Jump to content

Richard Sibbes

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
(Redirected from Sibbes, Richard)

Richard Sibbes
Born1577
Tostock, Suffolk
Died1635 (aged 57–58)
Notable workThe Bruised Reed
Theological work
EraElizabethan era
Tradition or movementAnglicanism, Puritanism, Calvinism

Richard Sibbes (or Sibbs) (1577–1635) was an Anglican theologian. He is known as a Biblical exegete, and as a representative, with William Perkins and John Preston, of what has been called "main-line" Puritanism[1] because he always remained in the Church of England and worshiped according to the Book of Common Prayer.

Life

[edit]

He was born in Tostock, Suffolk, where his father was a wheelwright;[2] other sources say Sudbury. After attending Bury St Edmunds Grammar School,[3] he attended St John's College, Cambridge from 1595.[4] He was lecturer at Holy Trinity Church, Cambridge, from 1610 or 1611 to 1615 or 1616.[5] It was erroneously held by 18th and 19th century scholars that Sibbes was deprived of his various academic posts on account of his Puritanism. In fact he was never deprived of any of his posts, due to his ingenuity of the system.[6]

He was then preacher at Gray's Inn, London, from 1617,[7] returning to Cambridge as Master of Catherine Hall in 1626, without giving up the London position.[8]

Also in 1626, the support group known as the Feoffees for Impropriations was set up, and Sibbes was a founding member. (It built on an informal grouping dating back to 1613). It was closely linked to St Antholin, Budge Row, for its seven years of existence: it was shut down in 1633.[9] With others, he worked to fund and provide platforms for preachers.[10] He was one of four ministers in the original feoffees, the other members being chosen as four lawyers and four laymen.[11]

Works

[edit]

He was the author of several devotional works expressing intense religious feeling – The Saint's Cordial (1629), The Bruised Reed and Smoking Flax (1631, exegesis of Isaiah 42:3), The Soules Conflict (1635), etc.

A volume of sermons appeared in 1630, dedicated to Horace Vere, 1st Baron Vere of Tilbury and his wife Lady Mare. Most of the other works were first published by Thomas Goodwin and Philip Nye, after Sibbes died. The content belied the mainly moderate and conforming attitudes for which Sibbes was known in his lifetime.[12] Beames of Divine Light, A Description of Christ in Three Sermons and Bowels Opened appeared in 1639, as did The Returning Backslider, sermons on the Book of Hosea.

A complete edition was published 1862–1864 in Edinburgh, in seven volumes, by James Nichol, with a biographical memoir by Alexander Grosart.

Views

[edit]

The clerical leaders of the Feoffees, Davenport, Gouge and Sibbes, all adhered to Calvinist covenant theology, as shaped by the English theologians Perkins, Preston, William Ames, and Thomas Taylor.[13][14] There was a tacit assumption of a state church.[15] Sibbes believed the Second Coming was necessary to complete the work that Christ had begun.[16]

Efforts to define further the Puritanism of Sibbes – which is a term much debated – place him in various groups. Under pious "non-separatists", he is with Preston, Richard Baxter, Robert Bolton, and John Dod.[17] Under those who would conform to set forms of worship, he is with Dod, Nicholas Byfield, Richard Capel, John Downame, Arthur Hildersham, and Richard Stock (another Feoffee).[18] He is also a fully conforming Puritan, with Preston, Samuel Ward, and Robert Hill.[19] With Richard Bernard, he was a moderate Calvinist who promoted religious tolerance.[20] With Perkins, Preston, Baxter and Henry Newcome, he was a moderate and non-Presbyterian Puritan.[21] However one classifies him, it is undeniable that he was a faithful member of the Elizabethan church.[22]

His perspective was European, or even wider, and he saw Catholicism in terms of a repressive conspiracy.[23] With Davenport, Gouge, Taylor, Thomas Gataker, John Stoughton, and Josias Shute, he helped raise money for Protestants of the Electorate of the Palatinate affected by the opening of the Thirty Years' War; and later for John Dury's missions.[24] Laud brought up Sibbes, Davenport, Gouge and Taylor in front of the Court of High Commission for this.[25] The Fountain Opened (1638) advocated mission work.[26]

Quotes

[edit]
  • “There is more mercy in Christ than sin in us.”[27]

Influence

[edit]

His works were much read in New England.[26] Thomas Hooker, prominent there from 1633, was directly influenced by Sibbes, and his "espousal theology", using marriage as a religious metaphor, draws on The Bruised Reed and Bowels Opened.[28]

The poet George Herbert was a contemporary, and there are suggestions on parallels. Where Herbert speaks in The Church Militant about the westward movement of the propagation of the gospel, Christopher Hill comments that this may have come from The Bruised Reed.[29] Other examples have been proposed by Doerksen.[30][31]

Sibbes was cited by the Methodist John Wesley.[32] The Baptist preacher Charles Spurgeon studied his craft in Sibbes, Perkins and Thomas Manton.[33] The evangelical Martyn Lloyd-Jones wrote in the highest terms of his own encounter with the work of Sibbes.[34]

References

[edit]
  1. ^ Hill 1976, p. 62
  2. ^ Frost 2004, p. 83; Beeke & Pederson 2006, p. 534
  3. ^ Gordon, Alexander (1897). "Sibbes, Richard" . Dictionary of National Biography. Vol. 52. pp. 182–184.
  4. ^ Venn & Venn 1953
  5. ^ Beeke & Pederson 2006
  6. ^ Dever 2009, pp. 396–413
  7. ^ Banner of Truth Trust 1998, p. VIII
  8. ^ Pyle 2000, pp. 744–774
  9. ^ Adam 2005
  10. ^ Bremer 2006, pp. 396–397
  11. ^ Hill 1956, p. 255
  12. ^ Tyacke 2001, pp. 121–123
  13. ^ Hill 1956, p. 347
  14. ^ Hill 1989, p. 170
  15. ^ Hill 1956, p. 179
  16. ^ Ball 1975, p. 47
  17. ^ Lamont 1979, p. 47
  18. ^ Hill 1964, p. 19
  19. ^ Doerksen 1997, p. 21
  20. ^ Doerksen 1995
  21. ^ Hill 1984, p. 211
  22. ^ Hall 2002, p. 440
  23. ^ Hill 1964, pp. 127–128
  24. ^ Milton 1996, p. 398
  25. ^ Hill 1993, p. 302
  26. ^ a b Rooy 1997, p. 619
  27. ^ "More Mercy in Christ than Sin in Us".
  28. ^ Porterfield 1992, pp. 36–37
  29. ^ Hill 1993, p. 139
  30. ^ Herbert 2007, p. 477
  31. ^ Herbert 2007, p. 500
  32. ^ Dreyer 1999, p. 90
  33. ^ Old 2002, p. 88
  34. ^ Lloyd-Jones 1973, p. 175

Sources

[edit]
[edit]