction and its retro-Diels-Alder (RDA) analogue seems to be very promising due to its thermal reversibility. In general, the monomer containing the functional groups such as furan or maleimide form two carbon-carbon bonds in a specific manner and construct the polymer through DA reaction. This polymer, upon heating, breaks down to its original monomeric units via RDA reaction and then reforms the polymer upon cooling or through any other conditions that were initially used to make the polymer. During the last few decades, two types of reversible polymers have been studied: (i) polymers where the pendant groups, such as furan or maleimide groups, cross-link through successive DA coupling reactions; (ii) polymers where the multifunctional monomers link to each other through successive DA coupling reactions.
In this type of polymer, the polymer forms through the cross linking of the pendant groups from the linear thermoplastics. For example, Saegusa et al. have shown the reversible cross-linking of modified poly(N-acetylethyleneimine)s containing either maleimide or furancarbonyl pendant moideties. The reaction is shown in Scheme 3. They mixed the two complementary polymers to make a highly cross-linked material through DA reaction of furan and maleimide units at room temperature, as the cross-linked polymer is more thermodynamically stable than the individual starting materials. However, upon heating the polymer to 80 °C for two hours in a polar solvent, two monomers were regenerated via RDA reaction, indicating the breaking of polymers. This was possible because the heating energy provided enough energy to go over the energy barrier and results in the two monomers. Cooling the two starting monomers, or damaged polymer, to room temperature for 7 days healed and reformed the polymer.
The reversible DA/RDA reaction is not limited to furan-meleimides based polymers as it is shown by the work of Schiraldi et al. They have shown the reversible cross-linking of polymers bearing pendent anthracene group with maleimides. However, the reversible reaction occurred only partially upon heating to 250 °C due to the competing decomposition reaction.
Polymerization of multifunctional monomers
In these systems, the DA reaction takes place in the backbone itself to construct the polymer, not as a link. For polymerization and healing processes of a DA-step-growth furan-maleimide based polymer (3M4F) were demonstrated by subjecting it to heating/cooling cycles. Tris-maleimide (3M) and tetra-furan (4F) formed a polymer through DA reaction and, when heated to 120 °C, de-polymerized through RDA reaction, resulting in the starting materials. Subsequent heating to 90–120 °C and cooling to room temperature healed the polymer, partially restoring its mechanical properties through intervention. The reaction is shown in Scheme 4.
The thiol-based polymers have disulfide bonds that can be reversibly cross-linked through oxidation and reduction. Under reducing condition, the disulfide (SS) bridges in the polymer breaks and results in monomers, however, under oxidizing condition, the thiols (SH) of each monomer forms the disulfide bond, cross-linking the starting materials to form the polymer. Chujo et al. have shown the thiol-based reversible cross-linked polymer using poly(N-acetylethyleneimine). (Scheme 5) 
A soft poly(urea-urethane) network uses the metathesis reaction in aromatic disulphides to provide room-temperature self-healing properties, without the need for external catalysts. This chemical reaction is naturally able to create covalent bonds at room temperature, allowing the polymer to autonomously heal without an external source of energy. Left to rest at room temperature, the material mended itself with 80 percent efficiency after only two hours and 97 percent after 24 hours. In 2014 a polyurea elastomer-based material was shown to be self-healing, melding together after being cut in half, without the addition of catalysts or other chemicals. The material also include inexpensive commercially available compounds. The elastomer molecules were tweaked, making the bonds between them longer. The resulting molecules are easier to pull apart from one another and better able to rebond at room temperature with almost the same strength. The rebonding can be repeated. Stretchy, self-healing paints and other coatings recently took a step closer to common use, thanks to research being conducted at the University of Illinois. Scientists there have used "off-the-shelf" components to create a polymer that melds back together after being cut in half, without the addition of catalysts or other chemicals.
Extrinsic polymer-based systems
In extrinsic systems, the healing chemistries are separated from the surrounding polymer in microcapsules or vascular networks, which after material damage/cracking release their content into the crack plane, reacting and allowing the restoration of material functionalities. These systems can be further subdivided in several categories. While capsule-based polymers sequester the healing agents in little capsules that only release the agents if they are ruptured, vascular self-healing materials sequester the healing agent in capillary type hollow channels which can be interconnected one dimensionally, two dimensionally, or three dimensionally. After one of these capillaries is damaged, the network can be refilled by an outside source or another channel that was not damaged. Intrinsic self-healing materials do not have a sequestered healing agent but instead have a latent self-healing functionality that is triggered by damage or by an outside stimulus. Extrinsic self-healing materials can achieve healing efficiencies over 100% even when the damage is large.
Capsule-based systems have in common that healing agents are encapsulated into suitable microstructures that rupture upon crack formation and lead to a follow up process in order to restore the materials´properties. If the walls of the capsule are created too thick, they may not fracture when the crack approaches, but if they are too thin, they may rupture prematurely. In order for this process to happen at room temperature, and for the reactants to remain in a monomeric state within the capsule, a catalyst is also imbedded into the thermoset. The catalyst lowers the energy barrier of the reaction and allows the monomer to polymerize without the addition of heat. The capsules (often made of wax) around the monomer and the catalyst are important to maintain separation until the crack facilitates the reaction. In the capsule-catalyst system, the encapsulated healing agent is released into the polymer matrix and reacts with the catalyst, already present in the matrix. There are many challenges in designing this type of material. First, the reactivity of the catalyst must be maintained even after it is enclosed in wax. Additionally, the monomer must flow at a sufficient rate (have low enough viscosity) to cover the entire crack before it is polymerized, or full healing capacity will not be reached. Finally, the catalyst must quickly dissolve into the monomer in order to react efficiently and prevent the crack from spreading further.
This process has been demonstrated with dicyclopentadiene (DCPD) and Grubbs' catalyst (benzylidene-bis(tricyclohexylphosphine)dichlororuthenium). Both DCPD and Grubbs' catalyst are imbedded in an epoxy resin. The monomer on its own is relatively unreactive and polymerization does not take place. When a microcrack reaches both the capsule containing DCPD and the catalyst, the monomer is released from the core–shell microcapsule and comes in contact with exposed catalyst, upon which the monomer undergoes ring opening metathesis polymerization (ROMP). The metathesis reaction of the monomer involves the severance of the two double bonds in favor of new bonds. The presence of the catalyst allows for the energy barrier (energy of activation) to be lowered, and the polymerization reaction can proceed at room temperature. The resulting polymer allows the epoxy composite material to regain 67% of its former strength.
Grubbs' catalyst is a good choice for this type of system because it is insensitive to air and water, thus robust enough to maintain reactivity within the material. Using a live catalyst is important to promote multiple healing actions. The major drawback is the cost. It was shown that using more of the catalyst corresponded directly to higher degree of healing. Ruthenium is quite costly, which makes it impractical for commercial applications.
