Talk:2006 RH120

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
WikiProject Astronomy / Astronomical objects  (Rated Start-class)
WikiProject icon 2006 RH120 is within the scope of WikiProject Astronomy, which collaborates on articles related to Astronomy on Wikipedia.
Start-Class article Start  This article has been rated as Start-Class on the project's quality scale.
 ???  This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
Taskforce icon
This article is supported by WikiProject Astronomical objects, which collaborates on articles related to astronomical objects.
 
WikiProject Solar System (Rated Start-class, Low-importance)
WikiProject icon This article is within the scope of WikiProject Solar System, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the Solar System on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
Start-Class article Start  This article has been rated as Start-Class on the project's quality scale.
 Low  This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
 
For more information, see the Solar System importance assessment guideline.

Proposed Name?[edit]

I am curious if anyone knows whether or not the discoverers have proposed a name yet. Perhaps a minor mythical character that was bound to greater one for a short time? Or maybe after a place, such an ancient city-state that was briefly absorbed into an empire, but quickly reasserted its independence -- maybe something like Tyre, although I am sure there is a better candidate. — Eoghanacht talk 19:15, 14 June 2007 (UTC)

Another thought is a character associated with Gaia, such as Antaeus (don't know if used already for an astronomical object, and there are obvious symbolic flaws with comparing the giant Anteaus to this boulder). This presupposes that meteoroids can be named at all. — Eoghanacht talk 21:46, 26 June 2007 (UTC)

object received designation 2006 RH120[edit]

http://www.birtwhistle.org/Gallery6R10DB9.htm
http://www.cfa.harvard.edu/mpec/K08/K08D12.html

Chesnok (talk) 08:30, 29 February 2008 (UTC)

I just moved the article to the new name. — Eoghanacht talk 17:36, 16 April 2008 (UTC)

Banned link[edit]

http://archive.is/hxee2006 RH120 was an Apollo-class asteroid using a 2012 epoch. It is sad to see that Archive.is is banned from Wikipedia. Archive.org does not allow captures of the JPL Small-Body Database due to robots.txt. Hopefully the ban will be appealed someday. -- Kheider (talk) 00:56, 25 February 2014 (UTC)

ERO paper by Yárnoz, Sánchez, and McInnes[edit]

EASILY RETRIEVABLE OBJECTS AMONG THE NEO POPULATION D. García Yárnoz,* J. P. Sánchez,† and C. R. McInnes† http://arxiv.org/pdf/1304.5082v2.pdf

They identify 2006 RH120 as a prime candidate: The lowest cost is of 58 m/s to transfer asteroid 2006 RH120 to a halo southern family with a single burn on 1st February 2021.

It's tough to extract the implications of this from their paper since understanding it involves somewhat advance mathematics. Does anyone know if that paper has been cited in published works intended for more general audiences? The notion that a retrieval of 2006 RH120 is within the realm of current capabilities is "notable" to say the least! (sdsds - talk) 22:08, 23 February 2015 (UTC)

It's speed relative to the Earth is often very low. In August 2028 the relative speed compared to Earth will be a very low 0.14 km/s. This low relative speed (and small size) is what allows easier capture of some NEOs. -- Kheider (talk) 01:22, 24 February 2015 (UTC)

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 5 external links on 2006 RH120. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

You may set the |checked=, on this template, to true or failed to let other editors know you reviewed the change. If you find any errors, please use the tools below to fix them or call an editor by setting |needhelp= to your help request.

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

If you are unable to use these tools, you may set |needhelp=<your help request> on this template to request help from an experienced user. Please include details about your problem, to help other editors.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:47, 17 June 2017 (UTC)