Talk:École Jeannine Manuel

France: Paris Low‑importance

	France portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject France, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of France on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.FranceWikipedia:WikiProject FranceTemplate:WikiProject FranceFrance articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Paris task force.

Schools Mid‑importance

	Schools portal This article is related to WikiProject Schools, a collaborative effort to write quality articles about schools around the world. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page.SchoolsWikipedia:WikiProject SchoolsTemplate:WikiProject Schoolsschool articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

[Untitled]

There's another article on the same school, abbreviated EABJM. Since the EABJM and above articles both talk about the same school, shouldn't they be merged? Dwainberg (talk) 03:29, 13 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The school has changed it's logo and name, it is now called "École Jeannine Manuel" or "EJM". — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jamestamim (talk • contribs) 14:44, 13 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Unfair deletion by Viewmont Viking

This article was previously classed as a stub. I provided information concerning the school's history, its administrative structure, its pedagogical approach and provided references to news articles and other outside links. All of this work was deleted without cause by the user Viewmontviking. It was deemed "promotion drival" (spelling mistake kept in its original form). This is contrary to the spirit of Wikipedia and leaves no room whatsoever for discussion. If Viewmontviking wishes to edit the article, he or she should do it section by section and provide justification for any deletion of content as prescribed by Wikipedia. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sarahsurama (talk • contribs) 15:01, 13 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

As you are the one with the COI, the onus is on you to get consensus for your changes. In addition if you are being Paid to work on this article you must disclose that on your User page. --VViking_TalkEdits 15:21, 13 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I am at the 3 reverts and will not be crossing that. I disagree with the information that is being added by User:Sarahsurma, the information does not conform to Wikipedia's strong stance against promotional editing. I will wait until other editors have commented.--VViking_TalkEdits 15:32, 13 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]