|WikiProject Writing systems||(Rated Start-class, Low-importance)|
2007-01-31 Automated pywikipediabot message
|This page has been transwikied to Wiktionary. |
The article has content that is useful at Wiktionary. Therefore the article can be found at either here or here (logs 1 logs 2.)
Note: This means that the article has been copied to the Wiktionary Transwiki namespace for evaluation and formatting. It does not mean that the article is in the Wiktionary main namespace, or that it has been removed from Wikipedia's. Furthermore, the Wiktionarians might delete the article from Wiktionary if they do not find it to be appropriate for the Wiktionary.
Removing this tag will usually trigger CopyToWiktionaryBot to re-transwiki the entry. This article should have been removed from Category:Copy to Wiktionary and should not be re-added there.
--CopyToWiktionaryBot 22:35, 31 January 2007 (UTC)
Schwa unstressed in English?
I don't get it -- I often see this mention that, unlike English (among other languages), the schwa in Romanian and other languages can be stressed. But I've seen words in English, either monosyllabic or derived, which had the stress on a schwa (ə), such as "bone" (UK: [bəʊn], according to Wiktionary) and its derivatives.--Printz150 (talk) 09:31, 21 April 2012 (UTC)
Proposed Merge with A with breve (Cyrillic)
I oppose the merge as proposed. Although these two articles cover characters that look exactly the same, they are separate characters in the Unicode standard and represent different writing systems. The two characters are already reasonably disambiguated so it should not be a problem. - - mathmitch7 (talk/contribs) 17:26, 8 August 2018 (UTC)