In contrast, in multicapsule systems both the catalyst and the healing agent are encapsulated in different capsules. In a third system, called latent functionality, a healing agent is encapsulated, that can react with the polymerizer component that is present in the matrix in the form of residual reactive functionalities. In the last approach (phase separation), either the healing agent or the polymerizer is phase-separated in the matrix material.
Hollow tube approach
For the first method, fragile glass capillaries or fibers are imbedded within a composite material. (Note: this is already a commonly used practice for strengthening materials. See Fiber-reinforced plastic.) The resulting porous network is filled with monomer. When damage occurs in the material from regular use, the tubes also crack and the monomer is released into the cracks. Other tubes containing a hardening agent also crack and mix with the monomer, causing the crack to be healed. There are many things to take into account when introducing hollow tubes into a crystalline structure. First to consider is that the created channels may compromise the load bearing ability of the material due to the removal of load bearing material. Also, the channel diameter, degree of branching, location of branch points, and channel orientation are some of the main things to consider when building up microchannels within a material. Materials that don’t need to withstand much mechanical strain, but want self-healing properties, can introduce more microchannels than materials that are meant to be load bearing. There are two types of hollow tubes: discrete channels, and interconnected channels.
Discrete channels can be built independently of building the material and are placed in an array throughout the material. When creating these microchannels, one major factor to take into account is that the closer the tubes are together, the lower the strength will be, but the more efficient the recovery will be. A sandwich structure is a type of discrete channels that consists of tubes in the center of the material, and heals outwards from the middle. The stiffness of sandwich structures is high, making it an attractive option for pressurized chambers. For the most part in sandwich structures, the strength of the material is maintained as compared to vascular networks. Also, material shows almost full recovery from damage.
Interconnected networks are more efficient than discrete channels, but are harder and more expensive to create. The most basic way to create these channels is to apply basic machining principles to create micro scale channel grooves. These techniques yield channels from 600–700 micrometers. This technique works great on the two-dimensional plane, but when trying to create a three-dimensional network, they are limited.
Direct ink writing
The Direct Ink Writing (DIW) technique is a controlled extrusion of viscoelastic inks to create three-dimensional interconnected networks. It works by first setting organic ink in a defined pattern. Then the structure is infiltrated with a material like an epoxy. This epoxy is then solidified, and the ink can be sucked out with a modest vacuum, creating the hollow tubes.
Carbon nanotube networks
Through dissolving a linear polymer inside a solid three-dimensional epoxy matrix, so that they are miscible to each other, the linear polymer becomes mobile at a certain temperature When carbon nanotubes are also incorporated into epoxy material, and a direct current is run through the tubes, a significant shift in sensing curve indicates permanent damage to the polymer, thus ‘sensing’ a crack. When the carbon nanotubes sense a crack within the structure, they can be used as thermal transports to heat up the matrix so the linear polymers can diffuse to fill the cracks in the epoxy matrix. Thus healing the material.
A different approach was suggested by Prof. J. Aizenberg from Harvard University, who suggested to use Slippery Liquid-Infused Porous Surfaces (SLIPS), a porous material inspired by the carnivorous pitcher plant and filled with a lubricating liquid immiscible with both water and oil. SLIPS possess self-healing and self-lubricating properties as well as icephobicity and were successfully used for many purposes.
Sacrificial thread stitching
Organic threads (such as polylactide filament for example) are stitched through laminate layers of fiber reinforced polymer, which are then boiled and vacuumed out of the material after curing of the polymer, leaving behind empty channels than can be filled with healing agents.
Self-healing fibre-reinforced polymer composites
Methods for the implementation of self-healing functionality into filled composites and fibre reinforced polymers (FRPs) are almost exclusively based on extrinsic systems and thus can be broadly classified into two approaches; discrete capsule-based systems and continuous vascular systems. In contrast to non-filled polymers, the success of an intrinsic approach based on bond reversibility has yet to be proven in FRPs. To date, self-healing of FRPs has mostly been applied to simple structures such as flat plates and panels. There is however a somewhat limited application of self-healing in flat panels, as access to the panel surface is relatively simple and repair methods are very well established in industry. Instead, there has been a strong focus on implementing self-healing in more complex and industrially relevant structures such as T-Joints and Aircraft Fuselages.
The creation of a capsule-based system was first reported by White et al. in 2001, and this approach has since been adapted by a number of authors for introduction into fibre reinforced materials. This method relies on the release of an encapsulated healing agent into the damage zone, and is generally a once off process as the functionality of the encapsulated healing agent cannot be restored. Even so, implemented systems are able to restore material integrity to almost 100% and remain stable over the material lifetime.
A vascular or fibre-based approach may be more appropriate for self-healing impact damage in fibre-reinforced polymer composite materials. In this method, a network of hollow channels known as vascules, similar to the blood vessels within human tissue, are placed within the structure and used for the introduction of a healing agent. During a damage event cracks propagate through the material and into the vascules causing them to be cleaved open. A liquid resin is then passed through the vascules and into the damage plane, allowing the cracks to be repaired. Vascular systems have a number of advantages over microcapsule based systems, such as the ability to continuously deliver large volumes of repair agents and the potential to be used for repeated healing. The hollow channels themselves can also be used for additional functionality, such as thermal management and structural health monitoring. A number of methods have been proposed for the introduction of these vascules, including the use of hollow glass fibres (HGFs),  3D printing, a ‘lost wax’ process  and a solid preform route.
Coatings allow the retention and improvement of bulk properties of a material. They can provide protection for a substrate from environmental exposure. Thus, when damage occurs (often in the form of microcracks), environmental elements like water and oxygen can diffuse through the coating and may cause material damage or failure. Microcracking in coatings can result in mechanical degradation or delamination of the coating, or in electrical failure in fibre-reinforced composites and microelectronics, respectively. As the damage is on such a small scale, repair, if possible, is often difficult and costly. Therefore, a coating that can automatically heal itself (“self-healing coating”) could prove beneficial by automatic recovering properties (such as mechanical, electrical and aesthetic properties), and thus extending the lifetime of the coating. The majority of the approaches that are described in literature regarding self-healing materials can be applied to make “self-healing” coatings, including microencapsulation and the introduction of reversible physical bonds such as hydrogen bonding, ionomers  and chemical bonds (Diels-Alder chemistry). Microencapsulation is the most common method to develop self-healing coatings. The capsule approach originally described by White et al., using microencapsulated dicyclopentadiene (DCPD) monomer and Grubbs’ catalyst to self-heal epoxy polymer was later adapted to epoxy adhesive films that are commonly used in the aerospace and automotive industries for bonding metallic and composite substrates. Recently, microencapsulated liquid suspensions of metal or carbon black were used to restore electrical conductivity in a multilayer microelectronic device and battery electrodes respectively; however the use of microencapsulation for restoration of electrical properties in coatings is limited. The most common application of this technique is proven in polymer coatings for corrosion protection. Corrosion protection of metallic materials is of significant importance on an economical and ecological scale. To prove the effectiveness of microcapsules in polymer coatings for corrosion protection, researchers have encapsulated a number of materials. These materials include isocyanates monomers such as DCPD GMA epoxy resin, linseed oil and tung oil. By using the aforementioned materials for self healing in coatings, it was proven that microencapsulation effectively protects the metal against corrosion and extends the lifetime of a coating.
