Talk:London postal district

London High‑importance

	London portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject London, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of London on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LondonWikipedia:WikiProject LondonTemplate:WikiProject LondonLondon-related articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Philately Mid‑importance

	Philately portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Philately, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of philately and stamp collecting on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PhilatelyWikipedia:WikiProject PhilatelyTemplate:WikiProject PhilatelyPhilately articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Archives

Archive 1

Archive 2

W1

Why was W1 a Head District in its own right, completely separate from the rest of W? Did W1 have as much mail as W2-14 (inclusive)? Norvo (talk) 22:44, 29 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Inner London areas

"The E, EC, N, IG, SE, RM, CM and WC postcode areas (the eight London postal districts) comprised the inner area of the London postal region and correspond to the London post town." Surely it should be N, NW, SW, SE, W, WC, E and EC postcodes? SaundersW (talk) 12:20, 5 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on London postal district. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 08:47, 24 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on London postal district. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added {{dead link}} tag to http://www.london.gov.uk/mqt/question.do?id=3704
Added {{dead link}} tag to http://www.londontravelwatch.org.uk/document/10759/get
Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20061104014042/http://www.museumoflondon.org.uk/postcodes/map.html to http://www.museumoflondon.org.uk/postcodes/map.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:40, 5 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Re-pointing external link

The link on 'Establishment of London postal districts – mailing list discussion' goes to the Conservation OnLine website (which should be linked to from the Art Conservation page): what should it be? Jackiespeel (talk) 20:49, 30 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Retraction of E division understatement

At the moment, the article only states that the London postal district boundary was retracted in the east, when areas in Essex, around Ilford, became part of other postal towns. this is a massive understatement! Literally, just under half of the entire original area was completely removed and added elsewhere in all directions, not just east. The ramifications of which are still felt to this day by Outer Londoners who fight daily regarding their London identity. Yet there seems to be no information stating how or why this came to be, or who was involved in this decision making process. There has to be information around somewhere regarding the postal administration's decision on this? Justgravy (talk) 18:13, 15 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]