Talk:2004 Les Saintes earthquake

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:2004 Les Saintes earthquake/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Some Dude From North Carolina (talk · contribs) 20:27, 19 July 2021 (UTC)

• Add a short description and then WP:ALT text to both images.
• "a moment magnitude of 6.3 and a maximum" → "a moment magnitude of 6.3 and maximum"
• "runup" should be written as "run-up".
• "northern and southern boundary" → "northern and southern boundaries"
• "a school, a church, and to some homes" → "a school, a church, and some homes"
• Add a comma after "mid-February".
• "again full again" - reword
• "Guadelouple" - typo?
• Archive sources (you can use this).
• Ping when done. Some Dude From North Carolina (talk) 20:09, 21 July 2021 (UTC)

• @Dawnseeker2000: it has been a week Some Dude From North Carolina (talk) 20:48, 28 July 2021 (UTC)

GA Review

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

---

This review is transcluded from Talk:2004 Les Saintes earthquake/GA2. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: LunaEatsTuna (talk · contribs) 16:00, 5 January 2023 (UTC)

• I will be able to get to this later tonight. 𓃦LunaEatsTuna (💬) 16:00, 5 January 2023 (UTC)
• Sorry for the delay! Please ping me once you have addressed these concerns of mine. Thanks, 𓃦LunaEatsTuna (💬) 15:15, 6 January 2023 (UTC)

  I will address the issues in a day or two. Been a hectic weekend for me. Thank you for understanding. Dora the Axe-plorer (explore) 16:27, 7 January 2023 (UTC)

  Hi @LunaEatsTuna, I've addressed the issues you've raised. Thank you. Dora the Axe-plorer (explore) 00:31, 8 January 2023 (UTC)

  Nice work! Thanks for wikilinking color-tagged structure. I am now happy to pass this article for GA status. 𓃦LunaEatsTuna (💬) 03:46, 8 January 2023 (UTC)

Copyvio

Earwig says good to go. No concerns from me after reading the sources either.

Files

File:USGS Shakemap – 2004 Les Saintes earthquake.jpg: good, relevant, valid public domain rationale.

Prose

• "the eastern boundary is that of the Lesser Antilles subduction zone" – first mention in the body, wikilink Lesser Antilles subduction zone
• "A maximum intensity of VIII (Heavily damaging)" – maybe reiterate that this was recorded via the European macroseismic scale?
• "and a college were red-tagged" – red-tagged?
• "that occurred about 7 km (4.3 mi) to the northwest of the" – "to the" is unnecessary.
• "and wall and roof damage (including at some locations that were damaged during the mainshock)." – this is personal taste but I find it visually unappealing when a sentence ends with parentheses like this; there are two punctuation marks plus the citation. Suggest "and wall and roof damage—including at some locations that were damaged during the mainshock."
• "scientists were on scene within several days to investigate." – reads a bit like an upbeat news article; maybe "scientists were on scene several days later to investigate."?
• There are a few instances of "sea dropped" – should "sea" be "sea level" here?
• Add WP:ALT text to the image.
• Recommend adding Template:Use mdy dates and Template:Use X English under the short description.

See also

• I do not think Overseas France is necessary; wikilinking overseas department in the lead should be enough.

Refs

• Refs 3 and 7 look to be dead links.

Spot check on refs 5 and 8 show no concerns—they both support their cited content. I have access to ref 5 via the Wikipedia Library.

External links

Good.

Other

Navs and cats all good.

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.