Self-healing cementitious materials
Cementitious materials have existed since the Roman era. These materials have a natural ability to self-heal, which was first reported by the French Academy of Science in 1836. This ability can be improved by the integration of chemical and biochemical strategies.
Autogenous healing is the natural ability of cementitious materials to repair cracks. This ability is principally attributed to further hydration of unhydrated cement particles and carbonation of dissolved calcium hydroxide. Cementitious materials in fresh-water systems can autogenously heal cracks up to 0.2 mm over a period of 7 weeks.
Chemical additives based healing
Self-healing of cementitious materials can be achieved through the reaction of certain chemical agents. Two main strategies exist for housing these agents, namely capsules and vascular tubes. These capsules and vascular tubes, once ruptured, release these agents and heal the crack damage. Studies have mainly focused on improving the quality of these housings and encapsulated materials in this field.
The self-healing ability of concrete has been improved by the incorporation of bacteria, which can induce calcium carbonate precipitation through their metabolic activity. These precipitates can build up and form an effective seal against crack related water ingress. Jonkers et al. first incorporated bacteria within cement paste for the development of self-healing concrete. It was found that the bacteria directly added to the paste only remained viable for 4 months. Later studies saw Jonkers use expanded clay particles and Van Tittlelboom use glass tubes, to protect the bacteria inside the concrete. Other strategies to protect the bacteria have also since been reported.
Generally, ceramics are superior in strength to metals at high temperatures, however, they are brittle and sensitive to flaws, and this brings into question their integrity and reliability as structural materials. Mn+1AXn phase ceramics, also known as MAX Phases, can autonomously heal crack damage by an intrinsic healing mechanism. Micro cracks caused by wear or thermal stress are filled with oxides formed from the MAX phase constituents, commonly the A-element, during high temperature exposure to air. Crack gap filling was first demonstrated for Ti3AlC2 by oxidation at 1200 °C in air. Ti2AlC and Cr2AlC have also demonstrated said ability, and more ternary carbides and nitrides are expected to be able to autonomously self-heal. The process is repeatable up to the point of element depletion, distinguishing MAX phases from other self-healing materials that require external healing agents (extrinsic healing) for single crack gap filling. Depending on the filling-oxide, improvement of the initial properties such as local strength can be achieved. On the other hand, mullite, alumina and zirconia do not have the ability to heal intrinsically, but could be endowed with self-healing capabilities by embedding second phase components into the matrix. Upon cracking, these particles are exposed to oxygen, and in the presence of heat, they react to form new materials which fill the crack gap under volume expansion. This concept has been proven using SiC to heal cracks in an Alumina matrix, and further studies have investigated the high temperature strength, and the static and cyclic fatigue strength of the healed part. The strength and bonding between the matrix and the healing agent are of prime importance and thus govern the selection of the healing particles.
When exposed for long times to high temperatures and moderate stresses, metals exhibit premature and low-ductility creep fracture, arising from the formation and growth of cavities. Those defects coalesce into cracks which ultimately cause macroscopic failure. Self-healing of early stage damage is thus a promising new approach to extend the lifetime of the metallic components. In metals, self-healing is intrinsically more difficult to achieve than in most other material classes, due to their high melting point and, as a result, low atom mobility. Generally, defects in the metals are healed by the formation of precipitates at the defect sites that immobilize further crack growth. Improved creep and fatigue properties have been reported for underaged aluminium alloys compared to the peak hardening Al alloys, which is due to the heterogeneous precipitation at the crack tip and its plastic zone. The first attempts to heal creep damage in steels were focused on the dynamic precipitation of either Cu or BN at the creep-cavity surface. Cu precipitation has only a weak preference for deformation-induced defects as a large fraction of spherical Cu precipitates is simultaneously formed with the matrix. Recently, gold atoms were recognized as a highly efficient healing agents in Fe-based alloys. A defect-induced mechanism is indicated for the Au precipitation, i.e. the Au solute remains dissolved until defects are formed. Autonomous repair of high-temperature creep damage was reported by alloying with a small amount of Au. Healing agents selectively precipitate at the free surface of a creep cavity, resulting in pore filling. For the lower stress levels up to 80% filling of the creep cavities with Au precipitates is achieved resulting in a substantial increase in creep life time. Work to translate the concept of creep damage healing in simple binary or ternary model systems to real multicomponent creep steels is ongoing.
Self-healing epoxies can be incorporated on to metals in order to prevent corrosion. A substrate metal showed major degradation and rust formation after 72 hours of exposure. But after being coated with the self-healing epoxy, there was no visible damage under SEM after 72 hours of same exposure.
Assessment of self-healing efficacy
Numerous methodologies for the assessment of self-healing capabilities have been developed for each material class (Table 1).
Table 1. Damaging methods for self-healing assessment of different classes of material.
|Material class||Damage mechanism||Healing|
|Polymers||Razor blade/scalpel cut; Tensile test with rupture; Ballistic impact||Autonomic healing supramolecular networks|
|Polymers||Razor blade/scalpel cut||Temperature triggered supramolecular networks|
|Fibre Reinforced Composite||Delamination BVID (Barely Visible Impact Damage)||Vascular self-healing; Microcapsule self-healing|
|Coatings||Microcutting with corrosion; Corrosion/erosion; Pull-out tests (adhesion); Microscratching||Molecular inter-diffusion (solvent); Encapsulated agent|
|Concrete||Crack initiation by bending compression||Activation of microencapsulated agent|
|Ceramic||Crack initiation by indentation||Temperature triggered oxidation reaction|
|Ceramic coating||Crack initiation by indentation||Temperature triggered oxidation reaction|
|Polyurethane foam coating||Puncturing with a spike||Reduction of the effective leakage area by negative strains pushing the walls of the fissure in the foam coatings to one another.|
Hence, when self-healing is assessed, different parameters need to be considered: type of stimulus (if any), healing time, maximum amount of healing cycles the material can tolerate, and degree of recovery, all whilst considering the material's virgin properties. This typically takes account of relevant physical parameters such as tensile modulus, elongation at break, fatigue-resistance, barrier properties, colour and transparency. The self-healing ability of a given material generally refers to the recovery of a specific property relative to the virgin material, designated as the self-healing efficiency. The self-healing efficiency can be quantified by comparing the respective experimental value obtained for the undamaged virgin sample (fvirgin) with the healed sample (fhealed) (eq. 1)
- (1) η = fhealed/
In a variation of this definition that is relevant to extrinsic self-healing materials, the healing efficiency takes into consideration the modification of properties caused by introducing the healing agent. Accordingly, the healed sample property is compared to that of an undamaged control equipped with self-healing agent fnon-healed (equation 2).
- (2) η = fhealed/
For a certain property Pi of a specific material, an optimal self-healing mechanism and process is characterized by the full restoration of the respective material property after a suitable, normalized damaging process. For a material where 3 different properties are assessed, it should be determined 3 efficiencies given as ƞ1(P1), ƞ2(P2) and ƞ3(P3). The final average efficiency based on a number n of properties for a self-healing material is accordingly determined as the harmonic mean given by equation 3. The harmonic mean is more appropriate than the traditional arithmetic mean, as it is less sensitive to large outliers.
At least two companies are attempting to bring the newer applications of self-healing materials to the market. Arkema, a leading chemicals company, announced in 2009 the beginning of industrial production of self-healing elastomers. As of 2012, Autonomic Materials Inc., had raised over three million US dollars.
- Ghosh, Swapan Kumar (2008). Self-healing materials : fundamentals, design Strategies, and applications (1st ed.). Weinheim: Wiley - VCH. p. 145. ISBN 978-3-527-31829-2.
- Thirumalini, P.; Ravi, R.; Sekar, S. K. and Nambirajan, M. (2011). "Study on the Performance Enhancement of Lime Mortar Used in Ancient Temples and Monuments in India". Indian Journal of Science and Technology. 4 (11): 1484.
- Wayman, Erin (November 16, 2011). "The Secrets of Ancient Rome's Buildings". Smithsonian. Retrieved 13 November 2016.
- Diesendruck, Charles E.; Sottos, Nancy R.; Moore, Jeffrey S.; White, Scott R. (2015). "Biomimetic Self-Healing". Angewandte Chemie International Edition. 54 (36): 10428–10447. doi:10.1002/anie.201500484.
- Zang, M.Q. (2008). "Self healing in polymers and polymer composites. Concepts, realization and outlook: A review". Polymer Letters. 2 (4): 238–250. doi:10.3144/expresspolymlett.2008.29.
- "Back to the Future with Roman Architectural Concrete". Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory. University of California. December 15, 2014. Retrieved 17 November 2016.
- Hartnett, Kevin (December 19, 2014). "Why is ancient Roman concrete still standing?". Boston Globe. Retrieved 17 November 2016.
- Jackson, Marie D.; Landis, Eric N.; Brune, Philip F.; Vitti, Massimo; Chen, Heng; Li, Qinfei; Kunz, Martin; Wenk, Hans-Rudolf; Monteiro, Paulo J. M.; Ingraffea, Anthony R. (30 December 2014). "Mechanical resilience and cementitious processes in Imperial Roman architectural mortar". Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 111 (52): 18484–18489. Bibcode:2014PNAS..11118484J. doi:10.1073/pnas.1417456111. PMC . PMID 25512521.
- "First international conference on self-healing materials". Delft University of Technology. 12 April 2007. Retrieved 19 May 2013.
- Nosonovsky, M.; Rohatgi, P. (2011). Biomimetics in Materials Science: Self-healing, self-lubricating, and self-cleaning materials. Springer Series in Materials Science. 152. Springer. ISBN 978-1-4614-0925-0.
- Speck, T.; Mülhaupt, R.; Speck, O. (2013). "Self-healing in plants as bio-inspiration for self-repairing polymers". In W. Binder. Self-Healing Polymers. Wiley-VCH. pp. 61–89. doi:10.1002/9783527670185.ch2. ISBN 978-3-527-33439-1.
- Speck, T.; et al. (2013). "Bio-inspired self-healing materials". In P. Fratzl, J.W.C. Dunlop, R. Weinkamer. Materials Design Inspired by Nature: Function through Inner Architecture. RSC Smart Materials. 4. The Royal Chemical Society. pp. 359–389.
- Speck, O.; Luchsinger, R.; Rampf, M.; Speck, T. (2014). "Selbstreparatur in Natur und Technik. – Konstruktion.": 9: 72–75 + 82.
- Konrad, W., Flues, F., Schmich,F., Speck, T., Speck, O. (2013). "An analytic model of the self-sealing mechanism of the succulent plant Delosperma cooperi". Journal of Theoretical Biology. 336: 96–109. doi:10.1016/j.jtbi.2013.07.013. PMID 23907028.
- Trask, R S; Williams, H R; Bond, I P (2007). "Self-healing polymer composites: mimicking nature to enhance performance". Bioinspiration & Biomimetics. 2 (1): P1–9. Bibcode:2007BiBi....2....1T. doi:10.1088/1748-3182/2/1/P01. PMID 17671320.
- "Genesys Reflexive (Self-Healing) Composites". Cornerstone Research Group. Retrieved 2009-10-02.
- Bond, I.P.; Weaver, P.M.; Trask, R.S.; Williams, H.R. (2008). "Minimum mass vascular networks in multifunctional materials". Journal of the Royal Society Interface. 5 (18): 55–65. doi:10.1098/rsif.2007.1022. PMC . PMID 17426011.
- Toohey, Kathleen S.; Sottos, Nancy R.; Lewis, Jennifer A.; Moore, Jeffrey S.; White, Scott R. (2007). "Self-healing Materials with Microvascular Networks" (PDF). Nature Materials. 6 (8): 581–5. doi:10.1038/nmat1934. PMID 17558429.
- Speck, T., Luchsinger, R., Busch,S., Rüggeberg, M., Speck, O. (2006). "Self-healing processes in nature and engineering: self-repairing biomimetic membranes for pneumatic structures". In C. A. Brebbia. Design and Nature III. WIT Press. pp. 105–114.
- Busch, S., Seidel,R., Speck, O., Speck, T. (2010). "Morphological aspects of self-repair of lesions caused by internal growth stresses in stems of Aristolochia macrophylla and Aristolochia ringens". Proceedings of the Royal Society London B. 277 (1691): 2113–2120. doi:10.1098/rspb.2010.0075.
- Rampf, M., Speck, O., Speck, T., Luchsinger, R. H. (2013). "Investigation of a fast mechanical self-repair mechanism for inflatable structures". International Journal of Engineering Science. 63: 61–70. doi:10.1016/j.ijengsci.2012.11.002.
- Rampf, M., Speck, O., Speck, T., Luchsinger, R. H. (2012). "Structural and mechanical properties of flexible polyurethane foams cured under pressure". Journal of Cellular Plastics. 48: 49–65. doi:10.1177/0021955X11429171.
- Rampf, M., Speck, O., Speck, T., Luchsinger, R. H. (2011). "Self-repairing membranes for inflatable structures inspired by a rapid wound sealing process of climbing plants". Journal of Bionic Engineering. 8 (3): 242–250. doi:10.1016/S1672-6529(11)60028-0.
- Bauer, G., Speck, T. (2012). "Restoration of tensile strength in bark samples of Ficus benjamina due to coagulation of latex during fast self-healing of fissures". Annals of Botany. 109 (4): 807–811. doi:10.1093/aob/mcr307. PMC . PMID 22207613.
- Bauer, G., Friedrich, C., Gillig, C., Vollrath, F., Speck, T., Holland, C. (2014). "Investigating the rheological properties of native plant latex". Journal of the Royal Society Interface. 11 (90): 90. doi:10.1098/rsif.2013.0847.
- Bauer, G., Gorb, S., Klein, M.C., Nellesen, A., Tapavicza, M. v., Speck, T. (2014). "Comparative study on latex particles and latex coagulation in Ficus benjamina, Campanula glomerata and three Euphorbia species". PLoS ONE. 9 (11): 11. Bibcode:2014PLoSO...9k3336B. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0113336. PMC . PMID 25409036.
- Nellesen, A., von Tapavicza,M., Bertling, J., Schmidt, A., Bauer, G., Speck, T. (2011). "Pflanzliche Selbstheilung als Vorbild für selbstreparierende Elastomerwerkstoffe, GAK — Gummi, Fasern, Kunststoffe" [Self-healing in plants as a model for self-repairing elastomer materials]. International Polymer Science and Technology. 64 (8): 472–475.
- Schüssele, A.C., Nübling, F., Thomann, Y., Carstensen, O., Bauer, G., Speck, T., Mülhaupt, R. (2012). "Self-healing rubbers based on NBR blends with hyperbranched polyethylenimines". Macromolecular Materials and Engineering. 9 (5): 411–419. doi:10.1002/mame.201100162.
- Yang, Y.; Urban, M. W. (2013). "Self-healing polymeric materials". Chemical Society Reviews. 42 (17): 7446–7467. doi:10.1039/c3cs60109a. PMID 23864042.
- Caruso, M.; Davis, Douglas A.; Shen, Qilong; Odom, Susan A.; Sottos, Nancy R.; White, Scott R.; Moore, Jeffrey S. (2009). "Mechanically-Induced Chemical Changes in Polymeric Materials". Chem. Rev. 109 (11): 5755–5758. doi:10.1021/cr9001353. PMID 19827748.
- Jones, F.R.; Zhang, W.; Branthwaite, M.; Jones, F.R. (2007). "Self-healing of damage in fibre-reinforced polymer-matrix composites". Journal of the Royal Society. 4 (13): 381–387. doi:10.1098/rsif.2006.0209. PMC . PMID 17311783.
- Bergman, S.D.; Wudl, F. (2008). "Mendable Polymers". Journal of Materials Chemistry. 18: 41–62. doi:10.1039/b713953p.
- Armstrong, G.; Buggy, M. (2005). "Hydrogen-bonded supramolecules polymers: A literature review". Journal of Materials Science. 40 (3): 547–559. Bibcode:2005JMatS..40..547A. doi:10.1007/s10853-005-6288-7.
- Chen, X.; Dam, MA; Ono, K; Mal, A; Shen, H; Nutt, SR; Sheran, K; Wudl, F (2002). "A Thermally Re-mendable Cross-Linked Polymeric Material". Science. 295 (5560): 1698–1702. Bibcode:2002Sci...295.1698C. doi:10.1126/science.1065879. PMID 11872836.
- Luo, X.; Ou, R.; Eberly, D.E.; Singhal, A.; Viratyaporn, W.; Mather, P.T. (2009). "A Thermoplastic/Thermoset Blend Exhibiting Thermal Mending and Reversible Adhesion". ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces. 1 (3): 612–620. doi:10.1021/am8001605. PMID 20355983.
- Cordier, P.; Tournilhac, F.; Soulié-Ziakovic, C.; Leibler, L (2008). "Self-healing and thermoreversible rubber from supramolecular assembly". Nature. 451 (7181): 977–980. Bibcode:2008Natur.451..977C. doi:10.1038/nature06669. PMID 18288191.
- Kalista, S.J.; Ward, T.C.; Oyetunji, Z. (2007). "Self-Healing of Poly(Ethylene-co-Methacrylic Acid) Copolymers Following Projectile Puncture". Mechanics of Advanced Materials and Structures. 14 (5): 391–97. doi:10.1080/15376490701298819.
- Yamaguchi, M.; Ono, S.; Okamoto, K. (2009). "Interdiffusion of dangling chains in weak gel and its application to self-repairing material". Mater. Sci. Eng. B. 162 (3): 189–94. doi:10.1016/j.mseb.2009.04.006.
- Chujo, Y.; Sada, K.; Saegusa, T. (1990). "Reversible Gelation of Polyoxazoline by Means of Diels-Alder Reaction". Macromolecules. 23 (10): 2636–2641. Bibcode:1990MaMol..23.2636C. doi:10.1021/ma00212a007.
- Schiraldi, D.A; Liotta, Charles L.; Collard, David M.; Schiraldi, David A. (1999). "Cross-Linking and Modification of Poly(ethylene terephthalate-co-2,6-anthracenedicarboxylate) by Diels−Alder Reactions with Maleimides". Macromolecules. 32 (18): 5786–5792. Bibcode:1999MaMol..32.5786J. doi:10.1021/ma990638z.
- Weizman, Haim; Nielsen, Christian; Weizman, Or S.; Nemat-Nasser, Sia (2011). "Synthesis of a Self-Healing Polymer Based on Reversible Diels–Alder Reaction: An Advanced Undergraduate Laboratory at the Interface of Organic Chemistry and Materials Science". Journal of Chemical Education. 88 (8): 1137–1140. Bibcode:2011JChEd..88.1137W. doi:10.1021/ed101109f.
- Saegusa, T.; Sada, Kazuki; Naka, Akio; Nomura, Ryoji; Saegusa, Takeo (1993). "Synthesis and redox gelation of disulfide-modified polyoxazoline". Macromolecules. 26 (5): 883–887. Bibcode:1993MaMol..26..883C. doi:10.1021/ma00057a001.
- Green, Richard (2014-02-15). "Scientists create an inexpensive self-healing polymer". Gizmag.com. Retrieved 2014-02-26.
- Ying, H.; Zhang, Y.; Cheng, J. (2014). "Dynamic urea bond for the design of reversible and self-healing polymers". Nature Communications. 5: 3218. Bibcode:2014NatCo...5E3218Y. doi:10.1038/ncomms4218. PMC . PMID 24492620.
- Blaiszik, B.J.; Kramer, S.L.B.; Olugebefola, S.C.; Moore, J.S.; Sottos, N.R.; White, S.R. (2010). "Self-Healing Polymers and Composites". Annual Review of Materials Research. 40 (1): 179–211. doi:10.1146/annurev-matsci-070909-104532. ISSN 1531-7331.
- Wang, Yongjing; Pham, Duc Truong; Ji, Chunqian (2015-12-31). "Self-healing composites: A review". Cogent Engineering. 2 (1): 1075686. doi:10.1080/23311916.2015.1075686.
- White, S. R.; Sottos, N. R.; Geubelle, P. H.; Moore, J. S.; Kessler, M. R.; Sriram, S. R.; Brown, E. N.; Viswanathan, S. (15 February 2001). "Autonomic healing of polymer composites". Nature. 409 (6822): 794–797. doi:10.1038/35057232. PMID 11236987.
- White, S. R.; Delafuente, David A.; Ho, Victor; Sottos, Nancy R.; Moore, Jeffrey S.; White, Scott R. (2007). "Solvent-Promoted Self-Healing in Epoxy Materials". Macromolecules. 40 (25): 8830–8832. Bibcode:2007MaMol..40.8830C. doi:10.1021/ma701992z.
- Brown, E. N., Sottos, N. R. and White, S. R (2002). "Fracture testing of a self-healing polymer composite". Experimental Mechanics. 42 (4): 372–379. doi:10.1007/BF02412141.
- Grubbs, R.; Tumas, W (1989). "Polymerization and Organotransition Metal Chemistry". Science. 243 (4893): 907–915. Bibcode:1989Sci...243..907G. doi:10.1126/science.2645643. PMID 2645643.
- Pang, J. W. C.; Bond, I. P. (2005). "A Hollow Fibre Reinforced Polymer Composite Encompassing Self-Healing and Enhanced Damage Visibility". Composite Science and Technology. 65 (11–12): 1791–1799. doi:10.1016/j.compscitech.2005.03.008.
- Keller, M.W.; White, S.R.; Sottos, N.R. (2007). "A self-healing poly(dimethyl siloxane) elastomer". Adv. Funct. Mater. 17 (14): 2399–404. doi:10.1002/adfm.200700086.
- Caruso, M.M; Delafuente, D.A.; Ho, V.; Sottos, N.R.; Moore, J.S.; White, S.R. (2007). "Solvent-Promoted Self-Healing Epoxy Materials". Macromolecules. 40 (25): 8830–32. Bibcode:2007MaMol..40.8830C. doi:10.1021/ma701992z.
- Cho, S.H.; Andersson, H.M.; White, S.R.; Sottos, N.R.; Braun, P.V. (2006). "Polydimethylsiloxane-Based Self-Healing Materials". Adv. Mater. 18 (8): 997–1000. doi:10.1002/adma.200501814.
- Dry, C.M.; Sottos, N.R. (1993). "Passive smart self-repair in polymer matrix composite materials". Smart Structures and Materials 1993: Smart Materials. SPIE Proc. (1916): 438–44. Bibcode:1993SPIE.1916..438D. doi:10.1117/12.148501.
- Wang, K.M.; Lorente, S.; Bejan, A. (2006). "Vascularized networks with two optimized channel sizes". J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys. 39 (14): 3086–96. Bibcode:2006JPhD...39.3086W. doi:10.1088/0022-3727/39/14/031.
- Dry, C. (1996). "Procedures Developed for Self-Repair of Polymer Matrix Composite Materials". Composite Structure. 35 (3): 263–264. doi:10.1016/0263-8223(96)00033-5.
- Olugebefola, S. C.; Aragon, A. M.; Hansen, C. J.; Hamilton, A. R.; Kozola, B. D.; Wu, W.; Geubelle, P. H.; Lewis, J. A.; et al. (2010). "Polymer Microvascular Network Composites". Journal of Composite Materials. 44 (22): 2587–2603. Bibcode:2010JCoMa..44.2587O. doi:10.1177/0021998310371537. ISSN 0021-9983.
- Williams, H R; Trask, R S; Bond, I P (2007). "Self-healing composite sandwich structures". Smart Materials and Structures. 16 (4): 1198–1207. Bibcode:2007SMaS...16.1198W. doi:10.1088/0964-1726/16/4/031. ISSN 0964-1726.
- Hayes, S.A.; Jones, F.R.; Marshiya, K.; Zhang, W. (2007). "A self-healing thermosetting composite material". Composites Part A: Applied Science and Manufacturing. 38 (4): 1116–1120. doi:10.1016/j.compositesa.2006.06.008. ISSN 1359-835X.
- Thostenson, E. T.; Chou, T.-W. (2006). "Carbon Nanotube Networks: Sensing of Distributed Strain and Damage for Life Prediction and Self Healing". Advanced Materials. 18 (21): 2837–2841. doi:10.1002/adma.200600977. ISSN 0935-9648.
- Nosonovsky, M. (2011). "Materials science: Slippery when wetted". Nature. 477 (7365): 412–413. Bibcode:2011Natur.477..412N. doi:10.1038/477412a. PMID 21938059.
- "Repeated Self-Healing Now Possible in Composite Materials". Beckman Institute. Retrieved 17 November 2016.
- Yang, T.; Zhang, J.; Mouritz, A. P.; Wang, C. H. (2013). "Healing of carbon fibre–epoxy composite T-joints using mendable polymer fibre stitching". Composites Part B: Engineering. 45: 1499–1507. doi:10.1016/j.compositesb.2012.08.022.
- Cullinan, J. F., Wisnom, M., and Bond, I., "A Novel Method for the Manipulation of Damage and In-Situ Repair of Composite T-Joints," 56th AIAA/ASCE/AHS/ASC Structures, Structural Dynamics, and Materials Conference, Reston, Virginia: American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics, 2015, pp. 1–10
- Minakuchi, S.; Sun, D.; Takeda, N. (2014). "Hierarchical system for autonomous sensing-healing of delamination in large-scale composite structures". Smart Materials and Structures. 23 (11): 115014. Bibcode:2014SMaS...23k5014M. doi:10.1088/0964-1726/23/11/115014.
- Kessler, M. R.; White, S. R. (2001). "Self-activated healing of delamination damage in woven composites" (PDF). Composites Part A: Applied Science and Manufacturing. 32 (5): 683–699. doi:10.1016/s1359-835x(00)00149-4.
- Kessler, M. R.; Sottos, N. R.; White, S. R. (2003). "Self-healing structural composite materials". Composites Part A: Applied Science and Manufacturing. 34 (8): 743–753. doi:10.1016/S1359-835X(03)00138-6.
- Patel, A. J.; Sottos, N. R.; Wetzel, E. D.; White, S. R. (2010). "Autonomic healing of low-velocity impact damage in fibre-reinforced composites". Composites Part A: Applied Science and Manufacturing. 41 (3): 360–368. doi:10.1016/j.compositesa.2009.11.002.
- Norris, C. J.; White, J. A. P.; McCombe, G.; Chatterjee, P.; Bond, I. P.; Trask, R. S. (2012). "Autonomous stimulus triggered self-healing in smart structural composites". Smart Materials and Structures. 21 (9): 094027. Bibcode:2012SMaS...21i4027N. doi:10.1088/0964-1726/21/9/094027.
- Bleay, S.; Loader, C.; Hawyes, V.; Humberstone, L.; Curtis, P. (2001). "A smart repair system for polymer matrix composites". Composites Part A: Applied Science and Manufacturing. 32 (12): 1767–1776. doi:10.1016/s1359-835x(01)00020-3.
- Trask, R.S.; Bond, I.P. (2006). "Biomimetic self-healing of advanced composite structures using hollow glass fibres". Smart Materials and Structures. 15 (3): 704–10. Bibcode:2006SMaS...15..704T. doi:10.1088/0964-1726/15/3/005.
- Trask, R. S.; Bond, I. P. (2010). "Bioinspired engineering study of Plantae vascules for self-healing composite structures". Journal of the Royal Society, Interface. 7 (47): 921–31. doi:10.1098/rsif.2009.0420.
- Esser-Kahn, A.P.; Thakre, P.R.; Dong, H.; Patrick, J.F.; Vlasko-Vlasov, V.K.; Sottos, N.R.; et al. (2011). "Three-dimensional microvascular fiber-reinforced composites". Advanced Materials. 23 (32): 3654–8. doi:10.1002/adma.201100933. PMID 21766345.
- Huang, C-Y.; Trask, R.S.; Bond, I.P. (2010). "Characterization and analysis of carbon fibre-reinforced polymer composite laminates with embedded circular vasculature". Journal of the Royal Society, Interface. 7 (49): 1229–41. doi:10.1098/rsif.2009.0534.
- Aissa, B.; Therriault, D.; Haddad, E.; Jamroz, W. (2011). "Self-Healing Materials Systems: Overview of Major Approaches and Recent Developed Technologies". Advances in Materials Science and Engineering. 2012: 1–17. doi:10.1155/2012/854203.
- Chen, Yulin; Guan, Zhibin (28 July 2014). "Multivalent hydrogen bonding block copolymers self-assemble into strong and tough self-healing materials". Chemical Communications. 50 (74): 10868–10870. doi:10.1039/C4CC03168G. PMID 25090104.
- Binder, Wolfgang H. (2013). Self-healing polymers : from principles to applications (1 ed.). Weinheim: Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH. pp. 315–334. doi:10.1002/9783527670185.ch13. ISBN 978-3-527-33439-1.
- Varley, R.J., Zwaag, S.V.D (2008). "Development of a quasi-static test method to investigate the origin of self-healing in ionomers under ballistic conditions". Polymer Testing. 27: 11–19. doi:10.1016/j.polymertesting.2007.07.013.
- Liua, Y.L., Chuoa, T.W (2013). "Self-healing polymers based on thermally reversible Diels–Alder chemistry". Polymer Chemistry. 4 (7): 2194–2205. doi:10.1039/C2PY20957H.
- Jin, H.; et al. (2013). "Fracture behavior of a self-healing, toughened epoxy adhesive". Int. J. Adhes. Adhes. 44: 157–165. doi:10.1016/j.ijadhadh.2013.02.015.
- Blaiszik, B.J.; et al. (2011). "Autonomic restoration of electrical conductivity". Adv. Mater. 24 (3): 398–401. doi:10.1002/adma.201102888. PMID 22183927.
- Kang, S.; et al. (2014). "Microencapsulated carbon black suspensions for restoration of electrical conductivity". Adv. Funct. Mater. 24 (20): 2947–2956. doi:10.1002/adfm.201303427.
- Huang, M. and Yang, J (2011). "Facile microencapsulation of HDI for self-healing anticorrosion coatings". Journal of Materials Chemistry. 21 (30): 11123–11130. doi:10.1039/C1JM10794A.
- Yang, J., Keller, M.W., Moore, J.F., White, S.R., Sottos, N.R (2008). "Microencapsulation of Isocyanates for Self-Healing Polymers". Macromolecules. 41 (24): 9650–9655. Bibcode:2008MaMol..41.9650Y. doi:10.1021/ma801718v.
- Meng, L.M., Yuan, Y.C., Rong, M.Z. and Zhang, M.Q (2010). "A dual mechanism single-component self-healing strategy for polymers". Journal of Materials Chemistry. 20 (29): 5969–6196. doi:10.1039/C0JM00268B.
- Jin, H.H., Mangun, C.L., Stradley, D.S., Moore, J.S., Sottos, N.R., White, S.R (2012). "Self-healing thermoset using encapsulated epoxy-amine healing chemistry". Polymer. 53 (2): 581–587. doi:10.1016/j.polymer.2011.12.005.
- Suryanarayana, C., Rao, K.C. and Kumar, D (2008). "Preparation and characterization of microcapsules containing linseed oil and its use in self-healing coatings". Progress in Organic Coatings. 63: 72–78. doi:10.1016/j.porgcoat.2008.04.008.
- Jadhav, R.S., Hundiwale,D.G. and Mahulikar, P.P (2011). "Synthesis and Characterization of Phenol–Formaldehyde Microcapsules Containing Linseed Oil and Its Use in Epoxy for Self-Healing and Anticorrosive Coating". Journal of Applied Polymer Science. 119 (5): 2911–2916. doi:10.1002/app.33010.
- Samadzadeha, M., Bouraa, S.H., Peikaria, M., Ashrafib, A. and Kasirihac, M (2011). "Tung oil: An autonomous repairing agent for self-healing epoxy coatings". Progress in Organic Coatings. 70 (4): 383–387. doi:10.1016/j.porgcoat.2010.08.017.
- de Rooij, M; Van Tittelboom, K; De Belie, N; Schlangen, E (2011). Self-Healing Phenomena in Cement-Based Materials. Springer Netherlands. ISBN 978-94-007-6624-2.
- Edvardsen, C (1999). "Water permeability and autogenous healing of cracks in concrete". ACI Materials Journal. 96 (4): 448–454. doi:10.14359/645.
- Mostavi, Ehsan; Asadi, Somayeh; Hassan, Marwa; Alansari, Mohamed (December 2015). "Evaluation of Self-Healing Mechanisms in Concrete with Double-Walled Sodium Silicate Microcapsules" (PDF). Materials in Civil Engineering. 27 (12): 04015035. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.0001314.
- Ehrlich, H.L. (1996). "How microbes influence mineral growth and dissolution". Chemical Geology. 1–4 (132): 5–9. doi:10.1016/S0009-2541(96)00035-6.
- Jonkers, H; Thijssen, A; Muyzer, G; Copuroglu, O; Schlangen, E (2010). "Application of bacteria as self-healing agent for the development of sustainable concrete". Ecological Engineering. 36 (2): 230–235. doi:10.1016/j.ecoleng.2008.12.036.
- Jonkers, H (2011). "Bacteria-based self-healing concrete" (PDF). HERON. 56 (1/2).
- Van Tittelboom, K; De Belie, N; Van Loo, D; Jacobs, P (2011). "Self-healing efficiency of cementitious materials containing tubular capsules filled with healing agent". Cement and Concrete Composites. 33 (4): 497–505. doi:10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2011.01.004.
- Wang, J; Van Tittelboom,, K; De Belie, N; Verstraete, W (2012). "Use of silica gel or polyurethane immobilized bacteria for self-healing concrete". Construction and Building Materials. 26 (1): 532–540. doi:10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2011.06.054.
- Ono, M; Nakao, W; Takahashi, K; Nakatani, M; Ando, K (2007). "A new methodology to guarantee the structural integrity of Al2O3/SiC composite using crack healing and a proof test". Fatigue Fract. Eng. Mater. Struct. 30 (7): 599–607. doi:10.1111/j.1460-2695.2007.01132.x.
- Yang, H. J.; Pei, Y. T.; Rao, J. C.; De Hosson, J. T. M. (2012). "Self-healing performance of Ti2AlC ceramic". Journal of Materials Chemistry. 22 (17): 8304–8313. doi:10.1039/C2JM16123K.
- Song, G.M.; Pei, Y.T.; Sloof, W.G.; Li, S.B.; De Hosson, J.Th.M.; van der Zwaag, S. (January 2008). "Oxidation-induced crack healing in Ti3AlC2 ceramics". Scripta Materialia. 58 (1): 13–16. doi:10.1016/j.scriptamat.2007.09.006.
- Shibo, L.; Guiming, S.; Kwakernaak, K.; Van der Zwaag, S.; Sloof, W. G. (2012). "Multiple crack healing of a Ti2AlC ceramic". Journal of the European Ceramic Society. 32 (8): 1813–1820. doi:10.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2012.01.017.
- Farle, A.; Kwarkernaak, C.; Van der Zwaag, S.; Sloof, W. G. (2015). "A conceptual study into the potential of Mn+1AXn-phase ceramics for self-healing of crack damage". Journal of the European Ceramic Society. 35: 37–45. doi:10.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2014.08.046.
- Nakao, W.; K., Takahashi; K., Ando. Self-Healing materials, Design, strategies and applications. Wiley-VCH Verkag GmbH & Co KGaA. p. 188. ISBN 978-3-527-31829-2.
- Nakao, W.; Abe, S. (2012). "Enhancement of the self-healing ability in oxidation induced self-healing ceramic by modifying the healing agent". Smart Materials & Structures. 21 (2): 1–7. Bibcode:2012SMaS...21b5002N. doi:10.1088/0964-1726/21/2/025002.
- Nakao, W.; Takahashi, K.; Ando, K. (2007). "Threshold stress during crack healing treatment of structural ceramics having crack healing ability". Material Letters. 61 (13): 2711–2713. doi:10.1016/j.matlet.2006.04.122.
- Ando, K.; Kim, B.-S.; Chu, M.-C.; Saito, S.; Takahashi, K. (2004). "Crack-healing and Mechanical Behaviour of Al2O3/Sic composites at elevated temperature". Fatigue Fract. Eng. Mater. Struct. 27 (7): 533–541. doi:10.1111/j.1460-2695.2004.00785.x.
- Lumley, R.N., A.J. Morton, and I.J. Polmear (2002). "Enhanced creep performance in an Al-Cu-Mg-Ag alloy through underageing". Acta Materialia. 50 (14): 3597–3608. doi:10.1016/S1359-6454(02)00164-7.
- Laha, K.; et al. (2005). "Beneficial effect of B segregation on creep cavitation in a type 347 austenitic stainless steel". Scripta Materialia. 52 (7): 675–678. doi:10.1016/j.scriptamat.2004.11.016.
- Laha, K., J. Kyono, and N. Shinya (2007). "An advanced creep cavitation resistance Cu-containing 18Cr-12Ni-Nb austenitic stainless steel". Scripta Materialia. 56 (10): 915–918. doi:10.1016/j.scriptamat.2006.12.030.
- He, S.M.; et al. (2010). "Thermally activated precipitation at deformation-induced defects in Fe-Cu and Fe-Cu-B-N alloys studied by positron annihilation spectroscopy". Physical Review. B 81 (9): 094103. Bibcode:2010PhRvB..81i4103H. doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.81.094103.
- He, S.M.; et al. (2010). "In situ determination of aging precipitation in deformed Fe-Cu and Fe-Cu-B-N alloys by time-resolved small-angle neutron scattering". Physical Review. B 82 (17): 174111. Bibcode:2010PhRvB..82q4111H. doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.82.174111.
- Zhang, S.; et al. (2013). "Defect-induced Au precipitation in Fe–Au and Fe–Au–B–N alloys studied by in situ small-angle neutron scattering". Acta Materialia. 61 (18): 7009–7019. doi:10.1016/j.actamat.2013.08.015.
- Zhang, S.; et al. (2015). "Self Healing of Creep Damage by Gold Precipitation in Iron Alloys". Advanced Engineering Materials. 17 (5): 1–6. doi:10.1002/adem.201400511.
- Yang, Zhao; Wei, Zhang; Le-ping, Liao; Hong-mei, Wang; Wu-jun, Li (2011). "The self-healing composite anticorrosion coating". Physics Procedia. 18: 216–221. Bibcode:2011PhPro..18..216Y. doi:10.1016/j.phpro.2011.06.084. ISSN 1875-3892.
- Zhu M, Rong MZ, Zhang MQ (2014). "Self-healing polymeric materials towards non-structural recovery of functional properties". Polymer International. 63 (10): 741–1749. doi:10.1002/pi.4723.
- Pacheco J, Šavija B, Schlangen E, Polder RB (2014). "Assessment of cracks in reinforced concrete by means of electrical resistance and image analysis". Construction and Building Materials. 65: 417–426. doi:10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2014.05.001.
- Mauldin, T C; Kessler, M R (2010). "Self-healing polymers and composites". International Materials Reviews. 55 (6): 317–346. doi:10.1179/095066010X12646898728408.
- "Self-healing elastomer enters industrial production". www.arkema.com. Retrieved 2015-12-13.
- Bourzac, Katherine (December 12, 2008). "First Self-Healing Coatings". technologyreview.com. Retrieved 18 November 2016.
- Rincon, Paul (30 October 2010). "Time to heal: The materials that repair themselves". BBC. Retrieved 19 May 2013.
|Wikimedia Commons has media related to Self-healing material.|